Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Esa ehst download improvements #2797
Esa ehst download improvements #2797
Changes from all commits
eb54a0d
4f28542
9e482d5
564e4fd
5a3ac64
bd45846
1bc13cd
68407bd
fb28c32
888d5ca
6387e3e
f1a833d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had another go through this looking into some consistency with the currently present API.
Practically this has the purpose as
get_obs_products
for jwst, right? https://github.com/astropy/astroquery/blob/main/astroquery/esa/jwst/core.py#L947While the return differs a bit, how do you feel about calling them the same, and in a follow-up PR making them do the same?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not the same, in this case we are only listing the file names, in case users want to filter them before download anything. get_obs_products downloads them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same API considerations, maybe this could be called
download_files
, and having a kwarg for extensions defaulting to'fits'
? This is really only a discussion item asdownload_files
is not really wide-spread, and the currently existing ones in alma and casda are having different signatureThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We wanted a specific method naming FITS, to make it more visible to users.