Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(lambda): L2 constructs for SnapStart #26761

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Aug 24, 2023
Merged

Conversation

roger-zhangg
Copy link
Member

Closes #23153

  • Support SnapStart on L2 constructs by setting snapStart: lambda.SnapStartConfig.ON_PUBLISHED_VERSIONS.
    This value will be converted to SnapStart: {ApplyOn: 'PublishedVersions',} in template.
  • Supports checking limitation stated in SnapStart except for Provisioned Concurrency which is at version level and can't be checked with function level props.
  • This PR is heavily inspired by PR from @DeerajTheepshi and discussion in the issue, Thank you

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

@github-actions github-actions bot added effort/medium Medium work item – several days of effort feature-request A feature should be added or improved. p2 beginning-contributor [Pilot] contributed between 0-2 PRs to the CDK labels Aug 15, 2023
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team August 15, 2023 17:41
Copy link
Collaborator

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.

A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.

the original handler.zip file is corrupted so added a new one
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation dismissed their stale review August 15, 2023 22:09

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

@roger-zhangg
Copy link
Member Author

roger-zhangg commented Aug 15, 2023

added a handler-snapstart.zip in integration test for the original handler.zip seems corrupted. Can we confirm if this make sense, then I'll replace the handler.zip with this new zip

unzip test/aws-lambda/test/handler.zip -d ~/tmp
Archive:  test/aws-lambda/test/handler.zip
error [test/aws-lambda/test/handler.zip]:  missing 12435228 bytes in zipfile
  (attempting to process anyway)
error [test/aws-lambda/test/handler.zip]:  start of central directory not found;
  zipfile corrupt.
  (please check that you have transferred or created the zipfile in the
  appropriate BINARY mode and that you have compiled UnZip properly)

@roger-zhangg
Copy link
Member Author

roger-zhangg commented Aug 15, 2023

Got some strange 503 error in codebuild

aws-cdk: �[2K�[1Gaws-cdk: �[2m$ cdk-build�[22m
cdk-assets: �[2K�[1Gcdk-assets: �[1myarn run v1.22.19�[22m
cdk-assets: �[2K�[1G�[2m$ cdk-test�[22m
aws-cdk: curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 503 
aws-cdk: Error: ./generate.sh exited with error code 22
aws-cdk: Build failed.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

link to the original log

Doesn't have any problem with yarn build locally. Can anyone help to take a look?

@colifran colifran self-requested a review August 15, 2023 23:17
@@ -832,6 +841,7 @@ export class Function extends FunctionBase {
codeSigningConfigArn: props.codeSigningConfig?.codeSigningConfigArn,
architectures: this._architecture ? [this._architecture.name] : undefined,
runtimeManagementConfig: props.runtimeManagementMode?.runtimeManagementConfig,
snapStart: this.configureSnapStart(props),
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, wil check this out

Copy link
Contributor

@colifran colifran left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@roger-zhangg this is looking pretty good so far! See my comments and let me know if you have any questions.

@mergify mergify bot dismissed colifran’s stale review August 16, 2023 21:18

Pull request has been modified.

@roger-zhangg
Copy link
Member Author

@colifran I've updated per our discussion, please take a look when you have time, thanks!

code: lambda.Code.fromAsset(path.join(__dirname, 'handler.zip')),
runtime: lambda.Runtime.JAVA_11,
handler: 'example.Handler::handleRequest',
snapStart: lambda.SnapStartConfig.ON_PUBLISHED_VERSIONS,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@roger-zhangg in case you didn't catch this from the build logs, it looks like the build is failing because you changed the class to SnapStartConf, but didn't update it here.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the catch, I'll update it

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also I wonder is there a local equivalent to this cloud build? So I won't miss next time

Copy link
Contributor

@colifran colifran Aug 16, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not that I'm aware of. If I have a failing build I always use the build logs we generate to understand why it's failing. In this case, at the bottom of the build logs it pointed to the README so I knew to check there.

@roger-zhangg
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks Colin, I think I got what you meant. I'll check out the code first and get to you if I have any problem

@valerena
Copy link
Contributor

@roger-zhangg sorry to be doing this now, but there was some additional context I wasn't aware of regarding the first go at implementing this. Specifically, we were against adding SnapStart as a property on FunctionOptions. The reason for this is that from the perspective of a user, they would see this and want to use it not necessarily knowing all the other requirements such as runtime, architecture, storage size restrictions, etc. The direction we wanted to move this in was to implement SnapStart as a method on the Functionconstruct. This could then be used as: lambdaFunction.enableSnapStart(). This method would then be responsible for performing the necessary validation and enabling SnapStart on the function. Again sorry for recognizing this late. @TheRealAmazonKendra can provide some more context if necessary as they were involved on the previous PR. In the meantime, I'll also think about how this method would work. Let me know if you have any questions.

What's the difference in practice with having "a method" instead of having the validation as part of the constructor? We took inspiration from the existing behavior for the VPC Configuration vpcConfig field, which also has a lot of restrictions and validation.

@valerena
Copy link
Contributor

My main concern about that is: how do customers know what is a property and what is a method? (of course, they will have to look at the documentation). Is there any other property that exists directly in a Lambda function via the API that in CDK is not a field in the constructor? Just so we don't add this as an "exception" from all the other fields that are directly supported.

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state.

2 similar comments
@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state.

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state.

@roger-zhangg
Copy link
Member Author

Hi @colifran , do you have a chance to look into @valerena comments? Thanks!

@colifran
Copy link
Contributor

colifran commented Aug 22, 2023

@roger-zhangg @valerena sorry for the delay. I will get back to you on this today.

@roger-zhangg @valerena I've spent some more time thinking about this and I'm not entirely sure what advantage we gain by making this a method vs. just adding it as a property. After re-reading the initial PR it seems like one of the concerns with making this a property was that there was an assumption that to enable SnapStart, a version has to already be published or the deployment would fail. It looks like further down this was found to not be the case and instead the $latest version of the lambda function would not benefit from SnapStart, but when you publish a new version from it afterwards it will have SnapStart capabilities. As @valerena mentions, do we really gain anything from having this as a method with verification vs. adding this as a property and performing the validation when we configure SnapStart? It seems like we're just moving the validation which is going to be throwing an error one way or another if the configured lambda function doesn't support SnapStart. The current implementation mirrors configureVpc. It looks like we're doing similar verification with code guru and we have added a Runtime property to help determine whether a specific Runtime supports code guru profiling. I'd still like some additional eyes on this - @mrgrain @TheRealAmazonKendra your thoughts on this would be appreciated.

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state.

throw new Error('SnapStart currently only support published versions');
}

if (props.runtime != Runtime.JAVA_11 && props.runtime != Runtime.JAVA_17 ) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@roger-zhangg looks like we're still waiting on some feedback, but pending that the only other change I would make here is to update our Runtime class to have supportsSnapStart as a LambdaRuntimeProp. Then we can add supportsSnapStart as true to any relevant Runtime when it gets added in the future:

export interface LambdaRuntimeProps {
/**
* Whether the ``ZipFile`` (aka inline code) property can be used with this runtime.
* @default false
*/
readonly supportsInlineCode?: boolean;
/**
* Whether the runtime enum is meant to change over time, IE NODEJS_LATEST.
* @default false
*/
readonly isVariable?: boolean;
/**
* The Docker image name to be used for bundling in this runtime.
* @default - the latest docker image "amazon/public.ecr.aws/sam/build-<runtime>" from https://gallery.ecr.aws
*/
readonly bundlingDockerImage?: string;
/**
* Whether this runtime is integrated with and supported for profiling using Amazon CodeGuru Profiler.
* @default false
*/
readonly supportsCodeGuruProfiling?: boolean;

We could then change this check to if (!props.runtime.supportsSnapStart) { //... }

@mrgrain
Copy link
Contributor

mrgrain commented Aug 23, 2023

I think a prop with validation is fine.
We should however add a acknowledgable warning (addWarningV2) that informs users about the need to create a version to get any benefit from it.
See: #26144

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state.

@mergify mergify bot dismissed colifran’s stale review August 24, 2023 17:48

Pull request has been modified.

@roger-zhangg
Copy link
Member Author

Hey @colifran @mrgrain Thank you all for your comments, I've updated the code per your suggestions. Please help to take another look when you are available. Thanks!

// so it can't be checked at function set up time
// SnapStart supports the Java 11 and Java 17 (java11 and java17) managed runtimes.
// See https://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/snapstart.html
if (props.snapStart != SnapStartConf.ON_PUBLISHED_VERSIONS) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Last thing and then we can approve this. Can we remove this? The only way a user can use SnapStartConf is as SnapStartConf.ON_PUBLISHED_VERSIONS

colifran
colifran previously approved these changes Aug 24, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@colifran colifran left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@roger-zhangg Looks good!

@mergify mergify bot dismissed colifran’s stale review August 24, 2023 20:04

Pull request has been modified.

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: 477188f
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Aug 24, 2023

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 356f302 into aws:main Aug 24, 2023
10 checks passed
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation removed the pr/needs-community-review This PR needs a review from a Trusted Community Member or Core Team Member. label Aug 24, 2023
@mriccia
Copy link

mriccia commented Aug 29, 2023

It is great to have SnapStart support with CDK, thank you for this feature.

I have a question about this feature implementation. Looking through the PR it seems that there is no check verifying that Lambda Versioning is enabled.

You can use SnapStart only on published function versions and aliases that point to versions. You can't use SnapStart on a function's unpublished version ($LATEST). Source

IMO it would make sense to either print out a warning, or even raise an error if SnapStart is configured without Versions being enabled. Would it be possible to consider this improvement?

@valerena
Copy link
Contributor

@mriccia One thing to know is that even though SnapStart works on published versions, the configuration is at the function level, and it will mean that all future versions of the function will have SnapStart enabled. So you don't really need to have versioning enabled right now for this to come into play in the future (and it doesn't hurt to activate it before having any version).

Having said that, a printed warning related to this was added, not checking the current versioning, but for users to be aware in general: https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/packages/aws-cdk-lib/aws-lambda/lib/function.ts#L1316

Does that make sense to you?

@mriccia
Copy link

mriccia commented Aug 30, 2023

That's great @valerena, yes this warning was what I was looking for (apologies for not spotting it in the code!).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
beginning-contributor [Pilot] contributed between 0-2 PRs to the CDK effort/medium Medium work item – several days of effort feature-request A feature should be added or improved. p2
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Lambda: Support SnapStart
6 participants