Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFC: Environmental Sustainability Mode / Carbon-Aware Mode #675

Closed
JacobValdemar opened this issue Sep 14, 2023 · 6 comments · May be fixed by aws/karpenter-provider-aws#6322
Closed

RFC: Environmental Sustainability Mode / Carbon-Aware Mode #675

JacobValdemar opened this issue Sep 14, 2023 · 6 comments · May be fixed by aws/karpenter-provider-aws#6322
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@JacobValdemar
Copy link

JacobValdemar commented Sep 14, 2023

Abstract ("TLDR")

This RFC proposes the addition of an "Environmental Sustainability Mode" to Karpenter. When Environmental Sustainability Mode is enabled, Karpenter optimize scaling decisions based on carbon emissions. This feature will help organizations make more environmentally responsible choices when it comes to provisioning and scaling their Kubernetes clusters.

Edit (22-04-2024): I finished my master's thesis where I have implemented this. Check it out here: https://github.com/JacobValdemar/carbon-efficient-karpenter-thesis

Motivation

Climate Change is important. As the global community continues to focus on reducing carbon emissions and environmental impact, it is crucial for technology projects to align with these objectives. Data centers, where Kubernetes clusters typically run, are significant contributors to carbon emissions. Optimizing node provisioning to minimize the carbon footprint of Kubernetes clusters is becoming increasingly important.

By implementing an Environmental Sustainability Mode in Karpenter, we can empower Kubernetes Administrators to make environmentally conscious decisions when managing their Kubernetes clusters.

Proposal

When this mode is enabled, Karpenter may minimize the following two metrics (independently):

  • embodied carbon emissions: Manufacturing emissions (CO2e) amortized over instance lifetime divided by how long we use the instance
  • operational carbon emissions: Carbon emitted by electricity grid to produce electricity for the instance in the region where it is used, multiplied by PUE

Usage

It could be enabled like this:

kind: Provisioner
metadata:
  name: default
spec:
  ...
  environmentalSustainability:
    enabled: true

or like this:

helm upgrade --install karpenter ...
  --set environmentalSustainability.enabled=1

I don't know what is the best solution. Any input on this?

Default?

I have been made aware, that many seem to back Karpenter's move to CNCF (kubernetes/org#4258) based on opportunities within sustainability. That could be an argument for making Karpenter sustainability-first and enabling this feature by default. In that case, it could be possible that this feature is not developed as an "optional mode", but more as an evolution of Karpenter. We would of course need to discuss the implications of that before we pursue that path. However, for now, I will assume that the feature is developed as a non-default mode.

Implementation

I will be doing the implementation as part of my master's thesis.

Possible methods:

Open question: Where exactly to integrate this into Karpenter?

Naming

I am unsure about what this mode should be called. Here are the options that are currently on the table:

Resources

@JacobValdemar JacobValdemar added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Sep 14, 2023
@ellistarn
Copy link
Contributor

Open question: Where exactly to integrate this into Karpenter?

Worth exploring: #693

@njtran njtran transferred this issue from aws/karpenter-provider-aws Nov 2, 2023
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 31, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Mar 1, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue with /reopen
  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close not-planned

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 31, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned".

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue with /reopen
  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close not-planned

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tomkerkhove
Copy link

What was the outcome on this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants