Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Label behaves differently between WORKSPACE and bzlmod build #14590

Closed
fmeum opened this issue Jan 17, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Label behaves differently between WORKSPACE and bzlmod build #14590

fmeum opened this issue Jan 17, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
area-Bzlmod Bzlmod-specific PRs, issues, and feature requests team-ExternalDeps External dependency handling, remote repositiories, WORKSPACE file. type: bug under investigation

Comments

@fmeum
Copy link
Collaborator

fmeum commented Jan 17, 2022

Description of the problem / feature request:

In some situations, the value of a string constant constructed via str(Label(...)) will be absolute without --experimental_enable_bzlmod, but relative with the flag enabled.

Bugs: what's the simplest, easiest way to reproduce this bug? Please provide a minimal example if possible.

I haven't been able to produce a truly minimized reproducer, but at least have a fully reproducible one:

$ git clone -b label-issue https://github.com/fmeum/rules_go
$ bazelisk build //go/tools/releaser
...
DEBUG: /home/fhenneke/.cache/bazel/_bazel_fhenneke/da2ee2360ba14ac857bdb47dfbba9b7d/external/io_bazel_rules_go/go/private/nogo.bzl:18:10: @io_bazel_rules_go//:default_nogo
...
INFO: Build completed successfully, 1 total action
$ bazelisk build //go/tools/releaser --experimental_enable_bzlmod
DEBUG: /home/fhenneke/git/rules_go/go/private/nogo.bzl:18:10: //:default_nogo
ERROR: /home/fhenneke/git/rules_go/BUILD.bazel:73:16: in nogo attribute of go_context_data rule //:go_context_data: rule '@.go_dependencies.io_bazel_rules_nogo//:default_nogo' does not exist
ERROR: /home/fhenneke/git/rules_go/BUILD.bazel:73:16: Analysis of target '//:go_context_data' failed
ERROR: Analysis of target '//go/tools/releaser:releaser' failed; build aborted: 
...
FAILED: Build did NOT complete successfully (0 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)

The reproducer differs from rules_go upstream only in fmeum/rules_go@661366a.

Note that I added the str(Label(...)) construction in https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_go/blob/979c3c634682c7bfda33bae44df4ea1c0ab2d624/go/private/nogo.bzl#L15 only recently in an effort to use repo-relative labels wherever possible. It did work with WORKSPACE builds, but I am now seeing it fail with bzlmod.

What operating system are you running Bazel on?

Linux

What's the output of bazel info release?

development version

If bazel info release returns "development version" or "(@non-git)", tell us how you built Bazel.

Bazelisk's last_green

What's the output of git remote get-url origin ; git rev-parse master ; git rev-parse HEAD ?

20d8807

I expect this to reproduce with 5.0.0, but haven't been able to verify since my reproducer triggers the bug fixed in 48a0fc5 first.

Have you found anything relevant by searching the web?

Any other information, logs, or outputs that you want to share?

fmeum added a commit to fmeum/rules_go that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2022
Changing this particular label to the str(Label(...)) pattern does not
behave as expected (bazelbuild/bazel#14590).
fmeum added a commit to fmeum/rules_go that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2022
Changing this particular label to the str(Label(...)) pattern does not
behave as expected (bazelbuild/bazel#14590).
It is thus safer to revert back to the old form for now and instead rely
on patches in a future renaming of io_bazel_rules_go to rules_go for the
BCR.
@Wyverald Wyverald self-assigned this Jan 17, 2022
@Wyverald Wyverald added area-Bzlmod Bzlmod-specific PRs, issues, and feature requests under investigation team-ExternalDeps External dependency handling, remote repositiories, WORKSPACE file. labels Jan 17, 2022
achew22 pushed a commit to bazelbuild/rules_go that referenced this issue Jan 18, 2022
Changing this particular label to the str(Label(...)) pattern does not
behave as expected (bazelbuild/bazel#14590).
It is thus safer to revert back to the old form for now and instead rely
on patches in a future renaming of io_bazel_rules_go to rules_go for the
BCR.
@Wyverald
Copy link
Member

I believe this is an unfortunate interaction between several factors in play:

  • With Bzlmod disabled, if your workspace name is foo, then the label @foo//:bar is often a completely different target than @//:bar. This is because the main repo technically only ever has an empty repo mapping; the fact that @foo//:bar works at all is due to a hack where we implicitly introduce a local_repository(name="foo",path=".") clause.
  • None of this happens with Bzlmod enabled; @foo//:bar simply goes through the repo mapping of the main repo and gets interpreted as @//:bar.
  • However, when serializing label objects with str(myLabel), we special-case labels in the main repo to not output the @repo part (code:
    public String getCanonicalForm() {
    return isMain() ? "" : getNameWithAt();
    }
    ). If you're thinking like me, this would look completely ridiculous, but I'm afraid to change the behavior because it might break thousands of users. So I just live with it :)

Hopefully this sheds some light on why you might run into the problem you noticed. As for how this should fixed, I have no idea :) One thing that could be done is to use Label objects directly instead of their serialized forms, but I realize that's not always possible.

@Wyverald
Copy link
Member

With the recent fixes around repo mapping (especially #14852), the first bullet point above should be less of a problem (@foo//:bar is the same as @//:bar now even without Bzlmod). I'll go ahead and close this one but please feel free to reopen if the problem persists.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-Bzlmod Bzlmod-specific PRs, issues, and feature requests team-ExternalDeps External dependency handling, remote repositiories, WORKSPACE file. type: bug under investigation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants