-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rolling Builds only for PRs #2066
Comments
Please try now, should work. Feel free to re-open the issue if something is not as expected, |
@IlyaFinkelshteyn, is there a separate option? Linked discussion is private. |
Thanks. I don't see it in my settings. I guess this feature is not rolled out to everybody |
Sorry. I can see it. Thanks |
:) |
cjchapman
added a commit
to adobe-type-tools/afdko
that referenced
this issue
May 22, 2018
Ilya Finkelshteyn said that the code removed by this commit is no longer needed now that appveyor/ci#2066 is fixed.
cjchapman
added a commit
to adobe-type-tools/afdko
that referenced
this issue
Jun 13, 2018
Ilya Finkelshteyn said that the code removed by this commit is no longer needed now that appveyor/ci#2066 is fixed. (This is round 2, because I'm trying again off a fresh branch from `develop`.)
miguelsousa
pushed a commit
to adobe-type-tools/afdko
that referenced
this issue
Jun 13, 2018
Ilya Finkelshteyn said that the code removed by this commit is no longer needed now that appveyor/ci#2066 is fixed. (This is round 2, because I'm trying again off a fresh branch from `develop`.)
schriftgestalt
pushed a commit
to schriftgestalt/afdko
that referenced
this issue
May 18, 2019
Ilya Finkelshteyn said that the code removed by this commit is no longer needed now that appveyor/ci#2066 is fixed. (This is round 2, because I'm trying again off a fresh branch from `develop`.)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Discussion
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: