Expose Ruff's public API as a Python library #1407
Conversation
src/lib_python.rs
Outdated
|
|
||
| #[pyfunction] | ||
| fn check(contents: &str) -> PyResult<Vec<Message>> { | ||
| // TODO(rgerecke): Accept settings |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should also accept an optional filename.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
On that topic, do we mirror the current API 1:1, i.e. should this also resolve settings by looking into the filesystem?
There was some discussion on the issue itself, but no clear direction yet (at least for me).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah I think we should. Similar to the Rust API (which doesn't accept settings... but should).
I think the rules are:
- If settings are provided, use those.
- Else, if filepath is provided, infer.
- Else, use defaults.
squiddy
force-pushed
the
python-library
branch
2 times, most recently
from
75db8af
to
7a91b3b
Compare
squiddy
force-pushed
the
python-library
branch
4 times, most recently
from
de5576a
to
6bd1f6b
Compare
maturin doesn't yet support packaging both a binary and a library into the same package. PyO3/maturin#368
squiddy
force-pushed
the
python-library
branch
from
6bd1f6b
to
79990b9
Compare
|
Most pieces are in place. Since maturin doesn't support binary+library in one package (at least I didn't find a way), I had to switch to the lower-level setuptools-rust. I need to do some more CI adjustments for that, so I'll be moving that into a separate PR. |
|
Sweet! I haven't reviewed yet, but @messense, do you know if Maturin can be used here to build a binary + library in one package? |
For the record, it's also not in a state where I'm waiting for a review. I can still do some cleaning up, adding docs and function signatures to the library, adjust CI etc. |
Not yet, supporting both lib and bin will complicate bindings detection and our auditwheel Rust implementation, but it's been worked on slowly. |
|
I really think that this is too soon ... we have not even stabilized the Rust API ... I have been refactoring our Rust API a lot recently but it's still very much not ready to be used by any third party, since it's very much subject to change drastically. |
|
Yeah, I agree -- I was excited for this but I've realized that it's too soon. Let's close for now, since it's getting a bit stale anyway. |
See #659