Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(node-api): remove the extra logic because the length is 32 #1455

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Jul 18, 2024

Conversation

hoank101
Copy link
Contributor

@hoank101 hoank101 commented Jun 13, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected a typo in the CommitteeIndexRequest struct for improved accuracy and consistency.
  • Refactor

    • Removed unnecessary checks for empty genesisRoot and stateRoot in the API handlers to streamline error handling.

@hoank101 hoank101 changed the title refactor: remove the extra logic because the length is 32 refactor(node-api): remove the extra logic because the length is 32 Jun 13, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes improve the handling and accuracy within the node API server. Error checks for empty genesis and state roots were removed from the handlers. Additionally, a typo in the CommitteeIndexRequest struct's field was corrected to ensure accurate naming, reflecting improved code maintainability and clarity.

Changes

File Change Summary
.../node-api/server/handlers/beacon.go Removed checks for empty genesisRoot and stateRoot in handler methods.
.../node-api/server/types/request.go Fixed typo in CommitteeIndexRequest struct, changing "ComitteeIndex" to "CommitteeIndex".

Poem

In the land of code where changes gleam,
Gone are checks that interrupt the stream.
Roots like whispers flow just right,
Typo mended, clarity in sight.
Little fixes, big delight,
🌟Beacon shines so clear and bright.🌟


Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@nidhi-singh02 nidhi-singh02 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range comments (2)
mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon.go (2)

Line range hint 13-19: Removal of genesisRoot length check could potentially expose the system to errors if genesisRoot is empty or null. Consider adding a validation or handling this case gracefully.


Line range hint 28-39: Removal of stateRoot length check could lead to similar issues as genesisRoot. Ensure that there's a mechanism to handle cases where stateRoot might be empty, to maintain system robustness.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ce41dd1 and 977c0c4.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon.go (2 hunks)
  • mod/node-api/server/types/request.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
mod/node-api/server/types/request.go (1)

67-67: Corrected typo in field name enhances consistency and readability.

@ocnc ocnc added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 19, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jun 19, 2024
@itsdevbear itsdevbear merged commit 43c5fcc into berachain:main Jul 18, 2024
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants