Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

23604 update logic for changing business name #599

Conversation

meawong
Copy link
Collaborator

@meawong meawong commented Nov 19, 2024

Issue #: /bcgov/entity#23604

Description of changes:

  • update logic for changing business name

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of the bcrs-entities-create-ui license (Apache 2.0).

@meawong meawong self-assigned this Nov 19, 2024
@bcgov bcgov deleted a comment from bcregistry-sre Nov 19, 2024
@meawong meawong marked this pull request as ready for review November 19, 2024 00:41
@@ -433,24 +433,20 @@ export default class ChangeBusinessType extends Mixins(CommonMixin) {
submitTypeChange () {
this.setEntityType(this.selectedEntityType)
this.isEditingType = false
if (this.shouldUpdateName()) {
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@meawong meawong Nov 19, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Using the old logic, we would only update the name and set the NR if the business name had NOT changed. This prevents the case when a user attempts to change the business type (and therefore the name) more than once, as the business name HAS changed in this case.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this logic work on a named company? With and without a new NR?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since these changes still retain the check for a numbered business, as before, named companies should not be reaching this block of code below. There should be separate logic that handles named businesses (I can verify where this is if you like).

Copy link
Collaborator

@severinbeauvais severinbeauvais Nov 19, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please verify and/or test if you haven't already.

I did a little test on a named BC Limited, and could not change the type to ULC without a NR.

As before, I could not change a named BC to a numbered ULC in one step -- it would take one alteration to change it to numbered, and a second one to change the type. But that's a future ticket so don't worry about it.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did a little test on a named BC Limited, and could not change the type to ULC without a NR.

I thought this was the expected behaviour for named businesses? Since altering the business type for a named business would require a name change and this requires an NR.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but what if wanted to change my named BC to a numbered ULC? Anyway, we discussed this previously and decided it was low priority right now.

@meawong
Copy link
Collaborator Author

meawong commented Nov 19, 2024

/gcbrun

@bcregistry-sre
Copy link
Collaborator

bcregistry-sre commented Nov 19, 2024

@bcgov bcgov deleted a comment from bcregistry-sre Nov 19, 2024
@severinbeauvais severinbeauvais changed the title update logic for changing business name 23604 update logic for changing business name Nov 19, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@severinbeauvais severinbeauvais left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good analysis and I agree with the solution, but please test a bit more (including saving and resuming) to make sure all edge cases are OK, too. Thanks!

@ArwenQin
Copy link
Collaborator

I did some tests, seems good!

@meawong
Copy link
Collaborator Author

meawong commented Nov 19, 2024

/gcbrun

@bcregistry-sre
Copy link
Collaborator

bcregistry-sre commented Nov 19, 2024

Copy link
Collaborator

@severinbeauvais severinbeauvais left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did some quick tests and it LGTM!

Please list out, in the ticket, the tests you did. Great job! Thanks!

@meawong meawong merged commit 0371bdf into bcgov:main Nov 19, 2024
9 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants