Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat!: new test-exclude with modified exclude rules #179

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 22, 2019
Merged

feat!: new test-exclude with modified exclude rules #179

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 22, 2019

Conversation

bcoe
Copy link
Owner

@bcoe bcoe commented Dec 22, 2019

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 22, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 513

  • 3 of 3 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.1%) to 94.239%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 506: 0.1%
Covered Lines: 558
Relevant Lines: 581
💛 - Coveralls

@bcoe bcoe merged commit af7d94d into master Dec 22, 2019
@bcoe bcoe deleted the update-test-exclude branch December 22, 2019 05:48
@release-please release-please bot mentioned this pull request Dec 22, 2019
Merged
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Nov 19, 2020
Open
@bcoe bcoe mentioned this pull request Feb 2, 2021
Closed
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jan 14, 2022
Open
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Apr 20, 2022
Closed
mcknasty pushed a commit to mcknasty/c8 that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2024
@bcoe
feat!: new test-exclude with modified exclude rules (bcoe#179)
b9dc2d0
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@bcoe @coveralls