Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add working definition datasets #98

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

gb-beng
Copy link
Contributor

@gb-beng gb-beng commented Feb 20, 2024

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 20, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
data-beeldengeluid-nl ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 24, 2024 8:15am

@Veldhoen
Copy link
Member

@gb-beng is this ready for review yet?

@gb-beng gb-beng force-pushed the add-working-definition-datasets branch from 773459f to a16d31e Compare April 23, 2024 06:47
@gb-beng gb-beng marked this pull request as ready for review April 23, 2024 06:58
@gb-beng
Copy link
Contributor Author

gb-beng commented Apr 23, 2024

@Veldhoen @mwigham no need to both review, but maybe one of you wants to review?

@gb-beng gb-beng force-pushed the add-working-definition-datasets branch from b9ff3aa to 7f5bc90 Compare April 24, 2024 08:14
@gb-beng
Copy link
Contributor Author

gb-beng commented Apr 24, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

@mwigham mwigham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

@gb-beng gb-beng merged commit dd3a247 into main Apr 26, 2024
4 checks passed
@gb-beng gb-beng deleted the add-working-definition-datasets branch April 26, 2024 10:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants