Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix file chunks list creation #112

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2024
Merged

Fix file chunks list creation #112

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2024

Conversation

clostao
Copy link
Contributor

@clostao clostao commented Oct 1, 2024

PR Type

Bug fix


Description

  • Fixed the file chunks list creation by filtering nodes to include only those with decodable data.
  • Corrected the totalChunks calculation to reflect the actual number of valid chunks.
  • Updated the chunks array to map only the filtered nodes, ensuring accurate metadata.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Bug fix
file.ts
Fix and optimize file chunks list creation logic                 

packages/auto-drive/src/metadata/offchain/file.ts

  • Added imports for IPLDNodeData and MetadataType.
  • Filtered nodes to include only those with decodable data.
  • Corrected the calculation of totalChunks based on filtered nodes.
  • Updated chunks mapping to use filtered nodes.
  • +7/-3     

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    Copy link

    github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2024

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Error Handling
    Ensure that the decode operation in the filter for chunks does not throw an error or handle potential exceptions that might arise from corrupt or unexpected data.

    Data Integrity
    Verify that the filtering and mapping logic correctly reflects the intended metadata structure and that no valid data is inadvertently filtered out.

    Copy link

    github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible bug
    Add error handling to the data decoding process to enhance robustness

    Ensure that the IPLDNodeData.decode(n.Data).data check in the filter function is
    robust against potential decoding failures or unexpected data formats. Consider
    adding error handling or validation to prevent runtime errors.

    packages/auto-drive/src/metadata/offchain/file.ts [24-26]

     const chunks = Array.from(dag.nodes.values()).filter(
    -  (n) => n.Data && IPLDNodeData.decode(n.Data).data,
    +  (n) => n.Data && safelyDecodeIPLDNodeData(n.Data)?.data,
     )
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: Adding error handling to the data decoding process is a significant improvement that can prevent runtime errors due to unexpected data formats or decoding failures, enhancing the robustness of the code.

    8
    Possible issue
    Ensure proper handling of missing data scenarios

    Verify that the chunk.Data?.length ?? 0 fallback to 0 is intentional and
    appropriate. If Data is expected to be non-null in valid cases, consider throwing an
    error or logging a warning when Data is missing.

    packages/auto-drive/src/metadata/offchain/file.ts [37]

    -size: chunk.Data?.length ?? 0,
    +size: chunk.Data?.length ?? logMissingDataError(),
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: The suggestion to handle missing data scenarios by logging an error or warning is valuable for debugging and ensuring data integrity, though it assumes that missing data is an exceptional case.

    7
    Enhancement
    Improve variable naming for clarity

    Consider using a more descriptive variable name than chunks for the filtered list of
    nodes to reflect that these nodes contain valid data.

    packages/auto-drive/src/metadata/offchain/file.ts [24-26]

    -const chunks = Array.from(dag.nodes.values()).filter(
    +const validDataNodes = Array.from(dag.nodes.values()).filter(
       (n) => n.Data && IPLDNodeData.decode(n.Data).data,
     )
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: Using a more descriptive variable name like validDataNodes improves code readability and clarity, making it easier to understand that the nodes contain valid data.

    6
    Performance
    Optimize performance by caching decoded data

    To improve performance, consider caching the results of IPLDNodeData.decode(n.Data)
    if it is computationally expensive and used multiple times for the same node data.

    packages/auto-drive/src/metadata/offchain/file.ts [24-26]

    +const decodedDataCache = new Map();
     const chunks = Array.from(dag.nodes.values()).filter(
    -  (n) => n.Data && IPLDNodeData.decode(n.Data).data,
    +  (n) => n.Data && getOrDecodeData(n, decodedDataCache).data,
     )
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: Caching decoded data can improve performance if the decoding process is computationally expensive and the same data is used multiple times, though the actual performance gain depends on the specific use case.

    5

    @clostao clostao merged commit 7c4f16b into main Oct 1, 2024
    3 checks passed
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants