Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(synthetics): asset code validation failed on bundled assets #26291

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 10, 2023

Conversation

kaizencc
Copy link
Contributor

@kaizencc kaizencc commented Jul 7, 2023

A re-roll of #19342. Thanks @RichiCoder1 for doing most of this work!

This PR moves asset validation from before staging the asset to after, and then validates on the staged asset instead. This allows for asset bundling because our prior validation was too eager.

In addition, this construct can help with synthetic canaries + bundled code: https://github.com/mrgrain/cdk-esbuild#amazon-cloudwatch-synthetics-canary-monitoring.

Fixes #11630

Co-authored-by: Richard Simpson richicoder1@outlook.com


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

@gitpod-io
Copy link

gitpod-io bot commented Jul 7, 2023

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team July 7, 2023 19:48
@mergify mergify bot added the contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. label Jul 7, 2023
@RichiCoder1
Copy link
Contributor

:shipit:

@kaizencc kaizencc changed the title fix(synthetics): asset code can be bundled fix(synthetics): asset code validation failed on bundled assets Jul 7, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added bug This issue is a bug. effort/medium Medium work item – several days of effort p1 labels Jul 7, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.

A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.

@kaizencc kaizencc added the pr-linter/exempt-integ-test The PR linter will not require integ test changes label Jul 7, 2023
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation dismissed their stale review July 7, 2023 20:04

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added the pr/needs-community-review This PR needs a review from a Trusted Community Member or Core Team Member. label Jul 7, 2023
@mrgrain mrgrain added the pr/do-not-merge This PR should not be merged at this time. label Jul 10, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@mrgrain mrgrain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code looks good. Putting the do-not-merge label on so you can address some issue in the PR description.

A re-roll of #22271

Did you mean #19342? 'Cause #22271 is an issue. Does the PR also fix issue #22271?

In addition, bumping this construct: https://github.com/mrgrain/cdk-esbuild#amazon-cloudwatch-synthetics-canary-monitoring.

Can you clarify what you mean by bumping in this context?

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation removed the pr/needs-community-review This PR needs a review from a Trusted Community Member or Core Team Member. label Jul 10, 2023
@kaizencc kaizencc removed the pr/do-not-merge This PR should not be merged at this time. label Jul 10, 2023
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 10, 2023

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: 09e918a
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 02a5482 into main Jul 10, 2023
@mergify mergify bot deleted the conroy/syn-code branch July 10, 2023 14:53
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 10, 2023

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

bmoffatt pushed a commit to bmoffatt/aws-cdk that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2023
…26291)

A re-roll of aws#19342. Thanks @RichiCoder1 for doing most of this work!

This PR moves asset validation from _before_ staging the asset to _after_, and then validates on the staged asset instead. This allows for asset bundling because our prior validation was too eager.

In addition, this construct can help with synthetic canaries + bundled code: https://github.com/mrgrain/cdk-esbuild#amazon-cloudwatch-synthetics-canary-monitoring.

Fixes aws#11630

Co-authored-by: Richard Simpson richicoder1@outlook.com

----

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2023
#27167)

Fixes #27089.

Canaries inside stages would fail at synth time after #26291 was introduced. This was due to a misunderstanding of `assetOutdir`. It turns out that `this.asset.assetPath` is a relative path of `Stage.of(scope).outdir`, not of `Stage.of(scope).assetOutdir`. These two out directories would be equivalent at the root level, but if there were nested stages, `assetOutdir` would equal `../${outdir}`.

This diagram may help:

```
CLOUD ASSEMBLY ROOT
  +-- asset.12345abcdef/
  +-- assembly-Stage
    +-- MyStack.template.json
    +-- MyStack.assets.json <- will contain { "path": "../asset.12345abcdef" }
```


----

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
HBobertz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2023
#27167)

Fixes #27089.

Canaries inside stages would fail at synth time after #26291 was introduced. This was due to a misunderstanding of `assetOutdir`. It turns out that `this.asset.assetPath` is a relative path of `Stage.of(scope).outdir`, not of `Stage.of(scope).assetOutdir`. These two out directories would be equivalent at the root level, but if there were nested stages, `assetOutdir` would equal `../${outdir}`.

This diagram may help:

```
CLOUD ASSEMBLY ROOT
  +-- asset.12345abcdef/
  +-- assembly-Stage
    +-- MyStack.template.json
    +-- MyStack.assets.json <- will contain { "path": "../asset.12345abcdef" }
```


----

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug This issue is a bug. contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. effort/medium Medium work item – several days of effort p1 pr-linter/exempt-integ-test The PR linter will not require integ test changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[synthetics] Validation of canary file existence done too early
4 participants