Document PEP517 difference #4480
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Good question... My guess is that ~all of the top 100 and top 1000 packages work with PEP 517 build isolation, though I haven't tried it. |
charliermarsh
approved these changes
Jun 24, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
PEP 517 build isolation #843 has not yet been mentioned in the PIP compatibility documentation. Add a section for it.
Test Plan
Visual inspection only
Open Questions
In the first non-trivial case I tried, it worked for a short time and then started failing. Is there any data out there on how many top 100 or top 1000 packages work with PEP 517 build isolation?
How can someone specify
--no-build-isolationfor just one package/line inrequirements.txt?