Avoid mutable-class-default violations for Pydantic subclasses (#9187)

Only applies to subclasses defined within the same file, as elsewhere.

See:
#5243 (comment).

crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/RUF012.py

@@ -59,3 +59,11 @@ class F(BaseSettings):
     without_annotation = []
     class_variable: ClassVar[list[int]] = []
     final_variable: Final[list[int]] = []
+
+
+class G(F):
+    mutable_default: list[int] = []
+    immutable_annotation: Sequence[int] = []
+    without_annotation = []
+    class_variable: ClassVar[list[int]] = []
+    final_variable: Final[list[int]] = []

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/ruff/rules/helpers.rs

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
-use ruff_python_ast::{self as ast, Arguments, Expr};
-
 use ruff_python_ast::helpers::{map_callable, map_subscript};
-use ruff_python_semantic::{BindingKind, SemanticModel};
+use ruff_python_ast::{self as ast, Expr};
+use ruff_python_semantic::{analyze, BindingKind, SemanticModel};
 
 /// Return `true` if the given [`Expr`] is a special class attribute, like `__slots__`.
 ///
@@ -57,19 +56,13 @@ pub(super) fn has_default_copy_semantics(
     class_def: &ast::StmtClassDef,
     semantic: &SemanticModel,
 ) -> bool {
-    let Some(Arguments { args: bases, .. }) = class_def.arguments.as_deref() else {
-        return false;
-    };
-
-    bases.iter().any(|expr| {
-        semantic.resolve_call_path(expr).is_some_and(|call_path| {
-            matches!(
-                call_path.as_slice(),
-                ["pydantic", "BaseModel" | "BaseSettings"]
-                    | ["pydantic_settings", "BaseSettings"]
-                    | ["msgspec", "Struct"]
-            )
-        })
+    analyze::class::any_over_body(class_def, semantic, &|call_path| {
+        matches!(
+            call_path.as_slice(),
+            ["pydantic", "BaseModel" | "BaseSettings"]
+                | ["pydantic_settings", "BaseSettings"]
+                | ["msgspec", "Struct"]
+        )
     })
 }