Style/tech doc #240
Merged
Style/tech doc #240
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MdechampG
approved these changes
Jun 21, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you @ccamel. Yes I will see with @ManonPoint26 all the modifications we need to do before creating a dedicated issue.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR brings some minor changes:
tech-docintotechnical-documentationBefore:
After:
NB1: The current style is still not 100% correct, and there will be a need for further improvements, which can be addressed through additional PRs.
NB2: This fix is necessary for the writing of the technical part of the site.