Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Simplify MSM implementation, and small speedup #157
Simplify MSM implementation, and small speedup #157
Changes from all commits
08c703b
abbfd91
656bc6b
5434fca
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As an aside, we should probably parallelize this loop. (Will have some complexity added, to handle the running sum's updates for subsequent chunks)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is that worthwhile? We're already parallelizing the outer loop (over the windows)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hrmm, probably should benchmark this. I thought its a linear number of buckets in the degree
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is, but the idea right now is that each thread gets its own window to operate over. Usually the number of windows is more than the number of threads, so the existing allocation is already fine for those cases. However if the number of threads is higher, then we could try leverage the extra threads for better parallelism; but we have to do so in a way that doesn't harm the normal mode of operation.
One idea would be to conditionally parallelize only if we have spare threads; this can be done via rayon's
ThreadPool
. The idea would be allocate some number of threads to the pool (say 2), and then execute operations inside the pool. The threadpool approach would ensure that all Rayon operations inside the pool use at most two threadsThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah I see. Didn't realize its already parallelized, then I agree its probably unlikely to be a perf bottleneck