Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(ssz): consolidate lists into one type #1666

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 1, 2024
Merged

feat(ssz): consolidate lists into one type #1666

merged 5 commits into from
Jul 1, 2024

Conversation

itsdevbear
Copy link
Contributor

@itsdevbear itsdevbear commented Jul 1, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved the creation of lists within various components to ensure accurate and efficient processing of data, enhancing overall system reliability.
    • Updated method signatures in the Withdrawal struct to ensure correct functionality and consistency.
  • Refactor

    • Renamed and updated various list handling functions to standardize their usage and improve code readability.

@itsdevbear itsdevbear requested a review from ocnc as a code owner July 1, 2024 01:41
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 1, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@itsdevbear has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 5 minutes and 51 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 37c7cb1 and 962b457.

Walkthrough

This update focuses on modifying the usage of lists within various components of the project. The primary change involves replacing ssz.ListCompositeFromElements with ssz.ListFromElements, which impacts how certain lists are constructed and manipulated. Additionally, there are updates to method signatures and type handling, particularly for the Withdrawal struct and List type, enabling more efficient and flexible processing.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
mod/cli/pkg/commands/genesis/payload.go, mod/consensus-types/pkg/genesis/genesis.go, mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload.go Replaced ssz.ListCompositeFromElements with ssz.ListFromElements for list construction.
mod/engine-primitives/pkg/engine-primitives/withdrawal.go Changed receiver type in methods for Withdrawal struct from (Withdrawal) to (*Withdrawal).
mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/list.go Renamed ListBasic to List, updated functions and method signatures to handle various types.

Poem

In the code where lists now dance,
A rabbit found a change by chance. 🐇
From composite to a simpler song,
Elements compile where they belong.
Structs and types in harmony,
Enhanced the code so gracefully.
Hip-hip-hooray, the code's delight,
A rabbit's joy in every byte!


Tip

Early access features: enabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • OpenAI gpt-4o model for code reviews and chat: OpenAI claims that this model is better at understanding and generating code than the previous models. We seek your feedback over the next few weeks before making it generally available.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues.
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 1, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 7.69231% with 48 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 22.70%. Comparing base (ed9bbea) to head (962b457).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1666      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   22.65%   22.70%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         270      270              
  Lines       11831    11804      -27     
  Branches       18       18              
==========================================
  Hits         2680     2680              
+ Misses       9029     9002      -27     
  Partials      122      122              
Files Coverage Δ
mod/consensus-types/pkg/genesis/genesis.go 94.94% <100.00%> (ø)
mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload.go 92.92% <100.00%> (ø)
mod/cli/pkg/commands/genesis/payload.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ine-primitives/pkg/engine-primitives/withdrawal.go 56.52% <0.00%> (ø)
mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/vector.go 42.00% <33.33%> (-2.69%) ⬇️
mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/list.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ed9bbea and 37c7cb1.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • mod/cli/pkg/commands/genesis/payload.go (1 hunks)
  • mod/consensus-types/pkg/genesis/genesis.go (1 hunks)
  • mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload.go (1 hunks)
  • mod/engine-primitives/pkg/engine-primitives/withdrawal.go (2 hunks)
  • mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/list.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (16)
mod/engine-primitives/pkg/engine-primitives/withdrawal.go (3)

Line range hint 74-78: LGTM!

Changing the receiver to a pointer receiver is appropriate for this method.


83-85: LGTM!

Changing the receiver to a pointer receiver is appropriate for this method.


88-90: LGTM!

Changing the receiver to a pointer receiver is appropriate for this method.

mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/list.go (10)

36-41: LGTM!

Renaming ListBasic to List and updating it to handle different types is appropriate for consolidating list types.


42-51: LGTM!

Updating ListFromElements to create a new List is appropriate for consolidating list types.


54-61: LGTM!

Updating IsFixed to handle the new List type is appropriate for consolidating list types.


63-67: LGTM!

Updating N to handle the new List type is appropriate for consolidating list types.


69-81: LGTM!

Updating ChunkCount to handle the new List type is appropriate for consolidating list types.


83-86: LGTM!

Updating SizeSSZ to handle the new List type is appropriate for consolidating list types.


88-101: LGTM!

Updating HashTreeRootWith to handle the new List type is appropriate for consolidating list types.


104-107: LGTM!

Updating HashTreeRoot to handle the new List type is appropriate for consolidating list types.


110-113: LGTM!

Updating MarshalSSZTo to handle the new List type is appropriate for consolidating list types.


121-135: LGTM!

Updating NewFromSSZ to handle the new List type is appropriate for consolidating list types.

mod/consensus-types/pkg/genesis/genesis.go (1)

Line range hint 155-159: LGTM!

Updating DefaultGenesisExecutionPayloadHeaderDeneb to use ssz.ListFromElements is appropriate for consolidating list types.

mod/cli/pkg/commands/genesis/payload.go (1)

Line range hint 186-190: LGTM!

Updating executableDataToExecutionPayloadHeader to use ssz.ListFromElements is appropriate for consolidating list types.

mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload.go (1)

84-87: Verify the correctness of the change to ssz.ListFromElements.

The change from ssz.ListCompositeFromElements to ssz.ListFromElements should be verified to ensure it maintains the intended functionality. Ensure that ssz.ListFromElements is appropriate for the data structure being handled.

Verification successful

Verify the correctness of the change to ssz.ListFromElements.

The change from ssz.ListCompositeFromElements to ssz.ListFromElements appears to be intentional and part of a broader refactoring effort. The ListFromElements function is correctly implemented to create a list from provided elements with a limit, and there are no indications of issues in its usage.

  • The definition of ListFromElements is appropriate for the data structure being handled.
  • The absence of ListCompositeFromElements in the codebase suggests it has been deprecated or replaced.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correctness of the change to `ssz.ListFromElements`.

# Test: Search for the definition and usage of `ssz.ListFromElements`. Expect: The function handles the data structure correctly.
rg --type go 'ListFromElements'

Length of output: 417



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the definition and implementation details of `ListFromElements` from `mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/list.go`.

# Search for the definition of `ListFromElements` in the relevant file.
rg --type go --context 10 'func ListFromElements' mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/list.go

Length of output: 576



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correctness of the change from `ssz.ListCompositeFromElements` to `ssz.ListFromElements`.

# Search for the definition and usage of `ListCompositeFromElements` in the codebase.
rg --type go 'ListCompositeFromElements'

Length of output: 40

@itsdevbear itsdevbear enabled auto-merge (squash) July 1, 2024 02:01
@itsdevbear itsdevbear merged commit f2087fd into main Jul 1, 2024
17 checks passed
@itsdevbear itsdevbear deleted the ssz-lits branch July 1, 2024 02:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant