-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 143
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ability to ignore some requests from httplib #263
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e5593f0
Expand ability to ignore some httplib calls.
jonathangreen 57898ce
Add tests.
jonathangreen cf9f93d
Add glob match to httplib ignore hostname.
jonathangreen eceaae2
Clean up httplib tests.
jonathangreen f1b2989
Use full module path for subclass.
jonathangreen 7a93c1a
Add documentation for ignoring httplib requests
jonathangreen 2efae24
Merge branch 'master' into httplib_ignore
jonathangreen ff94da3
Code review feedback
jonathangreen File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ | ||
from .patch import patch, unpatch | ||
from .patch import patch, unpatch, add_ignored, reset_ignored | ||
|
||
__all__ = ['patch', 'unpatch'] | ||
__all__ = ['patch', 'unpatch', 'add_ignored', 'reset_ignored'] |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm conflicted here - I know that using Python's built-in string matching as we are now will be faster than using
fnmatch
, but it would be awkward to not use this ignore mechanism and special-case /GetSamplingRules and /SamplingTargets.I guess the added latency is kinda peanuts compared to the actual network request, so it's probably ok, but what do you think @srprash?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel using
fnmatch
for ignoring /GetSamplingRules and /SamplingTarget is okay since it fits well in the overall mechanism to ignore any URL. I'm not really aware of the latency offnmatch
but my guess is that special casing the sampling urls and then matching the user urls would be roughly equivalent and won't cause much of a difference here.