Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avoid >= comparison for FeatureVersion objects #2883

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 8, 2023

Conversation

benjamn
Copy link
Member

@benjamn benjamn commented Dec 7, 2023

This won't be a problem in practice until we have major or minor version numbers greater than 9, because toString-based comparison of single digits works as expected.

I wish TypeScript could warn about implicit conversions during evaluation of expressions like a >= b, but I haven't found a way to enable that. Maybe a lint rule of some sort?

This won't be a problem in practice until we have major or minor
versions that are greater than 9, because toString-based comparison of
single digits works as expected.
@benjamn benjamn self-assigned this Dec 7, 2023
@benjamn benjamn requested a review from a team as a code owner December 7, 2023 21:30
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 7, 2023

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 7929770

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 7 packages
Name Type
@apollo/federation-internals Patch
@apollo/gateway Patch
@apollo/composition Patch
@apollo/query-planner Patch
@apollo/query-graphs Patch
@apollo/subgraph Patch
apollo-federation-integration-testsuite Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 7, 2023

Deploy Preview for apollo-federation-docs canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 7929770
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/apollo-federation-docs/deploys/65735af478d2650008e13b7f

Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Dec 7, 2023

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Copy link
Member

@trevor-scheer trevor-scheer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice catch!

internals-js/src/specs/__tests__/coreSpec.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@benjamn benjamn enabled auto-merge (squash) December 8, 2023 18:10
@benjamn benjamn merged commit 7b5b836 into main Dec 8, 2023
16 checks passed
@benjamn benjamn deleted the benjamn/fix-FeatureVersion-comparison branch December 8, 2023 18:10
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Dec 8, 2023
dariuszkuc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2023
This PR was opened by the [Changesets
release](https://github.com/changesets/action) GitHub action. When
you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and the packages will
be published to npm automatically. If you're not ready to do a release
yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will
be updated.


# Releases
## @apollo/composition@2.6.2

### Patch Changes

- Updated dependencies
\[[`7b5b836d15247c997712a47847f603aa5887312e`](7b5b836),
[`74ca7dd617927a20d79b824851f7651ef3c40a4e`](74ca7dd),
[`3f7392b84f8b626b248b59ce81f193d0f0272045`](3f7392b)]:
    -   @apollo/federation-internals@2.6.2
    -   @apollo/query-graphs@2.6.2

## @apollo/gateway@2.6.2

### Patch Changes

- Updated dependencies
\[[`7b5b836d15247c997712a47847f603aa5887312e`](7b5b836),
[`74ca7dd617927a20d79b824851f7651ef3c40a4e`](74ca7dd),
[`ffe67dfbdb77d15dde2ab6dee66dba05c7b5c037`](ffe67df)]:
    -   @apollo/federation-internals@2.6.2
    -   @apollo/query-planner@2.6.2
    -   @apollo/composition@2.6.2

## @apollo/federation-internals@2.6.2

### Patch Changes

- Avoid `>=` comparison for `FeatureVersion` objects
([#2883](#2883))

- Fix query planning bug where `__typename` on interface object types in
named fragments can cause query plan execution to fail.
([#2886](#2886))
([#2886](#2886))

## @apollo/query-graphs@2.6.2

### Patch Changes

- fix: handle directive conditions on fragments when building query
graphs ([#2875](#2875))

This fix addresses issues with handling fragments when they specify
directive conditions:

- when exploding the types we were not propagating directive conditions
- when processing fragment that specifies super type of an existing type
and also specifies directive condition, we were incorrectly preserving
the unnecessary type condition. This type condition was problematic as
it could be referencing types from supergraph that were not available in
the local schema. Instead, we now drop the redundant type condition and
only preserve the directives (if specified).

- Updated dependencies
\[[`7b5b836d15247c997712a47847f603aa5887312e`](7b5b836),
[`74ca7dd617927a20d79b824851f7651ef3c40a4e`](74ca7dd)]:
    -   @apollo/federation-internals@2.6.2

## @apollo/query-planner@2.6.2

### Patch Changes

- Add a limit to the number of options for a selection. In some cases,
we will generate a lot of possible paths to access a field. There is a
process to remove redundant paths, but when the list is too large, that
process gets very expensive. To prevent that, we introduce an optional
limit that will reject the query if too many paths are generated
([#2880](#2880))

- Updated dependencies
\[[`7b5b836d15247c997712a47847f603aa5887312e`](7b5b836),
[`74ca7dd617927a20d79b824851f7651ef3c40a4e`](74ca7dd),
[`3f7392b84f8b626b248b59ce81f193d0f0272045`](3f7392b)]:
    -   @apollo/federation-internals@2.6.2
    -   @apollo/query-graphs@2.6.2

## @apollo/subgraph@2.6.2

### Patch Changes

- Updated dependencies
\[[`7b5b836d15247c997712a47847f603aa5887312e`](7b5b836),
[`74ca7dd617927a20d79b824851f7651ef3c40a4e`](74ca7dd)]:
    -   @apollo/federation-internals@2.6.2

## apollo-federation-integration-testsuite@2.6.2

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants