Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sensitive map/list members #3065

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 17, 2024
Merged

Sensitive map/list members #3065

merged 6 commits into from
Jul 17, 2024

Conversation

alextwoods
Copy link
Contributor

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

  1. To make sure we include your contribution in the release notes, please make sure to add description entry for your changes in the "unreleased changes" section of the CHANGELOG.md file (at corresponding gem). For the description entry, please make sure it lives in one line and starts with Feature or Issue in the correct format.

  2. For generated code changes, please checkout below instructions first:
    https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-ruby/blob/version-3/CONTRIBUTING.md

Thank you for your contribution!

@alextwoods alextwoods requested a review from mullermp July 15, 2024 18:38
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
Unreleased Changes
------------------

* Issue - Ensure that nested sensitive members are filtered.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It should be lists and maps too right?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

actually the fix in core only applies to nested sensitive members. the codegen changes are what fixes lists and maps.

@alextwoods alextwoods merged commit 0c33950 into version-3 Jul 17, 2024
28 checks passed
@alextwoods alextwoods deleted the sensitve_map_list_members branch July 17, 2024 15:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants