Format StmtFor (#5163)

<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:

- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->

## Summary

format StmtFor

still trying to learn how to help out with the formatter. trying
something slightly more advanced than [break](#5158)

mostly copied form StmtWhile

## Test Plan

snapshots

crates/ruff_python_formatter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/statement/for.py

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+for x in y: # trailing test comment
+    pass # trailing last statement comment
+
+    # trailing for body comment
+
+# leading else comment
+
+else: # trailing else comment
+    pass
+
+    # trailing else body comment
+
+
+for aVeryLongNameThatSpillsOverToTheNextLineBecauseItIsExtremelyLongAndGoesOnAndOnAndOnAndOnAndOnAndOnAndOnAndOnAndOn in anotherVeryLongNameThatSpillsOverToTheNextLineBecauseItIsExtremelyLongAndGoesOnAndOnAndOnAndOnAndOnAndOnAndOnAndOnAndOn: # trailing comment
+    pass
+
+else:
+    ...
+
+for (
+    x,
+    y,
+    ) in z: # comment
+    ...
+
+
+# remove brackets around x,y but keep them around z,w
+for (x, y) in (z, w):
+    ...
+
+
+# type comment
+for x in (): # type: int
+    ...

crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/snapshots/ruff_python_formatter__tests__black_test__bracketmatch_py.snap

@@ -19,20 +19,25 @@ lambda x=lambda y={1: 3}: y['x':lambda y: {1: 2}]: x
 ```diff
 --- Black
 +++ Ruff
-@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
+@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
 -for ((x in {}) or {})["a"] in x:
--    pass
++for ((NOT_IMPLEMENTED_left < NOT_IMPLEMENTED_right) or {})[
++    "NOT_YET_IMPLEMENTED_STRING"
++] in x:
+     pass
 -pem_spam = lambda l, spam={"x": 3}: not spam.get(l.strip())
 -lambda x=lambda y={1: 3}: y["x" : lambda y: {1: 2}]: x
-+NOT_YET_IMPLEMENTED_StmtFor
 +pem_spam = lambda x: True
 +lambda x: True
 ```
 
 ## Ruff Output
 
 ```py
-NOT_YET_IMPLEMENTED_StmtFor
+for ((NOT_IMPLEMENTED_left < NOT_IMPLEMENTED_right) or {})[
+    "NOT_YET_IMPLEMENTED_STRING"
+] in x:
+    pass
 pem_spam = lambda x: True
 lambda x: True
 ```

crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/snapshots/ruff_python_formatter__tests__black_test__collections_py.snap

@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ if True:
 ```diff
 --- Black
 +++ Ruff
-@@ -1,99 +1,56 @@
+@@ -1,61 +1,40 @@
 -import core, time, a
 +NOT_YET_IMPLEMENTED_StmtImport
  
@@ -164,12 +164,10 @@ if True:
 +NOT_YET_IMPLEMENTED_StmtAssert
  
  # looping over a 1-tuple should also not get wrapped
--for x in (1,):
--    pass
--for (x,) in (1,), (2,), (3,):
--    pass
-+NOT_YET_IMPLEMENTED_StmtFor
-+NOT_YET_IMPLEMENTED_StmtFor
+ for x in (1,):
+@@ -63,37 +42,17 @@
+ for (x,) in (1,), (2,), (3,):
+     pass
  
 -[
 -    1,
@@ -257,8 +255,10 @@ y = {
 NOT_YET_IMPLEMENTED_StmtAssert
 
 # looping over a 1-tuple should also not get wrapped
-NOT_YET_IMPLEMENTED_StmtFor
-NOT_YET_IMPLEMENTED_StmtFor
+for x in (1,):
+    pass
+for (x,) in (1,), (2,), (3,):
+    pass
 
 [1, 2, 3]
 

crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/snapshots/ruff_python_formatter__tests__black_test__comments3_py.snap

@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ def func():
 ```diff
 --- Black
 +++ Ruff
-@@ -3,46 +3,15 @@
+@@ -3,46 +3,17 @@
  
  # %%
  def func():
@@ -97,7 +97,9 @@ def func():
 -                    )
 -                    # This should be left alone (after)
 -                )
-+        NOT_YET_IMPLEMENTED_StmtFor
++        for exc in exc_value.NOT_IMPLEMENTED_attr:
++            if NOT_IMPLEMENTED_left < NOT_IMPLEMENTED_right:
++                NOT_IMPLEMENTED_call()
  
      # everything is fine if the expression isn't nested
 -    traceback.TracebackException.from_exception(
@@ -128,7 +130,9 @@ def func():
     # Capture each of the exceptions in the MultiError along with each of their causes and contexts
     if NOT_IMPLEMENTED_call():
         embedded = []
-        NOT_YET_IMPLEMENTED_StmtFor
+        for exc in exc_value.NOT_IMPLEMENTED_attr:
+            if NOT_IMPLEMENTED_left < NOT_IMPLEMENTED_right:
+                NOT_IMPLEMENTED_call()
 
     # everything is fine if the expression isn't nested
     NOT_IMPLEMENTED_call()

crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/snapshots/ruff_python_formatter__tests__black_test__comments5_py.snap

@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ if __name__ == "__main__":
 ```diff
 --- Black
 +++ Ruff
-@@ -1,33 +1,20 @@
+@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
  while True:
 -    if something.changed:
 -        do.stuff()  # trailing comment
@@ -95,38 +95,40 @@ if __name__ == "__main__":
          # Comment belongs to the `if` block.
      # This one belongs to the `while` block.
  
-     # Should this one, too?  I guess so.
+@@ -8,26 +8,20 @@
  
  # This one is properly standalone now.
--
+ 
 -for i in range(100):
--    # first we do this
++for i in NOT_IMPLEMENTED_call():
+     # first we do this
 -    if i % 33 == 0:
--        break
++    if NOT_IMPLEMENTED_left < NOT_IMPLEMENTED_right:
+         break
  
--    # then we do this
+     # then we do this
 -    print(i)
--    # and finally we loop around
-+NOT_YET_IMPLEMENTED_StmtFor
++    NOT_IMPLEMENTED_call()
+     # and finally we loop around
  
 -with open(some_temp_file) as f:
 -    data = f.read()
--
++NOT_YET_IMPLEMENTED_StmtWith
+ 
 -try:
 -    with open(some_other_file) as w:
 -        w.write(data)
-+NOT_YET_IMPLEMENTED_StmtWith
++NOT_YET_IMPLEMENTED_StmtTry
  
 -except OSError:
 -    print("problems")
-+NOT_YET_IMPLEMENTED_StmtTry
- 
+-
 -import sys
 +NOT_YET_IMPLEMENTED_StmtImport
  
  
  # leading function comment
-@@ -42,7 +29,7 @@
+@@ -42,7 +36,7 @@
  # leading 1
  @deco1
  # leading 2
@@ -135,7 +137,7 @@ if __name__ == "__main__":
  # leading 3
  @deco3
  def decorated1():
-@@ -52,7 +39,7 @@
+@@ -52,7 +46,7 @@
  # leading 1
  @deco1
  # leading 2
@@ -144,7 +146,7 @@ if __name__ == "__main__":
  # leading function comment
  def decorated1():
      ...
-@@ -69,5 +56,5 @@
+@@ -69,5 +63,5 @@
      ...
  
  
@@ -167,7 +169,14 @@ while True:
 
 # This one is properly standalone now.
 
-NOT_YET_IMPLEMENTED_StmtFor
+for i in NOT_IMPLEMENTED_call():
+    # first we do this
+    if NOT_IMPLEMENTED_left < NOT_IMPLEMENTED_right:
+        break
+
+    # then we do this
+    NOT_IMPLEMENTED_call()
+    # and finally we loop around
 
 NOT_YET_IMPLEMENTED_StmtWith