[red-knot] Add MRO resolution for classes (#14027)

Cargo.toml

@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ hashbrown = { version = "0.15.0", default-features = false, features = [
 ignore = { version = "0.4.22" }
 imara-diff = { version = "0.1.5" }
 imperative = { version = "1.0.4" }
+indexmap = {version = "2.6.0" }
 indicatif = { version = "0.17.8" }
 indoc = { version = "2.0.4" }
 insta = { version = "1.35.1" }

crates/red_knot_python_semantic/Cargo.toml

@@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ bitflags = { workspace = true }
 camino = { workspace = true }
 compact_str = { workspace = true }
 countme = { workspace = true }
-itertools = { workspace = true}
+indexmap = { workspace = true }
+itertools = { workspace = true }
 ordermap = { workspace = true }
 salsa = { workspace = true }
 thiserror = { workspace = true }
@@ -43,10 +44,9 @@ red_knot_test = { workspace = true }
 red_knot_vendored = { workspace = true }
 
 anyhow = { workspace = true }
-dir-test = {workspace = true}
+dir-test = { workspace = true }
 insta = { workspace = true }
 tempfile = { workspace = true }
 
 [lints]
 workspace = true
-

crates/red_knot_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/assignment/augmented.md

@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ f = Foo()
 # that `Foo.__iadd__` may be unbound as additional context.
 f += "Hello, world!"
 
-reveal_type(f)  # revealed: int | @Todo
+reveal_type(f)  # revealed: int | Unknown
 ```
 
 ## Partially bound with `__add__`

crates/red_knot_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/attributes.md

@@ -18,3 +18,38 @@ else:
 
 reveal_type(C.x)  # revealed: Literal[1, 2]
 ```
+
+## Inherited attributes
+
+```py
+class A:
+    X = "foo"
+
+class B(A): ...
+class C(B): ...
+
+reveal_type(C.X)  # revealed: Literal["foo"]
+```
+
+## Inherited attributes (multiple inheritance)
+
+```py
+class O: ...
+
+class F(O):
+    X = 56
+
+class E(O):
+    X = 42
+
+class D(O): ...
+class C(D, F): ...
+class B(E, D): ...
+class A(B, C): ...
+
+# revealed: tuple[Literal[A], Literal[B], Literal[E], Literal[C], Literal[D], Literal[F], Literal[O], Literal[object]]
+reveal_type(A.__mro__)
+
+# `E` is earlier in the MRO than `F`, so we should use the type of `E.X`
+reveal_type(A.X)  # revealed: Literal[42]
+```

crates/red_knot_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/binary/instances.md

@@ -202,11 +202,7 @@ reveal_type(A() + B())  # revealed: MyString
 # N.B. Still a subtype of `A`, even though `A` does not appear directly in the class's `__bases__`
 class C(B): ...
 
-# TODO: we currently only understand direct subclasses as subtypes of the superclass.
-# We need to iterate through the full MRO rather than just the class's bases;
-# if we do, we'll understand `C` as a subtype of `A`, and correctly understand this as being
-# `MyString` rather than `str`
-reveal_type(A() + C())  # revealed: str
+reveal_type(A() + C())  # revealed: MyString
 ```
 
 ## Reflected precedence 2