Feat(eos_cli_config_gen): Extend listen_range support for BGP

[ccsnw]

Change Summary

• Allow user to configure multiple BGP listen_ranges with different kinds of filters
• Moved this to general BGP settings (this is also where EOS cli places the output)

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #N/A

Component(s) name

arista.avd.eos_cli_config_gen

Proposed changes

router_bgp:
  listen_ranges:
    - prefix: < A.B.C.D/E | A:B:C:D:E:F:G:H/I >
      # include router id as part of peer filter
      peer_id_include_router_id: < true | false >
      peer_group: < name of peer-group >
      # peer_filter and remote_as are mutally exclusive. if defined, peer_filter takes precedence
      peer_filter: < name of peer-filter >
      remote_as: < remote ASN in plain or dot notation >

How to test

Molecule tests added.

Checklist

User Checklist

• N/A

Repository Checklist

• My code has been rebased from devel before I start
• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
• My change requires a change to the documentation and documentation have been updated accordingly.
• I have updated molecule CI testing accordingly. (check the box if not applicable)

[ClausHolbechArista]

We have a large refactor PR for BGP templates in the works. We can still prepare this in parallel, but I will hold this one back until the refactor PR has been merged. Keep it in draft. Thanks.

• Missing documentation template (add a new table)

[ccsnw]

We have a large refactor PR for BGP templates in the works. We can still prepare this in parallel, but I will hold this one back until the refactor PR has been merged. Keep it in draft. Thanks.

• Missing documentation template (add a new table)

Will do!

[ccsnw]

We have a large refactor PR for BGP templates in the works. We can still prepare this in parallel, but I will hold this one back until the refactor PR has been merged. Keep it in draft. Thanks.

• Missing documentation template (add a new table)

Documentation template added for review @ClausHolbechArista

[ClausHolbechArista]

LGTM. Keep it as draft until we are done with the refactor.

[ClausHolbechArista]

@ccsnw We are ready to take this now. Please rebase and fix accordingly. We have changed the nested dictionaries to be lists of dictionaries for this template (no required change to input model).

will do a new review after rebase

[github-actions]

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

[ccsnw]

@ccsnw We are ready to take this now. Please rebase and fix accordingly. We have changed the nested dictionaries to be lists of dictionaries for this template (no required change to input model).

Thanks! On it

[github-actions]

Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

[tgodaA]

LGTM

[ClausHolbechArista]

LGTM