-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: use feature flags when hide form control #37143
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
app/client/src/pages/Editor/FormControl.tsx (2)
65-69
: Consider adding null check for feature flags.While the implementation is correct, consider adding a null check for the featureFlags object to prevent potential runtime errors.
const hidden = isHidden( formValueForEvaluatingHiddenObj, props.config.hidden, - featureFlags, + featureFlags ?? {}, );
Line range hint
214-219
: Enhance memo comparison for better performance.The current memo comparison might miss important prop changes. Consider implementing a more thorough comparison of relevant props.
export default memo(FormControl, (prevProps, nextProps) => { return ( - prevProps === nextProps && - prevProps.config.disabled === nextProps.config.disabled + prevProps.formName === nextProps.formName && + prevProps.config.disabled === nextProps.config.disabled && + prevProps.config.configProperty === nextProps.config.configProperty && + shallowEqual(prevProps.config.hidden, nextProps.config.hidden) ); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
app/client/src/pages/Editor/FormControl.tsx
(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
app/client/src/pages/Editor/FormControl.tsx (1)
34-34
: LGTM: Clean feature flags integration.
The feature flags setup follows Redux best practices with proper selector usage.
Also applies to: 52-52
## Description Fixes #`Issue Number` _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11596803399> > Commit: 7f833e9 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=11596803399&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Sanity` > Spec: > <hr>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 16:28:12 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enhanced visibility logic in the FormControl component based on feature flags. - Improved configurability of the component's rendering based on application state. - **Bug Fixes** - Updated memoization logic to prevent unnecessary re-renders when props remain unchanged. - **Refactor** - Adjusted internal state management to incorporate feature flags for better performance and responsiveness. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Description
Fixes #
Issue Number
or
Fixes
Issue URL
Warning
If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.
Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
🔍 Cypress test results
Tip
🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11596803399
Commit: 7f833e9
Cypress dashboard.
Tags:
@tag.Sanity
Spec:
Wed, 30 Oct 2024 16:28:12 UTC
Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor