D208 should outdent whole blocks and not line-byline

[ThiefMaster]

def test(categ_ids, start_dt, end_dt):
    """Retrieve time blocks that fall within a specific time interval.

       :param categ_ids: iterable containing list of category IDs
       :param start_dt: start of search interval (``datetime``, expected
                        to be in display timezone)
       :param end_dt: end of search interval (``datetime`` in expected
                      to be in display timezone)
    """

ruff --isolated --select D208 --fix does this:

def test(categ_ids, start_dt, end_dt):
    """Retrieve time blocks that fall within a specific time interval.

    :param categ_ids: iterable containing list of category IDs
    :param start_dt: start of search interval (``datetime``, expected
    to be in display timezone)
    :param end_dt: end of search interval (``datetime`` in expected
    to be in display timezone)
    """

But this would be sufficient to fix the violation and preserve the intent of the indentation that's not part of the over-indentation:

def test(categ_ids, start_dt, end_dt):
    """Retrieve time blocks that fall within a specific time interval.

    :param categ_ids: iterable containing list of category IDs
    :param start_dt: start of search interval (``datetime``, expected
                     to be in display timezone)
    :param end_dt: end of search interval (``datetime`` in expected
                   to be in display timezone)
    """

IMHO the behavior of the fix should be less aggressive or the fix should be marked as unsafe by default.

D207 should probably be adapted likewise when indenting under-indented docstrings.

[zanieb]

Thanks for the report, let me know if #8699 resolves your problems.

[ThiefMaster]

Yes, works exactly as I was hoping for - thanks for the quick fix!