Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: add additional test for bytes #1503

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 17, 2024

Conversation

hoank101
Copy link
Contributor

@hoank101 hoank101 commented Jun 17, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Renamed functions for handling hexadecimal data to improve clarity: BytesFromHex to FromHex and the generic unmarshaling helper to UnmarshalTextHelper.
  • Tests

    • Enhanced test cases using require assertions for better error messages and improved readability.
    • Added new test functions for comprehensive test coverage.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 17, 2024

Walkthrough

This update involves renaming functions and refactoring test cases in a Go package that deals with hexadecimal data handling and text unmarshalling. The changes aim to enhance code readability and maintainability by renaming the functions for clarity and using require assertions for better test case reliability. These enhancements ensure more descriptive error messages and improve the test cases' robustness.

Changes

Files Change Summary
mod/primitives/pkg/bytes/bytes.go Renamed BytesFromHex to FromHex and a helper function for unmarshalling text to UnmarshalTextHelper for better clarity.
mod/primitives/pkg/bytes/bytes_test.go Refactored test functions to use require assertions from github.com/stretchr/testify package, providing more robust, descriptive, and readable test cases. Removed "encoding/json" import and added "fmt". Added new test functions.

Poem

In bytes and hex, we found our way,
FromHex we call without delay.
Tests now flourish, clear and bright,
With require guiding through the night.
Code refined, our joy expressed,
In this update, we're truly blessed. 🌟🐇


Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 166682f and 80ccf81.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • mod/primitives/pkg/bytes/bytes.go (2 hunks)
  • mod/primitives/pkg/bytes/bytes_test.go (27 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (19)
mod/primitives/pkg/bytes/bytes.go (4)

47-47: Renaming BytesFromHex to FromHex improves the naming consistency with other similar functions in this package.


47-47: The implementation of FromHex uses hex.NewStringStrict to ensure the input is a valid hex string, which is a good practice for error handling and data validation.


147-147: Renaming the helper function to UnmarshalTextHelper clarifies its purpose and differentiates it from the standard UnmarshalText method.


147-147: The error handling in UnmarshalTextHelper is robust, providing clear feedback on the expected and actual byte lengths, which aids in debugging and ensures data integrity.

mod/primitives/pkg/bytes/bytes_test.go (15)

26-26: Added import of fmt, reflect, and strings packages.

Ensure these packages are used appropriately in the test cases.


32-32: Switched to using require assertions from the testify package.

This change enhances test reliability by making the failure conditions clearer and stopping tests on the first failure, which is suitable for unit tests.


77-81: Refactored to use require assertions for error handling and value comparisons.

This change improves the readability and robustness of the tests by making the expected outcomes explicit and stopping the test immediately on a failed assertion.


128-128: Introduced require.True to validate results in TestMustFromHex.

Using require.True here ensures that the test will stop immediately if the condition is not met, which is appropriate for critical error checks.


138-147: Added new test cases in TestSafeCopy.

The additional cases help ensure that the function behaves correctly across more diverse scenarios.


153-153: Use of require.Equal for comparing byte slices.

This is a good use of require.Equal for byte slice comparisons, ensuring that the test is precise and stops immediately if the comparison fails.


Line range hint 162-214: Extended TestSafeCopy2D with more varied test cases.

These cases effectively cover different scenarios including empty slices and mixed lengths, which is crucial for a utility function like this.


225-225: Applied require.Equal for deep slice comparisons in TestSafeCopy2D.

This ensures that the nested slices are correctly copied, and any discrepancy is caught immediately during testing.


253-253: Used require.Equal in TestReverseEndianness to check the results.

This usage is correct and ensures that the byte order reversal is verified accurately in each test case.


286-286: Implemented require.Equal for verifying results in TestPrependExtendToSize.

Correct application of require.Equal to ensure that the byte slice is prepended correctly according to the specified size.


320-324: Enhanced error handling in TestBytes4UnmarshalJSON using require assertions.

The structured approach using require helps in immediately identifying issues with JSON unmarshalling in different scenarios.


351-351: Used require.Equal for string comparison in TestBytes4String.

This ensures that the string representation of bytes is accurate and meets expectations.


387-388: Applied require.NoError and require.Equal in TestBytes4MarshalText.

These assertions are well-used here to check both the absence of errors and the correctness of the text marshalling output.


422-426: Refactored TestBytes4UnmarshalText with improved error handling.

Using require for error checking and value comparison enhances the test's clarity and effectiveness.


431-465: Added new test function TestToBytes4 with comprehensive test cases.

This function is thoroughly tested with inputs of varying lengths, ensuring robustness.

@itsdevbear itsdevbear merged commit 3dffc64 into berachain:main Jun 17, 2024
14 checks passed
@itsdevbear
Copy link
Contributor

ty king

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants