Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency configuration options #995

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 13, 2020
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
110 changes: 90 additions & 20 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -158,31 +158,75 @@ replacements:
"@io_bazel_rules_scala_scala_xml//:io_bazel_rules_scala_scala_xml"
```

## [Experimental] Using strict-deps
Bazel pushes towards explicit and minimal dependencies to keep BUILD file hygiene and allow for targets to refactor their dependencies without fear of downstream breaking.
Currently rules_scala does this at the cost of having cryptic `scalac` errors when one mistakenly depends on a transitive dependency or, as more often the case for some, a transitive dependency is needed to [please scalac](https://github.com/scalacenter/advisoryboard/blob/master/proposals/009-improve-direct-dependency-experience.md) itself.
To learn more about the motivation of strict-deps itself you can visit this Bazel blog [post](https://blog.bazel.build/2017/06/28/sjd-unused_deps.html) on the subject.
## [Experimental] Dependency options

To use it just add `--strict_java_deps=WARN|ERROR` to your `bazel` invocation.
In both cases of `WARN` or `ERROR` you will get the following text in the event of a violation:
There are a number of dependency options which can be set in the scala toolchain. These include `dependency_mode`, `strict_deps_mode`, `unused_dependency_checker_mode`, and `dependency_tracking_method`.

### [Experimental] Recommended options

We recommend one of the following sets of options

**Option A**
Accept the defaults, which might work well enough for you. The defaults are
```
...
Target '//some_package:transitive_dependency' is used but isn't explicitly declared, please add it to the deps.
You can use the following buildozer command:
buildozer 'add deps //some_package:transitive_dependency' //some_other_package:transitive_dependency_user
dependency_mode = "direct",
strict_deps_mode = "off",
unused_dependency_checker_mode = "off",
dependency_tracking_method = "high-level",
```
but you do not need to include this in the toolchain as they are the defaults.

**Option B**
```
dependency_mode = "plus-one",
strict_deps_mode = "error",
unused_dependency_checker_mode = "error",
dependency_tracking_method = "ast",
```
Note that if you have `buildozer` installed you can just run the last line and have it automatically apply the fix for you.

**Caveats:**
Should the first option result in too much effort in handling build files and the like due to confusing dependencies and you becoming confused as to why some specific dependency is needed when the code being compiled never references it, consider this set of options. It will include both dependencies and dependencies of dependencies, which in practice is enough to stop almost all strange missing dependency errors at the cost of somewhat more incremental compile cost in certain cases.

With these settings, we also will error on dependencies which are unneeded, and dependencies which should be included in `deps` due to be directly referenced in the code, but are not.

The dependency tracking method `ast` is experimental but so far proves to be better than the default for computing the direct dependencies for `plus-one` mode code. In the future we hope to make this the default for `plus-one` mode and remove the option altogether.

### [Experimental] Dependency mode
ittaiz marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

There are three dependency modes. The reason for the multiple modes is that often `scalac` depends on jars which seem unnecessary at first glance. Hence, in order to reduce the need to please `scalac`, we provide the following options.
- `dependency_mode = "direct"` - only include direct dependencies during compiliation; that is, those in the `deps` attribute
- `dependency_mode = "plus-one"` - only include `deps` and `deps` of `deps` during compiliation.
- `dependency_mode = "transitive"` - all transitive dependencies are included during compiliation. That is, `deps`, `deps` of `deps`, `deps` of `deps` of `deps`, and so on.

Note when a dependency is included, that means its jars are included on the classpath, along with the jars of any targets that it exports.

When using `direct` mode, there can be cryptic `scalac` errors when one mistakenly depends on a transitive dependency or, as more often the case for some, a transitive dependency is needed to [please scalac](https://github.com/scalacenter/advisoryboard/blob/master/proposals/009-improve-direct-dependency-experience.md) itself.

As one goes down the list, more dependencies are included which helps reduce confusing requirements to add `deps`, at the cost of increased incremental builds due to a greater number of dependencies. In practice, using `plus-one` deps results in almost no confusing `deps` entries required while still being relatively small in terms of the number of total dependencies included.

**Caveats for `plus_one` and `transitive`:**
ittaiz marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
<ul>
<li>Extra builds- when strict-deps is on the transitive dependencies are inputs to the compilation action which means you can potentially have more build triggers for changes the cross the ijar boundary </li>
<li>Extra builds- Extra dependencies are inputs to the compilation action which means you can potentially have more build triggers for changes the cross the ijar boundary </li>
<li>Label propagation- since label of targets are needed for the clear message and since it's not currently supported by JavaInfo from bazel we manually propagate it. This means that the error messages have a significantly lower grade if you don't use one of the scala rules or scala_import (since they don't propagate these labels)</li>
<li>javac outputs incorrect targets due to a problem we're tracing down. Practically we've noticed it's pretty trivial to understand the correct target (i.e. it's almost a formatting problem) </li>
</ul>

Note: Currently strict-deps is protected by a feature toggle but we're strongly considering making it the default behavior as `java_*` rules do.
Note: the last two issues are bugs which will be addressed by [https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_scala/issues/839].

### [Experimental] Strict deps mode
We have a strict dependency checker which requires that any type referenced in the sources of a scala target should be included in that rule's deps. To learn about the motivation for this you can visit this Bazel blog [post](https://blog.bazel.build/2017/06/28/sjd-unused_deps.html) on the subject.

## [Experimental] Unused dependency checking
The option `strict_deps_mode` can be set to `off`, `warn`, or `error`. We highly recommend setting it to `error`.

In both cases of `warn` or `error` you will get the following text in the event of a violation:
```
...
Target '//some_package:transitive_dependency' is used but isn't explicitly declared, please add it to the deps.
You can use the following buildozer command:
buildozer 'add deps //some_package:transitive_dependency' //some_other_package:transitive_dependency_user
```
Note that if you have `buildozer` installed you can just run the last line and have it automatically apply the fix for you.

### [Experimental] Unused dependency checking
To allow for better caching and faster builds we want to minimize the direct dependencies of our targets. Unused dependency checking
makes sure that all targets specified as direct dependencies are actually used. If `unused_dependency_checker_mode` is set to either
`error` or `warn` you will get the following message for any dependencies that are not used:
Expand All @@ -192,12 +236,38 @@ You can use the following buildozer command:
buildozer 'remove deps //some_package:unused_dep' //target:target
```

Currently unused dependency checking and strict-deps can't be used simultaneously, if both are set only strict-deps will run.

Unused dependency checking can either be enabled globally for all targets using a scala toolchain or for individual targets using the
`unused_dependency_checker_mode` attribute. The feature is still experimental and there can thus be cases where it works incorrectly,
in these cases you can enable unused dependency checking globally through a toolchain and override individual misbehaving targets
using the attribute.
`unused_dependency_checker_mode` attribute.

The feature is still experimental and there can thus be cases where it works incorrectly, in these cases you can enable unused dependency checking globally through a toolchain and disable reports of individual misbehaving targets with `unused_dependency_checker_ignored_targets` which is a list of labels.

### [Experimental] Dependency tracking method

The strict dependency tracker and unused dependency tracker need to track the used dependencies of a scala compilation unit. This toggle allows one to pick which method of tracking to use.

- `dependency_tracking_method = "high-level"` - This is the existing tracking method which has false positives and negatives but generally works reasonably well for `direct` dependency mode.
- `dependency_tracking_method = "ast"` - This is a new tracking method which is being developed for `plus-one` and `transitive` dependency modes. It is still being developed and may have issues which need fixing. If you discover an issue, please submit a small repro of the problem.

Note we intend to eventually remove this flag and use `high-level` as the method for `direct` dependency mode, and `ast` as the method for `plus-one` and `transitive` dependency modes.

In the meantime, if you are using `plus-one` or `transitive` dependency modes, you can use `ast` dependency tracking mode and see how well it works for you.

### [Experimental] Turning on strict_deps_mode/unused_dependency_checker_mode

It can be daunting to turn on strict deps checking or unused dependency mode checking on a large codebase. However, it need not be so bad if this is done in phases

1. Have a default scala toolchain `A` with the option of interest set to `off` (the starting state)
2. Create a second scala toolchain `B` with the option of interest set to `warn` or `error`. Those who are working on enabling the flag can run with this toolchain as a command line argument to help identify issues and fix them.
3. Once all issues are fixed, change `A` to have the option of interest set to `error` and delete `B`.

We recommend turning on strict_deps_mode first, as rule `A` might have an entry `B` in its `deps`, and `B` in turn depends on `C`. Meanwhile, the code of `A` only uses `C` but not `B`. Hence, the unused dependency checker, if on, will request that `B` be removed from `A`'s deps. But this will lead to a compile error as `A` can no longer depend on `C`. However, if strict dependency checking was on, then `A`'s deps is guaranteed to have `C` in it.

### [Experimental] Migrating from deprecated configurations

There are a few deprecated configuration methods which we will be removing in the near future.

- `plus_one_deps_mode = "on"` on the scala toolchain. Instead, set `dependency_mode = "plus-one"` on the scala toolchain. `plus_one_deps_mode` will be removed in the future.
- The command line argument `--strict_java_deps=WARN/ERROR`. Instead, set `dependency_mode = "transitive"` on the scala toolchain, and if only a warning is desired set `strict_deps_mode = "warn"` on the toolchain. In the future, `strict_java_deps` will no longer affect how scala files are compiled. Note that `strict_java_deps` will still control java compilation.

## Advanced configurable rules
To make the ruleset more flexible and configurable, we introduce a phase architecture. By using a phase architecture, where rule implementations are defined as a list of phases that are executed sequentially, functionality can easily be added (or modified) by adding (or swapping) phases.
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion scala/plusone.bzl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ PlusOneDeps = provider(
)

def _collect_plus_one_deps_aspect_impl(target, ctx):
if (ctx.toolchains["@io_bazel_rules_scala//scala:toolchain_type"].plus_one_deps_mode == "off"):
if (ctx.toolchains["@io_bazel_rules_scala//scala:toolchain_type"].dependency_mode != "plus-one"):
return []
export_plus_one_deps = []
for exported_dep in getattr(ctx.rule.attr, "exports", []):
Expand Down
17 changes: 4 additions & 13 deletions scala/private/dependency.bzl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,11 +8,6 @@ def new_dependency_info(
strict_deps_mode,
dependency_tracking_method):
is_strict_deps_on = strict_deps_mode != "off"

# Currently we do not support running both strict and unused deps at the same time
if is_strict_deps_on:
unused_deps_mode = "off"

is_unused_deps_on = unused_deps_mode != "off"

need_direct_jars = is_strict_deps_on or is_unused_deps_on
Expand All @@ -24,7 +19,7 @@ def new_dependency_info(
need_direct_jars = need_direct_jars,
need_direct_targets = need_direct_targets,
need_direct_info = need_direct_jars or need_direct_targets,
dependency_tracking_method = "high-level",
dependency_tracking_method = dependency_tracking_method,
unused_deps_mode = unused_deps_mode,
strict_deps_mode = strict_deps_mode,
use_analyzer = is_strict_deps_on or is_unused_deps_on,
Expand All @@ -41,7 +36,7 @@ def legacy_unclear_dependency_info_for_protobuf_scrooge(ctx):

# TODO(https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_scala/issues/987): Clariy the situation
def _legacy_unclear_dependency_mode_for_protobuf_scrooge(ctx):
if is_strict_deps_on(ctx):
if _is_strict_deps_on(ctx):
return "transitive"
else:
return "direct"
Expand All @@ -50,11 +45,7 @@ def get_strict_deps_mode(ctx):
if not hasattr(ctx.attr, "_dependency_analyzer_plugin"):
return "off"

# when the strict deps FT is removed the "default" check
# will be removed since "default" will mean it's turned on
if ctx.fragments.java.strict_java_deps == "default":
return "off"
return ctx.fragments.java.strict_java_deps
return ctx.toolchains["@io_bazel_rules_scala//scala:toolchain_type"].strict_deps_mode

def is_strict_deps_on(ctx):
def _is_strict_deps_on(ctx):
return get_strict_deps_mode(ctx) != "off"
21 changes: 4 additions & 17 deletions scala/private/phases/phase_dependency.bzl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@
load(
"@io_bazel_rules_scala//scala/private:dependency.bzl",
"get_strict_deps_mode",
"is_strict_deps_on",
"new_dependency_info",
)
load(
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -35,6 +34,8 @@ def _phase_dependency(
p,
unused_deps_always_off,
strict_deps_always_off):
toolchain = ctx.toolchains["@io_bazel_rules_scala//scala:toolchain_type"]

if strict_deps_always_off:
strict_deps_mode = "off"
else:
Expand All @@ -52,26 +53,12 @@ def _phase_dependency(
unused_deps_mode = "off"

return new_dependency_info(
_get_dependency_mode(ctx),
toolchain.dependency_mode,
unused_deps_mode,
strict_deps_mode,
"high-level",
toolchain.dependency_tracking_method,
)

def _is_plus_one_deps_on(ctx):
return ctx.toolchains["@io_bazel_rules_scala//scala:toolchain_type"].plus_one_deps_mode != "off"

def _get_dependency_mode(ctx):
if is_strict_deps_on(ctx):
# all transitive dependencies are included
return "transitive"
elif _is_plus_one_deps_on(ctx):
# dependencies and dependencies of dependencies are included
return "plus-one"
else:
# only explicitly-specified dependencies are included
return "direct"

def _get_unused_deps_mode(ctx):
if ctx.attr.unused_dependency_checker_mode:
return ctx.attr.unused_dependency_checker_mode
Expand Down
81 changes: 77 additions & 4 deletions scala/scala_toolchain.bzl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,12 +3,74 @@ load(
_ScalacProvider = "ScalacProvider",
)

def _compute_dependency_mode(input_dependency_mode, input_plus_one_deps_mode):
if input_plus_one_deps_mode == "on":
return "plus-one"

if input_dependency_mode == "":
return "direct"

return input_dependency_mode

def _compute_strict_deps_mode(input_strict_deps_mode, dependency_mode):
if dependency_mode == "direct":
return "off"
if input_strict_deps_mode == "default":
if dependency_mode == "transitive":
return "error"
else:
return "off"
return input_strict_deps_mode

def _compute_dependency_tracking_method(input_dependency_tracking_method):
if input_dependency_tracking_method == "default":
return "high-level"
return input_dependency_tracking_method

def _scala_toolchain_impl(ctx):
if ctx.attr.plus_one_deps_mode != "":
print(
"Setting plus_one_deps_mode on toolchain is deprecated." +
"Use 'dependency_mode = \"plus-one\"' instead",
)
if ctx.attr.dependency_mode != "" and ctx.attr.plus_one_deps_mode != "":
fail("Cannot set both dependency_mode and plus_one_deps_mode on toolchain")

if ctx.fragments.java.strict_java_deps != "default" and ctx.fragments.java.strict_java_deps != "off":
ittaiz marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
dependency_mode = "transitive"
strict_deps_mode = ctx.fragments.java.strict_java_deps
unused_dependency_checker_mode = "off"
dependency_tracking_method = "high-level"
else:
dependency_mode = _compute_dependency_mode(
ctx.attr.dependency_mode,
ctx.attr.plus_one_deps_mode,
)
strict_deps_mode = _compute_strict_deps_mode(
ctx.attr.strict_deps_mode,
dependency_mode,
)

unused_dependency_checker_mode = ctx.attr.unused_dependency_checker_mode
dependency_tracking_method = _compute_dependency_tracking_method(ctx.attr.dependency_tracking_method)

# Final quality checks to possibly detect buggy code above
if dependency_mode not in ("direct", "plus-one", "transitive"):
fail("Internal error: invalid dependency_mode " + dependency_mode)

if strict_deps_mode not in ("off", "warn", "error"):
fail("Internal error: invalid strict_deps_mode " + strict_deps_mode)

if dependency_tracking_method not in ("ast", "high-level"):
fail("Internal error: invalid dependency_tracking_method " + dependency_tracking_method)

toolchain = platform_common.ToolchainInfo(
scalacopts = ctx.attr.scalacopts,
scalac_provider_attr = ctx.attr.scalac_provider_attr,
unused_dependency_checker_mode = ctx.attr.unused_dependency_checker_mode,
plus_one_deps_mode = ctx.attr.plus_one_deps_mode,
dependency_mode = dependency_mode,
strict_deps_mode = strict_deps_mode,
unused_dependency_checker_mode = unused_dependency_checker_mode,
dependency_tracking_method = dependency_tracking_method,
enable_code_coverage_aspect = ctx.attr.enable_code_coverage_aspect,
scalac_jvm_flags = ctx.attr.scalac_jvm_flags,
scala_test_jvm_flags = ctx.attr.scala_test_jvm_flags,
Expand All @@ -23,13 +85,23 @@ scala_toolchain = rule(
default = "@io_bazel_rules_scala//scala:scalac_default",
providers = [_ScalacProvider],
),
"dependency_mode": attr.string(
values = ["direct", "plus-one", "transitive", ""],
),
"strict_deps_mode": attr.string(
default = "default",
values = ["off", "warn", "error", "default"],
),
"unused_dependency_checker_mode": attr.string(
default = "off",
values = ["off", "warn", "error"],
),
"dependency_tracking_method": attr.string(
default = "default",
values = ["ast", "high-level", "default"],
),
"plus_one_deps_mode": attr.string(
default = "off",
values = ["off", "on"],
values = ["off", "on", ""],
),
"enable_code_coverage_aspect": attr.string(
default = "off",
Expand All @@ -38,4 +110,5 @@ scala_toolchain = rule(
"scalac_jvm_flags": attr.string_list(),
"scala_test_jvm_flags": attr.string_list(),
},
fragments = ["java"],
)
10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions test/scala_test/A.scala
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@

import org.scalatest._

abstract class A extends FunSuite {
val Number: Int

test("number is positive") {
assert(Number > 0)
}
}
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions test/scala_test/B.scala
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@

class B extends A {
override val Number: Int = 12
}
12 changes: 12 additions & 0 deletions test/scala_test/BUILD
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
load("@io_bazel_rules_scala//scala:scala.bzl", "scala_test")

scala_test(
name = "a",
srcs = ["A.scala"],
)

scala_test(
name = "b",
srcs = ["B.scala"],
deps = [":a"],
)
Loading