Improve auto-layout #332
Improve auto-layout #332
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce several enhancements across multiple files, focusing on layout management, new UI components, and data handling improvements. Notable additions include a new CSS class for checkmarks, updates to Tailwind CSS configurations, and the introduction of new functions for icon rendering and data encoding/decoding. Additionally, the application now supports various auto-layout methods for visualizing graph structures, with corresponding updates in both Elm and TypeScript files to facilitate these functionalities. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (43)
frontend/src/Libs/Set.elm (1)
7-12: Consider adding documentation and simplifying the implementation.While the implementation is correct, consider these improvements:
- Add documentation to describe the function's purpose
- Simplify the pipe operator usage
Here's a suggested improvement:
+{-| Toggle an item in a set. If the item exists, it will be removed. +If it doesn't exist, it will be added. +-} toggle : comparable -> Set comparable -> Set comparable toggle item set = - if set |> Set.member item then - set |> Set.remove item + if Set.member item set then + Set.remove item set else - set |> Set.insert item + Set.insert item setfrontend/ts-src/types/basics.ts (3)
43-44: Consider adding documentation for layout methods.While most layout methods are self-explanatory, some like 'avsdf' and 'fcose' might benefit from documentation explaining their purpose, use cases, and behavior. This would help developers choose the appropriate layout method for their needs.
Consider adding JSDoc comments like this:
/** * Available auto-layout methods for arranging nodes in a diagram. * - random: Randomly positions nodes * - grid: Arranges nodes in a grid pattern * - circle: Places nodes in a circular layout * - avsdf: Average-link Small-Degree-First layout (optimized for small-degree graphs) * - breadthfirst: Arranges nodes in a tree-like structure * - cose: Compound Spring Embedder layout * - dagre: Hierarchical layout for directed graphs * - fcose: Fast Compound Spring Embedder layout */ export const AutoLayoutMethod = z.enum(['random', 'grid', 'circle', 'avsdf', 'breadthfirst', 'cose', 'dagre', 'fcose'])
45-46: Consider strengthening id validation.While the current schema validates that
idis a string, consider adding more specific validation rules to ensure consistent id formats and prevent potential issues.Consider this enhancement:
-export const DiagramNode = z.object({id: z.string(), size: Size, position: Position}).strict() +export const DiagramNode = z.object({ + id: z.string().min(1).regex(/^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$/), + size: Size, + position: Position +}).strict()
47-48: Consider enhancing the edge schema for better graph representation.The current edge schema might be too simplistic for a robust graph visualization. Consider adding support for:
- Edge labels or descriptions
- Edge styling (e.g., line style, color)
- Edge direction validation
- Reference integrity validation
Here's a suggested enhancement:
export const DiagramEdge = z.object({ src: z.string(), ref: z.string(), label: z.string().optional(), style: z.object({ lineStyle: z.enum(['solid', 'dashed', 'dotted']).optional(), color: z.string().optional(), }).optional(), }).refine( (data) => data.src !== data.ref, "Self-referential edges are not allowed" ).strict()Additionally, consider implementing a custom validation function to ensure that
srcandrefpoint to existing node IDs.frontend/src/Models/AutoLayout.elm (2)
9-22: Add documentation for layout methods and default choice.While the type definition is clear, adding documentation would help users understand:
- The characteristics of each layout method
- When to use which method
- Why Cose is the default choice
Add documentation like this:
+{-| Available auto-layout methods for arranging diagram elements. - Random: Positions nodes randomly - Grid: Arranges nodes in a grid pattern - Circle: Places nodes in a circular layout - Avsdf: Uses AVSDF (Automatic Variable Step Force Directed) algorithm - BreadthFirst: Arranges nodes in a tree-like structure level by level - Dagre: Optimized for directed acyclic graphs - Cose: Compound Spring Embedder algorithm - FCose: Fast Compound Spring Embedder algorithm -} type AutoLayoutMethod = Random | Grid | Circle | Avsdf | BreadthFirst | Dagre | Cose | FCose +{-| Default layout method. Cose is chosen as default because it provides a good balance between performance and aesthetically pleasing results for most graph structures. -} default : AutoLayoutMethod
25-30: Improve type aliases with documentation and clearer field names.Consider making the following improvements:
- Add documentation for both type aliases
- Use more descriptive field names in DiagramEdge
Apply these changes:
+{-| Represents a node in the diagram with its unique identifier, dimensions, and current position. -} type alias DiagramNode = { id : String , size : Size , position : Position } +{-| Represents an edge connecting two nodes in the diagram. -} type alias DiagramEdge = - { src : String - , ref : String + { sourceId : String + , targetId : String }libs/models/src/common.ts (2)
36-37: LGTM! Consider adding documentation.The new
Areatype is well-structured and follows the established patterns. Consider adding a JSDoc comment to document its purpose and usage in the auto-layout context.+/** + * Represents a rectangular area in 2D space, used for layout calculations. + * @property position - The top-left corner coordinates + * @property size - The width and height dimensions + */ export const Area = z.object({position: Position, size: Size}).strict() export type Area = z.infer<typeof Area>
36-37: Consider adding validation for negative values.Since this type is used for layout purposes, you might want to prevent negative values for position and size components.
-export const Area = z.object({position: Position, size: Size}).strict() +export const Area = z.object({ + position: z.object({ + left: Px.nonnegative(), + top: Px.nonnegative() + }).strict(), + size: z.object({ + width: Px.positive(), + height: Px.positive() + }).strict() +}).strict()frontend/src/Libs/Models/Area.elm (1)
95-99: Consider adding custom error handling for better debuggingThe decoder implementation is correct, but consider adding custom error messages for better debugging experience when JSON decoding fails.
Consider enhancing the decoder with custom error messages:
decode : Decode.Decoder Area decode = - Decode.map2 Area - (Decode.field "position" Position.decode) - (Decode.field "size" Size.decode) + Decode.map2 Area + (Decode.field "position" Position.decode + |> Decode.andThen + (\pos -> + if isValidPosition pos then + Decode.succeed pos + else + Decode.fail "Invalid position values in Area" + ) + ) + (Decode.field "size" Size.decode + |> Decode.andThen + (\size -> + if isValidSize size then + Decode.succeed size + else + Decode.fail "Invalid size values in Area" + ) + )backend/assets/css/app.css (1)
31-33: Consider improving the checkmark implementation and code organization.While the fallback implementation works, there are several improvements that could make it more robust:
The CSS rule is placed in an arbitrary location. Consider moving it to a more appropriate section, such as under "/* This file is for your main application CSS */".
The implementation could be more resilient:
-/* Fallback until ../tailwind.config.js `theme.extend.listStyleImage` works */ - -.list-image-checkmark { list-style-image: url("/images/icons/checkmark.svg"); } +/* Custom list styles */ +.list-image-checkmark { + /* Fallback until ../tailwind.config.js `theme.extend.listStyleImage` works */ + list-style-image: url("/images/icons/checkmark.svg"); + /* Fallback if image fails to load */ + list-style-type: "✓"; +} + +/* Support dark mode */ +@media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) { + .list-image-checkmark { + /* Consider using a light-colored checkmark SVG for dark mode */ + list-style-image: url("/images/icons/checkmark-light.svg"); + } +}frontend/src/Models/Organization.elm (1)
31-33: Consider separating layout and table count checks.The function now handles two distinct responsibilities:
- Checking if the layout matches the default layout
- Validating table counts against plan limits
Consider splitting these into separate functions for better maintainability and single responsibility principle.
Example refactor:
-canShowTables : LayoutName -> Int -> Int -> { x | organization : Maybe Organization } -> Bool -canShowTables layout layoutTables newTables projectRef = - layout == Conf.constants.defaultLayout || (projectRef.organization |> Maybe.mapOrElse (.plan >> .layoutTables >> Maybe.all (\max -> layoutTables + newTables <= max)) (newTables + layoutTables <= Feature.layoutTables.default)) +isDefaultLayout : LayoutName -> Bool +isDefaultLayout layout = + layout == Conf.constants.defaultLayout + +isWithinTableLimits : Int -> Int -> { x | organization : Maybe Organization } -> Bool +isWithinTableLimits layoutTables newTables projectRef = + projectRef.organization + |> Maybe.mapOrElse + (.plan >> .layoutTables >> Maybe.all (\max -> layoutTables + newTables <= max)) + (newTables + layoutTables <= Feature.layoutTables.default) + +canShowTables : LayoutName -> Int -> Int -> { x | organization : Maybe Organization } -> Bool +canShowTables layout layoutTables newTables projectRef = + isDefaultLayout layout || isWithinTableLimits layoutTables newTables projectReffrontend/src/Models/Area.elm (1)
90-92: Consider adding documentation for the calculationWhile the implementation is correct, adding a docstring would help explain how the bottom right position is calculated using the position and size delta.
+{-| Calculates the bottom right position of a CanvasLike area by adding the size delta to the current position. -} bottomRightCanvas : CanvasLike a -> Position.Canvas bottomRightCanvas area = area.position |> Position.moveCanvas (area.size |> Size.deltaCanvas)frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Models/ErdTable.elm (1)
160-163: Enhance documentation and maintainability of the ranking algorithm.While the implementation is correct, consider these improvements:
- The comment should explain the rationale behind the weighting system.
- The magic number
10should be defined as a named constant.Consider this refactoring:
+-- Weight for incoming relations in the ranking algorithm. +-- Higher value means incoming relations have more influence on the layout than the number of columns. +relationWeight : Int +relationWeight = + 10 + +{-| Compute table importance for layout positioning. + The rank is based on: + - Number of columns (1 point each) + - Number of incoming relations (relationWeight points each) + + Tables with higher ranks will be positioned more prominently in the layout. +-} rank : ErdTable -> Int rank table = - -- basic computation if "table importance", using number of incoming relations as the main metric, then number of columns - table.columns |> Dict.foldl (\_ c r -> r + 1 + (10 * (c.inRelations |> List.length))) 0 + table.columns + |> Dict.foldl + (\_ column acc -> + acc + + 1 -- Points for the column itself + + (relationWeight * List.length column.inRelations) + ) + 0frontend/src/Models/Project/TableRow.elm (1)
81-89: Add documentation and consider input validationWhile the implementation is correct, consider these improvements:
- Add documentation comments to describe:
- Purpose and usage of each function
- Expected input/output format
- Relationship with
toHtmlId/fromHtmlId- Consider adding validation for negative IDs if they're not valid in your domain.
Example documentation:
{-| Convert a table row ID to its string representation. -} toString : Id -> String {-| Attempt to parse a string into a table row ID. Returns Nothing if the string is not a valid integer. -} fromString : String -> Maybe Idfrontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Views/Navbar/Search.elm (3)
88-100: Consider extracting magic numbers and improving clarityThe implementation is good, but could be improved:
- Extract
15as a named constant likemaxSuggestedTables- Consider using
List.sortBy (.rank >> negate)or adding a comment explaining the rank negation+ topTablesLimit : Int + topTablesLimit = + 15 topTables : List ErdTable topTables = - tables |> Dict.values |> List.sortBy (ErdTable.rank >> negate) |> List.filter (\t -> shown |> Set.member t.id |> not) |> List.take 15 + tables |> Dict.values |> List.sortBy (.rank >> negate) |> List.filter (\t -> shown |> Set.member t.id |> not) |> List.take topTablesLimit
Line range hint
127-161: Consider reducing duplication in relation visibility checksThe implementation could be more DRY by extracting the common visibility check logic for relations:
+ isTableHidden : TableId -> Bool + isTableHidden tableId = + shown |> Set.member tableId |> not case res of FoundRelation relation -> - if shown |> Set.member relation.src.table |> not then + if isTableHidden relation.src.table then viewItem "relation" relation.src.table Icons.columns.foreignKey [ text relation.name ] False - else if shown |> Set.member relation.ref.table |> not then + else if isTableHidden relation.ref.table then viewItem "relation" relation.ref.table Icons.columns.foreignKey [ text relation.name ] False
Line range hint
1-1: Consider adding tests for search functionalityThe search implementation is comprehensive but would benefit from unit tests to verify:
- Ranking algorithm for search results
- Set-based visibility checks
- Edge cases in fuzzy matching
Would you like me to help create a test suite for this module?
frontend/src/Libs/List.elm (1)
609-612: Add documentation and test coverageThe implementation is correct and efficient, but would benefit from:
- Documentation explaining the behavior with duplicate keys (keeps the last value)
- Test cases to verify the behavior with:
- Empty list
- List with unique keys
- List with duplicate keys
Would you like me to help generate the documentation and test cases?
frontend/ts-src/types/ports.ts (1)
168-169: Consider enhancing type safety for auto-layout types.To improve type safety and maintainability, consider:
- Creating a shared interface for diagram data:
interface DiagramData { nodes: DiagramNode[] edges: DiagramEdge[] }
- Using this interface in both types:
type GetAutoLayout = { kind: 'GetAutoLayout' method: AutoLayoutMethod viewport: Area } & DiagramData type GotAutoLayout = { kind: 'GotAutoLayout' nodes: DiagramNode[] // Consider using DiagramData if edges should be included }This would:
- Reduce code duplication
- Make it easier to maintain consistency between related types
- Make it clearer when data structures intentionally differ
Also applies to: 217-218
frontend/src/Components/Slices/PlanDialog.elm (1)
150-151: LGTM! Consider making the exception more prominent.The addition of the clarification about the initial layout exception is valuable for user understanding. However, since this is an important limitation exception, consider making it more prominent rather than using a
smallelement.Consider this alternative implementation to make the exception more noticeable:
-[ bText ("Ooops, you just hit a plan limit, you can only add " ++ String.pluralize "table" limit ++ " per layout!"), br [] [], small [] [ text "*except on the initial layout" ] ] +[ bText ("Ooops, you just hit a plan limit, you can only add " ++ String.pluralize "table" limit ++ " per layout!") ] +, p [ class "text-sm text-gray-500" ] [ text "Note: This limit does not apply to the initial layout." ]frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Updates/Table.elm (1)
Line range hint
452-452: Consider improving the cross-reference commentThe comment references a specific line number in another file:
frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Updates.elm:502. Line numbers can become incorrect when files change. Consider referencing the function name instead.- -- initial position is computed in frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Updates.elm:502#computeInitialPosition when size is known + -- initial position is computed by computeInitialPosition in Updates.elm when size is knownfrontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Views/Erd.elm (1)
419-431: Simplify button implementation using pattern matching.The button implementation could be more concise using pattern matching on the table size.
Consider this refactor:
-div [ class "my-8 flex justify-around items-center" ] - [ Button.white4 Tw.indigo - [ onClick - (if Dict.size tables < Conf.constants.manyTablesLimit then - ShowAllTables "welcome" - else - confirm "Show all tables" - (text ("You are about to show " ++ (tables |> String.pluralizeD "table") ++ - ". That's a lot. It may slow down your browser and make Azimutt unresponsive. Continue?")) - (ShowAllTables "welcome") - ) - ] - [ text ("Show all " ++ (tables |> String.pluralizeD "table")) ] - , span [] [ text "or" ] - , Button.white4 Tw.indigo [ onClick (ShowTables topTables Nothing "welcome") ] - [ text ("Show " ++ (topTables |> String.pluralizeL "most central table")) ] - ] +let + showAllAction = + case Dict.size tables >= Conf.constants.manyTablesLimit of + True -> confirm "Show all tables" + (text ("You are about to show " ++ (tables |> String.pluralizeD "table") ++ + ". That's a lot. It may slow down your browser and make Azimutt unresponsive. Continue?")) + (ShowAllTables "welcome") + False -> ShowAllTables "welcome" +in +div [ class "my-8 flex justify-around items-center" ] + [ Button.white4 Tw.indigo [ onClick showAllAction ] + [ text ("Show all " ++ (tables |> String.pluralizeD "table")) ] + , span [] [ text "or" ] + , Button.white4 Tw.indigo [ onClick (ShowTables topTables Nothing "welcome") ] + [ text ("Show " ++ (topTables |> String.pluralizeL "most central table")) ] + ]frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Views/Commands.elm (2)
18-18: Simplify the module alias for clarity.Consider simplifying the alias in your import statement. Since the module is
Models.AutoLayout, usingas AutoLayoutmight improve readability.Apply this diff to adjust the alias:
-import Models.AutoLayout as AutoLayoutMethod +import Models.AutoLayout as AutoLayout
79-87: Ensure accurate and consistent labels for layout options.Some layout option labels may not accurately represent their corresponding layout methods:
- Line 83: Labeling
AutoLayoutMethod.BreadthFirstas "Breadth layout" might be unclear. Consider "Breadth-First layout".- Line 85:
AutoLayoutMethod.Coseis labeled "Compound layout". Since "CoSE" stands for "Compound Spring Embedder", consider using "CoSE layout".- Line 86:
AutoLayoutMethod.FCoseis labeled "Force layout". Given that "fCoSE" stands for "Fast Compound Spring Embedder", "fCoSE layout" might be more precise.Apply this diff to adjust the labels:
, ContextMenu.btn "" (ArrangeTables AutoLayoutMethod.BreadthFirst) [] [ text "Breadth layout" ] , ContextMenu.btn "" (ArrangeTables AutoLayoutMethod.Dagre) [] [ text "Dagre layout" ] , ContextMenu.btn "" (ArrangeTables AutoLayoutMethod.Cose) [] [ text "Compound layout" ] , ContextMenu.btn "" (ArrangeTables AutoLayoutMethod.FCose) [] [ text "Force layout" ], ContextMenu.btn "" (ArrangeTables AutoLayoutMethod.BreadthFirst) [] [ text "Breadth-First layout" ] , ContextMenu.btn "" (ArrangeTables AutoLayoutMethod.Dagre) [] [ text "Dagre layout" ] , ContextMenu.btn "" (ArrangeTables AutoLayoutMethod.Cose) [] [ text "CoSE layout" ] , ContextMenu.btn "" (ArrangeTables AutoLayoutMethod.FCose) [] [ text "fCoSE layout" ]frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Updates/Canvas.elm (5)
62-64: Notice the warning about diagram changes due to table header sizeThe comment warns that the diagram can change due to table header size alterations, referencing
headerTextSizeinTable.elm. Addressing this could improve layout consistency.Would you like assistance in resolving this issue or creating a GitHub issue to track it?
89-89: Address the TODO: Implement auto-layout toggle on showing all tablesThere's a
TODOcomment indicating that when the layout is empty, the auto-layout should be toggled upon showing all tables. Implementing this would enhance user experience by automatically arranging tables when they are first displayed.Would you like assistance in implementing this feature or creating a GitHub issue to track it?
104-106: Refactor duplicated code when creatingDiagramNodeinstancesThe code for creating
DiagramNodeinstances fortables,rows, andmemosis similar and can be refactored to reduce redundancy.Consider introducing a helper function:
createDiagramNode : String -> String -> Size -> Position -> DiagramNode createDiagramNode prefix id size position = { id = prefix ++ "/" ++ id , size = size |> Size.extractCanvas , position = position |> Position.extractGrid }Update the
nodesdefinition:nodes = - (tables |> List.map (\t -> { id = "table/" ++ TableId.toString t.id, size = t.props.size |> Size.extractCanvas, position = t.props.position |> Position.extractGrid })) - ++ (rows |> List.map (\r -> { id = "row/" ++ TableRow.toString r.id, size = r.size |> Size.extractCanvas, position = r.position |> Position.extractGrid })) - ++ (memos |> List.map (\m -> { id = "memo/" ++ MemoId.toString m.id, size = m.size |> Size.extractCanvas, position = m.position |> Position.extractGrid })) + (tables |> List.map (\t -> createDiagramNode "table" (TableId.toString t.id) t.props.size t.props.position)) + ++ (rows |> List.map (\r -> createDiagramNode "row" (TableRow.toString r.id) r.size r.position)) + ++ (memos |> List.map (\m -> createDiagramNode "memo" (MemoId.toString m.id) m.size m.position))
152-156: Avoid complex string manipulations for ID parsingThe code uses string splitting and joining to parse IDs from
DiagramNode.id. This approach can be error-prone and inefficient. Consider modifyingDiagramNodeto include separate fields forkindandid, which would eliminate the need for string parsing.Possible changes:
- Update
DiagramNodeto havekind : Stringandid : Stringfields.- Adjust the creation of
DiagramNodeinstances accordingly.- Modify
nodesByKindto group bykindwithout string manipulation.
184-203: Clarify the logic inobjectsToFitfunctionThe function determines whether to fit selected objects or all objects based on their selection state. The conditions might benefit from additional comments or restructuring for clarity.
Consider simplifying the conditionals or adding comments to explain the logic paths.
frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Updates/Hotkey.elm (3)
Line range hint
248-285: Address the FIXME incancelElementto improve cancel action managementThe
cancelElementfunction contains aFIXMEcomment indicating the need to maintain a list of cancel actions to manage cancellations properly. This suggests potential issues with the current cancelation logic, possibly leading to inconsistent user experiences.I can help refactor this function to implement a stack or queue of cancel actions, ensuring they are canceled in order and removed when no longer applicable. Would you like assistance with this, or should I open a new GitHub issue to track this enhancement?
30-30: Unused import might be unnecessaryThe import statement:
import PagesComponents.Organization_.Project_.Updates.Extra as Extra exposing (Extra)Ensure that all functions or types from
Extraare utilized in the code. If not all exposed entities are necessary, consider adjusting the import to expose only what is needed to improve code clarity.
82-82: Provide guidance when saving is disabledIn the "save" hotkey handler, when saving is disabled (
model.conf.saveisFalse), the user receives a warning:"Can't save in read-only mode". Consider offering guidance on how the user can enable saving or why saving is disabled to enhance user experience.frontend/ts-src/index.ts (2)
491-491: Incorrect comment URL for 'circle' layout method.The comment for the 'circle' layout references the 'grid' layout documentation. Please update the URL to point to the correct 'circle' layout documentation.
Apply this diff to correct the comment:
- else if (msg.method === 'circle') { runLayout(msg, {name: 'circle', spacingFactor: 0.3}) } // https://js.cytoscape.org/#layouts/grid + else if (msg.method === 'circle') { runLayout(msg, {name: 'circle', spacingFactor: 0.3}) } // https://js.cytoscape.org/#layouts/circle
483-498: Refactor 'getAutoLayout' function to improve maintainability.The current implementation uses a long chain of
if-elsestatements to handle different layout methods. This can become difficult to maintain as more layout methods are added. Consider refactoring using a mapping of method names to layout configurations.You can apply this refactor:
function getAutoLayout(msg: GetAutoLayout): void { + const width = msg.viewport.size.width || 1600; + const height = msg.viewport.size.height || 900; // default values on 0x0, avoid NaN on ratio :/ + const pos = msg.viewport.position; + const count = msg.nodes.length; + + const layouts: { [key: string]: LayoutOptions } = { + 'random': { name: 'random', boundingBox: { x1: pos.left, y1: pos.top, w: count * 100, h: count * 100 * (height / width) } }, + 'grid': { name: 'grid', condense: true, boundingBox: { x1: pos.left, y1: pos.top, w: width, h: height } }, + 'circle': { name: 'circle', spacingFactor: 0.3 }, + 'avsdf': { name: 'avsdf', nodeSeparation: 225 } as LayoutOptions, + 'breadthfirst': { name: 'breadthfirst', circle: true, spacingFactor: 1 }, + 'dagre': { name: 'dagre' }, + 'cose': { name: 'cose', boundingBox: { x1: 0, y1: 0, w: count * 100, h: count * 100 * (height / width) } }, + 'fcose': { name: 'fcose', idealEdgeLength: () => 300, fixedNodeConstraint: [] } as LayoutOptions + }; + + const layout = layouts[msg.method]; + if (layout) { + runLayout(msg, layout); + } else { + app.toast(ToastLevel.enum.error, `Unknown auto-layout method '${msg.method}', please report it for a fix.`); + } }backend/lib/azimutt_web/templates/website/index.html.heex (7)
30-32: Consider replacing '&' with 'and' for better readabilityUsing 'and' instead of '&' can improve readability and accessibility, making the text clearer for all users.
Apply this diff:
-Seamless exploration for<br> -large & complex <span class="text-indigo-600">databases</span> +Seamless exploration for<br> +large and complex <span class="text-indigo-600">databases</span>
Line range hint
126-165: Consider removing commented-out code to keep the codebase cleanInstead of commenting out unused sections, consider removing them to prevent clutter and maintain code readability.
173-175: Rephrase for clearer communicationThe phrase "to stay performant" might be unclear. Consider rephrasing it to "to maintain efficiency" or "to ensure optimal performance" for better clarity.
Apply this diff:
-Either with a large monolith or many microservices, once your system grows, you need visualization tools to stay performant. +Either with a large monolith or many microservices, once your system grows, you need visualization tools to maintain efficiency.
188-193: Use consistent and professional terminologyConsider replacing "dev" with "developer" for clarity. Also, rephrase "building incrementally your layouts" to "incrementally building your layouts" for improved readability.
Apply this diff:
-<li>dev joining a new team/company</li> +<li>developer joining a new team/company</li> ... -Azimutt makes database exploration easy by building incrementally your layouts with search everywhere, follow relations, find path and more...</p> +Azimutt makes database exploration easy by incrementally building your layouts with features like search everywhere, follow relations, find paths, and more...</p>
206-209: Improve clarity in list itemsConsider rephrasing for better understanding:
- "engineering efficiency teams improving onboarding" to "engineering teams aiming to improve onboarding processes"
Apply this diff:
-<li>engineering efficiency teams improving onboarding</li> +<li>engineering teams aiming to improve onboarding processes</li>
258-265: Reconsider the inclusion of the "Why NOT use Azimutt" sectionHighlighting reasons not to use the product might detract from the overall positive messaging. Consider addressing potential concerns in a more proactive way, such as an FAQ or a comparison with other tools.
271-276: Consider featuring testimonials from external users for greater impactIncluding testimonials from external users or customers can enhance credibility and resonate more with potential users.
frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Updates.elm (2)
950-968: Consider removing commented-out code to improve code cleanlinessLeaving large blocks of commented-out code (lines 950-965) can clutter the codebase and reduce readability. If this code is no longer needed, consider removing it entirely to keep the code clean and maintainable.
Line range hint
90-544: Consider refactoring theupdatefunction for better maintainabilityThe
updatefunction spans over 450 lines and handles numerous message cases. Refactoring it into smaller, dedicated functions or modules can improve readability, make the codebase easier to navigate, and facilitate testing and future enhancements.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
backend/priv/static/images/icons/checkmark.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgpnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (31)
backend/assets/css/app.css(1 hunks)backend/assets/tailwind.config.js(1 hunks)backend/lib/azimutt_web/components/icon.ex(2 hunks)backend/lib/azimutt_web/templates/website/index.html.heex(6 hunks)frontend/elm.json(0 hunks)frontend/package.json(1 hunks)frontend/src/Components/Slices/PlanDialog.elm(2 hunks)frontend/src/Conf.elm(1 hunks)frontend/src/Libs/List.elm(2 hunks)frontend/src/Libs/Models/Area.elm(2 hunks)frontend/src/Libs/Set.elm(1 hunks)frontend/src/Models/Area.elm(4 hunks)frontend/src/Models/AutoLayout.elm(1 hunks)frontend/src/Models/Organization.elm(3 hunks)frontend/src/Models/Project/TableRow.elm(2 hunks)frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Models.elm(2 hunks)frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Models/Erd.elm(2 hunks)frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Models/ErdTable.elm(2 hunks)frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Updates.elm(14 hunks)frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Updates/Canvas.elm(3 hunks)frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Updates/Hotkey.elm(7 hunks)frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Updates/Table.elm(4 hunks)frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Views/Commands.elm(2 hunks)frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Views/Erd.elm(5 hunks)frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Views/Navbar/Search.elm(5 hunks)frontend/src/Ports.elm(8 hunks)frontend/ts-src/index.ts(5 hunks)frontend/ts-src/services/elm.ts(3 hunks)frontend/ts-src/types/basics.ts(2 hunks)frontend/ts-src/types/ports.ts(6 hunks)libs/models/src/common.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- frontend/elm.json
🔇 Additional comments (58)
frontend/src/Libs/Set.elm (1)
7-7: Good rename from list to set!
The parameter rename better reflects the actual data structure being manipulated, improving code clarity.
frontend/src/Models/AutoLayout.elm (2)
1-7: LGTM! Well-structured module declaration and imports.
The module follows Elm conventions with clear exports and specific imports.
1-83: Verify integration with dependent modules.
The AI summary mentions integration with several modules. Let's verify these dependencies are properly handled.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now verify the integration of the AutoLayout module. The results show proper integration across multiple files:
Ports.elmproperly imports and uses the module for port definitions, withgetAutoLayoutfunction properly defined- Multiple components import and use the AutoLayout functionality:
PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Models.elmPagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Views/Commands.elmPagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Updates/Canvas.elm
- The implementation shows proper usage with
launchAutoLayoutandapplyAutoLayoutfunctions in the Canvas updates - The auto-layout is properly integrated into the main update cycle in
Updates.elm
Let me verify one more aspect to ensure complete coverage:
Auto-layout module is properly integrated and used
The verification confirms proper integration:
- All encoders/decoders are correctly used in the ports system
- Type definitions are properly exposed and used across the application
- The module is well-integrated into the application's update cycle with proper message handling
- Port communication for layout operations is correctly implemented
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for proper integration with dependent modules
# Check for imports of AutoLayoutMethod
rg --type elm "import.*Models\.AutoLayout.*AutoLayoutMethod" -A 5
# Check for usage of auto-layout related functions
rg --type elm "launchAutoLayout|applyAutoLayout|getAutoLayout" -A 5
# Check for proper port definitions
rg --type elm "^port.*[Ll]ayout.*:" -A 5
Length of output: 11318
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for proper decoder/encoder usage
rg --type elm "encodeAutoLayoutMethod|decodeDiagramNode|encodeDiagramNode|encodeDiagramEdge" -A 2
# Check for proper type usage
rg --type elm "type.*AutoLayoutMethod|type.*DiagramNode|type.*DiagramEdge" -A 5
Length of output: 3387
frontend/src/Libs/Models/Area.elm (2)
5-7: LGTM: Import statements are well-structured
The new JSON-related imports are appropriately added and follow Elm conventions.
87-92: LGTM: Encoding implementation is correct
The encode function properly handles both position and size fields of the Area type.
Let's verify the existence of the dependent encode functions:
✅ Verification successful
Encode function dependencies verified successfully
Both required encode functions exist with correct type signatures:
Position.encode : Position -> Valueinfrontend/src/Libs/Models/Position.elmSize.encode : Size -> Valueinfrontend/src/Libs/Models/Size.elm
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that Position.encode and Size.encode exist in their respective modules
# Expected: Find encode function definitions in both modules
rg -U "encode.*->.*Value" frontend/src/Libs/Models/Position.elm
rg -U "encode.*->.*Value" frontend/src/Libs/Models/Size.elm
Length of output: 177
frontend/package.json (2)
73-76: LGTM! Type definitions are correctly matched.
The TypeScript type definitions are properly aligned with their corresponding package versions.
62-65: Consider updating to latest stable versions.
The Cytoscape dependencies look good, but some packages have newer versions available:
cytoscape: 3.31.1 available (current: 3.30.3)cytoscape-fcose: 2.2.1 available (current: 2.2.0)
Let's verify if the current versions have any known vulnerabilities:
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the package-lock.json file existence and check the actual usage of these dependencies in the codebase.
Consider updating to latest stable versions
The GitHub security advisory check shows no known vulnerabilities for any of the Cytoscape packages at their current versions. While newer versions (cytoscape@3.31.1 and cytoscape-fcose@2.2.1) are available, the current versions are stable and secure. The caret (^) in version numbers will allow minor updates during dependency installation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for security advisories for Cytoscape and its plugins
# Check for security advisories in npm
for pkg in "cytoscape" "cytoscape-avsdf" "cytoscape-dagre" "cytoscape-fcose"; do
echo "Checking $pkg..."
npm audit --json "$pkg"
done
# Check GitHub security advisories
for pkg in "cytoscape" "cytoscape-avsdf" "cytoscape-dagre" "cytoscape-fcose"; do
echo "Checking GitHub advisories for $pkg..."
gh api graphql -f query='{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "'$pkg'") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
done
Length of output: 5288
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for package-lock.json and yarn.lock
fd -t f "package-lock.json|yarn.lock" frontend/
# Check how these dependencies are imported and used
rg -l "cytoscape" frontend/src/
rg "import.*cytoscape" frontend/src/ -A 2
Length of output: 125
backend/assets/css/app.css (1)
31-33: Verify the SVG asset path.
The hardcoded path to the checkmark SVG might break if the assets structure changes.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the checkmark.svg file and its location.
The SVG asset path is correctly configured
The path /images/icons/checkmark.svg is valid as:
- The file exists at
backend/priv/static/images/icons/checkmark.svg - The static assets are served from
priv/static, making/images/icons/checkmark.svgthe correct public URL - No other CSS files reference this asset, indicating consistent usage
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and location of the checkmark SVG file
# Test: Check if the SVG file exists in the expected location
fd --type f "checkmark.svg" --exec file {} \;
# Test: Look for any SVG files to confirm the correct path
fd --type f --extension svg --exec dirname {} \; | sort -u
Length of output: 309
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for the exact location of checkmark.svg
fd "checkmark.svg"
# Check the contents of the icons directory
fd . "backend/priv/static/images/icons" --type f
# Check if there are any references to checkmark.svg in other files
rg "checkmark\.svg" --type css
Length of output: 301
backend/assets/tailwind.config.js (2)
147-149: Verify the checkmark SVG asset and consider accessibility.
While the implementation is correct, there are a few considerations:
- The SVG path needs verification
- Consider adding appropriate ARIA attributes and alt text for screen readers when using this style
Let's verify the SVG file existence and location:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the SVG file exists in the expected location
fd -t f "checkmark.svg" -E "node_modules"
# Look for any usage of this list style in the codebase
rg -t html "list-image-checkmark"
rg -t css "list-image-checkmark"147-149: Clarify relationship with auto-layout improvements.
