fix(static_obstacle_avoidance): use wrong parameter

[satoshi-ota]

Description

There is a bug to use wrong parameter. It should use min_prepare_time instead of min_prepare_distance.

Related links

Parent Issue:

• TIER IV INTERNAL LINK

How was this PR tested?

• PASS TIER IV INTERNAL SCENARIOS

Notes for reviewers

None.

Interface changes

None.

Effects on system behavior

None.

[github-actions]

Thank you for contributing to the Autoware project!

🚧 If your pull request is in progress, switch it to draft mode.

Please ensure:

• You've checked our contribution guidelines.
• Your PR follows our pull request guidelines.
• All required CI checks pass before marking the PR ready for review.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 24.15%. Comparing base (58297a0) to head (6c420e2).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...r_path_static_obstacle_avoidance_module/helper.hpp	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8720      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   24.15%   24.15%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1401     1401              
  Lines      102286   102300      +14     
  Branches    38818    38818              
==========================================
- Hits        24711    24706       -5     
- Misses      75097    75114      +17     
- Partials     2478     2480       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	20.05% <0.00%> (?)
total	24.15% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️	Carriedforward from 58297a0

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.