Checks before conquer #999
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
guimarqu
approved these changes
Jul 20, 2023
Codecov ReportPatch coverage:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #999 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 79.61% 79.61%
=======================================
Files 82 82
Lines 5734 5735 +1
=======================================
+ Hits 4565 4566 +1
Misses 1169 1169
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I created a routine run_conquer in
treesearch.jlresponsible to perform checks before eventually calling the run! of conquer. This allowed to remove the boolean run_conquer from the conquer input.