The addition of a checkmark list style appears unrelated to the PR's objective of improving auto-layout. Could you clarify how this change contributes to the layout improvements?
Let's check for related layout changes:
frontend/src/Models/Organization.elm (2)
16-16: LGTM: Import statement is correctly added.
The import of LayoutName type is necessary for the updated canShowTables function signature.
31-33: Verify the default layout bypass behavior.
The function allows bypassing table count limits when using the default layout. This might have implications on the application's behavior and resource usage.
Let's verify the usage of this bypass:
✅ Verification successful
Default layout bypass is a valid feature with proper limits
The bypass behavior is intentionally designed with the following safeguards:
- The default layout named "initial layout" is a special case that allows showing tables without counting against plan limits
- Non-default layouts are properly restricted by plan limits (default: 10 tables)
- The code properly enforces these limits by showing a plan limit modal when exceeded
- This implementation aligns with the plan structure defined in both frontend and backend
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check where and how the default layout bypass is used
# Find where canShowTables is called
rg -l "canShowTables"
# Find the definition of defaultLayout constant
rg "defaultLayout.*="
# Look for any comments or documentation about this behavior
rg -i "default.*layout.*bypass|bypass.*default.*layout"
Length of output: 532
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the usage context in Updates.elm and understand how this function is used
rg -A 5 -B 5 "canShowTables" frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Updates.elm
# Check Feature.layoutTables.default definition
rg "layoutTables.*default" frontend/src/Feature.elm
# Check the Organization type definition to understand the plan structure
ast-grep --pattern 'type alias Organization = { $$$ }'
Length of output: 2499
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Feature module location and content
fd -g "*Feature*.elm"
# Let's understand the plan structure and limits
rg -A 5 "type.*Plan.*="
# Check if there's any documentation about layout limits
rg -i "layout.*limit|table.*limit" README.md docs/
Length of output: 1224
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the Feature module content for layout tables default
rg -A 3 "layoutTables" frontend/src/Models/Feature.elm
# Check Plan.elm for layout tables related fields
rg -A 3 "layoutTables" frontend/src/Models/Plan.elm
# Look for any comments about default layout in Conf.elm
rg -A 3 -B 3 "defaultLayout" frontend/src/Conf.elm
Length of output: 1940
frontend/src/Models/Area.elm (6)
1-1: LGTM: Module exports and imports are well-organized
The module header correctly exposes all new functions, and imports are properly organized with the necessary types.
Also applies to: 5-5
65-67: LGTM: Clean implementation of grid conversion
The function provides a clear and type-safe way to convert an AreaLike to a Grid, following Elm's conventions.
70-72: LGTM: Well-structured canvas conversion
The function maintains consistency with the module's style and provides a clear conversion path from AreaLike to Canvas.
75-77: LGTM: Clean extraction implementation
The function provides a clear inverse operation for canvas conversion, maintaining symmetry with other extraction functions in the module.
124-129: LGTM: Consistent merge implementation
The mergeGrid function follows the established pattern of mergeCanvas, providing a clean way to combine multiple grid areas.
132-134: LGTM: Clean position check implementation
The insideCanvas function provides a clear and type-safe way to check if a position falls within a canvas area.
frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Models/ErdTable.elm (1)
1-1: LGTM: Export list modification is well-structured.
The rank function is properly exposed and follows Elm's naming conventions.
frontend/src/Conf.elm (1)
60-61: Significant increase in table limits - verify performance impact.
The substantial increases in both limits:
manyTablesLimit: 50 → 100 (2x increase)fewTablesLimit: 10 → 30 (3x increase)
While this change allows for handling larger schemas, please ensure that:
- The auto-layout performance remains acceptable with larger table counts
- UI remains responsive when approaching these new limits
- Memory usage stays within reasonable bounds
Let's verify the usage of these constants and potential performance implications:
✅ Verification successful
Table limits are used appropriately with performance safeguards - no concerns
The code review reveals that these limits are used with proper performance safeguards:
-
When showing all tables above
manyTablesLimit(100), the app shows a warning confirmation:- "You are about to show X tables. That's a lot. It may slow down your browser and make Azimutt unresponsive. Continue?"
- This appears in both search and welcome views
-
For initial table display (when
fewTablesLimit= 30):- Shows all tables if count is below the limit
- Otherwise, shows only top-ranked tables up to the limit
- This prevents overwhelming the view on first load
The increased limits are well-protected by these existing safeguards, making the changes safe to implement.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for usage of these constants to understand their impact on layout and performance.
# Find direct references to these constants
echo "=== Direct constant usage ==="
rg -l "manyTablesLimit|fewTablesLimit"
# Look for performance-related code in layout handling
echo -e "\n=== Layout performance handling ==="
rg -l "performance|layout.*tables|tables.*layout"
# Search for any existing performance tests
echo -e "\n=== Performance tests ==="
rg -l "performance.*test|test.*performance"
Length of output: 4051
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual usage of these constants in the identified files
echo "=== Usage in Updates.elm ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "manyTablesLimit|fewTablesLimit" "frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Updates.elm"
echo -e "\n=== Usage in Views/Erd.elm ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "manyTablesLimit|fewTablesLimit" "frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Views/Erd.elm"
echo -e "\n=== Usage in Search.elm ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "manyTablesLimit|fewTablesLimit" "frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Views/Navbar/Search.elm"
echo -e "\n=== Layout performance handling in Erd.elm ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "performance|layout.*tables|tables.*layout" "frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Views/Erd.elm"
echo -e "\n=== Layout handling in ErdLayout.elm ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "layout.*tables|tables.*layout" "frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Models/ErdLayout.elm"
Length of output: 9076
frontend/ts-src/services/elm.ts (3)
24-24: LGTM: Import statement is properly structured
The addition of DiagramNode import aligns with the auto-layout functionality requirements.
61-61: LGTM: Callback registration follows established patterns
The GetAutoLayout callback is properly integrated into the existing callback system.
122-122: LGTM: Method implementation is consistent with class patterns
The implementation follows the established patterns, but we should verify the corresponding message handler in the Elm code.
✅ Verification successful
Implementation verified: Both TypeScript and Elm sides handle GotAutoLayout correctly
The implementation is properly handled on both sides:
- TypeScript sends
GotAutoLayoutwithDiagramNode[] - Elm has proper message type definition in
Ports.elm DiagramNodetype inModels/AutoLayout.elmmatches the expected structure- Message handler is implemented in
Updates.elmusingapplyAutoLayout
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Elm message handler for GotAutoLayout
# Search for the GotAutoLayout message type and handler in Elm files
rg -t elm "type Msg.*= GotAutoLayout" ./frontend
rg -t elm "GotAutoLayout.*->.*Msg" ./frontend
Length of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for GotAutoLayout in Elm files
rg -t elm "GotAutoLayout" ./frontend
# Also search for type definitions containing DiagramNode to find relevant Elm modules
rg -t elm "type.*DiagramNode" ./frontend
# Search for files that might handle diagram-related messages
rg -t elm "type Msg.*= .*Diagram" ./frontend
Length of output: 655
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of the GotAutoLayout handler in Updates.elm
rg -A 5 "GotAutoLayout nodes ->" ./frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Updates.elm
# Also check the DiagramNode type definition
cat ./frontend/src/Models/AutoLayout.elm
Length of output: 2281
frontend/src/Models/Project/TableRow.elm (2)
1-1: LGTM: Export list properly updated
The module exports have been correctly updated to include the new toString and fromString functions.
81-89: Verify consistent usage patterns
The new toString/fromString functions complement existing toHtmlId/fromHtmlId. Let's verify their usage to ensure consistency.
✅ Verification successful
No issues with the new conversion functions
The code analysis shows that:
- The new
toString/fromStringfunctions are used for internal ID serialization - The existing
toHtmlId/fromHtmlIdfunctions are used specifically for DOM element IDs - Both sets of functions are used consistently throughout the codebase:
toHtmlIdis used for DOM-related operations (observing sizes, selecting elements)toStringis used for data serialization and internal ID handling
The functions serve different purposes and are used appropriately in their respective contexts without any confusion or mixing of concerns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential confusion between generic and HTML ID conversion functions
# Look for places where both conversion types are used
rg -l "toString|fromString|toHtmlId|fromHtmlId" --type elm
# Check for potential mixed usage
ast-grep --pattern 'toString $id' --lang elm
ast-grep --pattern 'toHtmlId $id' --lang elm
Length of output: 6535
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual usage patterns in the codebase
rg "toString|fromString|toHtmlId|fromHtmlId" frontend/src/Models/Project/TableRow.elm -B 2 -A 2
# Check if these functions are used in tests
rg "toString|fromString|toHtmlId|fromHtmlId" frontend/tests/Models/Project/TableIdTest.elm -B 2 -A 2
# Look for actual usage in the application
rg "TableRow\.(toString|fromString|toHtmlId|fromHtmlId)" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 11104
frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Views/Navbar/Search.elm (2)
27-27: LGTM: Clean import additions
The new imports for ErdTable and Set are properly organized and align with the implementation changes.
Also applies to: 29-29
35-39: LGTM: Efficient Set implementation
Converting shownTables to a Set improves performance for membership checks from O(n) to O(log n). Good use of function composition for the conversion.
frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Models/Erd.elm (2)
220-222: LGTM! Clean implementation of the viewport function.
The function has a clear single responsibility and follows good functional programming practices by composing existing functions.
224-227: LGTM! Good refactoring of viewportM.
The function now properly delegates to viewport for the core logic while handling the Maybe case. This improves code organization and maintainability.
frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Models.elm (2)
20-20: LGTM! Clean import statement.
The explicit type exposure of AutoLayoutMethod follows good Elm practices.
284-284: Verify all ArrangeTables message construction sites.
The change from ArrangeTables to ArrangeTables AutoLayoutMethod is a breaking change that requires updates to all code constructing this message.
✅ Verification successful
All ArrangeTables message construction sites have been properly updated
All occurrences of ArrangeTables in the codebase are correctly using the AutoLayoutMethod parameter:
- The type definition in
Models.elmdeclares it withAutoLayoutMethod - The message handler in
Updates.elmpattern matches with a method parameter - All construction sites in
Views/Commands.elmpass specificAutoLayoutMethodvalues (Random, Grid, Circle, etc.)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all construction sites of ArrangeTables message to ensure they've been updated
# to pass the required AutoLayoutMethod parameter
# Search for ArrangeTables usage in Elm files
rg "ArrangeTables" --type elm
Length of output: 1726
frontend/src/Libs/List.elm (1)
22-22: LGTM: Clean module interface update
The indexBy function is properly exposed and follows the module's alphabetical ordering convention.
frontend/ts-src/types/ports.ts (3)
2-2: LGTM: Import statements are well-organized.
The new imports for auto-layout types are properly placed and organized within the existing import structure.
Also applies to: 35-37
184-185: LGTM: Union type updates are consistent.
The new auto-layout types are properly integrated into both ElmMsg and JsMsg union types, maintaining the established pattern and alphabetical ordering.
Also applies to: 253-254
168-169: LGTM with a verification request.
The new type definitions are well-structured and follow the established pattern. However, please verify the asymmetry between GetAutoLayout and GotAutoLayout:
GetAutoLayoutincludes bothnodesandedgesGotAutoLayoutonly includesnodes
Is this intentional? If the edges remain unchanged after auto-layout, it might be worth adding a comment to explain this design decision.
Let's check if there's any documentation or related code that explains this design:
Also applies to: 217-218
frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Updates/Table.elm (3)
117-117: LGTM: Good use of auto-layout initialization
The addition of auto-layout initialization when starting with an empty tables list is a good improvement. The code uses the B.cond helper for better readability.
143-148: LGTM: Well-structured code with improved readability
The changes to showAllTables are well-implemented:
- Good variable naming improves code clarity
- Consistent auto-layout initialization with
showTables - Clean state management with proper type handling
15-15: Verify usage of newly imported modules
The newly added imports AutoLayout and launchAutoLayout appear to be unused in this file. This might indicate:
- Incomplete implementation of auto-layout features
- Leftover imports from refactoring
Also applies to: 39-39
✅ Verification successful
The search results show that both AutoLayout and launchAutoLayout are actively used in the codebase:
AutoLayoutis used inUpdates.elmwithAutoLayout.defaultlaunchAutoLayoutis defined inCanvas.elmand used in multiple places includingUpdates.elm
The imports in Table.elm are justified as this module is part of the auto-layout feature implementation, working together with other modules in the codebase. Let me verify the specific usage in Table.elm to ensure completeness:
Let me check the content of the Table.elm file to see if these imports are used in the implementation:
After reviewing the Table.elm file, I can see that while Models.AutoLayout is imported, it's not directly used in this file. However, launchAutoLayout is indirectly used through the layoutOnLoad = "arrange" setting in both showTables and showAllTables functions when tables list is empty. This is confirmed by the TODO comment in Canvas.elm that references this behavior:
-- TODO: toggle this on show all tables if layout was empty before, see frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Updates/Table.elm:128#showAllTablesThe imports are part of a larger auto-layout feature implementation where:
- Table.elm sets
layoutOnLoad = "arrange"when showing tables in an empty layout - This triggers
launchAutoLayoutin other modules (as seen in Updates.elm) - The AutoLayout module provides the configuration (seen used as
AutoLayout.default)
The imports are correctly used and necessary for the auto-layout feature implementation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the imported modules are used elsewhere in the codebase
# Check for AutoLayout usage
rg "AutoLayout\." -A 3
# Check for launchAutoLayout usage
rg "launchAutoLayout" -A 3
Length of output: 4008
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for usage of AutoLayout and launchAutoLayout specifically in Table.elm
rg -g "Table.elm" "AutoLayout\.|launchAutoLayout" -A 3
Length of output: 712
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the content of Table.elm to verify the usage
cat frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Updates/Table.elm
Length of output: 25617
frontend/src/Ports.elm (2)
189-191: LGTM: Auto-layout implementation is well-structured
The implementation of the auto-layout functionality follows good practices:
- Clear function signature with appropriate parameters
- Consistent message handling pattern
- Proper encoding of all required data
Also applies to: 305-305, 463-464
550-551: Consider handling viewport updates in the auto-layout response
The decoder only processes the nodes from the auto-layout response, while the request sends additional data including viewport and edges. Consider whether the response should also include viewport updates to ensure the newly laid out nodes are properly visible.
- "GotAutoLayout" ->
- Decode.map GotAutoLayout (Decode.field "nodes" (Decode.list decodeDiagramNode))
+ "GotAutoLayout" ->
+ Decode.map2 (\nodes viewport -> GotAutoLayout nodes (Maybe.withDefault viewport))
+ (Decode.field "nodes" (Decode.list decodeDiagramNode))
+ (Decode.maybeField "viewport" Area.decode)frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Views/Erd.elm (4)
3-3: LGTM! Import changes align with UI updates.
The replacement of Tooltip with Alert and addition of Button imports correspond to the UI component changes in the viewEmptyState function.
Also applies to: 5-5
391-393: LGTM! Improved table selection logic.
The new approach of ranking tables and selecting the top 30 is more maintainable and provides better results than using naming conventions.
422-427: LGTM! Good UX for large datasets.
The confirmation dialog for large datasets is a great addition that prevents potential performance issues. The message clearly explains the implications to users.
433-433: LGTM! Improved user guidance.
The Alert component provides better visibility for the important information about column icons and relations.
backend/lib/azimutt_web/components/icon.ex (3)
431-451: Implementation looks good!
The new bars_arrow_down icon follows the established pattern with proper outline, solid, and mini variants. The SVG paths are well-formatted and the implementation is consistent with other icons in the module.
27-27: Proper placement in icon list!
The icon is correctly placed in alphabetical order within the case statement, maintaining the module's organization.
431-451: Code quality and consistency maintained!
The implementation maintains high code quality with proper:
- Consistent indentation and formatting
- Reuse of class handling pattern
- Consistent SVG attributes
frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Updates/Canvas.elm (5)
1-1: Updated module exports to include new auto-layout functions
The module now exports applyAutoLayout and launchAutoLayout, aligning with the new auto-layout features added to the application.
5-31: Added necessary imports for auto-layout functionality
The new imports bring in required modules and types such as Models.AutoLayout, ErdColumnProps, ErdColumnRef, ErdLayout, Memo, and Ports. These imports are essential for supporting the auto-layout features and appear to be correctly referenced.
55-55: Correctly mapping objects to their off-grid areas
The code efficiently maps over tables, rows, and memos to obtain their off-grid areas, preparing them for layout computations.
167-169: Ensure safe handling of positions in dictionaries
The use of Maybe.mapOrElse when updating positions is appropriate for gracefully handling missing entries. This ensures that objects without new positions retain their existing state.
171-176: Verify the conditional fitting of the canvas after auto-layout
The if full then condition applies fitCanvasAlgo when all objects are involved. Ensure that this logic aligns with user expectations and that the canvas fitting is correctly triggered.
Would you like to confirm that the full flag accurately represents when all objects are included and that fitCanvasAlgo adjusts the view appropriately?
frontend/src/PagesComponents/Organization_/Project_/Updates/Hotkey.elm (2)
38-38: Ensure all return statements match the updated return type
The handleHotkey function's return type has changed to ( Model, Extra Msg ). Verify that all return statements within this function have been updated accordingly to prevent any type mismatches.
121-121: Verify the zoom reset calculation
The "reset-zoom" hotkey handler sets the zoom level using the expression 1 - currentZoom. If currentZoom is 1, this results in a zoom level of 0, which might not be intended.
Ensure that the zoom reset calculation correctly resets the zoom to the default level. Consider updating the expression to set the zoom level directly to 1:
"reset-zoom" ->
- ( model, Zoom (1 - (model.erd |> Maybe.mapOrElse (Erd.currentLayout >> .canvas >> .zoom) 0)) |> Extra.msg )
+ ( model, Zoom (1 - (model.erd |> Maybe.mapOrElse (Erd.currentLayout >> .canvas >> .zoom) 1)) |> Extra.msg )Or simply:
"reset-zoom" ->
( model, Zoom (1 - 1) |> Extra.msg )backend/lib/azimutt_web/templates/website/index.html.heex (4)
7-10: Promotional banner updates look correct
The adjustments to the Black Friday promotional banner are properly implemented.
63-70: Navigation links are appropriately updated
The links and buttons for logged-in and anonymous users are correctly implemented.
80-82: Updated audience list reads well
The addition of 'Tech Support' to the audience list is appropriate.
280-285: Feature section updates are properly implemented
The feature section is correctly structured and leverages partial rendering appropriately.
| ( model, model |> moveTables { dx = 0, dy = -10 } |> Maybe.orElse (model |> upDetails) |> Extra.msgM ) | ||
|
|
||
| "move-right" -> | ||
| ( model, model |> moveTables { dx = 10, dy = 0 } |> Maybe.orElse (model |> nextDetails) |> Maybe.withDefault Cmd.none ) | ||
| ( model, model |> moveTables { dx = 10, dy = 0 } |> Maybe.orElse (model |> nextDetails) |> Extra.msgM ) | ||
|
|
||
| "move-down" -> | ||
| ( model, model |> moveTables { dx = 0, dy = 10 } |> Maybe.withDefault Cmd.none ) | ||
| ( model, model |> moveTables { dx = 0, dy = 10 } |> Extra.msgM ) | ||
|
|
||
| "move-left" -> | ||
| ( model, model |> moveTables { dx = -10, dy = 0 } |> Maybe.orElse (model |> prevDetails) |> Maybe.withDefault Cmd.none ) | ||
| ( model, model |> moveTables { dx = -10, dy = 0 } |> Maybe.orElse (model |> prevDetails) |> Extra.msgM ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Inconsistent handling of 'move' hotkeys
The hotkeys for "move-up", "move-right", and "move-left" include both table movement and detail navigation using Maybe.orElse with functions like upDetails, nextDetails, and prevDetails. However, the "move-down" hotkey only handles table movement and lacks corresponding detail navigation.
Consider implementing a downDetails function to provide consistent behavior across all directional hotkeys. Here's how you might update the code:
-- Add the downDetails function
downDetails : Model -> Maybe Msg
downDetails model =
onDetails model
(\_ -> Nothing)
(\view -> view.table.next |> Maybe.map (.id >> DetailsSidebar.ShowTable))
(\_ -> Nothing)
-- Update the "move-down" hotkey handler
"move-down" ->
( model, model |> moveTables { dx = 0, dy = 10 } |> Maybe.orElse (model |> downDetails) |> Extra.msgM )
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Refactor
Style
Tests