Bump version to v0.1.12

[charliermarsh]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

ruff-ecosystem results

Linter (stable)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

Linter (preview)

ℹ️ ecosystem check detected linter changes. (+0 -4 violations, +0 -0 fixes in 1 projects; 42 projects unchanged)

pandas-dev/pandas (+0 -4 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --preview

- pandas/core/internals/construction.py:161:5: PLR0917 Too many positional arguments (6/5)
- pandas/core/internals/construction.py:237:5: PLR0917 Too many positional arguments (6/5)
- pandas/core/internals/construction.py:441:9: PLC0415 `import` should be at the top-level of a file
- pandas/core/internals/construction.py:784:5: PLC0415 `import` should be at the top-level of a file

Changes by rule (2 rules affected)

code	total	+ violation	- violation	+ fix	- fix
PLR0917	2	0	2	0	0
PLC0415	2	0	2	0	0

Formatter (stable)

✅ ecosystem check detected no format changes.

Formatter (preview)

✅ ecosystem check detected no format changes.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #9475 will degrade performances by 4.35%

_{Comparing charlie/bump (97702d9) with main (eb4ed24)}

Summary

❌ 1 regressions
✅ 29 untouched benchmarks

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	main	charlie/bump	Change
❌	parser[numpy/ctypeslib.py]	12.2 ms	12.8 ms	-4.35%

[AlexWaygood]

A few small suggestions ;)

[AlexWaygood]

Looks like these are both changes to RUF011 -- is it correct to classify them as flake8-bugbear?

[charliermarsh]

Oops, thanks. This rule was moved to flake8-bugbear, but that PR hasn't actually merged yet, my mistake!

[charliermarsh]

Thanks @AlexWaygood, sloppy work on my part, appreciate it :)

[zanieb]

<3

[AlexWaygood]

Looks great! Hyped to use some of these in my projects