83 hours per day?

[saracarl]

Rebecca at GCLS reports:
I was downloading our volunteer data for tracking and noticed that some of the numbers seemed way off in January. For example, one of the days someone transcribed about 83 hours which should be impossible for a 24-hour day. Has there been a glitch with the time tracker?

[saracarl]

Reproduce with a single day's report.

[saracarl]

When Rebecca runs a month of January report from the owner summary, we see a large number of minutes on the 15th of January for 2 users: elitranscribes and Zachary Busch.

We drill in and just run the report for January 15th. The spreadsheet download is empty(!!) and the UI only shows one of the 2 users with bad data:

[saracarl]

To fix this:

1. where("name LIKE 'transcribe#%'") -- get rid of this filter.
2. redo continuity to take deed type and date/time; check for save at the earlier date/time. If "save" then add text: 20 minutes, spreadsheet: 90 minutes, field: 5 minutes. Increase tolerance to 90 minutes.
3. make the user summary run off the ahoy activity summary -- roll back sylvie's code + use # 1 to fix missed windows.
4. make the collection statistics run off the ahoy activity summary
5. remediate data in ahoy activity summary (rerun the rake task for those dates)