Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

chore(network,tcp,udp): implement socket server, and socket #313

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2021
Merged

chore(network,tcp,udp): implement socket server, and socket #313

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2021

Conversation

azjezz
Copy link
Owner

@azjezz azjezz commented Dec 12, 2021

closes #312

@azjezz azjezz added Priority: Medium This issue may be useful, and needs some attention. Status: Completed Nothing further to be done with this issue. Awaiting to be closed by the requestor out of politeness Type: Enhancement Most issues will probably ask for additions or changes. labels Dec 12, 2021
@azjezz azjezz added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Dec 12, 2021
@azjezz azjezz self-assigned this Dec 12, 2021
@azjezz azjezz force-pushed the feat/network-server-stream-handles branch from 8dbad09 to f93f956 Compare December 12, 2021 02:48
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 12, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1568527230

  • 9 of 9 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 4 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+2.0e**-05%**) to 99.969%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 1562808420: 2.0e-05%
Covered Lines: 3216
Relevant Lines: 3217
💛 - Coveralls

@azjezz azjezz force-pushed the feat/network-server-stream-handles branch from f93f956 to dcbc372 Compare December 12, 2021 02:50
@azjezz azjezz merged commit ee13c72 into 2.0.x Dec 12, 2021
@azjezz azjezz deleted the feat/network-server-stream-handles branch December 12, 2021 02:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@azjezz azjezz

Labels
Priority: Medium This issue may be useful, and needs some attention. Status: Completed Nothing further to be done with this issue. Awaiting to be closed by the requestor out of politeness Type: Enhancement Most issues will probably ask for additions or changes.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.0.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[network] ServerInterface should implement IO\CloseHandleInterface
2 participants
@azjezz @coveralls