Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs/current output #606

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 21, 2024
Merged

Docs/current output #606

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 21, 2024

Conversation

ccamel
Copy link
Member

@ccamel ccamel commented Mar 21, 2024

This PR makes the current_output/1 predicate described and tested through a thorough feature test that demonstrates various scenarios.

Additionally, it refactors the tests to use the response returned by the module's logic, rather than just the answer. This enables the testing of both gas consumption and the user output.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Restructured YAML output format for predicates related to Bech32 addresses, block height, block time, and more, adding height and gas_used fields for detailed responses.
    • Adjusted sidebar positions for improved navigation.
  • New Features
    • Testing features added for current_output/1 predicate, covering output stream interactions and UTF-8 character handling.
  • Refactor
    • Updated response structures for various features to include height and gas_used fields, enhancing response clarity.
    • Internal logic and test suite modified to accommodate new types and structures, improving reliability.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Corrected reference in registry.go for the "current_output/1" key for proper functionality.

@ccamel ccamel self-assigned this Mar 21, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 21, 2024

Note

Reviews Paused

Use the following commands to manage reviews:

  • @coderabbitai resume to resume automatic reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a single review.

Walkthrough

The recent updates focus on enhancing response structures across various predicates and features, mainly by including height and gas_used fields. Additionally, there's a notable adjustment in the sidebar_position for several documents, alongside the introduction of new functionalities and reorganized data formats to improve clarity and processing logic. These changes collectively aim at enriching the data provided in responses and refining documentation organization.

Changes

Files Summary
.../bech32_address_2.md, .../block_height_1.md, .../block_time_1.md, .../consult_1.md, .../open_3.md, .../open_4.md Updated to include height and gas_used fields in responses, with restructured answer sections.
.../current_output_1.md, .../current_output_1.feature Introduced testing for the current_output/1 predicate with scenarios for writing to the output stream.
.../did_components_2.md, .../ecdsa_verify_4.md, .../eddsa_verify_4.md, .../hex_bytes_2.md, .../json_prolog_2.md, .../open_4.md, .../read_string_3.md, .../source_file_1.md, .../string_bytes_3.md, .../uri_encoded_3.md Updated sidebar_position values.
x/logic/interpreter/registry.go, x/logic/predicate/io.go Updated references and introduced CurrentOutput predicate.
x/logic/keeper/features/... Updated feature files to include additional fields in responses and modified response structures.
x/logic/keeper/features_test.go Enhanced test configurations and structures to accommodate new changes.

"In the realm of code, where logic intertwines,
A rabbit hopped through, leaving updates behind.
🐰 With each leap and bound, fields grew, structured anew,
Sidebar positions climbed, as documentation flew.
Through streams of data, in clarity we trust,
Celebrating changes, in bytes we must."
🎉📜✨

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 7

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 113bd38 and aa5a9b5.
Files selected for processing (26)
  • docs/predicate/bech32_address_2.md (7 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/block_height_1.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/block_time_1.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/consult_1.md (3 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/current_output_1.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/did_components_2.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/ecdsa_verify_4.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/eddsa_verify_4.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/hex_bytes_2.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/json_prolog_2.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/open_3.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/open_4.md (8 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/read_string_3.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/source_file_1.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/string_bytes_3.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/uri_encoded_3.md (1 hunks)
  • x/logic/interpreter/registry.go (1 hunks)
  • x/logic/keeper/features/bech32_address_2.feature (17 hunks)
  • x/logic/keeper/features/block_height_1.feature (2 hunks)
  • x/logic/keeper/features/block_time_1.feature (2 hunks)
  • x/logic/keeper/features/consult_1.feature (3 hunks)
  • x/logic/keeper/features/current_output_1.feature (1 hunks)
  • x/logic/keeper/features/open_3.feature (1 hunks)
  • x/logic/keeper/features/open_4.feature (11 hunks)
  • x/logic/keeper/features_test.go (7 hunks)
  • x/logic/predicate/io.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 68
docs/predicate/source_file_1.md (1)
  • 2-2: The update of sidebar_position from 18 to 19 is appropriate for maintaining the logical sequence in the documentation's navigational structure.
docs/predicate/hex_bytes_2.md (1)
  • 2-2: The update of sidebar_position from 13 to 14 is appropriate for maintaining the logical sequence in the documentation's navigational structure.
docs/predicate/json_prolog_2.md (1)
  • 2-2: The update of sidebar_position from 14 to 15 is appropriate for maintaining the logical sequence in the documentation's navigational structure.
docs/predicate/uri_encoded_3.md (1)
  • 2-2: The update of sidebar_position from 20 to 21 is appropriate for maintaining the logical sequence in the documentation's navigational structure.
x/logic/predicate/io.go (1)
  • 5-23: The implementation and documentation of the CurrentOutput predicate are clear and concise, effectively enhancing the module's functionality and usability.
docs/predicate/read_string_3.md (1)
  • 2-2: The update of sidebar_position from 17 to 18 is appropriate for maintaining the logical sequence in the documentation's navigational structure.
docs/predicate/string_bytes_3.md (1)
  • 2-2: The update of sidebar_position from 19 to 20 is appropriate for maintaining the logical sequence in the documentation's navigational structure.
x/logic/keeper/features/open_3.feature (1)
  • 33-39: The addition of height and gas_used fields, along with the restructured answer, enhances the detail and utility of the module's logic, aligning with the PR's objectives.
docs/predicate/did_components_2.md (2)
  • 2-2: The change in sidebar_position from 10 to 11 is noted and appears appropriate for the updated documentation organization.
  • 1-5: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [6-34]

The documentation for did_components/2 is clear and accurately describes the predicate's functionality, signature, and provides relevant examples.

x/logic/keeper/features/block_height_1.feature (2)
  • 18-26: The addition of height and gas_used fields to the response structure enhances the detail and utility of the module's logic, aligning with the PR objectives.
  • 45-53: The consistent application of the updated response structure in different scenarios demonstrates thorough testing and attention to detail.
x/logic/keeper/features/block_time_1.feature (2)
  • 18-26: The inclusion of height and gas_used fields in the response structure for block_time/1 is a valuable enhancement, providing more detailed insights into the block time checks.
  • 46-54: The consistent application of the updated response structure across different scenarios ensures thorough testing and enhances the module's data analysis capabilities.
docs/predicate/block_height_1.md (2)
  • 46-54: The documentation updates for block_height/1, including the addition of height and gas_used fields in the response, provide clear and detailed information that enhances the utility of the predicate.
  • 81-89: The consistent documentation of the updated response structure across different scenarios demonstrates thoroughness and enhances the clarity of the predicate's functionality.
docs/predicate/open_3.md (2)
  • 2-2: The update in sidebar_position to 17 appears appropriate for the updated documentation organization.
  • 61-71: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [6-70]

The documentation for open/3 clearly describes the predicate's functionality, signature, and provides a relevant example. The updates to the response structure are accurately documented.

docs/predicate/eddsa_verify_4.md (2)
  • 2-2: The change in sidebar_position from 12 to 13 is noted and appears appropriate for the updated documentation organization.
  • 1-5: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [6-34]

The documentation for eddsa_verify/4 is clear and accurately describes the predicate's functionality, signature, and provides relevant examples.

docs/predicate/block_time_1.md (2)
  • 46-54: The documentation updates for block_time/1, including the addition of height and gas_used fields in the response, provide clear and detailed information that enhances the utility of the predicate.
  • 82-90: The consistent documentation of the updated response structure across different scenarios demonstrates thoroughness and enhances the clarity of the predicate's functionality.
docs/predicate/ecdsa_verify_4.md (2)
  • 2-2: The change in sidebar_position from 11 to 12 is noted and appears appropriate for the updated documentation organization.
  • 1-5: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [6-34]

The documentation for ecdsa_verify/4 is clear and accurately describes the predicate's functionality, signature, and provides relevant examples.

x/logic/keeper/features/current_output_1.feature (3)
  • 46-59: In the Prolog program, after writing a message to the user stream, a newline character is explicitly added. This is a good practice for readability when multiple messages are written, ensuring each message starts on a new line.
  • 85-91: The JSON configuration correctly sets a limit for the user output size. However, ensure that the system correctly handles cases where the output is exactly at the limit or slightly over, to avoid partial character encoding issues, especially with multi-byte characters like UTF-8.
  • 124-130: The scenario for writing UTF-8 characters with a limit is well-designed, highlighting the importance of considering byte size rather than character count. This is crucial for correctly handling multi-byte characters and avoiding unexpected truncation.
docs/predicate/current_output_1.md (2)
  • 126-126: When describing the scenario with a limit, it's clear and informative, correctly setting expectations for the output behavior. This helps users understand how the system will behave when the output exceeds the configured limit.
  • 170-173: The explanation of UTF-8 character handling in relation to output limits is very informative, providing a clear example of how multi-byte characters are counted against the limit. This is an important detail for users working with diverse character sets.
docs/predicate/consult_1.md (1)
  • 67-75: Including height and gas_used in the response structure provides valuable information for understanding the execution context and resource consumption. This enhancement aligns with the PR objectives to enrich response data.
x/logic/keeper/features/consult_1.feature (3)
  • 36-44: The inclusion of height and gas_used in the response structure is a significant improvement, providing more context about the execution. This aligns with the PR objectives to enhance the detail and utility of the module's logic.
  • 78-79: The query syntax is consistent and well-formatted, demonstrating the use of the consult/1 predicate in a complex scenario. This example is valuable for users looking to understand how to chain consultations.
  • 133-144: The scenario for consulting several Prolog programs showcases the flexibility and power of the consult/1 predicate. The detailed response structure, including height, gas_used, and variable substitutions, provides a comprehensive view of the execution outcome.
docs/predicate/bech32_address_2.md (1)
  • 45-53: The addition of height and gas_used fields in the YAML output format is a significant enhancement, providing more detailed information about the execution context.

Ensure that the documentation accurately reflects these changes across all relevant predicates and scenarios.

x/logic/interpreter/registry.go (1)
  • 53-53: The update from engine.CurrentOutput to predicate.CurrentOutput for the "current_output/1" key in the registry map aligns with the PR's objective to enhance the current_output/1 predicate.

Ensure that this change is thoroughly tested to confirm that the new implementation behaves as expected.

x/logic/keeper/features_test.go (6)
  • 15-15: The addition of the "dario.cat/mergo" import for merging configurations is a good practice for handling complex configurations in tests.

Ensure that the mergo library is used consistently and correctly throughout the test suite.

  • 63-65: The modifications to the testCase struct, including the addition of the params field and changing the got field type, are necessary to support the updated testing framework.

Ensure that these changes are reflected in all test cases and that the new structure is utilized effectively.

  • 112-127: The givenTheModuleConfiguration function, which handles module configuration by merging provided JSON configuration with existing parameters, is a robust approach to configuring test cases.

Consider adding error handling for JSON unmarshalling and mergo.Merge to ensure robustness in test setup.

  • 199-199: Updating the got field within the whenTheQueryIsRun function to store the response aligns with the changes made to the testCase struct.

Ensure that the updated got field is utilized correctly in assertions to verify the outcomes of test cases.

  • 217-217: The use of yaml.Unmarshal in the theAnswerWeGetIs function to compare expected and actual responses is a good practice for readability and maintainability of tests.

Verify that the YAML format is consistently used for specifying expected responses in test scenarios.

  • 304-304: Setting module parameters in the newQueryClient function using logicKeeper.SetParams is crucial for ensuring that tests run with the correct configurations.

Ensure that all relevant parameters are set before executing test cases to avoid unexpected behavior.

docs/predicate/open_4.md (8)
  • 2-2: The update to sidebar_position from 15 to 16 is noted. This change should ensure that the documentation remains navigable and that the predicates are presented in a logical sequence, as mentioned in the PR objectives.
  • 102-110: The addition of height and gas_used fields in the YAML structure of the answer section is a significant enhancement. It aligns with the PR's objective to facilitate a more detailed analysis of gas consumption and user output. Ensure that these fields are consistently added across all relevant predicates to maintain uniformity in the documentation.
  • 154-162: Similar to the previous comment, the inclusion of height and gas_used fields here is consistent with the PR objectives and enhances the detail provided in the documentation. This consistency in updates across examples is commendable.
  • 204-212: Again, the consistent addition of height and gas_used fields in this scenario's answer section is noted and aligns with the PR's goals. This consistency in documentation updates is crucial for user clarity and understanding.
  • 231-237: The inclusion of height and gas_used fields in the scenario of trying to open a non-existing resource is consistent with the PR's objectives. This addition across various scenarios ensures that users have a clear understanding of gas consumption and other relevant metrics.
  • 257-263: The addition of height and gas_used fields in the scenario of trying to open a resource for writing, where the resource does not allow writing, is consistent with the PR's objectives. This consistency in documentation updates is crucial for user clarity and understanding.
  • 283-289: The inclusion of height and gas_used fields in the scenario of trying to open a resource for appending, where the resource does not allow appending, is consistent with the PR's objectives. This consistency in documentation updates is crucial for user clarity and understanding.
  • 308-314: The addition of height and gas_used fields in the scenario of trying to open a resource with incorrect options is consistent with the PR's objectives. This consistency in documentation updates is crucial for user clarity and understanding.
x/logic/keeper/features/open_4.feature (9)
  • 45-46: The addition of height and gas_used fields in the response structure is a significant enhancement. It provides valuable information for analyzing gas consumption and the execution context. Ensure that these fields are consistently populated across all scenarios to maintain uniformity in the response structure.
  • 88-89: Including height and gas_used in the response for reading the content of an existing resource is consistent with the enhancements made across other scenarios. This consistency is crucial for a unified user experience and data analysis.
  • 129-130: The consistent inclusion of height and gas_used in the base64-encoded content reading scenario further demonstrates the thorough application of these enhancements across different use cases. This consistency aids in the predictability of the response structure.
  • 151-152: The handling of non-existing resources with the inclusion of height and gas_used fields in the response is appropriate. It ensures that even in error scenarios, the response structure remains consistent, providing valuable execution context information.
  • 172-173: The response to attempting to open a resource for writing, which includes height and gas_used, aligns with the enhancements made across other scenarios. This consistency in handling different types of access attempts (read, write, append) is commendable.
  • 193-194: Similarly, the response to attempting to open a resource for appending, including height and gas_used, maintains the consistency observed in other scenarios. This uniform handling of error scenarios enhances the predictability and usability of the response structure.
  • 214-215: The inclusion of height and gas_used in the response to opening a resource with incorrect options demonstrates a comprehensive application of these enhancements. It's important to ensure that these fields are accurately populated to reflect the actual execution context.
  • 234-235: The response to opening a resource with an incorrect mode, including height and gas_used, is consistent with the enhancements applied across other scenarios. This uniformity in error handling is crucial for a consistent user experience.
  • 253-254: The handling of insufficiently instantiated arguments with the inclusion of height and gas_used in the response is appropriate. It ensures that even in scenarios where the query cannot be fully executed, the response structure remains consistent and informative.
x/logic/keeper/features/bech32_address_2.feature (10)
  • 18-19: The addition of height and gas_used fields in the response for decoding Bech32 addresses into their Address Pair representation is a valuable enhancement. It provides critical information for analyzing gas consumption and the execution context. Ensure these fields are consistently populated across all scenarios.
  • 41-42: Including height and gas_used in the response for decoding Hrp and Address from a Bech32 address is consistent with the enhancements made across other scenarios. This consistency is crucial for a unified user experience and data analysis.
  • 65-66: The consistent inclusion of height and gas_used in the scenario for extracting the address from a Bech32 address string demonstrates the thorough application of these enhancements across different use cases. This consistency aids in the predictability of the response structure.
  • 86-87: Encoding an Address Pair into a Bech32 Address with the inclusion of height and gas_used aligns with the enhancements made across other scenarios. This consistency in handling different types of operations (decoding, encoding) is commendable.
  • 111-112: Checking if a Bech32 address is part of the okp4 protocol with the inclusion of height and gas_used maintains the consistency observed in other scenarios. This uniform handling of different query types enhances the predictability and usability of the response structure.
  • 132-133: The response to checking address equality, including height and gas_used, demonstrates a comprehensive application of these enhancements. It's important to ensure that these fields are accurately populated to reflect the actual execution context.
  • 165-166: Decoding the HRP from a Bech32 address with the inclusion of height and gas_used is consistent with the enhancements applied across other scenarios. This uniformity in handling different query types is crucial for a consistent user experience.
  • 188-189: The system's response to an incorrect Bech32 address format, including height and gas_used, aligns with the objective to enhance the detail and utility of the module's logic. This inclusion in error scenarios ensures that the response structure remains informative and consistent.
  • 209-210: Handling incorrect Bech32 address types with the inclusion of height and gas_used in the response is appropriate. It ensures that even in scenarios where the query cannot be fully executed due to type errors, the response structure remains consistent and informative.
  • 229-230: The response to not sufficiently instantiated queries, including height and gas_used, is consistent with the enhancements made across other scenarios. This uniform handling of instantiation errors enhances the predictability and usability of the response structure.

docs/predicate/current_output_1.md Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/predicate/current_output_1.md Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/predicate/consult_1.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 3

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 113bd38 and f9ddfcf.
Files selected for processing (26)
  • docs/predicate/bech32_address_2.md (7 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/block_height_1.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/block_time_1.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/consult_1.md (3 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/current_output_1.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/did_components_2.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/ecdsa_verify_4.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/eddsa_verify_4.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/hex_bytes_2.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/json_prolog_2.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/open_3.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/open_4.md (8 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/read_string_3.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/source_file_1.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/string_bytes_3.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/predicate/uri_encoded_3.md (1 hunks)
  • x/logic/interpreter/registry.go (1 hunks)
  • x/logic/keeper/features/bech32_address_2.feature (17 hunks)
  • x/logic/keeper/features/block_height_1.feature (2 hunks)
  • x/logic/keeper/features/block_time_1.feature (2 hunks)
  • x/logic/keeper/features/consult_1.feature (3 hunks)
  • x/logic/keeper/features/current_output_1.feature (1 hunks)
  • x/logic/keeper/features/open_3.feature (1 hunks)
  • x/logic/keeper/features/open_4.feature (11 hunks)
  • x/logic/keeper/features_test.go (7 hunks)
  • x/logic/predicate/io.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (10)
  • x/logic/interpreter/registry.go
  • x/logic/keeper/features/bech32_address_2.feature
  • x/logic/keeper/features/block_height_1.feature
  • x/logic/keeper/features/block_time_1.feature
  • x/logic/keeper/features/consult_1.feature
  • x/logic/keeper/features/current_output_1.feature
  • x/logic/keeper/features/open_3.feature
  • x/logic/keeper/features/open_4.feature
  • x/logic/keeper/features_test.go
  • x/logic/predicate/io.go
Additional comments: 20
docs/predicate/source_file_1.md (1)
  • 2-2: Change in sidebar_position from 18 to 19 is noted and appropriate for the documentation reorganization. Given that this file is auto-generated, the grammatical issues flagged by static analysis are considered false positives and do not require action.
docs/predicate/hex_bytes_2.md (1)
  • 2-2: Change in sidebar_position from 13 to 14 is noted and appropriate for the documentation reorganization. Given that this file is auto-generated, the grammatical issues flagged by static analysis are considered false positives and do not require action.
docs/predicate/json_prolog_2.md (1)
  • 2-2: Change in sidebar_position from 14 to 15 is noted and appropriate for the documentation reorganization. Given that this file is auto-generated, the grammatical and spelling issues flagged by static analysis are considered false positives and do not require action.
docs/predicate/uri_encoded_3.md (1)
  • 2-2: Change in sidebar_position from 20 to 21 is noted and appropriate for the documentation reorganization. Given that this file is auto-generated, the grammatical issues flagged by static analysis are considered false positives and do not require action.
docs/predicate/read_string_3.md (1)
  • 2-2: Change in sidebar_position from 17 to 18 is noted and appropriate for the documentation reorganization. Given that this file is auto-generated, the grammatical issues and the possible missing article flagged by static analysis are considered false positives and do not require action.
docs/predicate/string_bytes_3.md (1)
  • 2-2: Change in sidebar_position from 19 to 20 is noted and appropriate for the documentation reorganization. Given that this file is auto-generated, the grammatical issues and the possible misuse of "is" flagged by static analysis are considered false positives and do not require action.
docs/predicate/did_components_2.md (1)
  • 2-2: Change in sidebar_position from 10 to 11 is noted and appropriate for the documentation reorganization. Given that this file is auto-generated, the grammatical issues, the possible verb agreement error, and the possible spelling mistakes flagged by static analysis are considered false positives and do not require action.
docs/predicate/block_height_1.md (2)
  • 46-54: The inclusion of height and gas_used fields in the response structure for the block_height/1 predicate is a valuable enhancement, providing more detailed information for block height checks.
  • 81-89: The updates to include height and gas_used fields in the response for checking if the block height is greater than a certain value are well-implemented and enhance the utility of the predicate.
docs/predicate/open_3.md (2)
  • 2-2: The update to the sidebar position is appropriate for maintaining the logical organization of the documentation.
  • 64-70: The inclusion of height and gas_used fields in the response structure is a valuable addition for enhancing the detail and utility of the module's logic.
docs/predicate/eddsa_verify_4.md (1)
  • 2-2: The adjustment of the sidebar position to 13 helps in keeping the documentation well-organized.
docs/predicate/block_time_1.md (1)
  • 46-54: The inclusion of height and gas_used fields in the response structure enhances the detail and utility of the module's logic, providing more comprehensive data analysis capabilities.
docs/predicate/ecdsa_verify_4.md (1)
  • 2-2: Adjusting the sidebar position to 12 is appropriate for maintaining the logical organization of the documentation.
docs/predicate/current_output_1.md (2)
  • 2-2: The update to the sidebar position is appropriate for maintaining the logical organization of the documentation.
  • 28-215: The detailed examples provided effectively showcase the current_output/1 predicate's functionality, including handling output size limits and UTF-8 characters. These examples are valuable for understanding the predicate's utility in various scenarios.
docs/predicate/consult_1.md (1)
  • 67-75: The inclusion of height and gas_used fields in the response structure is a valuable addition for enhancing the detail and utility of the module's logic.
docs/predicate/bech32_address_2.md (1)
  • 45-53: The YAML output format has been updated to include height and gas_used fields. This change aligns with the PR objectives to enhance the detail and utility of the module's logic.
docs/predicate/open_4.md (2)
  • 2-2: The sidebar position has been updated from 15 to 16. This change likely reflects an updated organization of content within the documentation.
  • 102-110: The YAML output format has been updated to include height and gas_used fields in the answer section. This change enhances the detail provided in the documentation and aligns with the PR objectives.

docs/predicate/bech32_address_2.md Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/predicate/open_4.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@amimart amimart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@ccamel
Copy link
Member Author

ccamel commented Mar 21, 2024

@coderabbitai pause

@ccamel ccamel merged commit 00b46bb into main Mar 21, 2024
19 checks passed
@ccamel ccamel deleted the docs/current-output branch March 21, 2024 17:11
@bot-anik
Copy link
Member

bot-anik commented Apr 2, 2024

🎉 This PR is included in version 7.1.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants