Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add an option in local model trainer to remove inputs and container artifacts #4978

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pintaoz-aws
Copy link
Contributor

…using local model trainer

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:

Testing done:

Merge Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.

General

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I certify that the changes I am introducing will be backward compatible, and I have discussed concerns about this, if any, with the Python SDK team
  • I used the commit message format described in CONTRIBUTING
  • I have passed the region in to all S3 and STS clients that I've initialized as part of this change.
  • I have updated any necessary documentation, including READMEs and API docs (if appropriate)

Tests

  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if appropriate)
  • I have added unit and/or integration tests as appropriate to ensure backward compatibility of the changes
  • I have checked that my tests are not configured for a specific region or account (if appropriate)
  • I have used unique_name_from_base to create resource names in integ tests (if appropriate)
  • If adding any dependency in requirements.txt files, I have spell checked and ensured they exist in PyPi

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@pintaoz-aws pintaoz-aws requested a review from a team as a code owner December 26, 2024 04:16
@pintaoz-aws pintaoz-aws requested a review from benieric December 26, 2024 04:16
@@ -203,6 +203,8 @@ class ModelTrainer(BaseModel):
local_container_root (Optional[str]):
The local root directory to store artifacts from a training job launched in
"LOCAL_CONTAINER" mode.
remove_inputs_and_container_artifacts (Optional[bool]):
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This option seems to be specifically for local mode? Can we not just do the cleanup for local mode by default?
We should be very careful in expanding the input param list for ModelTrainer (we shouldn't unless User experience warrants it).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

Is there any advantage we provide by keeping the artifacts stored?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the users may need to check the environment variables and hyperparameters in each container to debug

Copy link
Member

@mufaddal-rohawala mufaddal-rohawala left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@@ -108,6 +108,8 @@ class _LocalContainer(BaseModel):
container_entrypoint: Optional[List[str]]
container_arguments: Optional[List[str]]

_temperary_folders: List[str] = []
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: temporary_folders

@@ -203,6 +203,8 @@ class ModelTrainer(BaseModel):
local_container_root (Optional[str]):
The local root directory to store artifacts from a training job launched in
"LOCAL_CONTAINER" mode.
remove_inputs_and_container_artifacts (Optional[bool]):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

Is there any advantage we provide by keeping the artifacts stored?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants