Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expand asyncio-dangling-task (RUF006) to include new_event_loop #9976

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 13, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
23 changes: 23 additions & 0 deletions crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/RUF006.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -162,3 +162,26 @@ async def f(x: bool):
T = asyncio.create_task(asyncio.sleep(1))
else:
T = None


# Error
def f():
loop = asyncio.new_event_loop()
loop.create_task(main()) # Error

# Error
def f():
loop = asyncio.get_event_loop()
loop.create_task(main()) # Error

# OK
def f():
global task
loop = asyncio.new_event_loop()
task = loop.create_task(main()) # Error

# OK
def f():
global task
loop = asyncio.get_event_loop()
task = loop.create_task(main()) # Error
22 changes: 17 additions & 5 deletions crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/ruff/rules/asyncio_dangling_task.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ use std::fmt;
use ast::Stmt;
use ruff_diagnostics::{Diagnostic, Violation};
use ruff_macros::{derive_message_formats, violation};
use ruff_python_ast::call_path::compose_call_path;
use ruff_python_ast::{self as ast, Expr};
use ruff_python_semantic::{analyze::typing, Scope, SemanticModel};
use ruff_text_size::Ranged;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -52,14 +53,15 @@ use ruff_text_size::Ranged;
/// - [The Python Standard Library](https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-task.html#asyncio.create_task)
#[violation]
pub struct AsyncioDanglingTask {
expr: String,
method: Method,
}

impl Violation for AsyncioDanglingTask {
#[derive_message_formats]
fn message(&self) -> String {
let AsyncioDanglingTask { method } = self;
format!("Store a reference to the return value of `asyncio.{method}`")
let AsyncioDanglingTask { expr, method } = self;
format!("Store a reference to the return value of `{expr}.{method}`")
}
}

Expand All @@ -80,19 +82,29 @@ pub(crate) fn asyncio_dangling_task(expr: &Expr, semantic: &SemanticModel) -> Op
})
{
return Some(Diagnostic::new(
AsyncioDanglingTask { method },
AsyncioDanglingTask {
expr: "asyncio".to_string(),
method,
},
expr.range(),
));
}

// Ex) `loop = asyncio.get_running_loop(); loop.create_task(...)`
// Ex) `loop = ...; loop.create_task(...)`
if let Expr::Attribute(ast::ExprAttribute { attr, value, .. }) = func.as_ref() {
if attr == "create_task" {
if typing::resolve_assignment(value, semantic).is_some_and(|call_path| {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know if ruff's typing analysis is good enough for this, but it would be better to check that the type of value is asyncio.AbstractEventLoop, so that the following would also be flagged:

import asyncio


def create_event_loop() -> asyncio.AbstractEventLoop:
  return asyncio.new_event_loop()


loop = create_event_loop()
loop.create_task(asyncio.sleep(1))

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah we don't quite support that yet unfortunately.

matches!(call_path.as_slice(), ["asyncio", "get_running_loop"])
matches!(
call_path.as_slice(),
[
"asyncio",
"get_event_loop" | "get_running_loop" | "new_event_loop"
]
)
}) {
return Some(Diagnostic::new(
AsyncioDanglingTask {
expr: compose_call_path(value).unwrap_or_else(|| "asyncio".to_string()),
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think loop would be a better fallback:

Suggested change
expr: compose_call_path(value).unwrap_or_else(|| "asyncio".to_string()),
expr: compose_call_path(value).unwrap_or_else(|| "loop".to_string()),

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will change, though I think in practice this should never happen. I wish it were encoded in the type system, but e.g. value here has to be a Name, and compose_call_path always returns Some given a name.

method: Method::CreateTask,
},
expr.range(),
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -25,20 +25,40 @@ RUF006.py:68:12: RUF006 Store a reference to the return value of `asyncio.create
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ RUF006
|

RUF006.py:74:26: RUF006 Store a reference to the return value of `asyncio.create_task`
RUF006.py:74:26: RUF006 Store a reference to the return value of `loop.create_task`
|
72 | def f():
73 | loop = asyncio.get_running_loop()
74 | task: asyncio.Task = loop.create_task(coordinator.ws_connect())
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ RUF006
|

RUF006.py:97:5: RUF006 Store a reference to the return value of `asyncio.create_task`
RUF006.py:97:5: RUF006 Store a reference to the return value of `loop.create_task`
|
95 | def f():
96 | loop = asyncio.get_running_loop()
97 | loop.create_task(coordinator.ws_connect()) # Error
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ RUF006
|

RUF006.py:170:5: RUF006 Store a reference to the return value of `loop.create_task`
|
168 | def f():
169 | loop = asyncio.new_event_loop()
170 | loop.create_task(main()) # Error
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ RUF006
171 |
172 | # Error
|

RUF006.py:175:5: RUF006 Store a reference to the return value of `loop.create_task`
|
173 | def f():
174 | loop = asyncio.get_event_loop()
175 | loop.create_task(main()) # Error
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ RUF006
176 |
177 | # OK
|


Loading