Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

more robust test/examples for optimization analysis #336

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 26, 2022
Merged

Conversation

aviatesk
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@aviatesk
Copy link
Owner Author

The primary motivation was JuliaLang/julia#44512 -- that PR will optimize more abstract callsites and so some of our test cases will be (unexpectedly) optimized with it.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 26, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #336 (81a7ba8) into master (c487ac0) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #336   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.95%   87.95%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines        2176     2176           
=======================================
  Hits         1914     1914           
  Misses        262      262           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c487ac0...81a7ba8. Read the comment docs.

@aviatesk aviatesk merged commit 2560070 into master Mar 26, 2022
@aviatesk aviatesk deleted the avi/opt branch March 26, 2022 12:17
@github-actions
Copy link

JET Benchmark Result

Judge result

Benchmark Report for /home/runner/work/JET.jl/JET.jl

Job Properties

  • Time of benchmarks:
  • Target: 26 Mar 2022 - 12:28
  • Baseline: 26 Mar 2022 - 12:46
  • Package commits:
  • Target: 7d3a7c
  • Baseline: c487ac
  • Julia commits:
  • Target: 9b2169
  • Baseline: 9b2169
  • Julia command flags:
  • Target: None
  • Baseline: None
  • Environment variables:
  • Target: None
  • Baseline: None

Results

A ratio greater than 1.0 denotes a possible regression (marked with ❌), while a ratio less
than 1.0 denotes a possible improvement (marked with ✅). Only significant results - results
that indicate possible regressions or improvements - are shown below (thus, an empty table means that all
benchmark results remained invariant between builds).

ID time ratio memory ratio

Benchmark Group List

Here's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:

  • []

Julia versioninfo

Target

Julia Version 1.9.0-DEV.250
Commit 9b2169181d3 (2022-03-26 08:45 UTC)
Platform Info:
 OS: Linux (x86_64-linux-gnu)
 Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS
 uname: Linux 5.11.0-1028-azure #31~20.04.2-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 18 08:46:15 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64
 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2673 v3 @ 2.40GHz: 
 speed user nice sys idle irq
 #1 2394 MHz 6355 s 1 s 424 s 5561 s 0 s
 #2 2394 MHz 6068 s 1 s 436 s 5862 s 0 s
 Memory: 6.784542083740234 GB (5415.22265625 MB free)
 Uptime: 1243.08 sec
 Load Avg: 1.19 1.1 0.88
 WORD_SIZE: 64
 LIBM: libopenlibm
 LLVM: libLLVM-13.0.1 (ORCJIT, haswell)
 Threads: 1 on 2 virtual cores

Baseline

Julia Version 1.9.0-DEV.250
Commit 9b2169181d3 (2022-03-26 08:45 UTC)
Platform Info:
 OS: Linux (x86_64-linux-gnu)
 Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS
 uname: Linux 5.11.0-1028-azure #31~20.04.2-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 18 08:46:15 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64
 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2673 v3 @ 2.40GHz: 
 speed user nice sys idle irq
 #1 2394 MHz 11475 s 1 s 734 s 10882 s 0 s
 #2 2394 MHz 11854 s 1 s 747 s 10520 s 0 s
 Memory: 6.784542083740234 GB (5362.49609375 MB free)
 Uptime: 2320.33 sec
 Load Avg: 1.18 1.29 1.22
 WORD_SIZE: 64
 LIBM: libopenlibm
 LLVM: libLLVM-13.0.1 (ORCJIT, haswell)
 Threads: 1 on 2 virtual cores

Target result

Benchmark Report for /home/runner/work/JET.jl/JET.jl

Job Properties

  • Time of benchmark: 26 Mar 2022 - 12:28
  • Package commit: 7d3a7c
  • Julia commit: 9b2169
  • Julia command flags: None
  • Environment variables: None

Results

Below is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks.
The values listed in the ID column have the structure [parent_group, child_group, ..., key], and can be used to
index into the BaseBenchmarks suite to retrieve the corresponding benchmarks.
The percentages accompanying time and memory values in the below table are noise tolerances. The "true"
time/memory value for a given benchmark is expected to fall within this percentage of the reported value.
An empty cell means that the value was zero.

ID time GC time memory allocations
["a bit complex"] 1.391 s (5%) 744 bytes (1%) 19
["cached easy"] 4.446 ms (5%) 744 bytes (1%) 19
["easy"] 1.150 s (5%) 744 bytes (1%) 19
["end to end"] 12.922 s (5%) 10.07 KiB (1%) 234
["first time"] 4.316 s (5%) 936 bytes (1%) 20
["invalidation"] 3.951 s (5%) 768 bytes (1%) 19
["package loading"] 281.861 ms (5%) 664 bytes (1%) 19
["self analysis"] 17.117 s (5%) 976 bytes (1%) 19
["top-level first time"] 8.989 s (5%) 1.67 KiB (1%) 20
["top-level"] 2.751 s (5%) 1.08 KiB (1%) 19

Benchmark Group List

Here's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:

  • []

Julia versioninfo

Julia Version 1.9.0-DEV.250
Commit 9b2169181d3 (2022-03-26 08:45 UTC)
Platform Info:
 OS: Linux (x86_64-linux-gnu)
 Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS
 uname: Linux 5.11.0-1028-azure #31~20.04.2-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 18 08:46:15 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64
 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2673 v3 @ 2.40GHz: 
 speed user nice sys idle irq
 #1 2394 MHz 6355 s 1 s 424 s 5561 s 0 s
 #2 2394 MHz 6068 s 1 s 436 s 5862 s 0 s
 Memory: 6.784542083740234 GB (5415.22265625 MB free)
 Uptime: 1243.08 sec
 Load Avg: 1.19 1.1 0.88
 WORD_SIZE: 64
 LIBM: libopenlibm
 LLVM: libLLVM-13.0.1 (ORCJIT, haswell)
 Threads: 1 on 2 virtual cores

Baseline result

Benchmark Report for /home/runner/work/JET.jl/JET.jl

Job Properties

  • Time of benchmark: 26 Mar 2022 - 12:46
  • Package commit: c487ac
  • Julia commit: 9b2169
  • Julia command flags: None
  • Environment variables: None

Results

Below is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks.
The values listed in the ID column have the structure [parent_group, child_group, ..., key], and can be used to
index into the BaseBenchmarks suite to retrieve the corresponding benchmarks.
The percentages accompanying time and memory values in the below table are noise tolerances. The "true"
time/memory value for a given benchmark is expected to fall within this percentage of the reported value.
An empty cell means that the value was zero.

ID time GC time memory allocations
["a bit complex"] 1.368 s (5%) 744 bytes (1%) 19
["cached easy"] 4.419 ms (5%) 744 bytes (1%) 19
["easy"] 1.120 s (5%) 744 bytes (1%) 19
["end to end"] 13.038 s (5%) 10.04 KiB (1%) 235
["first time"] 4.310 s (5%) 936 bytes (1%) 20
["invalidation"] 3.865 s (5%) 768 bytes (1%) 19
["package loading"] 280.898 ms (5%) 664 bytes (1%) 19
["self analysis"] 16.969 s (5%) 976 bytes (1%) 19
["top-level first time"] 8.944 s (5%) 1.67 KiB (1%) 20
["top-level"] 2.685 s (5%) 1.08 KiB (1%) 19

Benchmark Group List

Here's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:

  • []

Julia versioninfo

Julia Version 1.9.0-DEV.250
Commit 9b2169181d3 (2022-03-26 08:45 UTC)
Platform Info:
 OS: Linux (x86_64-linux-gnu)
 Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS
 uname: Linux 5.11.0-1028-azure #31~20.04.2-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 18 08:46:15 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64
 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2673 v3 @ 2.40GHz: 
 speed user nice sys idle irq
 #1 2394 MHz 11475 s 1 s 734 s 10882 s 0 s
 #2 2394 MHz 11854 s 1 s 747 s 10520 s 0 s
 Memory: 6.784542083740234 GB (5362.49609375 MB free)
 Uptime: 2320.33 sec
 Load Avg: 1.18 1.29 1.22
 WORD_SIZE: 64
 LIBM: libopenlibm
 LLVM: libLLVM-13.0.1 (ORCJIT, haswell)
 Threads: 1 on 2 virtual cores

Runtime information

Runtime Info
BLAS #threads 2
BLAS.vendor() lbt
Sys.CPU_THREADS 2

lscpu output:

Architecture: x86_64
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order: Little Endian
Address sizes: 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
CPU(s): 2
On-line CPU(s) list: 0,1
Thread(s) per core: 1
Core(s) per socket: 2
Socket(s): 1
NUMA node(s): 1
Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
CPU family: 6
Model: 63
Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2673 v3 @ 2.40GHz
Stepping: 2
CPU MHz: 2394.452
BogoMIPS: 4788.90
Hypervisor vendor: Microsoft
Virtualization type: full
L1d cache: 64 KiB
L1i cache: 64 KiB
L2 cache: 512 KiB
L3 cache: 30 MiB
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0,1
Vulnerability Itlb multihit: KVM: Mitigation: VMX unsupported
Vulnerability L1tf: Mitigation; PTE Inversion
Vulnerability Mds: Mitigation; Clear CPU buffers; SMT Host state unknown
Vulnerability Meltdown: Mitigation; PTI
Vulnerability Spec store bypass: Vulnerable
Vulnerability Spectre v1: Mitigation; usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization
Vulnerability Spectre v2: Mitigation; Full generic retpoline, STIBP disabled, RSB filling
Vulnerability Srbds: Not affected
Vulnerability Tsx async abort: Not affected
Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc rep_good nopl xtopology cpuid pni pclmulqdq ssse3 fma cx16 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 movbe popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand hypervisor lahf_lm abm invpcid_single pti fsgsbase bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid xsaveopt md_clear

Cpu Property Value
Brand Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2673 v3 @ 2.40GHz
Vendor :Intel
Architecture :Haswell
Model Family: 0x06, Model: 0x3f, Stepping: 0x02, Type: 0x00
Cores 2 physical cores, 2 logical cores (on executing CPU)
No Hyperthreading hardware capability detected
Clock Frequencies Not supported by CPU
Data Cache Level 1:3 : (32, 256, 30720) kbytes
64 byte cache line size
Address Size 48 bits virtual, 46 bits physical
SIMD 256 bit = 32 byte max. SIMD vector size
Time Stamp Counter TSC is accessible via rdtsc
TSC increased at every clock cycle (non-invariant TSC)
Perf. Monitoring Performance Monitoring Counters (PMC) are not supported
Hypervisor Yes, Microsoft

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants