Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(primitives): add more test for tree #1695

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 5, 2024

Conversation

hoank101
Copy link
Contributor

@hoank101 hoank101 commented Jul 5, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Renamed method Concatenates to Concat for improved clarity.
  • Tests

    • Added comprehensive test functions for tree index operations including GetBranchIndices, GetPathIndices, CalculateMerkleRoot, VerifyMerkleProof, GetHelperIndices, CalculateMultiMerkleRoot, and VerifyMerkleMultiproof.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes involve renaming the Concatenates method to Concat in the GeneralizedIndicies struct for simplification in the index.go file. Additionally, a suite of new test functions has been added for various operations related to tree indices and Merkle root calculations, ensuring robust validation of these functionalities.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/tree/index.go Renamed method Concatenates to Concat in GeneralizedIndicies.
mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/tree/index_test.go Introduced test functions for GetBranchIndices, GetPathIndices, CalculateMerkleRoot, VerifyMerkleProof, GetHelperIndices, CalculateMultiMerkleRoot, and VerifyMerkleMultiproof.

Poem

🐇 In the garden where code doth grow,
Methods change, new tests bestow.
From Concatenates to Concat so neat,
Ensuring indices never miss a beat.
Among Merkle roots, proofs concur,
CodeRabbit smiles, with updates we ensure. ✨


Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@itsdevbear
Copy link
Contributor

❤️

@itsdevbear itsdevbear enabled auto-merge (squash) July 5, 2024 02:04
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2065586 and 75918a2.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/tree/index.go (1 hunks)
  • mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/tree/index_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (9)
mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/tree/index.go (1)

Line range hint 139-145:
LGTM! But verify the method usage in the codebase.

The renaming from Concatenates to Concat is approved as it simplifies the method name.

However, ensure that all method calls to Concatenates are updated to Concat.

Verification successful

Renaming verified successfully.

The method Concatenates has been correctly renamed to Concat, and all instances of the old method name have been updated in the codebase.

  • Verified usage in: mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/tree/index_test.go
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all method calls to `Concatenates` are updated to `Concat`.

# Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new method name.
rg --type go $'.Concatenates'

Length of output: 28


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all method calls to `Concatenates` and `Concat` in the codebase.

# Search for the old method name `Concatenates`
rg --type go '\.Concatenates'

# Search for the new method name `Concat`
rg --type go '\.Concat'

Length of output: 131

mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/tree/index_test.go (8)

121-147: Test function looks good.

The test cases cover various scenarios for the GetBranchIndices method, ensuring its correctness.


149-174: Test function looks good.

The test cases cover various scenarios for the GetPathIndices method, ensuring its correctness.


176-217: Test function looks good.

The test cases cover valid proof and invalid proof length scenarios for the CalculateMerkleRoot method, ensuring its correctness.


219-263: Test function looks good.

The test cases cover valid proof, invalid proof, and error scenarios for the VerifyMerkleProof method, ensuring its correctness.


265-300: Test function looks good.

The test cases cover various scenarios for the GetHelperIndices method, ensuring its correctness.


302-359: Test function looks good.

The test cases cover various scenarios for the CalculateMultiMerkleRoot method, ensuring its correctness.


361-421: Test function looks good.

The test cases cover various scenarios for the VerifyMerkleMultiproof method, ensuring its correctness.


Line range hint 105-119:
Test function looks good.

The test cases cover concatenating multiple generalized indices into a single generalized index, ensuring the correctness of the Concat method.

@itsdevbear itsdevbear merged commit cc76a3a into berachain:main Jul 5, 2024
15 checks passed
@hoank101 hoank101 deleted the hoa/add-test-tree branch July 5, 2024 02:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants