Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: use faster-hex instead of hex-simd #198

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 23, 2022
Merged

refactor: use faster-hex instead of hex-simd #198

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 23, 2022

Conversation

KaoImin
Copy link
Contributor

@KaoImin KaoImin commented Mar 23, 2022

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Which docs this PR relation:

Ref #

Which toolchain this PR adaption:

No Breaking Change

Special notes for your reviewer:

@KaoImin KaoImin changed the title refactor: use faster hex instead of hex-simd refactor: use faster-hex instead of hex-simd Mar 23, 2022
@KaoImin KaoImin requested a review from driftluo March 23, 2022 02:58
@KaoImin KaoImin temporarily deployed to chaos March 23, 2022 03:00 Inactive
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #198 (aa36650) into main (fdcad51) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #198   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   42.62%   42.62%           
=======================================
  Files          87       87           
  Lines        5971     5973    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits         2545     2546    +1     
- Misses       3426     3427    +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
protocol/src/types/mod.rs 0.00% <ø> (ø)
protocol/src/codec/mod.rs 60.00% <100.00%> (+3.47%) ⬆️
core/mempool/src/tx_wrapper.rs 87.50% <0.00%> (-1.79%) ⬇️

@KaoImin KaoImin merged commit a3a0bce into main Mar 23, 2022
@KaoImin KaoImin deleted the hex branch March 23, 2022 14:25
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants