Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(graphql-model-transformer): implemented support for nested non model fields #7884

Closed
wants to merge 79 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

pavellazar
Copy link
Contributor

Description of changes

Description of how you validated changes

  • yarn test passes

Checklist

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@pavellazar pavellazar requested a review from a team as a code owner August 4, 2021 17:44
@pavellazar pavellazar changed the title Non model types fix(graphql-model-transformer): implemented support for nested non model fields Aug 4, 2021
@cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor

cjihrig commented Aug 7, 2021

Can you rebase this please.

@pavellazar pavellazar changed the base branch from master to 2493-clear-require-cache-between-lambda-invocations August 8, 2021 03:42
@pavellazar pavellazar changed the base branch from 2493-clear-require-cache-between-lambda-invocations to master August 8, 2021 03:42
Copy link
Contributor

@cjihrig cjihrig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add a call to validateModelSchema() in the test. Other than that, LGTM.

@cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor

cjihrig commented Aug 9, 2021

It looks like LGTM bot is having some issues with this PR as well.

@cjihrig cjihrig self-assigned this Aug 9, 2021
@pavellazar pavellazar changed the base branch from master to 2493-clear-require-cache-between-lambda-invocations August 16, 2021 18:17
@pavellazar pavellazar changed the base branch from 2493-clear-require-cache-between-lambda-invocations to master August 16, 2021 18:17
@pavellazar pavellazar closed this Aug 16, 2021
@pavellazar
Copy link
Contributor Author

already merged as part of #7927

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants