Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Publish version 0.1 and use semantic versioning #22

Closed
ProgramFan opened this issue Aug 21, 2016 · 9 comments
Closed

Publish version 0.1 and use semantic versioning #22

ProgramFan opened this issue Aug 21, 2016 · 9 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@ProgramFan
Copy link
Contributor

Since a lot of new stuff are added recently, I think it's time to publish a new version to rubygems so that broader users can benifit from it.

I would like to use semantic versioning and mark this version as 0.1.

@ProgramFan
Copy link
Contributor Author

How about you? @tstumm @mojavelinux

@ProgramFan ProgramFan added this to the v0.1 milestone Aug 21, 2016
@mojavelinux
Copy link
Member

Let's use v0.1.0 instead. I think we should stick to the three number scheme.

@ProgramFan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for correction. We will use v0.1.0

@ProgramFan ProgramFan modified the milestones: v0.1.0, v0.1 Aug 22, 2016
@ProgramFan ProgramFan self-assigned this Aug 22, 2016
@tstumm
Copy link
Contributor

tstumm commented Aug 22, 2016

We could use PI as versioning format. Start with 3 and add the decimal places as we go... Just kidding, three number scheme is fine.

@ProgramFan
Copy link
Contributor Author

I will then mark the latest trunk v0.1.0.

ProgramFan added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 22, 2016
@ProgramFan
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have marked the release. Would you push a new gem to rubygems? @tstumm. I can make the push if you don't mind.

@tstumm
Copy link
Contributor

tstumm commented Aug 24, 2016

I just published 0.1.0 on rubygems. Sorry for the delay.

@tstumm tstumm closed this as completed Aug 24, 2016
@mojavelinux
Copy link
Member

Brilliant! Thanks @tstumm!

@ProgramFan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nice job. @tstumm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants