-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 242
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Do not resume but verify paused status #3519
Do not resume but verify paused status #3519
Conversation
This is more compatible behavior with the implementation of the inverse method save_to_file() and with it both methods will now only verify paused status before and after they execute. Signed-off-by: Plamen Dimitrov <plamen.dimitrov@intra2net.com>
This pull request introduces 1 alert when merging b2a267d into f34a8a1 - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
Hmmm, is this issue caused by me? The overriding method assumes argument that I don't think I touched on my side. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@YongxueHong Could you help reviewing this? Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
Is there any chance we can merge this to free #3518 for reviewing/refactoring since it has two approvals already? |
This is more compatible behavior with the implementation of the inverse method save_to_file() and with it both methods will now only verify paused status before and after they execute.
Signed-off-by: Plamen Dimitrov plamen.dimitrov@intra2net.com