Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Read from /bin/sh if /bin/ls cannot be found when determing libc path #1433

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 16, 2024

Conversation

zanieb
Copy link
Member

@zanieb zanieb commented Feb 16, 2024

I'm not sure if we should just switch to always reading from sh instead? I don't love that all these errors are strings and I if /bin/ls exists but can't be parsed we still won't try /bin/sh. We may want to address these things in the future.

Closes #1395

@zanieb zanieb added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 16, 2024
@zanieb zanieb marked this pull request as ready for review February 16, 2024 05:21
Copy link
Member

@BurntSushi BurntSushi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should bring this in as-is since it fixes a known problem, but I do agree that probably just checking /bin/sh is sufficient.

@BurntSushi BurntSushi merged commit d99c4ca into main Feb 16, 2024
7 checks passed
@BurntSushi BurntSushi deleted the zb/read-sh branch February 16, 2024 12:51
BurntSushi added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2024
BurntSushi added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2024
It turns out that /bin/ls can sometimes be plain text file. For
example, in Rocky Linux 9:

```
$ cat /bin/ls
#!/usr/bin/coreutils --coreutils-prog-shebang=ls
```

However, `/bin/sh` is an ELF binary:

```
$ file /bin/sh
/bin/sh: ELF 64-bit LSB pie executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, BuildID[sha1]=7acbb41bf6f1b7d977f1b44675bf3ed213776835, for GNU/Linux 3.2.0, stripped
```

In a related issue (#1433), @zanieb fixed #1395 where, on NixOS,
`/bin/ls` doesn't exist but `/bin/sh` does. However, the fix attempts
`/bin/ls` first and only tries `/bin/sh` if `/bin/ls` doesn't exist. If
`/bin/ls` exists but isn't a valid ELF file, then the entire enterprise
gives up and `uv` fails to detect the version of `libc` that is
installed.

Instead of tweaking the logic to keep trying `/bin/ls` and then
`/bin/sh` after even if parsing `/bin/ls` fails, we just switch over to
reading `/bin/sh` only. It seems like a more fundamental thing to sniff
and likely less error prone.

We can adjust this heuristic as needed if it provdes to be problematic.

I tested this fix manually on Rocky Linux 9 via Docker:

```
$ cross b -r -p uv --target x86_64-unknown-linux-musl
$ cp target/x86_64-unknown-linux-musl/release/uv ~/astral/issues/uv/i1486/uv
$ docker run --rm -it --mount type=bind,src=/home/andrew/astral/issues/uv/i1486,dst=/host rockylinux:9 bash
[root@df2baa65d2f8 /]# /host/uv venv
Using Python 3.9.18 interpreter at /usr/bin/python3.9
Creating virtualenv at: .venv
[root@df2baa65d2f8 /]#
```

Fixes #1486, Ref #1433
@cnpryer cnpryer mentioned this pull request Feb 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support alternative platform detection mechanisms other than reading /bin/ls
2 participants