Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: add failing test for multiple uses of generic types #154

Conversation

upMKuhn
Copy link

@upMKuhn upMKuhn commented Aug 18, 2023

As requested a failing test of the scenario.

Comment on lines +9 to +22
"name" : "GenericValue",
"fields" : [ {
"name" : "z",
"type" : "string"
} ]
}
}, {
"name" : "b",
"type" : {
"type" : "record",
"name" : "GenericValue",
"fields" : [ {
"name" : "z",
"type" : "double"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is avro spec handling 2 record types with the same name but different fields ? Sounds weird to me 🤔

@thake thake closed this Aug 24, 2023
@thake
Copy link
Member

thake commented Aug 24, 2023

Closed. See #153 (comment) for more information.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants