Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: refactored git status #34270

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2024
Merged

chore: refactored git status #34270

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2024

Conversation

sondermanish
Copy link
Contributor

@sondermanish sondermanish commented Jun 17, 2024

Description

  • Refactored Git status method to remove redundant logic in overloaded method, now the base getStatus method uses, the overloaded method.

Fixes #Issue Number
or
Fixes Issue URL

Warning

If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.

Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Git"

🔍 Cypress test results

Tip

🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9544409678
Commit: 42fa457
Cypress dashboard.
Tags: @tag.Git

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

  • Yes
  • No

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved readability and maintainability of the code handling Git operations.
    • Enhanced efficiency in file locking and data fetching processes.

@sondermanish sondermanish requested a review from a team as a code owner June 17, 2024 06:59
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 17, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in CommonGitServiceCEImpl.java involve refactoring the getStatus method to enhance readability and maintainability. Enhancements include better file-lock handling, improved Git authentication data handling, and a streamlined code structure for fetching remote data. Several operations such as saving artifacts and error handling have been simplified to enhance code clarity and efficiency.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/.../CommonGitServiceCEImpl.java Refactored getStatus method to improve readability and maintainability. Enhanced file-lock handling, added Git authentication data setting, introduced repo suffix creation, reorganized Mono creation, and simplified remote data fetching and error handling.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant CommonGitServiceCEImpl
    participant GitManager
    participant RemoteRepository

    Client->>CommonGitServiceCEImpl: call getStatus(compareRemote)
    CommonGitServiceCEImpl->>CommonGitServiceCEImpl: set gitData with Git authentication
    CommonGitServiceCEImpl->>CommonGitServiceCEImpl: create repoSuffix
    CommonGitServiceCEImpl->>GitManager: lock file
    GitManager-->>CommonGitServiceCEImpl: file locked
    CommonGitServiceCEImpl->>GitManager: save artifacts
    GitManager-->>CommonGitServiceCEImpl: artifacts saved
    CommonGitServiceCEImpl->>CommonGitServiceCEImpl: create exportedArtifactJsonMono
    CommonGitServiceCEImpl->>CommonGitServiceCEImpl: create statusMono by chaining operations
    alt compareRemote == true
        CommonGitServiceCEImpl->>RemoteRepository: fetch remote data and compare
        RemoteRepository-->>CommonGitServiceCEImpl: remote data fetched
    else
        CommonGitServiceCEImpl->>CommonGitServiceCEImpl: skip fetching remote data
    end
    CommonGitServiceCEImpl->>Client: return status result
Loading

Poem

In code we weave a tale so bright,
Refactor done, a new insight.
With locks and paths, our data flows,
Simplified, the logic shows.
Git whispers secrets, we now hear,
Errors vanish, clarity near.
A rabbit's joy, code refined,
Progress made, so well-defined. 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sondermanish sondermanish added ok-to-test Required label for CI Git status Issues related to information shown on git status modal or number of changes appearing in a branch labels Jun 17, 2024
@sondermanish sondermanish changed the title refactored git status chore: refactored git status Jun 17, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog label Jun 17, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2b73e8b and 42fa457.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/common/CommonGitServiceCEImpl.java (5 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/common/CommonGitServiceCEImpl.java (5)

344-358: Ensure that the reset operation in the Git status fetching process is robust and correctly handles exceptions.


424-430: Validate the retrieval of artifact data and ensure that the error handling is comprehensive for the getArtifactById method.

Verification successful

The getArtifactById method is indeed used multiple times in the CommonGitServiceCEImpl.java file. To verify if proper error handling is implemented for each usage, we need to ensure that each invocation of getArtifactById is followed by switchIfEmpty.

Let's generate a new shell script to check if each instance of getArtifactById in CommonGitServiceCEImpl.java is followed by switchIfEmpty.


The output confirms that the getArtifactById method in CommonGitServiceCEImpl.java is followed by switchIfEmpty with proper error handling.

  • app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/common/CommonGitServiceCEImpl.java: The getArtifactById method is followed by switchIfEmpty which handles errors by throwing a new AppsmithException with AppsmithError.GIT_GENERIC_ERROR.

This indicates that the error handling for the getArtifactById method is comprehensive as per the code snippet provided.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Validate error handling in artifact retrieval.
ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'getArtifactById($$$).switchIfEmpty($$$)'

Length of output: 74



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all instances of getArtifactById method usage in the codebase.
ast-grep --lang java --pattern 'getArtifactById($$$)'

Length of output: 55



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the definition and usage of getArtifactById method in the codebase.
rg 'getArtifactById'

Length of output: 4275



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if each instance of getArtifactById in CommonGitServiceCEImpl.java is followed by switchIfEmpty.
rg 'getArtifactById' -A 3 app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/common/CommonGitServiceCEImpl.java | rg 'switchIfEmpty'

Length of output: 244


304-305: Check the generation of repository suffix path for consistency and correctness.


310-315: Review the logic for handling Mono chaining in the status fetching process. Ensure that addFileLock and subsequent operations are robust against errors.


300-301: Ensure proper error handling when setting Git authentication data.

@sondermanish sondermanish self-assigned this Jun 17, 2024
@sondermanish sondermanish added ok-to-test Required label for CI and removed ok-to-test Required label for CI labels Jun 17, 2024
@appsmithorg appsmithorg deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jun 17, 2024
@sondermanish sondermanish enabled auto-merge (squash) June 17, 2024 08:51
@sondermanish sondermanish merged commit 8b85f36 into release Jun 17, 2024
70 of 82 checks passed
@sondermanish sondermanish deleted the chore/git-status branch June 17, 2024 08:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Git status Issues related to information shown on git status modal or number of changes appearing in a branch ok-to-test Required label for CI skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants