Add array_of DI extension macro
#348
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Switches to a more custom DSL to be more flexible/feature rich
Simplify/re-organize code
Seemingly working implemention of `array_of`
Blacksmoke16
added
component:dependency-injection
kind:enhancement
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow up to #332 (comment), I thought about it and realized there's not much benefit in having the dedicated type macros, just to try and construct the type that you could otherwise get directly off the
TypeDeclaration.However, I did see a lot of value in the
array_ofmacro as a means of defining an array of anonymous strictly typed objects. Before you had to do this as an array of a named tuple type, but this had some downsides. Mainly that you are unable to define defaults for the property. As such in order to make a key optional, it had to be nilable.array_ofmacro toADI::Extension::Schemaproperty?EXTENSION_SCHEMA_PROPERTIES_MAPto not useTypeDeclarationdirectly