Allow rights for users #316
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates to the Azimutt application enhance code clarity, improve role management, and streamline data retrieval processes. Key modifications include renaming functions for better semantic understanding, optimizing preload operations, and adding role fields to user and organization models. These changes aim to improve maintainability and user experience while preserving core functionalities of the application. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Controller
participant Service
participant Database
User->>Controller: Initiate action (e.g., create member)
Controller->>Service: Validate user and organization context
Service->>Database: Update or retrieve member information
Database-->>Service: Return result
Service-->>Controller: Send back response
Controller-->>User: Display result
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (5)
backend/lib/azimutt/organizations/organization_invitation.ex (1)
25-25: Therolefield is not being validated.The recent changes include the
rolefield in thecreate_changesetfunction, but there is no validation for this field. It is important to ensure that therolefield is properly validated to avoid invalid data.
- Add
validate_required([:role])to ensure therolefield is present.- Consider adding other relevant validations for the
rolefield as needed.Analysis chain
LGTM! Ensure proper validation of the new field.
The
create_changesetfunction has been updated to include therolefield. Verify that the new field is properly validated and used in the application.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the validation of the new `role` field in the codebase. # Test: Search for the validation of the `role` field. Expect: Proper validation across the codebase. rg --type elixir 'validate_required\(\[:role\]'Length of output: 49
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the validation of the new `role` field in the codebase. # Test: Search for other common validation patterns for the `role` field. rg --type elixir 'validate_\w+\(\[:role\]' rg --type elixir 'validate_\w+\(\[:sent_to, :role\]' rg --type elixir 'validate_\w+\(\[:sent_to\]'Length of output: 245
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for custom validations for the `role` field. # Test: Search for custom validation functions that might include `role`. rg --type elixir 'defp validate_\w+\(.*role.*\)'Length of output: 50
frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Models/ErdConf.elm (2)
4-4: Ensure consistent naming for imported modules.Consider renaming the alias
UserRoleto avoid confusion with the exposedUserRoletype.- import Models.UserRole as UserRole exposing (UserRole) + import Models.UserRole exposing (UserRole)
24-25: Update documentation to reflect the new parameter.The function documentation should be updated to reflect the new
UserRoleparameter and its impact on thesaveandsharingfields.{-| Creates an ErdConf configuration based on the presence of a token and the user's role. -} project : Maybe ProjectTokenId -> UserRole -> ErdConfbackend/lib/azimutt_web/controllers/organization_member_controller.ex (2)
91-108: Missing organization plan handling in theremoveaction.The
removeaction inorganization_member_controller.exdoes not call theget_organization_planfunction. This means the organization plan handling is not integrated as intended.
backend/lib/azimutt_web/controllers/organization_member_controller.ex:removeactionAnalysis chain
Verify the organization plan handling in the
removeaction.Ensure that the organization plan handling is correctly integrated and enhances the functionality as intended.
Verify the integration of
get_organization_planin theremoveaction.Ensure that the
get_organization_planfunction is called in theremoveaction oforganization_member_controller.exto handle the organization plan correctly.
Verify the
get_organization_plancall within theremoveaction.Ensure that the
get_organization_planfunction is called within theremoveaction oforganization_member_controller.exto handle the organization plan correctly.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the organization plan handling in the `remove` action. # Test: Search for the `get_organization_plan` function definition and usages. Expect: Correct implementation and usage. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'def get_organization_plan'Length of output: 599
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of `get_organization_plan` in the `remove` action. # Test: Search for the `get_organization_plan` function call in the `organization_member_controller.ex` file. rg 'get_organization_plan' backend/lib/azimutt_web/controllers/organization_member_controller.exLength of output: 417
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `get_organization_plan` call within the `remove` action. # Test: Search for the `remove` function definition and check for `get_organization_plan` call within it. rg -A 20 'def remove' backend/lib/azimutt_web/controllers/organization_member_controller.exLength of output: 1073
56-75: Missing organization plan handling in thecancel_invitationaction.The
cancel_invitationfunction does not include any calls toget_organization_plan, which means the organization plan handling is not integrated as intended.
- Ensure that the
get_organization_planfunction is called within thecancel_invitationaction to handle organization plans correctly.Analysis chain
Verify the organization plan handling in the
cancel_invitationaction.Ensure that the organization plan handling is correctly integrated and enhances the functionality as intended.
Verify the organization plan handling in the
cancel_invitationaction.Ensure that the
get_organization_planfunction is used within theorganization_member_controller.exfile to handle the organization plan correctly.
The changes are consistent with the rest of the codebase.
The
user_projectfunction is only defined inbackend/lib/azimutt_web/views/website_view.exand is not used elsewhere in the codebase. This confirms that the changes are consistent.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `user_project` function. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Consistent usage with the new implementation. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'user_project'Length of output: 522
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all occurrences of `user_project` in the codebase. rg --type elixir 'user_project'Length of output: 127
9-13: LGTM! But verify the changes.The
user_organizationfunction correctly maps overuser.membersto extract organizations and finds the organization by its ID.However, ensure that the changes are consistent with the rest of the codebase.
Verification successful
Verify the usage of
user_organizationfunction across the codebase.The
user_organizationfunction is defined correctly, but we need to ensure that its usage is consistent with the new implementation.
The
user_organizationfunction is used consistently with the new implementation.The usage of the
user_organizationfunction inbackend/lib/azimutt_web/templates/layout/_scripts.html.heexis consistent with the new implementation.
backend/lib/azimutt_web/templates/layout/_scripts.html.heex: The function is called with@current_userand@conn.params["organization_id"], and the result is processed correctly.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `user_organization` function. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Consistent usage with the new implementation. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'user_organization'Length of output: 1686
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `user_organization` function across the codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Consistent usage with the new implementation. rg 'user_organization\('Length of output: 649
backend/lib/azimutt_web/admin/user/user_controller.ex (1)
21-27: LGTM! But verify the changes.The
showfunction correctly maps overuser.membersto extract organizations and renders them in the response.However, ensure that the changes are consistent with the rest of the codebase.
Verification successful
Consistent usage of
user.membersThe usage of
user.membersin theshowfunction is consistent with its usage in other parts of the codebase.
backend/lib/azimutt/organizations.exbackend/lib/azimutt/accounts.exbackend/lib/azimutt_web/views/website_view.exbackend/lib/azimutt_web/admin/user/user_controller.exScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `user.members` in the `show` function. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Consistent usage with the new implementation. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'user.members'Length of output: 3432
backend/lib/azimutt/organizations/organization/data.ex (1)
22-37: Ensure all fields are correctly mapped.The function correctly maps all fields from the
datato the resulting map. This is a straightforward implementation and looks good.backend/lib/azimutt_web/templates/layout/root_elm.html.heex (2)
10-15: Verify correctness of member retrieval logic.The new logic introduces a
membervariable to fetch the current user's membership based on the organization ID. Ensure that theassigns[:current_user].membersis correctly populated and theorganization_idparameter is always present when needed.
16-20: Verify correctness of script variable assignments.The script variables are updated to use the member's organization data. Ensure that
org_gatewayandmember.roleare correctly assigned and available at runtime.backend/lib/azimutt_web/utils/controller_helpers.ex (5)
9-15: Ensure proper handling of owner check.The function correctly checks if the current user is an owner of the organization and executes the provided function if true. Ensure that the
Organizations.owner?/2function is reliable and correctly identifies owners.
17-23: Ensure proper handling of writer check.The function correctly checks if the current user is a writer of the organization and executes the provided function if true. Ensure that the
Organizations.writer?/2function is reliable and correctly identifies writers.
25-33: Ensure proper handling of feature check.The function correctly checks if a feature is supported in the given plan and executes the provided function if true. Ensure that the
feature[plan.id]correctly retrieves the feature value and theis_boolean(value)check is sufficient.
35-37: Ensure proper handling of HTML response.The function correctly sets a flash message and redirects to the organization's show page. Ensure that the
Routes.organization_path/3function is reliable and the flash message is correctly displayed.
38-40: Ensure proper handling of JSON response.The function correctly sets the status to unauthorized and renders an error JSON response. Ensure that the
AzimuttWeb.ErrorViewcorrectly renders the error JSON and the status code is appropriate.backend/lib/azimutt/organizations/organization_invitation.ex (1)
11-11: LGTM! Ensure proper usage of the new field.The addition of the
rolefield is clear and correctly usesEcto.Enum. Verify that the new field is properly used in the application.Verification successful
LGTM! Ensure proper usage of the new field.
The addition of the
rolefield is clear and correctly usesEcto.Enum. The field is properly used across the codebase in various modules, controllers, views, and migrations.
- Files to note:
backend/lib/azimutt/organizations/organization_invitation.exbackend/lib/azimutt/organizations/organization_member.exbackend/lib/azimutt_web/controllers/organization_member_controller.exbackend/lib/azimutt_web/controllers/user_onboarding_controller.exbackend/priv/repo/migrations/20240724110212_add_user_rights.exsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new `role` field in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the `role` field. Expect: Proper usage across the codebase. rg --type elixir 'role'Length of output: 4799
backend/lib/azimutt_web/templates/website/features.html.heex (1)
11-11: LGTM! Ensure proper definition and usage of the new source.The change from
Azimutt.featurestoAzimutt.showcase_featuresis straightforward. Verify that the new source is properly defined and used in the application.Verification successful
The new source
Azimutt.showcase_featuresis properly defined and used.
- The function
Azimutt.showcase_featuresis defined inbackend/lib/azimutt.ex.- It is used consistently in templates and controllers.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and usage of the new `Azimutt.showcase_features` source in the codebase. # Test: Search for the definition and usage of the `Azimutt.showcase_features` source. Expect: Proper definition and usage across the codebase. rg --type elixir 'Azimutt.showcase_features'Length of output: 644
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of `Azimutt.showcase_features` in the codebase. # Test: Locate the definition of `Azimutt.showcase_features`. rg --type elixir 'def showcase_features' -A 5Length of output: 315
backend/lib/azimutt/organizations/organization_plan.ex (1)
31-43: LGTM! Ensure proper definition and usage of the new source.The change from
Azimutt.limits()toAzimutt.features()is straightforward. Verify that the new source is properly defined and used in the application.Verification successful
LGTM! The
Azimutt.features()source is properly defined and used.The change from
Azimutt.limits()toAzimutt.features()is correctly implemented. Thefeaturesfunction inbackend/lib/azimutt.exis well-defined and provides the necessary features for different plans.
backend/lib/azimutt.ex: Definition offeaturesfunction.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and usage of the new `Azimutt.features()` source in the codebase. # Test: Search for the definition and usage of the `Azimutt.features()` source. Expect: Proper definition and usage across the codebase. rg --type elixir 'Azimutt.features'Length of output: 2631
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the definition of `Azimutt.features()` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the definition of `Azimutt.features()`. Expect: Proper definition in the codebase. ast-grep --lang elixir --pattern 'def features()'Length of output: 51
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the definition of `Azimutt.features()` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the definition of `features` within the `Azimutt` module. Expect: Proper definition in the codebase. rg --type elixir 'def features'Length of output: 323
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the content of the `features` function from `backend/lib/azimutt.ex`. # Test: Display the content of the `features` function. Expect: Proper implementation of the function. rg --type elixir -A 20 'def features' backend/lib/azimutt.exLength of output: 1698
backend/lib/azimutt_web/templates/website/use-cases.html.heex (1)
Line range hint
11-19:
Verify the correctness of the new data source.Ensure that
Azimutt.showcase_usagesis correctly populated and used within the loop.Verification successful
Verified the correctness of the new data source.
The
Azimutt.showcase_usagesdata source is correctly defined and populated with the expected use case data.
- Definition found in
backend/lib/azimutt.ex- Populated with a list of maps containing use case attributes.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new data source `Azimutt.showcase_usages` is correctly populated. # Test: Search for the definition and population of `Azimutt.showcase_usages`. Expect: Correct population logic. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'Azimutt.showcase_usages'Length of output: 1406
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the definition and population logic of `Azimutt.showcase_usages`. # Search for the definition of `Azimutt.showcase_usages`. rg --type elixir 'def showcase_usages' -A 10Length of output: 713
backend/lib/azimutt_web/templates/sitemap/index.xml.eex (2)
9-11: Verify the correctness of the new data source.Ensure that
Azimutt.showcase_featuresis correctly populated and used within the loop.Verification successful
Verify the correctness of the new data source.
The
Azimutt.showcase_featuresfunction is correctly defined and populated with the necessary data. Each feature includes anid,icon,name,description, andimage, which are appropriate for use in the sitemap template.
- Definition found in
backend/lib/azimutt.ex:def showcase_features do [ %{ id: "erd", icon: "rectangle-stack", name: "An ERD that scales", description: "Avoid unreadable diagram, choose what's displayed: tables, columns, relations, order...", image: "/images/screenshots/see-what-you-need.png" }, %{ id: "aml", ...Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new data source `Azimutt.showcase_features` is correctly populated. # Test: Search for the definition and population of `Azimutt.showcase_features`. Expect: Correct population logic. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'Azimutt.showcase_features'Length of output: 2045
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find the definition of `Azimutt.showcase_features` to verify its correctness. # Test: Search for the definition of `Azimutt.showcase_features`. Expect: Correct definition and population logic. rg --type elixir 'def showcase_features' -A 10Length of output: 639
5-7: Verify the correctness of the new data source.Ensure that
Azimutt.showcase_usagesis correctly populated and used within the loop.Verification successful
Azimutt.showcase_usagesis correctly populated and used.
- The function
Azimutt.showcase_usagesis defined inbackend/lib/azimutt.exand returns a list of use cases.- This list is correctly used in the loop within the
index.xml.eextemplate.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new data source `Azimutt.showcase_usages` is correctly populated. # Test: Search for the definition and population of `Azimutt.showcase_usages`. Expect: Correct population logic. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'Azimutt.showcase_usages'Length of output: 1406
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find the definition and population logic of `Azimutt.showcase_usages`. # Search for the definition of `Azimutt.showcase_usages` rg --type elixir -A 10 'def showcase_usages' # Search for the population logic of `Azimutt.showcase_usages` rg --type elixir 'showcase_usages'Length of output: 992
backend/lib/azimutt/organizations/organization_member.ex (4)
28-32: Verify the correctness of the default role setting.Ensure that the default role is correctly set to
:ownerwithin thecreator_changesetfunction.Verification successful
The default role is correctly set to
:ownerwithin thecreator_changesetfunction.
- The
creator_changesetfunction sets theroletoOrganizationMember.owner().- The function correctly associates the
current_userwithuser,created_by, andupdated_by.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the default role setting in the `creator_changeset` function. # Test: Search for the usage and integration of the default role setting in the `creator_changeset` function. Expect: Correct integration logic. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'creator_changeset'Length of output: 1606
44-50: Verify the correctness of the role update and tracking logic.Ensure that the
update_role_changesetfunction correctly updates the role and tracks the update time and user.Verification successful
Verify the presence and setup of the
role,updated_at, andupdated_by_idfields in theOrganizationMemberschema.Ensure that these fields exist in the
OrganizationMemberschema and are correctly set up for changesets.
Verified: The
update_role_changesetfunction correctly updates the role and tracks the update time and user.The
OrganizationMemberschema includes the necessary fields, and the function correctly references and updates them.
rolefield is present and usesEcto.Enum.updated_atis managed bytimestamps().updated_byis abelongs_toassociation withUser.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the role update and tracking logic in the `update_role_changeset` function. # Test: Search for the usage and integration of the role update and tracking logic in the `update_role_changeset` function. Expect: Correct integration logic. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'update_role_changeset'Length of output: 1231
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence and setup of the `role`, `updated_at`, and `updated_by_id` fields in the `OrganizationMember` schema. # Search for the `schema` definition in the `OrganizationMember` module to check the fields. rg --type elixir 'schema "organization_members"' -A 20Length of output: 2069
35-41: Verify the correctness of the role parameter handling.Ensure that the role parameter is correctly handled and integrated within the
new_member_changesetfunction.Verification successful
Verify the correctness of the role parameter handling.
Ensure that the
OrganizationMember.owner()function provides a valid default role when the role parameter is not a binary.
The role parameter handling in the
new_member_changesetfunction is correct.The function correctly defaults to
:ownerwhen the role is not a binary, ensuring a valid role is always assigned.
- The
OrganizationMember.owner()function returns:owner, which is a valid default role.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the role parameter handling in the `new_member_changeset` function. # Test: Search for the usage and integration of the role parameter in the `new_member_changeset` function. Expect: Correct integration logic. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'new_member_changeset'Length of output: 2576
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition of `OrganizationMember.owner()` to ensure it provides a valid default role. # Test: Search for the definition of the `owner` function in the `OrganizationMember` module. rg --type elixir 'def owner' -A 5Length of output: 1086
14-14: Verify the correctness of the new field definition.Ensure that the new
rolefield is correctly defined and integrated within the schema.Verification successful
The new
rolefield definition is correct and well-integrated within the schema.
- The
rolefield is defined asEcto.Enumwith the values[:owner, :writer, :reader].- The field is properly utilized within functions and changesets in the
organization_member.exfile.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new field definition in the schema. # Test: Search for the usage and integration of the `role` field in the schema. Expect: Correct integration logic. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'field :role, Ecto.Enum, values: [:owner, :writer, :reader]'Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new field definition in the schema specifically within the organization_member.ex file. # Test: Search for the usage and integration of the `role` field in the organization_member.ex file. Expect: Correct integration logic. rg --type elixir -A 5 'field :role, Ecto.Enum, values: [:owner, :writer, :reader]' backend/lib/azimutt/organizations/organization_member.exLength of output: 141
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence and contents of the organization_member.ex file. # List the contents of the directory to confirm the presence of the organization_member.ex file. ls backend/lib/azimutt/organizations/ # Display the contents of the organization_member.ex file if it exists. cat backend/lib/azimutt/organizations/organization_member.exLength of output: 1976
frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Models/ErdConf.elm (1)
Line range hint
29-40:
Role-based logic implementation looks good.The logic for
saveandsharingfields correctly incorporates the user's role, enhancing the control flow.frontend/src/Pages/Organization_/Project_.elm (3)
12-12: Import statement forUserRolelooks good.The import statement for
UserRoleis correctly placed and consistent with the rest of the imports.
37-37: Passing user role toinitfunction looks good.The user role is correctly passed to the
initfunction, ensuring that the application can utilize user role data during its setup.
56-58: Initialization logic with user role looks good.The initialization logic correctly incorporates the user role, enhancing the control flow.
backend/lib/azimutt/clever_cloud.ex (2)
20-20: Optimization inall_resourcesfunction looks good.The optimization to preload both
:organizationand its associated:projectsin one statement improves data retrieval efficiency.
63-63: Ensure the additionalnilargument is correctly handled.The additional
nilargument in thenew_member_changesetfunction call should be correctly handled. Verify that the function definition and its usage elsewhere in the codebase accommodate this change.Verification successful
Ensure consistency in the usage of
new_member_changesetfunction.The
new_member_changesetfunction appears to handle anilvalue for theroleparameter correctly. Verify that other usages of this function in the codebase are consistent with the updated function signature.
The additional
nilargument is correctly handled and consistent across the codebase.The
new_member_changesetfunction's additionalnilargument is appropriately managed in its definition and consistently used in all instances.
backend/lib/azimutt/clever_cloud.exbackend/lib/azimutt/heroku.exbackend/lib/azimutt/organizations.exbackend/lib/azimutt/accounts.exScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `new_member_changeset` function definition and its usage accommodate the additional `nil` argument. # Test: Search for the function definition and its usage. Expect: The function definition and its usage accommodate the additional `nil` argument. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'def new_member_changeset'Length of output: 725
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify other usages of the `new_member_changeset` function to ensure consistency with the updated function signature. # Test: Search for other usages of the `new_member_changeset` function in the codebase. rg --type elixir 'new_member_changeset'Length of output: 732
backend/lib/azimutt_web/controllers/website_controller.ex (2)
58-66: Verify the function usage in the codebase.The function call to
Azimutt.showcase_features()replacesAzimutt.features(). Ensure that all function calls tofeatures_showare updated accordingly.Verification successful
Verify the function usage in the codebase.
The function call to
Azimutt.showcase_features()replacesAzimutt.features(). Ensure that all function calls tofeatures_showare updated accordingly.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `features_show` match the new data source. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new data source. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'features_show'Length of output: 1763
49-49: Verify the function usage in the codebase.The function call to
Azimutt.showcase_usages()replacesAzimutt.use_cases(). Ensure that all function calls touse_cases_showare updated accordingly.Verification successful
The function usage is correctly updated.
The
Azimutt.showcase_usages()function is properly defined and returns the expected data. The change fromAzimutt.use_cases()toAzimutt.showcase_usages()in theuse_cases_showfunction is valid and correctly implemented.
backend/lib/azimutt.ex:def showcase_usages do ... endScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `use_cases_show` match the new data source. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new data source. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'use_cases_show'Length of output: 2001
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the implementation of `Azimutt.showcase_usages()` # Search for the definition of `showcase_usages` in the Azimutt module ast-grep --lang elixir --pattern 'def showcase_usages()' # Search for the definition of `use_cases` in the Azimutt module to compare ast-grep --lang elixir --pattern 'def use_cases()'Length of output: 111
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Broader search for the definitions of `showcase_usages` and `use_cases` in the codebase # Search for the definition of `showcase_usages` in the codebase rg 'def showcase_usages' # Search for the definition of `use_cases` in the codebase rg 'def use_cases'Length of output: 349
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the implementation of `showcase_usages` in `backend/lib/azimutt.ex` # Display the implementation of `showcase_usages` rg -A 10 'def showcase_usages' backend/lib/azimutt.exLength of output: 469
backend/lib/azimutt/heroku.ex (2)
20-20: LGTM! Simplified data loading logic.The
preloadoperation has been streamlined, improving the clarity of the relationships being loaded.
74-74: Verify the function usage in the codebase.The
new_member_changesetfunction call has been updated to include a new parameter,nil. Ensure that all function calls toadd_member_if_neededare updated accordingly.#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `add_member_if_needed` match the new parameter. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new parameter. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'add_member_if_needed'
Update function calls to match the new parameter.
The
add_member_if_neededfunction call has been updated to include a new parameter,nil. Ensure that the function calls in the following files are updated accordingly:
backend/lib/azimutt_web/controllers/clever_cloud_controller.exbackend/lib/azimutt_web/controllers/heroku_controller.exAnalysis chain
Verify the function usage in the codebase.
The
new_member_changesetfunction call has been updated to include a new parameter,nil. Ensure that all function calls toadd_member_if_neededare updated accordingly.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `add_member_if_needed` match the new parameter. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new parameter. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'add_member_if_needed'Length of output: 2514
backend/lib/azimutt_web/views/layout_view.ex (2)
81-93: LGTM! Enhanced control flow for plan validation.The
plan_badge_for/1function encapsulates the logic for plan validation, improving the control flow.
94-100: LGTM! Robust error handling for role retrieval.The
member_role/1function introduces a robust error handling mechanism into the role retrieval process.frontend/src/Shared.elm (3)
13-13: Import statement looks good.The import statement for
UserRoleis necessary for the newrolefield inGlobalConf.
24-24: Type alias changes are correct.The
FlagsandGlobalConftype aliases have been updated to include therolefield, correctly typed asStringandUserRolerespectively.Also applies to: 31-31
93-94: Initialization logic is correct.The
initfunction correctly extracts and parses therolefromflags.conf, defaulting toUserRole.Ownerif parsing fails.Also applies to: 94-94
backend/lib/azimutt_web/templates/organization/edit.html.heex (2)
23-23: Feature retrieval looks good.The
gateway_customfeature set is now retrieved into a variable namedfeature, improving code clarity.
39-40: Feature display logic looks good.The display logic for the gateway label and badge now uses properties from the
featurevariable, improving maintainability.Also applies to: 40-40
backend/lib/azimutt_web/controllers/organization_controller.ex (4)
9-9: Import statement looks good.The import statement for
for_owners/4is necessary for the new ownership verification logic.
64-67: Ownership verification ineditaction looks good.The
editaction now uses thefor_owners/4function, improving code readability and maintainability.
75-86: Ownership verification inupdateaction looks good.The
updateaction now uses thefor_owners/4function, improving code readability and maintainability.
93-99: Ownership verification indeleteaction looks good.The
deleteaction now uses thefor_owners/4function, improving code readability and maintainability.backend/lib/azimutt_web/templates/organization/billing.html.heex (1)
19-19: Verify the correctness of theAzimutt.features()method.Ensure that the
Azimutt.features()method correctly retrieves the user limits and is consistent with the application's feature management system.Verification successful
The
Azimutt.features()method correctly retrieves user limits.The
Azimutt.featuresmethod includes auserskey that provides the maximum number of users for various plans. The code change inbilling.html.heexis consistent with the application's feature management system.
backend/lib/azimutt.ex: TheAzimutt.featuresmethod correctly defines theuserskey.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `Azimutt.features()` method is correctly used and retrieves user limits. # Test: Search for the `Azimutt.features` method definition and usages. Expect: Correct implementation and usage. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'def features'Length of output: 1332
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the full implementation of the `Azimutt.features` method to verify the presence and structure of the `users` key. rg --type elixir -A 50 'def features' backend/lib/azimutt.exLength of output: 4391
backend/lib/azimutt_web/controllers/api/project_controller.ex (2)
45-45: LGTM! Verify the refactoredshowmethod.The refactoring enhances readability without altering functionality.
However, ensure the refactored
showmethod works correctly.Verification successful
Verify the refactored
showmethod works correctly.The refactoring enhances readability without altering functionality. However, ensure the refactored
showmethod works correctly.
backend/lib/azimutt_web/controllers/api/project_controller.ex: Refactoredshowmethod implementation.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the refactored `show` method works correctly. # Test: Search for the `show` method definition and usages. Expect: Correct implementation and usage. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'def show'Length of output: 9428
62-72: Verify the organization lookup andfor_writers_apihelper function usage.Ensure that the organization lookup and the
for_writers_apihelper function are correctly used and enhance the functionality as intended.Verification successful
The organization lookup and
for_writers_apihelper function are correctly implemented and used.
- The
get_organization/2function ensures the organization is associated with the current user.- The
writer?/2function verifies the user's permissions.These functions support the intended functionality of the
updateaction.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the organization lookup and `for_writers_api` helper function usage in the `update` action. # Test: Search for the `for_writers_api` function definition and usages. Expect: Correct implementation and usage. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'def for_writers_api'Length of output: 608
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of `Organizations.get_organization/2` and `Organizations.writer?/2`. # Test: Search for the `get_organization` function definition and usages. Expect: Correct implementation and usage. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'def get_organization' # Test: Search for the `writer?` function definition and usages. Expect: Correct implementation and usage. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'def writer?'Length of output: 4094
backend/lib/azimutt_web/controllers/organization_member_controller.ex (4)
77-88: Verify the newset_roleaction.Ensure that the new
set_roleaction is correctly implemented and integrates with the existing functionality as intended.Verification successful
The
set_rolemethod is correctly implemented and integrated.
- The method fetches the necessary organization and plan details.
- It ensures that only authorized users can change roles and that the appropriate features are enabled.
- The method is correctly routed in the router file.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new `set_role` action is correctly implemented. # Test: Search for the `set_role` method definition and usages. Expect: Correct implementation and usage. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'def set_role'Length of output: 896
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new `set_role` action is correctly implemented and integrated. # Search for the complete implementation of the `set_role` method. rg --type elixir -A 20 $'def set_role' backend/lib/azimutt_web/controllers/organization_member_controller.ex # Search for all usages of the `set_role` method in the codebase. rg 'set_role' --type elixirLength of output: 1667
14-25: Verify the organization plan handling in theindexaction.Ensure that the organization plan handling is correctly integrated and enhances the functionality as intended.
Verification successful
Verify the complete implementation and usage of
get_organization_planandvalidate_organization_planfunctions.Ensure that these functions are correctly implemented and used in the
indexaction.
The organization plan handling in the
indexaction is correctly integrated and enhances the functionality as intended.
- The
get_organization_planfunction retrieves and validates the organization's plan.- The
validate_organization_planfunction handles different scenarios for validating and updating the organization's plan.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the organization plan handling in the `index` action. # Test: Search for the `get_organization_plan` function definition and usages. Expect: Correct implementation and usage. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'def get_organization_plan'Length of output: 599
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the complete implementation and usage of `get_organization_plan` and `validate_organization_plan` functions. # Search for the complete implementation of `get_organization_plan` function. rg --type elixir -A 15 $'def get_organization_plan' # Search for the complete implementation of `validate_organization_plan` function. rg --type elixir -A 15 $'def validate_organization_plan'Length of output: 2992
29-54: Verify the organization plan handling and feature checks in thecreate_invitationaction.Ensure that the organization plan handling and feature checks are correctly integrated and enhance the functionality as intended.
Verification successful
The organization plan handling and feature checks in the
create_invitationaction are correctly integrated and enhance the functionality as intended.
- The
get_organization_planfunction correctly handles organization plans and applies necessary overrides.- The
featuresmethod provides the required feature checks based on the organization plan.- The
create_invitationfunction correctly utilizes thefeaturesmethod to enforce feature-based conditions.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the organization plan handling and feature checks in the `create_invitation` action. # Test: Search for the `get_organization_plan` function definition and usages. Expect: Correct implementation and usage. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'def get_organization_plan'Length of output: 599
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the complete implementation of the `get_organization_plan` function and the `features` method. # Test 1: Retrieve the full implementation of the `get_organization_plan` function. rg --type elixir -A 20 $'def get_organization_plan' # Test 2: Search for the definition and usage of the `features` method. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'def features'Length of output: 3332
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `features` method in the `create_invitation` function. # Test: Search for the usage of the `features` method in the `create_invitation` function. rg --type elixir -A 10 'features' backend/lib/azimutt_web/controllers/organization_member_controller.exLength of output: 1311
111-122: Verify the modifiedrender_indexfunction.Ensure that the
render_indexfunction correctly handles the organization plan and integrates with the existing functionality as intended.Verification successful
Verify the modified
render_indexfunction.Ensure that the
render_indexfunction correctly handles the organization plan and integrates with the existing functionality as intended.
Verify the modified
render_indexfunction.Ensure that the
render_indexfunction correctly handles the organization plan and integrates with the existing functionality as intended.
Verify the handling of the
planargument inrender_indexfunction calls.Ensure that the
planargument is correctly prepared and passed in the contexts whererender_indexis called.
The
render_indexfunction correctly handles theplanargument and integrates with the existing functionality as intended.
- The
planargument is correctly prepared and passed in thecreate_invitationandcancel_invitationfunctions.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the modified `render_index` function correctly handles the organization plan. # Test: Search for the `render_index` function definition and usages. Expect: Correct implementation and usage. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'defp render_index'Length of output: 826
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all usages of the `render_index` function to verify correct handling of the `plan` argument. rg --type elixir 'render_index('Length of output: 111
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all usages of the `render_index` function to verify correct handling of the `plan` argument. rg --type elixir 'render_index\('Length of output: 499
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract surrounding code for `render_index` function calls to verify handling of the `plan` argument. rg --type elixir -A 10 'render_index\(conn, organization, plan, current_user, organization_invitation_changeset\)' rg --type elixir -A 10 'render_index\(conn, organization, plan, current_user, changeset\)'Length of output: 2778
backend/lib/azimutt_web/templates/website/pricing.html.heex (3)
44-51: Verify the correctness of the new method usage.Ensure that
Azimutt.features()correctly retrieves the features and that all features are correctly accessed.Verification successful
The
featuresmethod is correctly used and implemented.The
featuresmethod inbackend/lib/azimutt.exreturns a map of feature configurations, which aligns with the usage in thepricing.html.heexfile.
backend/lib/azimutt.ex: Implementation of thefeaturesmethod.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the new method usage. # Test: Search for the definition of `features` method in the `Azimutt` module. rg --type elixir 'def features' | rg 'Azimutt'Length of output: 46
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the new method usage. # Test: Search for the definition of `features` method in the entire codebase. rg --type elixir 'def features'Length of output: 323
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the implementation of the `features` method from `backend/lib/azimutt.ex`. # Extract the implementation of the `features` method. rg --type elixir -A 20 'def features' backend/lib/azimutt.exLength of output: 1698
60-69: Verify the correctness of the new method usage.Ensure that
Azimutt.features()correctly retrieves the features and that all features are correctly accessed.Verification successful
The
Azimutt.features()method correctly retrieves the features, and all the feature keys used in the template are defined in thefeaturesmap.
- The keys
project_share,api,sso,user_rights,gateway_custom,billing,support_on_premise,support_enterprise,consulting, androadmapare present in thefeaturesmap.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the new method usage. # Test: Search for the definition of `features` method in the `Azimutt` module. rg --type elixir 'def features' | rg 'Azimutt'Length of output: 46
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the new method usage. # Test: Search for the definition of `features` method in the entire codebase. rg --type elixir 'def features'Length of output: 323
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the implementation of the `features` method in the `azimutt.ex` file. # Test: Extract the implementation of the `features` method. rg --type elixir -A 20 'def features' backend/lib/azimutt.exLength of output: 1698
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all feature keys used in the template are defined in the `features` map. # Test: Search for the feature keys in the `features` map. rg --type elixir 'project_share|api|sso|user_rights|gateway_custom|billing|support_on_premise|support_enterprise|consulting|roadmap' backend/lib/azimutt.exLength of output: 1736
53-58: Verify the correctness of the new method usage.Ensure that
Azimutt.features()correctly retrieves the features and that all features are correctly accessed.Verification successful
The new method usage is correct.
The
featuresmethod inAzimuttcorrectly retrieves the features, and all the features accessed in thepricing.html.heextemplate are present in the returned map.
usersprojectsproject_dbsproject_layoutslayout_tablesproject_docScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the new method usage. # Test: Search for the definition of `features` method in the `Azimutt` module. rg --type elixir 'def features' | rg 'Azimutt'Length of output: 46
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of the `features` method across the entire codebase. # Test: Search for the definition of `features` method in Elixir files. rg --type elixir 'def features'Length of output: 323
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the definition and implementation of the `features` method from `backend/lib/azimutt.ex`. # Test: Extract the `features` method implementation. rg --type elixir -A 20 'def features' backend/lib/azimutt.exLength of output: 1698
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the features `users`, `projects`, `project_dbs`, `project_layouts`, `layout_tables`, and `project_doc` are keys in the map returned by the `features` method. # Test: Search for the keys in the map returned by the `features` method. rg --type elixir -A 20 'def features' backend/lib/azimutt.ex | rg 'users|projects|project_dbs|project_layouts|layout_tables|project_doc'Length of output: 138
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the entire map returned by the `features` method for manual inspection. # Test: Extract the entire `features` method implementation. rg --type elixir -A 100 'def features' backend/lib/azimutt.exLength of output: 6084
backend/lib/azimutt_web/templates/layout/_website_navbar.html.heex (3)
34-34: Verify the correctness of the new data source usage.Ensure that
Azimutt.showcase_featurescorrectly retrieves the features and that all features are correctly accessed.Verification successful
The new data source usage is correct.
The
Azimutt.showcase_featuresfunction is correctly defined and provides the necessary data for the features.
backend/lib/azimutt.ex: Definition ofshowcase_featuresbackend/lib/azimutt_web/templates/layout/_website_navbar.html.heex: Correct usage ofshowcase_featuresScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the new data source usage. # Test: Search for the definition of `showcase_features` in the `Azimutt` module. rg --type elixir 'def showcase_features' | rg 'Azimutt'Length of output: 55
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Broaden the search to find `showcase_features` across the entire codebase. # Search for any mentions of `showcase_features` in the codebase. rg 'showcase_features'Length of output: 934
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the implementation of `showcase_features` from `backend/lib/azimutt.ex`. # Search for the implementation of `showcase_features` in `backend/lib/azimutt.ex`. rg --type elixir 'def showcase_features' -A 10 backend/lib/azimutt.exLength of output: 409
71-71: Verify the correctness of the new data source usage.Ensure that
Azimutt.showcase_usagescorrectly retrieves the use cases and that all use cases are correctly accessed.Verification successful
The new data source usage is correct.
The
Azimutt.showcase_usagesfunction correctly retrieves a list of use cases, and the usage in the template file is consistent with accessing this list.
backend/lib/azimutt.ex: Definition ofshowcase_usagesbackend/lib/azimutt_web/templates/layout/_website_navbar.html.heex: Usage ofshowcase_usagesScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the new data source usage. # Test: Search for the definition of `showcase_usages` in the `Azimutt` module. rg --type elixir 'def showcase_usages' | rg 'Azimutt'Length of output: 53
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition and usage of `showcase_usages` across the entire codebase. rg 'showcase_usages'Length of output: 1015
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementation of `showcase_usages` from `backend/lib/azimutt.ex`. rg -A 10 'def showcase_usages' backend/lib/azimutt.exLength of output: 469
13-13: Verify the correctness of the new data source usage.Ensure that
Azimutt.showcase_usagescorrectly retrieves the use cases and that all use cases are correctly accessed.Verification successful
Verified the correctness of the new data source usage.
The
Azimutt.showcase_usagesfunction is correctly defined and retrieves the intended use cases. The updated code in the template correctly accesses this data source.
backend/lib/azimutt.ex:def showcase_usagesreturns a list of use cases.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the new data source usage. # Test: Search for the definition of `showcase_usages` in the `Azimutt` module. rg --type elixir 'def showcase_usages' | rg 'Azimutt'Length of output: 53
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and usage of `showcase_usages` in the codebase. # Search for any mention of `showcase_usages` within the codebase. rg 'showcase_usages'Length of output: 1015
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the implementation details of `showcase_usages` from `backend/lib/azimutt.ex`. # Extract the implementation of `showcase_usages` from `backend/lib/azimutt.ex`. rg --context 10 'def showcase_usages' backend/lib/azimutt.exLength of output: 857
backend/lib/azimutt_web/controllers/organization_billing_controller.ex (3)
94-114: Verify the correctness of thefor_owners/4function usage.Ensure that the
for_owners/4function is correctly utilized and that the logic within the function is correctly handled.Verification successful
The usage of the
for_owners/4function is correct.The
for_owners/4function is correctly defined inbackend/lib/azimutt_web/utils/controller_helpers.exand appropriately used inbackend/lib/azimutt_web/controllers/organization_billing_controller.ex. The function ensures that the provided action is executed only if the current user is an owner of the organization, otherwise, it returns an error message, which aligns with the intended logic.
backend/lib/azimutt_web/utils/controller_helpers.ex: Definition offor_owners/4backend/lib/azimutt_web/controllers/organization_billing_controller.ex: Usage offor_owners/4Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `for_owners/4` function usage. # Test: Search for the usage of `for_owners` function in the `edit` action. rg --type elixir 'for_owners' | rg 'edit'Length of output: 39
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `for_owners/4` function usage. # Step 1: Search for the definition of the `for_owners` function. echo "Searching for the definition of the 'for_owners' function:" ast-grep --lang elixir --pattern 'def for_owners($_, $_, $_, $_) do $$$ end' # Step 2: Search for the usage of the `for_owners` function in the `organization_billing_controller.ex` file. echo "Searching for the usage of the 'for_owners' function in the 'organization_billing_controller.ex' file:" rg 'for_owners' backend/lib/azimutt_web/controllers/organization_billing_controller.exLength of output: 1352
15-15: Verify the correctness of the import and the usage of thefor_owners/4function.Ensure that the
for_owners/4function is correctly imported and utilized in the file.Verification successful
The import and usage of the
for_owners/4function are correct.
- The
for_owners/4function is defined in theControllerHelpersmodule.- The function is correctly utilized in the
organization_billing_controller.exfile.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the import and the usage of the `for_owners/4` function. # Test: Search for the definition of `for_owners` function in the `ControllerHelpers` module. rg --type elixir 'def for_owners' | rg 'ControllerHelpers'Length of output: 58
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition of the `for_owners/4` function in the `ControllerHelpers` module. # Test: Search for the definition of `for_owners/4` in the entire codebase to ensure it is defined in the `ControllerHelpers` module. rg 'def for_owners' --type elixir -A 5Length of output: 596
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `for_owners/4` function in the `organization_billing_controller.ex` file. # Test: Search for the usage of `for_owners/4` in the `organization_billing_controller.ex` file. rg 'for_owners' backend/lib/azimutt_web/controllers/organization_billing_controller.ex -A 5Length of output: 1082
28-37: Verify the correctness of thefor_owners/4function usage.Ensure that the
for_owners/4function is correctly utilized and that the logic within the function is correctly handled.Verification successful
The
for_owners/4function is correctly utilized and the logic within the function is correctly handled.
- The
for_owners/4function ensures that the provided function is only executed if the user is an owner of the organization.- The usage in
organization_billing_controller.exaligns with this logic.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `for_owners/4` function usage. # Test: Search for the usage of `for_owners` function in the `index` action. rg --type elixir 'for_owners' | rg 'index'Length of output: 40
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the definition and usages of the `for_owners/4` function in the codebase. # Locate the definition of the `for_owners` function. ast-grep --lang elixir --pattern 'def for_owners($_, $_, $_, $_) { $$$ }' # Locate all usages of the `for_owners` function. rg --type elixir 'for_owners'Length of output: 2238
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the implementation of the `for_owners/4` function and show its context in `organization_billing_controller.ex`. # Retrieve the implementation of the `for_owners/4` function. rg --type elixir -A 20 'def for_owners' backend/lib/azimutt_web/utils/controller_helpers.ex # Show the context of `for_owners` usage in `organization_billing_controller.ex`. rg --type elixir -A 10 'for_owners' backend/lib/azimutt_web/controllers/organization_billing_controller.exLength of output: 2618
backend/lib/azimutt/accounts/user.ex (2)
7-7: Alias addition forUserProfile.The alias simplifies the reference to
UserProfilein thehas_oneassociation.
32-33: Changes in associations.The
has_oneassociation forprofilenow referencesUserProfiledirectly. Themany_to_manyassociation fororganizationshas been changed to ahas_manyassociation formembers.Ensure that these changes are reflected in the data model and verify the impact on related code.
backend/lib/azimutt_web/templates/layout/_organization_left_bar.html.heex (3)
67-71: Conditional check for writer.The conditional check ensures that only users with the appropriate permissions can see the "New Project" link.
74-78: Conditional check for owner and Stripe configuration.The conditional check ensures that the "Billing" link is only shown if the user is an owner and Stripe is configured.
78-79: Conditional check for owner.The conditional check ensures that the "Settings" link is only shown if the user is an owner.
backend/lib/azimutt_web/templates/website/_footer.html.heex (1)
39-39: Loop source modification.The loop now iterates over
Azimutt.showcase_usagesinstead ofAzimutt.use_cases. This change alters the data being displayed in the footer section, indicating a shift in focus from general use cases to a specific showcase of usages.Ensure that the data being displayed is as intended and verify the impact on the user interface.
Verification successful
Loop source modification.
The loop now iterates over
Azimutt.showcase_usagesinstead ofAzimutt.use_cases. This change alters the data being displayed in the footer section, indicating a shift in focus from general use cases to a specific showcase of usages.
Azimutt.showcase_usagesis defined and used appropriately in the codebase.- References to
use_casesin the router and controller are related to routing and rendering, not the data source for the loop.Ensure that the data being displayed is as intended and verify the impact on the user interface.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the loop source modification on the displayed data. # Test: Search for the usage of `showcase_usages` and `use_cases`. Expect: Only occurances of `showcase_usages` in the footer template. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'showcase_usages' rg --type elixir -A 5 $'use_cases'Length of output: 4323
backend/lib/azimutt/admin.ex (6)
25-25: LGTM!The refactoring to a single-line definition with a
preloadcall improves readability without altering functionality.
30-32: LGTM!The refactoring to consolidate multiple
preloadcalls into a single list simplifies the structure while retaining the same logic.
37-37: LGTM!The refactoring to consolidate multiple
preloadcalls into a single list simplifies the structure while retaining the same logic.
44-52: LGTM!The refactoring to consolidate multiple
preloadcalls into a single list simplifies the structure while retaining the same logic.
57-58: LGTM!The refactoring to a single-line definition with a
preloadcall improves readability without altering functionality.
114-114: LGTM!The refactoring to consolidate multiple
preloadcalls into a single list simplifies the structure while retaining the same logic.backend/lib/azimutt.ex (3)
100-100: LGTM!The renaming from
limitstofeaturesand the content update improve clarity and expressiveness.
157-157: LGTM!The renaming from
use_casestoshowcase_usagesand the content update enhance clarity regarding the function's purpose.
183-183: LGTM!The renaming from
featurestoshowcase_featuresand the content update emphasize the intent to highlight specific features in a more demonstrative context.backend/lib/azimutt_web/controllers/user_auth.ex (1)
140-140: LGTM!The modification to include more associations in the
preloadcall enhances the depth of data retrieved, improving the application's ability to handle user-related data efficiently.backend/lib/azimutt_web/templates/organization_member/index.html.heex (5)
7-9: LGTM!The introduction of
is_owner,user_rights, andmax_seatsenhances the functionality by managing user roles and permissions.
Line range hint
17-45: LGTM!The conditional block ensures that only owners can see certain information. The logic looks correct.
47-71: LGTM!The conditional logic ensures that only owners with available seats can send invitations. The use of
user_rightsto conditionally render role selection is a good addition.
74-106: LGTM!The logic ensures that only owners can see and manage member invitations. The rendering of organization members now includes role information, which enhances clarity.
109-149: LGTM!The logic ensures that only owners can manage roles and remove members. The conditions for displaying options are well-defined.
backend/lib/azimutt/accounts.ex (8)
13-13: LGTM!The guard clause ensures that the
get_userfunction only accepts binary IDs, improving type safety.
15-16: LGTM!The guard clauses ensure that the
get_user_by_providerfunction only accepts binary provider and provider_uid, improving type safety.
20-21: LGTM!The guard clause ensures that the
get_user_by_emailfunction only accepts binary emails, improving type safety.
85-85: LGTM!The modification to include a
nilargument in theOrganizationMember.new_member_changesetfunction call likely reflects an update in how member attributes are handled during creation. The logic looks correct.
108-108: LGTM!The modification to use a more concise syntax for preloading associated data in the
Result.mapfunction enhances clarity and aligns with a more functional programming style. The logic looks correct.
398-400: LGTM!The updates align the data retrieval with the new structure of user relationships and ensure the filtering logic remains intact. The logic looks correct.
406-408: LGTM!The updates ensure that the correct organization is retrieved based on the new structure of user relationships. The logic looks correct.
420-421: LGTM!The updates ensure that the correct organization is retrieved based on the new structure of user relationships. The logic looks correct.
backend/lib/azimutt_web/router.ex (1)
146-146: LGTM!The new route for updating the role of a member within an organization enhances the functionality by providing a mechanism to modify user roles dynamically. The logic looks correct.
backend/lib/azimutt/tracking.ex (2)
86-86: Efficient Preloading of AssociationsConsolidating the preload operations into a single call improves efficiency and readability. This change reduces the number of database calls, which can enhance performance.
272-272: Encapsulation of Data Transformation LogicRefactoring the construction of the
datafield to useOrganization.Data.to_hash(org.data)encapsulates the transformation logic within a dedicated function. This promotes better separation of concerns and maintainability.backend/lib/azimutt/organizations.ex (6)
25-26: Improved Preloading of AssociationsConsolidating the preload operations into a single call with a list of associations improves code readability and potentially optimizes database queries. This change reduces the number of preload calls, which can enhance performance.
36-36: Improved Preloading of Associations forget_organization_by_customerConsolidating the preload operations into a single call with a list of associations improves code readability and potentially optimizes database queries. This change reduces the number of preload calls, which can enhance performance.
45-45: Improved Preloading of Associations forlist_organizationsConsolidating the preload operations into a single call with a list of associations improves code readability and potentially optimizes database queries. This change reduces the number of preload calls, which can enhance performance.
124-130: Addition ofowner?/2FunctionThe
owner?/2function checks if a given user is an owner of the organization. This function improves the capability to manage user permissions within organizations.
132-138: Addition ofwriter?/2FunctionThe
writer?/2function checks if a given user is either an owner or a writer of the organization. This function improves the capability to manage user permissions within organizations.
140-143: Addition ofset_member_role/4FunctionThe
set_member_role/4function allows for updating a member's role, enhancing the capability to manage user permissions within organizations.backend/lib/azimutt_web/templates/website/index.html.heex (3)
21-21: Updated Number of StarsThe number of stars for the project has been updated from "1112 stars" to "1163 stars," reflecting an increase in the project's popularity or engagement.
126-126: Updated Mapping Function for FeaturesThe mapping function for features has been modified to use
Azimutt.showcase_usagesinstead ofAzimutt.use_cases. This change suggests a shift in the source of data for the features section, potentially indicating a new focus or a different set of use cases being highlighted.
130-130: Updated Section IdentifierThe section identifier has been updated from "features" to "main-usage." This change may reflect a rebranding or restructuring of the content, aiming to better represent the purpose of the section in the overall layout of the webpage.
frontend/src/Components/Organisms/TableRow.elm (1)
978-978: Verify the impact of the additional argument inErdConf.project.The addition of
UserRole.Ownerto theErdConf.projectfunction call might affect how user roles are handled within the broader context of the application. Ensure that this change is correctly propagated and does not introduce any unintended side effects.Verification successful
Verify the impact of the additional argument in
ErdConf.project.The addition of
UserRole.Ownerto theErdConf.projectfunction call is consistent with the function's expected parameters and should not introduce any unintended side effects.
frontend/src/Components/Organisms/TableRow.elm:ErdConf.project Nothing UserRole.Owneris correctly aligned with the function's design.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `ErdConf.project` with the new argument. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type elm -A 5 $'ErdConf.project'Length of output: 1017
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of `ErdConf.project` to understand its parameters and handling. # Test: Search for the function definition. Expect: Find the function definition to review its parameters and logic. rg --type elm 'ErdConf.project' -A 10Length of output: 1751
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of `ErdConf.project` across the entire codebase. # Test: Search for the function definition. Expect: Find the function definition to review its parameters and logic. rg 'ErdConf.project' -A 10Length of output: 1740
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of `ErdConf` across the entire codebase. # Test: Search for the module or file definition. Expect: Find the module definition to locate the `project` function. rg 'module ErdConf' -A 10Length of output: 27
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any files or modules that might contain `ErdConf` or `project` definitions. # Test: Search for any occurrences of `ErdConf` or `project` definitions across the entire codebase. rg 'ErdConf' -A 10Length of output: 91943
backend/lib/azimutt_web/components/icon.ex (1)
859-877: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
ellipsis_verticalare correctly integrated within the codebase.Verification successful
Function usage verified and correctly integrated.
The
ellipsis_verticalfunction is correctly defined, mapped, and utilized within the codebase, specifically in theorganization_member/index.html.heextemplate file.
backend/lib/azimutt_web/components/icon.ex: Function definition and mapping.backend/lib/azimutt_web/templates/organization_member/index.html.heex: Template usage.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `ellipsis_vertical` are correctly integrated within the codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new function. rg --type elixir -A 5 $'ellipsis_vertical'Length of output: 973
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all occurrences of the function `ellipsis_vertical` in the entire codebase. # Test: Search for all occurrences of the function `ellipsis_vertical`. rg 'ellipsis_vertical'Length of output: 348
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- frontend/src/Models/Project/ProjectSettings.elm (3 hunks)
- frontend/tests/Models/Project/ProjectSettingsTest.elm (1 hunks)
- frontend/tests/Storage/ProjectV2Test.elm (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (10)
frontend/tests/Models/Project/ProjectSettingsTest.elm (6)
13-13: LGTM!The test case correctly verifies that the "created_by" column is removed by the
removeColumnfunction using the provided regex pattern.
14-14: LGTM!The test case correctly verifies that the "created_at" column is not removed by the
removeColumnfunction using the provided regex pattern.
15-15: LGTM!The test case correctly verifies that the "updated_by" column is removed by the
removeColumnfunction using the provided regex pattern.
16-16: LGTM!The test case correctly verifies that the "updated_at" column is removed by the
removeColumnfunction using the provided regex pattern.
17-17: LGTM!The test case correctly verifies that the "data.updated_at" column is removed by the
removeColumnfunction using the provided regex pattern.
18-18: LGTM!The test case correctly verifies that the "data.updated_by" column is not removed by the
removeColumnfunction using the provided regex pattern.frontend/src/Models/Project/ProjectSettings.elm (2)
56-56: LGTM!The addition of the
deleted_.+pattern to thehiddenColumnsinitialization broadens the criteria for hidden columns, improving the flexibility of column visibility settings.
90-92: LGTM!The use of
ColumnPath.showin theremoveColumnfunction enhances the readability and maintainability of the code by leveraging a dedicated method for obtaining the string representation of the column path.frontend/tests/Storage/ProjectV2Test.elm (2)
137-137: LGTM!The addition of the
deleted_.+pattern to theHiddenColumnsparameter in thesettingsfield ofproject1broadens the criteria for hidden columns, improving the flexibility of column visibility settings.
241-241: LGTM!The addition of the
deleted_.+pattern to theHiddenColumnsparameter in thesettingsfield ofproject2broadens the criteria for hidden columns, improving the flexibility of column visibility settings.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Style