Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create symbols with Symbol.for() #5131

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 31, 2023
Merged

Create symbols with Symbol.for() #5131

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 31, 2023

Conversation

neumark
Copy link
Contributor

@neumark neumark commented Mar 27, 2023

When multiple copies of @graphql-tools/delegate are available in a workspace (eg: because stitch and wrap depend on different versions), creating symbols with Symbol() can lead to bugs when one version of delegate sets an object property using its version of the symbol which the other delegate instance will not be able to access. Using Symbol.for() fixes this: as long as both versions of delegate use the same string description, they will refer to the same symbol.

🚨 IMPORTANT: Please do not create a Pull Request without creating an issue first.

Any change needs to be discussed before proceeding. Failure to do so may result in the rejection of the pull request.

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Related # (issue)
#5130

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

Screenshots/Sandbox (if appropriate/relevant):

Adding links to sandbox or providing screenshots can help us understand more about this PR and take action on it as appropriate

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Test A
  • Test B

Test Environment:

  • OS:
  • @graphql-tools/...:
  • NodeJS:

Checklist:

  • I have followed the CONTRIBUTING doc and the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests and linter rules pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

When multiple copies of `@graphql-tools/delegate` are available in a workspace (eg: because `stitch` and `wrap` depend on different versions), creating symbols with `Symbol()` can lead to bugs when one version of `delegate` sets an object property using its version of the symbol which the other `delegate` instance will not be able to access. Using `Symbol.for()` fixes this: as long as both versions of delegate use the same string description, they will refer to the same symbol.
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Mar 27, 2023

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: e6bceee

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 7 packages
Name Type
@graphql-tools/delegate Patch
@graphql-tools/batch-delegate Patch
@graphql-tools/links Patch
@graphql-tools/stitch Patch
@graphql-tools/stitching-directives Patch
@graphql-tools/wrap Patch
federation-benchmark Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link
Collaborator

@saihaj saihaj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please add a changeset. Learn more here

@saihaj saihaj requested a review from ardatan March 27, 2023 16:37
@ardatan ardatan merged commit f26392a into ardatan:master Mar 31, 2023
@theguild-bot theguild-bot mentioned this pull request Apr 23, 2023
@theguild-bot theguild-bot mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2023
@theguild-bot theguild-bot mentioned this pull request May 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants