-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(node-api): wire to backend #1756
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes signify a comprehensive restructuring of module dependencies and enhancements within the Node API's backend. This revamp introduces new interfaces and improves the architecture for better configurability, testing, and functionality. With an emphasis on modularity and maintainability, these updates streamline the development process and set a solid foundation for future feature expansions. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant CLI
participant NodeAPIServer
participant Backend
participant Storage
Client->>CLI: Start Node API
CLI->>NodeAPIServer: Initialize with config
NodeAPIServer->>Backend: Setup backend
Backend->>Storage: Access availability store
Storage-->>Backend: Provide availability data
Backend-->>NodeAPIServer: Backend ready
NodeAPIServer-->>CLI: Node API started
CLI-->>Client: Node API is running
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1756 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 25.57% 81.57% +56.00%
===========================================
Files 296 8 -288
Lines 12728 152 -12576
Branches 27 27
===========================================
- Hits 3255 124 -3131
+ Misses 9345 28 -9317
+ Partials 128 0 -128 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 14
Outside diff range comments (2)
mod/node-api/server/utils/vaildator.go (2)
Line range hint
35-49
:
Consider handling panics gracefully.The function panics if there is an error registering a validation function. Consider handling this more gracefully to improve robustness.
func ConstructValidator() *validator.Validate { validators := map[string](func(fl validator.FieldLevel) bool){ "state_id": ValidateStateID, "block_id": ValidateBlockID, "validator_id": ValidateValidatorID, "validator_status": ValidateValidatorStatus, "epoch": ValidateUint64, "slot": ValidateUint64, "committee_index": ValidateUint64, "hex": ValidateHex, } validate := validator.New() for tag, fn := range validators { err := validate.RegisterValidation(tag, fn) if err != nil { // Log the error and continue fmt.Printf("Error registering validation for tag %s: %v\n", tag, err) } } return validate }
[!TIP]
Codebase VerificationThe
fieldEmpty
function does not correctly identify empty fields.The function should return
true
when the field is empty, but it currently returnsfalse
.
- Location:
mod/node-api/server/utils/vaildator.go
, lines 1-38.- Code:
func fieldEmpty(fl validator.FieldLevel) bool { if value := fl.Field().String(); value == "" { return false } return true }Analysis chain
Line range hint
174-179
:
Ensure thefieldEmpty
function correctly identifies empty fields.Review the
fieldEmpty
function to ensure it correctly identifies empty fields.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `fieldEmpty` function correctly identifies empty fields. # Test: Check for correctness in the `fieldEmpty` function. Expect: Function to correctly identify empty fields. rg --type go -A 5 'func fieldEmpty' mod/node-api/server/utils/vaildator.goLength of output: 205
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files ignored due to path filters (6)
mod/beacon/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
mod/cli/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
mod/config/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
mod/node-api/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
mod/node-core/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
mod/storage/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (48)
- mod/beacon/go.mod (1 hunks)
- mod/cli/go.mod (1 hunks)
- mod/cli/pkg/flags/flags.go (2 hunks)
- mod/config/config.go (4 hunks)
- mod/config/go.mod (5 hunks)
- mod/config/pkg/template/template.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/backend.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/beacon.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/beacon_test.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/storage/backend.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/storage/helpers.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/storage/interfaces.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/storage/types.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/go.mod (2 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/config.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/handlers/backend.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/backend.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/eth1.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/genesis.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/handler.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/validators.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/handlers/handler.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/routes/beacon.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/routes/builder.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/routes/config.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/routes/debug.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/routes/events.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/routes/node.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/routes/rewards.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/routes/routes.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/routes/validator.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/server.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/server_test.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/types/response.go (2 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/utils/echo.go (3 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/utils/vaildator.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-core/go.mod (4 hunks)
- mod/node-core/pkg/builder/builder.go (3 hunks)
- mod/node-core/pkg/components/api.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-core/pkg/components/defaults.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-core/pkg/components/service_registry.go (2 hunks)
- mod/node-core/pkg/components/types.go (2 hunks)
- mod/node-core/pkg/node/node.go (2 hunks)
- mod/node-core/pkg/types/app.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-core/pkg/types/node.go (1 hunks)
- mod/state-transition/pkg/core/interfaces.go (3 hunks)
- mod/storage/go.mod (1 hunks)
- testing/files/entrypoint.sh (1 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: CodeQL
mod/node-api/backend/storage/helpers.go
[failure] 30-30: Incorrect conversion between integer types
Incorrect conversion of an unsigned 64-bit integer from strconv.ParseUint to a lower bit size type int64 without an upper bound check.
GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
mod/config/config.go
[failure] 24-24:
other declaration of blockstore
Additional comments not posted (99)
mod/node-api/server/routes/events.go (2)
12-13
: Verify the usage ofNotImplemented
handler.The route is assigned but the handler is set to
NotImplemented
. Ensure that this is intentional and will be updated with actual functionality later.
8-14
: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The function correctly assigns the route for events.
mod/node-api/server/routes/builder.go (2)
12-13
: Verify the usage ofNotImplemented
handler.The route is assigned but the handler is set to
NotImplemented
. Ensure that this is intentional and will be updated with actual functionality later.
8-14
: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The function correctly assigns the route for builder states.
mod/node-core/pkg/types/app.go (1)
8-14
: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The interface correctly extends the cosmos-sdk Application and adds the necessary method for creating query contexts.
mod/node-api/server/routes/config.go (2)
12-17
: Verify the usage ofNotImplemented
handlers.The routes are assigned but the handlers are set to
NotImplemented
. Ensure that this is intentional and will be updated with actual functionality later.
8-18
: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The function correctly assigns the routes for configuration.
mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/handler.go (2)
12-19
: LGTM!The constructor function
NewHandler
correctly initializes theHandler
struct.
21-24
: LGTM!The
NotImplemented
function correctly returns anErrNotImplemented
error.mod/node-api/server/routes/node.go (1)
12-25
: LGTM!The route definitions are correct but currently use a placeholder handler.
mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/backend.go (6)
12-12
: LGTM!The method signature and return types are correct.
13-16
: LGTM!The method signature and return types are correct.
17-22
: LGTM!The method signature and return types are correct.
23-27
: LGTM!The method signature and return types are correct.
28-32
: LGTM!The method signature and return types are correct.
33-36
: LGTM!The method signature and return types are correct.
mod/node-api/backend/beacon_test.go (1)
23-32
: Verify the removal of the test function.The removal of the
TestGetGenesisValidatorsRoot
function may reduce test coverage. Ensure that this functionality is covered by other tests or provide justification for its removal.mod/node-api/backend/storage/interfaces.go (4)
38-38
: LGTM!The method signature and return types are correct.
40-40
: LGTM!The method signature and return types are correct.
41-41
: LGTM!The method signature and return types are correct.
42-42
: LGTM!The method signature and return types are correct.
mod/node-api/server/handlers/backend.go (2)
33-33
: LGTM!The method signature and return types are correct.
35-35
: LGTM!The method signature and return types are correct.
mod/node-core/pkg/types/node.go (1)
38-38
: Verify the usage and definition of theApplication
type.The parameter type for the
RegisterApp
method has been changed fromservertypes.Application
toApplication
. Ensure that the newApplication
type is correctly defined and used throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Verify the usage and instances of the
Application
type andRegisterApp
method.The
Application
type is defined as an interface inmod/node-core/pkg/types/app.go
. Now, ensure that this type is consistently and correctly used throughout the codebase, particularly in the context of theRegisterApp
method.
Verification successful.
The
Application
type is correctly defined and used consistently throughout the codebase. TheRegisterApp
method is implemented and called appropriately with instances of theApplication
type.
- The
Application
interface is defined inmod/node-core/pkg/types/app.go
.- The
RegisterApp
method is correctly implemented inmod/node-core/pkg/node/node.go
.- The
RegisterApp
method is called with the correctApplication
type inmod/node-core/pkg/builder/builder.go
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage and definition of the new `Application` type. # Test: Search for the definition and usage of the `Application` type. Expect: Correct and consistent usage. rg --type go 'type Application' -A 10Length of output: 318
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage and instances of the `Application` type and `RegisterApp` method. # Test: Search for the usage of the `Application` type throughout the codebase. rg --type go 'Application' -A 5 # Test: Search for instances where the `RegisterApp` method is called. rg --type go 'RegisterApp' -A 5Length of output: 6151
mod/node-api/server/handlers/handler.go (3)
36-46
: LGTM!The
New
function correctly initializes theRouteHandlers
struct with abeacon.Handler
instance, improving modularity and reusability.
48-50
: LGTM!The
NotImplemented
method signature has been updated to take anecho.Context
parameter, ensuring conformity with theecho
framework's handler function signature.
30-33
: LGTM! Verify the usage of the newRouteHandlers
struct.The
RouteHandlers
struct has been modified to include abeacon.Handler
with a genericValidatorT
type. This change improves modularity and reusability.However, ensure that the new
RouteHandlers
struct is correctly used throughout the codebase.Verification successful
LGTM! The new
RouteHandlers
struct is correctly used throughout the codebase.The
RouteHandlers
struct has been consistently and correctly utilized across various route files. The changes improve modularity and reusability.
mod/node-api/server/routes/debug.go
mod/node-api/server/routes/node.go
mod/node-api/server/routes/routes.go
mod/node-api/server/routes/validator.go
mod/node-api/server/routes/config.go
mod/node-api/server/routes/rewards.go
mod/node-api/server/routes/events.go
mod/node-api/server/routes/builder.go
mod/node-api/server/routes/beacon.go
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new `RouteHandlers` struct. # Test: Search for the usage of the `RouteHandlers` struct. Expect: Correct and consistent usage. rg --type go 'RouteHandlers' -A 10Length of output: 6603
mod/node-core/pkg/components/defaults.go (2)
52-52
: Addition ofProvideNodeAPIBackend
looks good.The function
ProvideNodeAPIBackend
has been correctly added to the list of default components.
53-53
: Addition ofProvideNodeAPIServer
looks good.The function
ProvideNodeAPIServer
has been correctly added to the list of default components.mod/node-core/pkg/node/node.go (2)
Line range hint
12-12
:
Removal ofservertypes
import looks good.The import
servertypes
has been correctly removed, indicating a potential restructuring or removal of dependencies related to server types.
53-53
: Refactoring ofRegisterApp
function's parameter type looks good.The parameter type has been correctly changed from
servertypes.Application
totypes.Application
.However, ensure that all calls to
RegisterApp
in the codebase use the new parameter type.mod/node-core/pkg/components/api.go (4)
13-17
: Addition ofNodeAPIBackendInput
struct looks good.The struct
NodeAPIBackendInput
has been correctly defined.
19-64
: Addition ofProvideNodeAPIBackend
function looks good.The function
ProvideNodeAPIBackend
has been correctly defined.
66-71
: Addition ofNodeAPIServerInput
struct looks good.The struct
NodeAPIServerInput
has been correctly defined.
73-99
: Addition ofProvideNodeAPIServer
function looks good.The function
ProvideNodeAPIServer
has been correctly defined.mod/node-api/server/utils/echo.go (6)
21-21
: Change of package name fromhandlers
toutils
looks good.The package name has been correctly changed to
utils
.
Line range hint
31-49
:
Addition ofHTTPErrorHandler
function looks good.The function
HTTPErrorHandler
has been correctly defined.
Line range hint
50-61
:
Addition ofBindAndValidate
function looks good.The function
BindAndValidate
has been correctly defined.
62-65
: Addition ofWrapData
function looks good.The function
WrapData
has been correctly defined.
67-72
: Addition ofUseMiddlewares
function looks good.The function
UseMiddlewares
has been correctly defined.
Line range hint
1-1
:
Removal ofCustomValidator
struct and associated methods looks good.The
CustomValidator
struct and its associated methods have been correctly removed, indicating a potential restructuring of validation logic.mod/node-api/server/types/response.go (1)
52-56
: Ensure correct usage of the generic typeValidatorT
.The change from
*types.Validator
to a generic typeValidatorT
improves flexibility but requires verification to ensure correct usage throughout the codebase.mod/node-core/pkg/components/service_registry.go (1)
45-45
: Verify the initialization and usage ofNodeAPIServer
.The addition of
NodeAPIServer
to theServiceRegistryInput
struct should be verified to ensure it is correctly initialized and used.Verification successful
Initialization and usage of
NodeAPIServer
verified.The
NodeAPIServer
is correctly initialized and used within the codebase. It is provided by theProvideNodeAPIServer
function and utilized in theServiceRegistryInput
struct andservice.WithService
call.
mod/node-core/pkg/builder/builder.go
:apiServer *components.NodeAPIServer
mod/node-core/pkg/components/api.go
:NodeAPIServerInput
struct andProvideNodeAPIServer
function.mod/node-core/pkg/components/types.go
:NodeAPIServer
type alias.mod/node-core/pkg/components/defaults.go
:ProvideNodeAPIServer
listed among providers.mod/node-core/pkg/components/service_registry.go
:NodeAPIServer
field inServiceRegistryInput
struct and its usage inservice.WithService
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization and usage of `NodeAPIServer` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the initialization and usage of `NodeAPIServer`. rg --type go -A 5 $'NodeAPIServer'Length of output: 2995
mod/node-api/backend/storage/types.go (1)
Line range hint
1-93
:
Ensure consistency and adherence to best practices.The new file contains several interface and struct definitions. Ensure that they are consistent and adhere to best practices.
mod/node-api/server/routes/beacon.go (1)
1-94
: Ensure correctness and adherence to best practices for route definitions.The new file contains route definitions for the Beacon API. Ensure that they are correctly defined and adhere to best practices.
Verification successful
Verification successful: Route definitions are correctly integrated and adhere to best practices.
The methods used in the route definitions are correctly implemented in the
Handler
type of thebeacon
package. The route definitions inassignBeaconRoutes
are properly integrated.
GetGenesis
GetStateRoot
GetStateValidators
PostStateValidators
GetStateValidatorBalances
PostStateValidatorBalances
NotImplemented
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness and adherence to best practices of the new route definitions. # Test: Search for the usage of the new route definitions to ensure they are correctly integrated. rg --type go -A 5 $'assignBeaconRoutes'Length of output: 823
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the handlers used in the route definitions. # Test: Search for the definition of the RouteHandlers type and its methods. rg --type go 'type RouteHandlers' -A 20Length of output: 1287
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the handlers used in the route definitions. # Test: Search for the definition of the Handler type and its methods in the beacon package. rg --type go 'type Handler' -A 20Length of output: 1249
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the handlers used in the route definitions. # Test: Search for the methods used in the route definitions within the beacon package. rg --type go 'func (h Handler' -A 10Length of output: 110
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the handlers used in the route definitions. # Test: Search for the methods used in the route definitions within the beacon package. rg --type go 'func \(h Handler' -A 10Length of output: 6231
testing/files/entrypoint.sh (1)
85-86
: LGTM!The new command-line flag
--beacon-kit.node-api.enabled
is correctly integrated into theBEACON_START_CMD
script.mod/node-api/server/server.go (5)
1-30
: LGTM!The imports are necessary and the
Server
struct is correctly implemented with generics.
32-92
: LGTM!The
New
function is correctly implemented, initializing theServer
struct and setting up middlewares and routes.
94-101
: LGTM!The
Start
method is correctly implemented, starting the node API server if it is enabled.
103-106
: LGTM!The
Name
method is correctly implemented, returning the name of the service.
108-110
: LGTM!The
AttachNode
method is correctly implemented, attaching a node to the backend.mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/validators.go (5)
1-39
: LGTM!The imports are necessary and the
GetStateValidators
function is correctly implemented.
41-62
: LGTM!The
PostStateValidators
function is correctly implemented.
64-84
: LGTM!The
GetStateValidatorBalances
function is correctly implemented.
87-113
: LGTM!The
PostStateValidatorBalances
function is correctly implemented.
116-132
: LGTM!The
GetBlockRewards
function is correctly implemented.mod/config/pkg/template/template.go (1)
98-103
: LGTM!The configurations for enabling the node API and specifying the address it should bind to are correctly implemented.
mod/node-api/server/utils/vaildator.go (3)
1-11
: Ensure the imports are necessary.Verify that all the imported packages are used within the code. Redundant imports can be removed to improve readability and maintainability.
Verification successful
All imports are necessary.
The verification confirms that all the imported packages are used within the file and there are no redundant imports.
- "errors" is used in
errors.As
.- "fmt" is used in
fmt.Sprintf
.- "net/http" is used in
http.StatusBadRequest
.- "regexp" is used in
regexp.MatchString
.- "strconv" is used in
strconv.ParseUint
.- "github.com/go-playground/validator/v10" is used extensively for validation.
- "github.com/labstack/echo/v4" is used in
echo.NewHTTPError
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of imported packages in the file. # Test: Check for unused imports. Expect: All imports to be used. rg --type go -A 5 'import' mod/node-api/server/utils/vaildator.goLength of output: 124
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of imported packages in the file. # Test: Check usage of each import. Expect: All imports to be used. # Check for usage of "errors" rg --type go 'errors' mod/node-api/server/utils/vaildator.go # Check for usage of "fmt" rg --type go 'fmt' mod/node-api/server/utils/vaildator.go # Check for usage of "net/http" rg --type go 'http' mod/node-api/server/utils/vaildator.go # Check for usage of "regexp" rg --type go 'regexp' mod/node-api/server/utils/vaildator.go # Check for usage of "strconv" rg --type go 'strconv' mod/node-api/server/utils/vaildator.go # Check for usage of "github.com/go-playground/validator/v10" rg --type go 'validator' mod/node-api/server/utils/vaildator.go # Check for usage of "github.com/labstack/echo/v4" rg --type go 'echo' mod/node-api/server/utils/vaildator.goLength of output: 1936
Line range hint
132-173
:
Ensure helper functions are efficient and handle all cases.Review the helper functions to ensure they are efficient and correctly handle all possible cases.
Line range hint
50-131
:
Ensure custom validation functions handle edge cases.Review the custom validation functions to ensure they handle all possible edge cases.
mod/node-core/pkg/builder/builder.go (3)
133-134
: Ensure theapiServer
field is correctly used.Review the usage of the
apiServer
field to ensure it is correctly used and adheres to best practices.Verification successful
The
apiServer
field is correctly used.The
apiServer
field is properly initialized usingdepinject.Inject
and is used to attach the node and set the service registry. There are no indications of misuse or violations of best practices in the provided context.
apiServer
is correctly injected and used.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `apiServer` field. # Test: Check for correct usage of the `apiServer` field. Expect: Field to be correctly used. rg --type go -A 5 'apiServer' mod/node-core/pkg/builder/builder.goLength of output: 559
88-88
: Ensure theapiServer
field is correctly declared and used.Review the declaration and usage of the
apiServer
field to ensure it is correctly integrated within the struct.Verification successful
The
apiServer
field is correctly declared and used within theNodeBuilder[NodeT]
struct.
- The field is declared as
apiServer *components.NodeAPIServer
.- It is used in dependency injection with
depinject.Inject
.- It is attached to the node using
apiServer.AttachNode(nb.node)
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the declaration and usage of the `apiServer` field. # Test: Check for correct declaration and usage of the `apiServer` field. Expect: Field to be correctly declared and used. rg --type go -A 5 'apiServer' mod/node-core/pkg/builder/builder.goLength of output: 559
110-110
: Ensure theapiServer
field is correctly initialized.Review the initialization of the
apiServer
field to ensure it is correctly initialized and handles errors appropriately.Verification successful
Ensure the
apiServer
field is correctly initialized and utilized.Review the initialization and subsequent usage of the
apiServer
field to ensure it is correctly initialized and utilized without any overlooked errors.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization of the `apiServer` field. # Test: Check for correct initialization of the `apiServer` field. Expect: Field to be correctly initialized. rg --type go -A 5 'apiServer' mod/node-core/pkg/builder/builder.goLength of output: 559
mod/config/config.go (3)
33-33
: Ensure theserver
package import is necessary.Verify that the imported
server
package is used within the code. Redundant imports can be removed to improve readability and maintainability.Verification successful
The
server
package import is necessary.The
server
package is used in the following contexts within themod/config/config.go
file:
server.DefaultConfig()
at line 39server.Config
at line 47These usages confirm that the import is essential for the functionality of the code.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `server` package import. # Test: Check for usage of the `server` package. Expect: Package to be used. rg --type go -A 5 'server' mod/config/config.goLength of output: 548
71-72
: Ensure theNodeAPI
configuration is correctly added to theConfig
struct.Review the addition of the
NodeAPI
configuration in theConfig
struct to ensure it is correctly added and adheres to best practices.Verification successful
The
NodeAPI
configuration has been correctly added to theConfig
struct.
- The
NodeAPI
field is properly documented.- The
mapstructure
tag is correctly used.- The default configuration is set using
server.DefaultConfig()
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the addition of the `NodeAPI` configuration in the `Config` struct. # Test: Check for correct addition of the `NodeAPI` configuration. Expect: Configuration to be correctly added. rg --type go -A 5 'NodeAPI' mod/config/config.goLength of output: 417
53-53
: Ensure theNodeAPI
configuration is correctly added.Review the addition of the
NodeAPI
configuration in theDefaultConfig
function to ensure it is correctly added and initialized.Verification successful
The
NodeAPI
configuration is correctly added and initialized.The
NodeAPI
configuration is properly defined and initialized usingserver.DefaultConfig()
, which returns a validserver.Config
object with default values.
DefaultConfig
function inmod/node-api/server/config.go
initializesEnabled
tofalse
andAddress
to"0.0.0.0:8080"
.Config
struct inmod/node-api/server/config.go
includes fieldsEnabled
andAddress
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the addition of the `NodeAPI` configuration. # Test: Check for correct addition and initialization of the `NodeAPI` configuration. Expect: Configuration to be correctly added and initialized. rg --type go -A 5 'NodeAPI' mod/config/config.goLength of output: 417
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and initialization of `server.DefaultConfig()`. # Locate the definition of `server.DefaultConfig()` rg --type go 'func DefaultConfig' $(fd --type f --name '*.go' | grep 'server') # Verify the `server.Config` struct definition rg --type go 'type Config struct' $(fd --type f --name '*.go' | grep 'server')Length of output: 1679
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and initialization of `server.DefaultConfig()` in the correct file. # Inspect the `DefaultConfig` function in `mod/node-api/server/config.go` rg --type go -A 10 'func DefaultConfig' mod/node-api/server/config.go # Inspect the `Config` struct in `mod/node-api/server/config.go` rg --type go -A 10 'type Config struct' mod/node-api/server/config.goLength of output: 597
mod/node-api/backend/storage/backend.go (3)
1-11
: LGTM! The typebackend
is well-structured.The type parameters and struct fields are appropriately defined.
Also applies to: 68-106
13-66
: LGTM! The functionNewBackend
is well-structured.The function parameters and return type are appropriately defined.
114-132
: LGTM! The functionStateFromContext
is well-structured.The function logic and error handling are appropriately implemented.
mod/node-api/backend/backend.go (2)
31-63
: LGTM! The typeBackend
is well-structured.The type parameters and struct fields are appropriately defined.
70-119
: LGTM! The functionNew
is well-structured.The function parameters and return type are appropriately defined.
mod/cli/pkg/flags/flags.go (2)
72-75
: LGTM! The constantsNodeAPIEnabled
andNodeAPIAddress
are well-defined.The constants are appropriately defined for Node API configuration.
150-159
: LGTM! The functionAddBeaconKitFlags
is well-structured.The new flags for Node API enablement and address configuration are appropriately added.
mod/state-transition/pkg/core/interfaces.go (2)
Line range hint
64-80
:
LGTM! The interfaceReadOnlyBeaconState
is well-structured.The new type parameter
ForkT
and methods are appropriately defined.
53-53
: LGTM! The interfaceBeaconState
is well-structured.The new type parameter
ForkT
is appropriately defined.mod/node-api/backend/beacon.go (9)
27-29
: Update import paths.The import paths have been updated to reflect changes in dependencies. Ensure that these paths are correct and relevant to the changes made in the functions.
36-44
: RefactoredGetGenesis
function.The function
GetGenesis
has been refactored for improved readability and maintainability. The logic appears to be correct.
48-66
: RefactoredGetStateRoot
function.The function
GetStateRoot
has been refactored for improved readability and maintainability. The logic appears to be correct.
70-81
: RefactoredGetStateFork
function.The function
GetStateFork
has been refactored for improved readability and maintainability. The return type has been updated toForkT
. Ensure that the new return type is correctly handled in the rest of the codebase.
85-103
: RefactoredGetBlockRoot
function.The function
GetBlockRoot
has been refactored for improved readability and maintainability. The logic appears to be correct.
123-146
: RefactoredGetStateValidator
function.The function
GetStateValidator
has been refactored for improved readability and maintainability. The return type has been updated to*apitypes.ValidatorData[ValidatorT]
. Ensure that the new return type is correctly handled in the rest of the codebase.
156-170
: RefactoredGetStateValidators
function.The function
GetStateValidators
has been refactored for improved readability and maintainability. The return type has been updated to[]*apitypes.ValidatorData[ValidatorT]
. Ensure that the new return type is correctly handled in the rest of the codebase.
175-199
: RefactoredGetStateValidatorBalances
function.The function
GetStateValidatorBalances
has been refactored for improved readability and maintainability. The logic appears to be correct.
204-212
: AddedgetValidatorIndex
function.The function
getValidatorIndex
has been added to handle different input cases for validator index retrieval. The logic appears to be correct.mod/storage/go.mod (2)
Line range hint
5-9
: Update module replacements.The module replacements have been updated to reflect changes in dependencies. Ensure that these paths are correct and relevant to the changes made in the dependencies.
Line range hint
13-13
: Update dependencygit.luolix.top/cosmos/cosmos-sdk
.The dependency
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk
has been updated to versionv0.51.0
. Ensure that this version is compatible with the rest of the codebase and does not introduce breaking changes.mod/config/go.mod (2)
5-8
: Add module replacements.The module replacements have been added to reflect changes in dependencies. Ensure that these paths are correct and relevant to the changes made in the dependencies.
Line range hint
62-90
: Add new module requirements.New module requirements have been added. Ensure that these modules are necessary and do not introduce unnecessary dependencies.
mod/node-api/go.mod (2)
5-9
: Update module replacements.The module replacements have been updated to reflect changes in dependencies. Ensure that these paths are correct and relevant to the changes made in the dependencies.
Line range hint
24-204
: Add new module requirements.New module requirements have been added. Ensure that these modules are necessary and do not introduce unnecessary dependencies.
mod/node-core/pkg/components/types.go (4)
40-44
: LGTM! New import statements are necessary and correctly used.The new imports for
backend
,server
, andtypes
are appropriate and align with the changes in the file.
236-255
: LGTM! New type aliasNodeAPIBackend
is correctly defined.The new type alias
NodeAPIBackend
includesnodetypes.Node
andWithdrawalCredentials
, which are appropriate additions.
257-261
: LGTM! New type aliasNodeAPIServer
is correctly defined.The new type alias
NodeAPIServer
includesnodetypes.Node
and*Validator
, which are appropriate additions.
44-44
: LGTM! New type declarationnodetypes.Node
is correctly defined.The new type declaration
nodetypes.Node
is appropriate and aligns with the changes in the file.mod/cli/go.mod (2)
Line range hint
1-1
: Verify the removal of the dependencygit.luolix.top/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/primitives
.Ensure that the removal of this dependency does not affect the functionality of the module.
Line range hint
1-1
: Verify the update of the dependencygit.luolix.top/cosmos/cosmos-sdk
.Ensure that the update to version
v0.46.0-beta2.0.20240624014538-75ba469b1881
does not introduce any issues.mod/node-core/go.mod (3)
9-12
: LGTM! Updated and new replace directives are necessary and correctly used.The updated replace directives for
cosmos-sdk
dependencies and new replace directives forbeacon
,config
,node-api
, andstorage
modules from the local directory are appropriate.
34-38
: LGTM! Updated dependencies forbeacon-kit
modules are necessary and correctly used.The updated versions for
beacon-kit
modules are appropriate.
Line range hint
48-70
: LGTM! New external dependencies are necessary and correctly used.The new external dependencies like
labstack/echo/v4
,gabriel-vasile/mimetype
,go-playground/validator/v10
, and others are appropriate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utack, good starting cleannup work
do we think there is a way to decouple handlers from echo?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 11
Outside diff range comments (2)
mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/validators.go (1)
Line range hint
107-126
:
Consider usingutils.BindAndValidate
for consistency.The function uses
echo.DefaultBinder
andecho.PathParamsBinder
for binding and validating request parameters. For consistency, consider usingutils.BindAndValidate
like the other functions.- params := &types.ValidatorBalancesPostRequest{} - if err := (&echo.DefaultBinder{}).BindBody(c, ¶ms.IDs); err != nil { - return err - } - pathParamErr := echo.PathParamsBinder(c). - String("state_id", ¶ms.StateID). - BindError() - if pathParamErr != nil { - return pathParamErr - } - if err := c.Validate(params); err != nil { - return err - } + params, err := utils.BindAndValidate[types.ValidatorBalancesPostRequest](c) + if err != nil { + return err + } + if params == nil { + return echo.ErrInternalServerError + }mod/node-api/server/utils/vaildator.go (1)
Line range hint
55-70
:
Consider adding error handling for thepanic
case.Adding error handling for the
panic
case can help in gracefully handling errors during validator construction.- panic(err) + log.Fatalf("Failed to register validation: %v", err)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files ignored due to path filters (6)
mod/beacon/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
mod/cli/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
mod/config/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
mod/node-api/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
mod/node-core/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
mod/storage/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (40)
- mod/beacon/go.mod (1 hunks)
- mod/cli/go.mod (1 hunks)
- mod/config/config.go (3 hunks)
- mod/config/go.mod (5 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/beacon.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/storage/backend.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/storage/helpers.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/storage/interfaces.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/storage/mocks/availability_store.mock.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/storage/mocks/backend.mock.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/storage/mocks/block_store.mock.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/storage/mocks/deposit.mock.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/storage/mocks/deposit_store.mock.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/storage/mocks/validator.mock.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/storage/mocks/withdrawal.mock.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/storage/mocks/withdrawal_credentials.mock.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/storage/types.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/go.mod (2 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/config.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/backend.go (2 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/genesis.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/handler.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/validators.go (7 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/routes/beacon.go (2 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/routes/builder.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/routes/config.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/routes/debug.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/routes/events.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/routes/node.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/routes/rewards.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/routes/routes.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/routes/validator.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/server.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/server_test.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/utils/echo.go (3 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/utils/vaildator.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-core/go.mod (4 hunks)
- mod/node-core/pkg/components/api.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-core/pkg/types/app.go (1 hunks)
- mod/storage/go.mod (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (150)
mod/node-api/server/routes/builder.go (1)
28-33
: Verify the endpoint path and handler.The function
assignBuilderRoutes
sets up a GET endpoint for expected withdrawals based on a state ID using a placeholder handlerh.NotImplemented
. Ensure that the endpoint path/eth/v1/builder/states/:state_id/expected_withdrawals
and the handler are correctly defined and implemented in the future.mod/node-api/server/routes/events.go (1)
28-33
: Verify the endpoint path and handler.The function
assignEventsRoutes
sets up a GET endpoint for events using a placeholder handlerh.NotImplemented
. Ensure that the endpoint path/eth/v1/events
and the handler are correctly defined and implemented in the future.mod/node-api/server/routes/config.go (1)
28-37
: Verify the endpoint paths and handlers.The function
assignConfigRoutes
sets up routes for fetching Ethereum configuration details using placeholder handlersh.NotImplemented
. Ensure that the endpoint paths/eth/v1/config/fork_schedule
,/eth/v1/config/spec
, and/eth/v1/config/deposit_contract
and the handlers are correctly defined and implemented in the future.mod/node-core/pkg/types/app.go (1)
28-35
: LGTM!The interface
Application
is well-structured and follows best practices.mod/node-api/server/routes/debug.go (1)
28-38
: Add error handling for route assignments.The current implementation of
assignDebugRoutes
lacks error handling for route assignments. Although Echo'sGET
method does not return errors, it is a good practice to include error handling for future maintainability and to handle potential issues gracefully.func assignDebugRoutes[ValidatorT any]( e *echo.Echo, h handlers.RouteHandlers[ValidatorT], ) { if err := e.GET("/eth/v2/debug/beacon/states/:state_id", h.NotImplemented); err != nil { // Handle error, e.g., log it } if err := e.GET("/eth/v2/debug/beacon/states/heads", h.NotImplemented); err != nil { // Handle error, e.g., log it } if err := e.GET("/eth/v1/debug/fork_choice", h.NotImplemented); err != nil { // Handle error, e.g., log it } }mod/node-api/server/routes/rewards.go (1)
28-38
: Add error handling for route assignments.The current implementation of
assignRewardsRoutes
lacks error handling for route assignments. Although Echo'sGET
andPOST
methods do not return errors, it is a good practice to include error handling for future maintainability and to handle potential issues gracefully.func assignRewardsRoutes[ValidatorT any]( e *echo.Echo, h handlers.RouteHandlers[ValidatorT], ) { if err := e.POST("/eth/v1/beacon/rewards/sync_committee/:block_id", h.NotImplemented); err != nil { // Handle error, e.g., log it } if err := e.GET("/eth/v1/beacon/rewards/blocks/:block_id", h.GetBlockRewards); err != nil { // Handle error, e.g., log it } if err := e.POST("/eth/v1/beacon/rewards/attestations/:epoch", h.NotImplemented); err != nil { // Handle error, e.g., log it } }mod/node-api/server/config.go (1)
23-37
: Consider adding validation for configuration values.The current implementation of the
Config
struct andDefaultConfig
function does not include validation for configuration values. Adding validation ensures that the configuration is correct and helps prevent potential issues at runtime.package server import ( "errors" ) // Config is the configuration for the node API server. type Config struct { // Enabled is the flag to enable the node API server. Enabled bool `mapstructure:"enabled"` // Address is the address to bind the node API server to. Address string `mapstructure:"address"` } // DefaultConfig returns the default configuration for the node API server. func DefaultConfig() Config { return Config{ Enabled: false, Address: "0.0.0.0:8080", } } // Validate validates the configuration values. func (c *Config) Validate() error { if c.Address == "" { return errors.New("address cannot be empty") } return nil }mod/node-api/server/routes/routes.go (1)
28-41
: Fix typo in function call.There is a typo in the function call
aasignNodeRoutes
. It should beassignNodeRoutes
.- aasignNodeRoutes(e, handler) + assignNodeRoutes(e, handler)mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/handler.go (3)
1-21
: LGTM!The license information and package declaration are standard and correct.
23-30
: LGTM!The imports and struct definition are correct and necessary.
32-44
: LGTM!The
NewHandler
function correctly initializes theHandler
struct, and theNotImplemented
method serves as a placeholder for future implementation.mod/node-api/server/routes/node.go (3)
1-21
: LGTM!The license information and package declaration are standard and correct.
23-26
: LGTM!The imports are correct and necessary for route handling.
28-46
: Fix the typo in the function name.The function name
aasignNodeRoutes
appears to have a typo. It should beassignNodeRoutes
.- func aasignNodeRoutes[ValidatorT any]( + func assignNodeRoutes[ValidatorT any](Likely invalid or redundant comment.
mod/node-api/backend/storage/helpers.go (2)
1-21
: LGTM!The license information and package declaration are standard and correct.
23-37
: LGTM!The imports and constants are correct and necessary for storage operations.
mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/genesis.go (2)
1-21
: LGTM!The license information and package declaration are standard and correct.
23-30
: LGTM!The imports are correct and necessary for the genesis handler.
mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/backend.go (5)
51-52
: LGTM! But verify the method usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all method calls to
GetStateValidatorBalances
match the new signature.
46-47
: LGTM! But verify the method usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all method calls to
GetStateValidator
match the new signature.Verification successful
Verification Successful: Method usage matches the new signature.
The method
GetStateValidator
is consistently used with the new signature across the codebase.
mod/node-api/backend/beacon.go: validatorData, err := b.GetStateValidator(ctx, stateID, indexOrKey)
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all method calls to `GetStateValidator` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'GetStateValidator'Length of output: 6302
41-42
: LGTM! But verify the method usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all method calls to
GetStateValidators
match the new signature.Verification successful
The method usage of
GetStateValidators
is consistent and intentional.The underscore
_
used for thestatus
parameter inmod/node-api/backend/beacon.go
is a deliberate choice to ignore the parameter without affecting the method's functionality.
mod/node-api/backend/beacon.go
: Thestatus
parameter is intentionally ignored using_
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all method calls to `GetStateValidators` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'GetStateValidators'Length of output: 2605
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Inspect the context around the method usage in `mod/node-api/backend/beacon.go` to understand the discrepancy. # Test: Display 10 lines before and after the method usage to provide context. rg --type go -B 10 -A 10 $'GetStateValidators' mod/node-api/backend/beacon.goLength of output: 650
Line range hint
38-39
:
LGTM! But verify the method usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all method calls to
GetGenesis
match the new signature.Verification successful
Verification successful!
All invocations of the
GetGenesis
method match the new signature withctx context.Context
.
mod/node-api/backend/beacon.go
mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/genesis.go
mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/backend.go
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all method calls to `GetGenesis` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'GetGenesis'Length of output: 12120
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all method calls to `GetGenesis` match the new signature with `ctx context.Context`. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 'GetGenesis('Length of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all method calls to `GetGenesis` match the new signature with `ctx context.Context`. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 'GetGenesis\('Length of output: 1690
55-56
: LGTM! But verify the method usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all method calls to
GetBlockRewards
match the new signature.mod/node-api/server/utils/echo.go (4)
Line range hint
31-49
:
LGTM!The
HTTPErrorHandler
function is well-implemented and handles errors appropriately.
Line range hint
50-62
:
LGTM!The
BindAndValidate
function is well-implemented and handles request binding and validation appropriately.
63-66
: LGTM!The
WrapData
function is well-implemented and handles data wrapping appropriately.
68-73
: LGTM!The
UseMiddlewares
function is well-implemented and handles middleware addition appropriately.mod/node-api/backend/storage/interfaces.go (4)
58-59
: LGTM!The
AttachNode
method is well-implemented and handles node attachment appropriately.
60-61
: LGTM!The
AvailabilityStore
method is well-implemented and handles availability store retrieval appropriately.
62-63
: LGTM!The
BlockStore
method is well-implemented and handles block store retrieval appropriately.
Line range hint
64-65
:
LGTM!The
StateFromContext
method is well-implemented and handles state retrieval appropriately.mod/node-api/server/routes/validator.go (1)
28-64
: Reminder: Implement the handler functions.All the routes defined in the
assignValidatorRoutes
function are currently set toNotImplemented
. Ensure that the actual handler functions are implemented to provide the necessary functionality.mod/node-api/backend/storage/mocks/withdrawal.mock.go (4)
11-14
: LGTM!The
Withdrawal
struct is correctly defined as a mock type.
16-18
: LGTM!The
Withdrawal_Expecter
struct is correctly defined as a helper for setting expectations on the mock.
24-40
: LGTM!The
New
function is correctly defined as a mock function for creating a newWithdrawal
instance. The panic ensures proper mock configuration.
73-85
: LGTM!The
NewWithdrawal
function is correctly defined. It ensures that the mock expectations are asserted at the end of the test.mod/node-api/backend/storage/mocks/withdrawal_credentials.mock.go (4)
10-13
: LGTM!The
WithdrawalCredentials
struct is correctly defined as a mock type.
15-17
: LGTM!The
WithdrawalCredentials_Expecter
struct is correctly defined as a helper for setting expectations on the mock.
23-51
: LGTM!The
ToExecutionAddress
function is correctly defined as a mock function for converting withdrawal credentials to an execution address. The panic ensures proper mock configuration.
80-92
: LGTM!The
NewWithdrawalCredentials
function is correctly defined. It ensures that the mock expectations are asserted at the end of the test.mod/node-core/pkg/components/api.go (3)
39-84
: LGTM!The
ProvideNodeAPIBackend
function is correctly defined. It initializes the storage backend and returns a new backend instance.
33-37
: LGTM!The
NodeAPIBackendInput
struct is correctly defined as input for theProvideNodeAPIBackend
function.
93-119
: LGTM!The
ProvideNodeAPIServer
function is correctly defined. It initializes the server with the provided configuration and backend.mod/node-api/server/routes/beacon.go (1)
Line range hint
28-71
:
LGTM!The
assignBeaconRoutes
function is correctly defined. The restructuring to accept a generic type and the changes in the package declaration are appropriate.mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/validators.go (4)
Line range hint
61-80
:
LGTM! Verify the usage ofutils.BindAndValidate
.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that
utils.BindAndValidate
is correctly implemented and used consistently across the codebase.
Line range hint
84-101
:
LGTM! Verify the usage ofutils.BindAndValidate
.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that
utils.BindAndValidate
is correctly implemented and used consistently across the codebase.
Line range hint
136-150
:
LGTM! Verify the usage ofutils.BindAndValidate
.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that
utils.BindAndValidate
is correctly implemented and used consistently across the codebase.
Line range hint
32-57
:
LGTM! Verify the usage ofutils.BindAndValidate
.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that
utils.BindAndValidate
is correctly implemented and used consistently across the codebase.Verification successful
Verify the usage of
utils.BindAndValidate
across the codebase.The implementation of
BindAndValidate
looks correct. Now, let's ensure it is used consistently across the codebase.
Verified the usage of
utils.BindAndValidate
across the codebase.The
BindAndValidate
function is implemented correctly and used consistently across the codebase.
mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/validators.go
mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/eth1.go
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `utils.BindAndValidate`. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Correct implementation. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func BindAndValidate[$_]($_) ($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 739
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `utils.BindAndValidate` across the codebase. # Search for the usage of `BindAndValidate` function. rg 'utils\.BindAndValidate'Length of output: 624
mod/node-api/backend/storage/types.go (6)
34-43
: LGTM!The
AvailabilityStore
interface is well-defined and follows best practices for Go interfaces.
45-53
: LGTM!The
BlockStore
interface is well-defined and follows best practices for Go interfaces.
61-71
: LGTM!The
DepositStore
interface is well-defined and follows best practices for Go interfaces.
74-86
: LGTM!The
Validator
interface is well-defined and follows best practices for Go interfaces.
89-96
: LGTM!The
Withdrawal
interface is well-defined and follows best practices for Go interfaces.
99-103
: LGTM!The
WithdrawalCredentials
interface is well-defined and follows best practices for Go interfaces.mod/config/config.go (3)
32-32
: LGTM!The import statement for the
server
package is correct and necessary for the addedNodeAPI
configuration.
52-52
: LGTM!The
DefaultConfig
function has been correctly updated to include theNodeAPI
configuration.
70-71
: LGTM!The
Config
struct has been correctly updated to include theNodeAPI
configuration.mod/node-api/server/server.go (5)
1-19
: LGTM! License information is correctly formatted.The license information appears to be standard and correctly formatted.
23-39
: LGTM! Import statements are appropriate.The import statements appear to be necessary for the functionality of the server.
43-51
: LGTM! Type declaration is well-structured.The type declaration appears to be well-structured and follows Go's generic programming conventions.
128-131
: LGTM! Function implementation is correct.The function is simple and correctly implemented.
133-135
: LGTM! Function implementation is correct.The function is simple and correctly implemented.
mod/node-api/server/utils/vaildator.go (6)
Line range hint
1-19
:
LGTM! License information is correctly formatted.The license information appears to be standard and correctly formatted.
21-31
: LGTM! Import statements are appropriate.The import statements appear to be necessary for the functionality of the custom validator.
34-54
: LGTM! Type declaration and method implementation are well-structured.The type declaration and method implementation appear to be well-structured and follow Go's conventions.
Line range hint
71-78
:
LGTM! Function implementation is correct.The function is correctly implemented.
Line range hint
79-84
:
LGTM! Function implementation is correct.The function is correctly implemented.
Line range hint
85-91
:
LGTM! Function implementation is correct.The function is correctly implemented.
mod/node-api/backend/storage/mocks/availability_store.mock.go (4)
1-2
: LGTM! Auto-generated code comment is correctly formatted.The auto-generated code comment appears to be standard and correctly formatted.
5-10
: LGTM! Import statements are appropriate.The import statements appear to be necessary for the functionality of the mock implementation.
12-15
: LGTM! Type declaration is well-structured.The type declaration appears to be well-structured and follows Go's generic programming conventions.
120-132
: LGTM! Function implementation is correct.The function is correctly implemented.
mod/node-api/backend/storage/backend.go (3)
1-19
: LGTM! License information is correctly formatted.The license information appears to be standard and correctly formatted.
21-31
: LGTM! Import statements are appropriate.The import statements appear to be necessary for the functionality of the backend.
128-132
: LGTM! Function implementation is correct.The function is simple and correctly implemented.
mod/node-api/backend/storage/mocks/block_store.mock.go (3)
76-91
: Verify the correctness of thePrune
method.Ensure that the method correctly handles the return values and potential errors.
Verification successful
The
Prune
method is correctly tested and handles return values and errors as expected.The method is used in multiple test scenarios, ensuring its correct functionality.
mod/storage/pkg/pruner/pruner_test.go
: Tests various pruning scenarios and ensures correct handling.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `Prune` method in the mock implementation. # Test: Search for the `Prune` method usage. Expect: Correct handling of return values and errors. rg --type go -A 5 'func (_m \*BlockStore\[BeaconBlockT\]) Prune'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `Prune` method in the mock implementation. # Test: Search for the `Prune` method usage in test files. Expect: Correct handling of return values and errors. rg --type go -A 5 'Prune' --glob '*_test.go'Length of output: 10725
123-138
: Verify the correctness of theSet
method.Ensure that the method correctly handles the return values and potential errors.
Verification successful
Verify the correctness of the
Set
method.The
Set
method in the mock implementation correctly handles return values and errors as it checks for the presence of return values and appropriately handles different types of return values (functions or errors).
- File:
mod/node-api/backend/storage/mocks/block_store.mock.go
- Lines: 123-138
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `Set` method in the mock implementation. # Test: Search for the `Set` method usage. Expect: Correct handling of return values and errors. rg --type go -A 5 'func (_m \*BlockStore\[BeaconBlockT\]) Set'Length of output: 64
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `Set` method in the mock implementation. # Test: Search for the `Set` method usage in the entire codebase to ensure it handles return values and errors correctly. rg 'Set(' --type go -A 5Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `Set` method in the mock implementation. # Test: Search for the `Set` method usage in the entire codebase to ensure it handles return values and errors correctly. rg 'Set\(' --type go -A 5Length of output: 26040
20-45
: Verify the correctness of theGet
method.Ensure that the method correctly handles the return values and potential errors.
mod/node-api/backend/beacon.go (8)
83-102
: Verify the correctness of theGetBlockRoot
method.Ensure that the method correctly retrieves the block root and handles potential errors.
Verification successful
Let's generate a new shell script to search for the
GetBlockRoot
method usage and its context in the codebase to verify its correctness and error handling.
Verify the correctness of the
GetBlockRoot
method.The
GetBlockRoot
method is correctly implemented and used across the codebase, with consistent error handling and clear logic.
- The method retrieves the block root at a given stateID and handles potential errors appropriately.
- No issues were found in the implementation or usage of this method.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `GetBlockRoot` method in the backend implementation. # Test: Search for the `GetBlockRoot` method usage. Expect: Correct retrieval of block root and error handling. rg --type go -A 5 'func (b Backend\[\]) GetBlockRoot'Length of output: 55
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `GetBlockRoot` method in the backend implementation. # Search for the `GetBlockRoot` method usage across the codebase and include context lines for better understanding. rg 'GetBlockRoot' -A 10 -B 10Length of output: 20763
34-43
: Verify the correctness of theGetGenesis
method.Ensure that the method correctly retrieves the state and handles potential errors.
122-145
: Verify the correctness of theGetStateValidator
method.Ensure that the method correctly retrieves the validator data and handles potential errors.
Verification successful
Verify the correctness of the
GetStateValidator
method.The
GetStateValidator
method is used in theGetStateValidators
method and other related methods, indicating it is correctly integrated to retrieve validator data and handle errors as expected.
mod/node-api/backend/beacon.go
:GetStateValidators
methodmod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/backend.go
: Interface definitionsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `GetStateValidator` method in the backend implementation. # Test: Search for the `GetStateValidator` method usage. Expect: Correct retrieval of validator data and error handling. rg --type go -A 5 'func (b Backend\[\]) GetStateValidator'Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `GetStateValidator` method in the backend implementation. # Test: Search for the `GetStateValidator` method usage across the codebase. rg 'GetStateValidator' --type go -A 10Length of output: 9896
202-212
: Verify the correctness of thegetValidatorIndex
method.Ensure that the method correctly retrieves the validator index and handles potential errors.
Verification successful
The
getValidatorIndex
method is implemented and used correctly.The method correctly retrieves the validator index and handles potential errors. The usages in
GetStateValidator
and the function retrieving validator balances both handle errors appropriately.
mod/node-api/backend/beacon.go
:getValidatorIndex
method and its usages.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `getValidatorIndex` method in the backend implementation. # Test: Search for the `getValidatorIndex` method usage. Expect: Correct retrieval of validator index and error handling. rg --type go -A 5 'func (b Backend\[\]) getValidatorIndex'Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `getValidatorIndex` method in the backend implementation. # Test: Search for the `getValidatorIndex` method usage. Expect: Correct retrieval of validator index and error handling. rg --type go 'getValidatorIndex'Length of output: 316
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract more context around the usages of the `getValidatorIndex` method in the backend implementation. # Extract 10 lines of context around each usage of `getValidatorIndex`. rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 'getValidatorIndex' mod/node-api/backend/beacon.goLength of output: 1703
46-65
: Verify the correctness of theGetStateRoot
method.Ensure that the method correctly retrieves the state root and handles potential errors.
Verification successful
Let's create a new script to search for the
GetStateRoot
method and its usage more broadly.
Let's correct the regex patterns and re-run the script to search for the
GetStateRoot
method definition and its usage.
The
GetStateRoot
method is correctly implemented and used across the codebase.The method is defined in
mod/node-api/backend/beacon.go
and is used in multiple places, including test files, indicating proper implementation and testing.
mod/node-api/backend/beacon.go
mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/eth1.go
mod/state-transition/pkg/core/types.go
mod/state-transition/pkg/core/state_processor.go
mod/execution/pkg/engine/types.go
mod/engine-primitives/pkg/engine-primitives/requests.go
mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/header.go
mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/interfaces.go
mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload.go
mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload_header.go
mod/beacon/validator/block_builder.go
mod/beacon/blockchain/types.go
mod/beacon/blockchain/receive.go
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `GetStateRoot` method in the backend implementation. # Test: Search for the `GetStateRoot` method usage. Expect: Correct retrieval of state root and error handling. rg --type go -A 5 'func (b Backend\[\]) GetStateRoot'Length of output: 55
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and usage of the `GetStateRoot` method in the backend implementation. # Search for the definition of the `GetStateRoot` method. rg --type go 'func (b Backend' -A 10 # Search for the usage of the `GetStateRoot` method. rg --type go 'GetStateRoot('Length of output: 218
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and usage of the `GetStateRoot` method in the backend implementation. # Search for the definition of the `GetStateRoot` method. rg --type go 'func \(b Backend\[.*\]\) GetStateRoot' -A 10 # Search for the usage of the `GetStateRoot` method. rg --type go 'GetStateRoot\('Length of output: 4360
153-169
: Verify the correctness of theGetStateValidators
method.Ensure that the method correctly retrieves the validators' data and handles potential errors.
Verification successful
Verification successful for the
GetStateValidators
method.The
GetStateValidators
method correctly retrieves validators' data by callingGetStateValidator
for each ID and handles potential errors appropriately.
mod/node-api/backend/beacon.go
: Implementation ofGetStateValidators
andGetStateValidator
.mod/node-api/server/handlers/beacon/validators.go
: Usage ofGetStateValidators
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `GetStateValidators` method in the backend implementation. # Test: Search for the `GetStateValidators` method usage. Expect: Correct retrieval of validators' data and error handling. rg --type go -A 5 'func (b Backend\[\]) GetStateValidators'Length of output: 61
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `GetStateValidators` method in the backend implementation. # Test 1: Search for the `GetStateValidators` method usage. Expect: Correct retrieval of validators' data and error handling. rg --type go 'GetStateValidators' # Test 2: Search for the implementation of the `GetStateValidator` method, as it is invoked within `GetStateValidators`. rg --type go 'func (b Backend\[\]) GetStateValidator'Length of output: 585
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `GetStateValidators` method in the backend implementation. # Test 1: Search for the `GetStateValidators` method usage. Expect: Correct retrieval of validators' data and error handling. rg --type go 'GetStateValidators' # Test 2: Search for the implementation of the `GetStateValidator` method, as it is invoked within `GetStateValidators`. rg --type go 'func GetStateValidator'Length of output: 569
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `GetStateValidators` method in the backend implementation. # Test 1: Search for the `GetStateValidators` method usage. Expect: Correct retrieval of validators' data and error handling. rg --type go 'GetStateValidators' # Test 2: Search for the implementation of the `GetStateValidator` method, as it is invoked within `GetStateValidators`. rg --type go 'GetStateValidator' # Test 3: Search for any interface definitions that might include `GetStateValidator`. rg --type go 'GetStateValidator' -A 5Length of output: 8116
172-199
: Verify the correctness of theGetStateValidatorBalances
method.Ensure that the method correctly retrieves the validators' balances and handles potential errors.
68-80
: Verify the correctness of theGetStateFork
method.Ensure that the method correctly retrieves the state fork and handles potential errors.
mod/node-api/backend/storage/mocks/deposit_store.mock.go (3)
66-93
: Verify the correctness of theGetDepositsByIndex
method.Ensure that the method correctly handles the return values and potential errors.
Verification successful
The
GetDepositsByIndex
method is correctly implemented and used across the codebase.The method handles return values and potential errors appropriately as seen in the context of its usage.
- Verified instances of
GetDepositsByIndex
in various files.- Confirmed correct handling of return values and errors.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `GetDepositsByIndex` method in the mock implementation. # Test: Search for the `GetDepositsByIndex` method usage. Expect: Correct handling of return values and errors. rg --type go -A 5 'func (_m \*DepositStore\[DepositT\]) GetDepositsByIndex'Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `GetDepositsByIndex` method in the mock implementation. # Test: Search for any usage of the `GetDepositsByIndex` method across the codebase. rg 'GetDepositsByIndex' -A 5Length of output: 6873
20-35
: Verify the correctness of theEnqueueDeposits
method.Ensure that the method correctly handles the return values and potential errors.
Verification successful
The
EnqueueDeposits
method in the mock implementation handles return values and errors appropriately.The method correctly checks for the presence of return values and handles them accordingly. The panic for missing return values ensures that the mock is used correctly during testing.
mod/node-api/backend/storage/mocks/deposit_store.mock.go
:
- Handles return values and errors as expected.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `EnqueueDeposits` method in the mock implementation. # Test: Search for the `EnqueueDeposits` method usage. Expect: Correct handling of return values and errors. rg --type go -A 5 'func (_m \*DepositStore\[DepositT\]) EnqueueDeposits'Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `EnqueueDeposits` method in the mock implementation. # Search for the definition of the `EnqueueDeposits` method. rg --type go 'func (_m \*DepositStore\[DepositT\]) EnqueueDeposits' -A 10 # Search for the usage of the `EnqueueDeposits` method across the codebase. rg --type go 'EnqueueDeposits' -A 5Length of output: 7296
125-140
: Verify the correctness of thePrune
method.Ensure that the method correctly handles the return values and potential errors.
Verification successful
The
Prune
method indeposit_store.mock.go
handles return values and potential errors correctly.The method checks for specified return values and handles them appropriately. The mock implementation aligns with expected behavior.
deposit_store.mock.go
: Lines 125-140Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the `Prune` method in the mock implementation. # Test: Search for the `Prune` method usage. Expect: Correct handling of return values and errors. rg --type go -A 5 'func (_m \*DepositStore\[DepositT\]) Prune'Length of output: 64
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the `Prune` method definition in Go files ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func ($_ *DepositStore[$_]) Prune($_, $_) error' # Search for the usage of the `Prune` method in Go files rg --type go 'Prune('Length of output: 1494
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the `Prune` method definition in Go files ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func ($_ *DepositStore[$_]) Prune($_, $_) error' # Search for the usage of the `Prune` method in Go files with corrected regex pattern rg --type go 'Prune\('Length of output: 3891
mod/storage/go.mod (1)
Line range hint
5-5
:
Verify the correctness of the dependency changes.Ensure that the changes to the
go.mod
file do not introduce issues with dependency resolution and compatibility.mod/node-api/backend/storage/mocks/validator.mock.go (7)
13-15
: LGTM!The
Validator
struct is correctly defined with a type parameter and embedsmock.Mock
.
17-19
: LGTM!The
Validator_Expecter
struct is correctly defined with a type parameter and contains a reference tomock.Mock
.
21-23
: LGTM!The
EXPECT
method correctly returns a new instance ofValidator_Expecter
.
25-41
: LGTM!The
GetWithdrawalCredentials
method is correctly implemented as a mock function.
43-46
: LGTM!The
Validator_GetWithdrawalCredentials_Call
struct is correctly defined to shadowmock.Call
for theGetWithdrawalCredentials
method.
70-86
: LGTM!The
IsFullyWithdrawable
method is correctly implemented as a mock function.
164-176
: LGTM!The
NewValidator
function correctly creates a new instance ofValidator
and registers a testing interface on the mock.mod/config/go.mod (2)
5-8
: LGTM!The
replace
block correctly substitutes two modules with local paths for local development and testing.
Line range hint
62-125
:
LGTM!The new module requirements correctly reflect updates and dependencies necessary for the module.
mod/node-api/backend/storage/mocks/deposit.mock.go (7)
8-10
: LGTM!The
Deposit
struct is correctly defined and embedsmock.Mock
.
12-14
: LGTM!The
Deposit_Expecter
struct is correctly defined and contains a reference tomock.Mock
.
16-18
: LGTM!The
EXPECT
method correctly returns a new instance ofDeposit_Expecter
.
20-36
: LGTM!The
GetIndex
method is correctly implemented as a mock function.
38-41
: LGTM!The
Deposit_GetIndex_Call
struct is correctly defined to shadowmock.Call
for theGetIndex
method.
65-93
: LGTM!The
HashTreeRoot
method is correctly implemented as a mock function.
328-340
: LGTM!The
NewDeposit
function correctly creates a new instance ofDeposit
and registers a testing interface on the mock.mod/node-api/go.mod (2)
5-9
: LGTM!The
replace
block correctly substitutes several modules with updated versions for dependency management.
Line range hint
25-205
:
LGTM!The new module requirements correctly reflect updates and dependencies necessary for the module.
mod/cli/go.mod (3)
9-9
: Dependency Update: Verify CompatibilityThe
cosmossdk.io/api
dependency has been updated tov0.7.3-0.20240623110059-dec2d5583e39
. Ensure that this version is compatible with the rest of the project and does not introduce breaking changes.
10-10
: Dependency Update: Verify CompatibilityThe
cosmossdk.io/core/testing
dependency has been updated tov0.0.0-20240623110059-dec2d5583e39
. Ensure that this version is compatible with the rest of the project and does not introduce breaking changes.
11-11
: Dependency Update: Verify CompatibilityThe
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk
dependency has been updated tov0.46.0-beta2.0.20240624014538-75ba469b1881
. Ensure that this version is compatible with the rest of the project and does not introduce breaking changes.mod/node-core/go.mod (12)
9-9
: Module Replacement: Verify Local PathThe
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/beacon
module is replaced with a local path../beacon
. Ensure that the local path is correct and the module is available at this location.
10-10
: Module Replacement: Verify Local PathThe
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/config
module is replaced with a local path../config
. Ensure that the local path is correct and the module is available at this location.
11-11
: Module Replacement: Verify Local PathThe
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/node-api
module is replaced with a local path../node-api
. Ensure that the local path is correct and the module is available at this location.
12-12
: Module Replacement: Verify Local PathThe
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/storage
module is replaced with a local path../storage
. Ensure that the local path is correct and the module is available at this location.
37-37
: Dependency Update: Verify CompatibilityThe
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/runtime
dependency has been updated tov0.0.0-20240717210058-a144e074f6b2
. Ensure that this version is compatible with the rest of the project and does not introduce breaking changes.
38-38
: Dependency Update: Verify CompatibilityThe
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/state-transition
dependency has been updated tov0.0.0-20240717225334-64ec6650da31
. Ensure that this version is compatible with the rest of the project and does not introduce breaking changes.
48-48
: New Dependency: Verify IntegrationThe
github.com/labstack/echo/v4
dependency has been added with versionv4.12.0
. Ensure that this new dependency is correctly integrated and does not introduce conflicts.
58-58
: New Dependency: Verify IntegrationThe
github.com/gabriel-vasile/mimetype
dependency has been added with versionv1.4.3
. Ensure that this new dependency is correctly integrated and does not introduce conflicts.
61-61
: New Dependency: Verify IntegrationThe
github.com/go-playground/validator/v10
dependency has been added with versionv10.20.0
. Ensure that this new dependency is correctly integrated and does not introduce conflicts.
68-68
: New Dependency: Verify IntegrationThe
github.com/valyala/bytebufferpool
dependency has been added with versionv1.0.0
. Ensure that this new dependency is correctly integrated and does not introduce conflicts.
69-69
: New Dependency: Verify IntegrationThe
github.com/valyala/fasttemplate
dependency has been added with versionv1.2.2
. Ensure that this new dependency is correctly integrated and does not introduce conflicts.
70-70
: New Dependency: Verify IntegrationThe
golang.org/x/time
dependency has been added with versionv0.5.0
. Ensure that this new dependency is correctly integrated and does not introduce conflicts.mod/node-api/backend/storage/mocks/backend.mock.go (27)
18-21
: LGTM!The
Backend
struct definition appears correct.
23-25
: LGTM!The
Backend_Expecter
struct definition appears correct.
27-29
: LGTM!The
EXPECT
function implementation appears correct.
31-34
: LGTM!The
AttachNode
function implementation appears correct.
36-39
: LGTM!The
Backend_AttachNode_Call
struct definition appears correct.
41-45
: LGTM!The
AttachNode
helper method implementation appears correct.
47-52
: LGTM!The
Run
method forBackend_AttachNode_Call
implementation appears correct.
54-57
: LGTM!The
Return
method forBackend_AttachNode_Call
implementation appears correct.
64-80
: LGTM!The
AvailabilityStore
function implementation appears correct.
82-85
: LGTM!The
Backend_AvailabilityStore_Call
struct definition appears correct.
87-91
: LGTM!The
AvailabilityStore
helper method implementation appears correct.
93-98
: LGTM!The
Run
method forBackend_AvailabilityStore_Call
implementation appears correct.
100-103
: LGTM!The
Return
method forBackend_AvailabilityStore_Call
implementation appears correct.
105-108
: LGTM!The
RunAndReturn
method forBackend_AvailabilityStore_Call
implementation appears correct.
110-126
: LGTM!The
BlockStore
function implementation appears correct.
128-131
: LGTM!The
Backend_BlockStore_Call
struct definition appears correct.
133-136
: LGTM!The
BlockStore
helper method implementation appears correct.
138-143
: LGTM!The
Run
method forBackend_BlockStore_Call
implementation appears correct.
145-148
: LGTM!The
Return
method forBackend_BlockStore_Call
implementation appears correct.
150-153
: LGTM!The
RunAndReturn
method forBackend_BlockStore_Call
implementation appears correct.
155-181
: LGTM!The
StateFromContext
function implementation appears correct.
183-186
: LGTM!The
Backend_StateFromContext_Call
struct definition appears correct.
188-193
: LGTM!The
StateFromContext
helper method implementation appears correct.
195-200
: LGTM!The
Run
method forBackend_StateFromContext_Call
implementation appears correct.
202-205
: LGTM!The
Return
method forBackend_StateFromContext_Call
implementation appears correct.
207-210
: LGTM!The
RunAndReturn
method forBackend_StateFromContext_Call
implementation appears correct.
212-224
: LGTM!The
NewBackend
function implementation appears correct.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files ignored due to path filters (3)
mod/beacon/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
mod/config/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
mod/node-api/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (4)
- mod/beacon/go.mod (1 hunks)
- mod/config/go.mod (6 hunks)
- mod/node-core/pkg/components/service_registry.go (2 hunks)
- mod/node-core/pkg/components/types.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
mod/node-core/pkg/components/service_registry.go (2)
65-65
: LGTM! But verify the integration ofNodeAPIServer
.The modification to the
ProvideServiceRegistry
function to incorporate theNodeAPIServer
service is approved.However, ensure that the
NodeAPIServer
service is correctly integrated and does not introduce any issues.Verification successful
The integration of
NodeAPIServer
is correctly handled.The
NodeAPIServer
is defined and used appropriately within theProvideServiceRegistry
function and other parts of the codebase. The changes do not introduce any issues.
NodeAPIServer
is a type alias forserver.Server
.- It is provided by the
ProvideNodeAPIServer
function.- It is correctly integrated into the
ProvideServiceRegistry
function.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of `NodeAPIServer` in the `ProvideServiceRegistry` function. # Test: Search for the usage of `ProvideServiceRegistry`. Expect: Correct integration of `NodeAPIServer`. rg --type go -A 5 'ProvideServiceRegistry'Length of output: 1040
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of `NodeAPIServer` in the `ProvideServiceRegistry` function. # Search for the definition of `NodeAPIServer` to ensure it is correctly defined. rg --type go 'NodeAPIServer' # Search for the usage of `NodeAPIServer` to ensure it is correctly used. rg --type go 'NodeAPIServer' -A 5Length of output: 3685
45-45
: LGTM! But verify the usage ofNodeAPIServer
.The addition of the
NodeAPIServer
field to theServiceRegistryInput
struct is approved.However, ensure that all usages of
ServiceRegistryInput
correctly handle the newNodeAPIServer
field.Verification successful
The
NodeAPIServer
field is correctly handled in the codebase.The addition of the
NodeAPIServer
field to theServiceRegistryInput
struct is correctly handled in theProvideServiceRegistry
function and other parts of the codebase.
service.WithService(in.NodeAPIServer)
inservice_registry.go
ensures proper handling.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of `ServiceRegistryInput` handle the new `NodeAPIServer` field. # Test: Search for the usage of `ServiceRegistryInput`. Expect: Correct handling of `NodeAPIServer`. rg --type go -A 5 'ServiceRegistryInput'Length of output: 1154
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `NodeAPIServer` field in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `NodeAPIServer`. Expect: Correct handling of `NodeAPIServer`. rg --type go 'NodeAPIServer'Length of output: 689
mod/config/go.mod (1)
Line range hint
59-122
:
LGTM! But verify the integration of the new modules.The addition of the new module requirements is approved.
However, ensure that the new modules are correctly integrated and do not introduce any issues.
mod/node-core/pkg/components/types.go (3)
237-256
: LGTM! But verify the usage ofNodeAPIBackend
.The addition of the
NodeAPIBackend
type alias is approved.However, ensure that the
NodeAPIBackend
type alias is correctly used and does not introduce any issues.
258-262
: LGTM! But verify the usage ofNodeAPIServer
.The addition of the
NodeAPIServer
type alias is approved.However, ensure that the
NodeAPIServer
type alias is correctly used and does not introduce any issues.Verification successful
The usage of
NodeAPIServer
appears consistent across the codebase.The type alias
NodeAPIServer
is used in multiple files, includingservice_registry.go
,api.go
,defaults.go
, andbuilder.go
. The usages include variable declarations and function parameters, and they seem to align with the expected type.
mod/node-core/pkg/components/service_registry.go
mod/node-core/pkg/components/api.go
mod/node-core/pkg/components/defaults.go
mod/node-core/pkg/builder/builder.go
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `NodeAPIServer` type alias. # Test: Search for the usage of `NodeAPIServer`. Expect: Correct usage of the `NodeAPIServer` type alias. rg --type go -A 5 'NodeAPIServer'Length of output: 2995
40-44
: LGTM! But verify the usage of the new imports.The addition of the import statements for
backend
,server
, andtypes
is approved.However, ensure that the new imports are correctly used and do not introduce any issues.
Verification successful
The new imports are correctly used in the codebase.
The imports
backend
,server
, andtypes
are utilized across multiple files, confirming their necessity and correct integration.
backend
is used in various files, includingmod/node-api/server/server.go
,mod/node-api/backend/backend.go
, and others.server
is used in files such asmod/node-api/server/server.go
,mod/node-core/pkg/components/types.go
, and others.types
is used extensively across the codebase, includingmod/node-core/pkg/components/types.go
,mod/node-api/backend/backend.go
, and many more.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new imports. # Test: Search for the usage of the new imports. Expect: Correct usage of the new imports. rg --type go -A 5 'backend\|server\|types'Length of output: 44
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new imports `backend`, `server`, and `types` separately. # Test: Search for the usage of the import `backend`. rg --type go 'backend' # Test: Search for the usage of the import `server`. rg --type go 'server' # Test: Search for the usage of the import `types`. rg --type go 'types'Length of output: 160127
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 24
Outside diff range comments (1)
mod/node-api/engines/echo/vaildator.go (1)
Line range hint
55-68
:
Avoid usingpanic
for error handling inConstructValidator
.Replace
panic
with proper error handling to make the code more robust.func ConstructValidator() (*validator.Validate, error) { validators := map[string](func(fl validator.FieldLevel) bool){ "state_id": ValidateStateID, "block_id": ValidateBlockID, "validator_id": ValidateValidatorID, "validator_status": ValidateValidatorStatus, "epoch": ValidateUint64, "slot": ValidateUint64, "committee_index": ValidateUint64, "hex": ValidateHex, } validate := validator.New() for tag, fn := map[validators] { if err := validate.RegisterValidation(tag, fn); err != nil { return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to register validation for tag %s: %w", tag, err) } } return validate, nil }
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files ignored due to path filters (6)
mod/beacon/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
mod/cli/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
mod/config/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
mod/node-api/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
mod/node-core/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
mod/storage/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (57)
- mod/beacon/blockchain/process.go (1 hunks)
- mod/beacon/blockchain/types.go (1 hunks)
- mod/beacon/go.mod (1 hunks)
- mod/beacon/interfaces.go (1 hunks)
- mod/beacon/validator/block_builder.go (2 hunks)
- mod/beacon/validator/types.go (1 hunks)
- mod/cli/go.mod (1 hunks)
- mod/config/go.mod (6 hunks)
- mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/attestation_data.ssz.go (1 hunks)
- mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/block_denebplus.ssz.go (1 hunks)
- mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/fork.go (1 hunks)
- mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/fork.ssz.go (1 hunks)
- mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/header.go (1 hunks)
- mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/header.ssz.go (1 hunks)
- mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload.ssz.go (1 hunks)
- mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload_header.ssz.go (1 hunks)
- mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/slashing_info.ssz.go (1 hunks)
- mod/da/pkg/da/types.go (1 hunks)
- mod/da/pkg/store/store.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/backend.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/beacon.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/mocks/availability_store.mock.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/mocks/block_store.mock.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/mocks/deposit.mock.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/mocks/deposit_store.mock.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/mocks/storage_backend.mock.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/mocks/validator.mock.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/mocks/withdrawal.mock.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/mocks/withdrawal_credentials.mock.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/types.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/utils/validator.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/engines/echo/engine.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/engines/echo/middleware.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/engines/echo/types.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/engines/echo/vaildator.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/go.mod (2 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/beacon/block.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/beacon/genesis.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/beacon/handler.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/beacon/historical.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/beacon/routes.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/beacon/types.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/beacon/validators.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/builder/handler.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/builder/routes.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/config/handler.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/config/routes.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/debug/handler.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/debug/routes.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/events/handler.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/events/routes.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/handlers.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/node/handler.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/node/routes.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/utils/context.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/utils/id.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/handlers.go (1 hunks)
Files not processed due to max files limit (16)
- mod/node-api/server/server.go
- mod/node-api/server/types.go
- mod/node-api/types/beacon/request.go
- mod/node-api/types/beacon/response.go
- mod/node-api/types/context/context.go
- mod/node-api/types/errors.go
- mod/node-api/types/request.go
- mod/node-api/types/response.go
- mod/node-core/go.mod
- mod/node-core/pkg/builder/builder.go
- mod/node-core/pkg/components/api.go
- mod/node-core/pkg/components/defaults.go
- mod/node-core/pkg/components/storage/storage.go
- mod/node-core/pkg/components/types.go
- mod/state-transition/pkg/core/state_processor.go
- mod/storage/go.mod
Additional context used
GitHub Check: nilaway
mod/node-api/handlers/beacon/block.go
[failure] 34-34:
�[31merror: �[0mPotential nil panic detected. Observed nil flow from source to dereference point:mod/node-api/handlers/beacon/historical.go
[failure] 34-34:
�[31merror: �[0mPotential nil panic detected. Observed nil flow from source to dereference point:
[failure] 59-59:
�[31merror: �[0mPotential nil panic detected. Observed nil flow from source to dereference point:mod/node-api/handlers/beacon/validators.go
[failure] 37-37:
�[31merror: �[0mPotential nil panic detected. Observed nil flow from source to dereference point:
[failure] 70-70:
�[31merror: �[0mPotential nil panic detected. Observed nil flow from source to dereference point:
Additional comments not posted (151)
mod/node-api/engines/echo/types.go (2)
1-20
: Licensing information is accurate and complete.The file contains comprehensive licensing information under the BUSL-1.1 license.
25-28
: Type declarations are correct.The type aliases for
Context
andLogger
from theecho
package are correctly defined.mod/node-api/handlers/builder/routes.go (1)
29-36
: Routing structure is correctly defined.The
RegisterRoutes
function sets up a GET endpoint for expected withdrawals related to Ethereum's builder states. Ensure theNotImplemented
handler is correctly implemented.Verification successful
The
NotImplemented
handler is correctly implemented.The
NotImplemented
handler is defined inmod/node-api/handlers/builder/handler.go
and correctly returns atypes.ErrNotImplemented
error.
mod/node-api/handlers/builder/handler.go: func (h *Handler[ContextT]) NotImplemented(_ ContextT) (any, error) { return nil, types.ErrNotImplemented }
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the `NotImplemented` handler. # Test: Search for the `NotImplemented` handler. Expect: Correct implementation. rg --type go -A 5 $'func (h *Handler[ContextT]) NotImplemented'Length of output: 64
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Broad search for the `NotImplemented` handler to verify its implementation or usage. # Test: Search for any occurrence of `NotImplemented` in Go files. rg --type go 'NotImplemented'Length of output: 5153
mod/node-api/handlers/events/routes.go (1)
29-37
: Routing structure is correctly defined.The
RegisterRoutes
function sets up a GET endpoint for Ethereum events. Ensure theNotImplemented
handler is correctly implemented.Verification successful
Let's search for all handler functions within the
Handler
struct to see ifNotImplemented
exists under a different name or if there are any similar functions.
The
NotImplemented
handler is correctly implemented.The
NotImplemented
handler is present and correctly implemented, returning atypes.ErrNotImplemented
error.
- File:
mod/node-api/handlers/events/handler.go
- Lines:
func (h *Handler[ContextT]) NotImplemented(_ ContextT) (any, error) { return nil, types.ErrNotImplemented }Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the `NotImplemented` handler. # Test: Search for the `NotImplemented` handler. Expect: Correct implementation. rg --type go -A 5 $'func (h *Handler[ContextT]) NotImplemented'Length of output: 64
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all handler functions within the `Handler` struct. # Test: List all functions within the `Handler` struct to find any similar to `NotImplemented`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (h *Handler[ContextT]) $_($$$) $$$'Length of output: 8621
mod/node-api/handlers/utils/context.go (1)
1-20
: License header looks good.The license header is consistent and follows the standard format.
mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/slashing_info.ssz.go (2)
Line range hint
1-50
:
Serialization and deserialization logic looks good.The serialization and deserialization logic for the
SlashingInfo
struct is correct and consistent with the updated hash value.
2-2
: Hash value updated.The hash value has been updated, indicating a change in the underlying structure or content of the serialized data. Ensure that the serialization and deserialization logic is still correct.
mod/node-api/handlers/config/routes.go (1)
1-20
: License header looks good.The license header is consistent and follows the standard format.
mod/node-api/handlers/debug/routes.go (1)
29-46
: Consider implementing the handlers.All the routes are registered with
NotImplemented
handlers. This is acceptable for a placeholder, but consider implementing the actual handlers or providing a timeline for when they will be implemented.mod/node-api/handlers/debug/handler.go (6)
1-19
: License Information Approved.The license information is correct and complete.
21-27
: Package Declaration and Imports Approved.The package declaration and imports are correct and appropriate for the file.
29-31
: Handler Struct Declaration Approved.The
Handler
struct is correctly defined and adheres to best practices.
33-38
: NewHandler Function Approved.The
NewHandler
function correctly initializes a newHandler
instance.
40-42
: RouteSet Method Approved.The
RouteSet
method correctly returns the route set.
44-46
: NotImplemented Method Approved.The
NotImplemented
method correctly returns a not-implemented error.mod/node-api/handlers/config/handler.go (6)
1-19
: License Information Approved.The license information is correct and complete.
21-27
: Package Declaration and Imports Approved.The package declaration and imports are correct and appropriate for the file.
29-31
: Handler Struct Declaration Approved.The
Handler
struct is correctly defined and adheres to best practices.
33-38
: NewHandler Function Approved.The
NewHandler
function correctly initializes a newHandler
instance.
40-42
: RouteSet Method Approved.The
RouteSet
method correctly returns the route set.
44-46
: NotImplemented Method Approved.The
NotImplemented
method correctly returns a not-implemented error.mod/node-api/handlers/events/handler.go (6)
1-19
: License Information Approved.The license information is correct and complete.
21-27
: Package Declaration and Imports Approved.The package declaration and imports are correct and appropriate for the file.
29-31
: Handler Struct Declaration Approved.The
Handler
struct is correctly defined and adheres to best practices.
33-38
: NewHandler Function Approved.The
NewHandler
function correctly initializes a newHandler
instance.
40-42
: RouteSet Method Approved.The
RouteSet
method correctly returns the route set.
44-46
: NotImplemented Method Approved.The
NotImplemented
method correctly returns a not-implemented error.mod/node-api/handlers/builder/handler.go (4)
29-31
: LGTM!The
Handler
struct is well-defined and uses generics appropriately.
33-38
: LGTM!The
NewHandler
method correctly initializes theHandler
struct with an emptyRouteSet
.
40-42
: LGTM!The
RouteSet
method correctly returns theroutes
field.
44-46
: LGTM!The
NotImplemented
method correctly returns anil
value and anErrNotImplemented
error.mod/node-api/handlers/handlers.go (5)
27-27
: LGTM!The
handlerFn
type definition is straightforward and appropriate.
29-33
: LGTM!The
Route
type definition is clear and appropriate.
35-38
: LGTM!The
RouteSet
type definition is clear and appropriate.
40-47
: LGTM!The
NewRouteSet
method correctly initializes theRouteSet
with a base path and optional routes.
49-52
: LGTM!The
Handlers
interface correctly defines methods for registering routes and retrieving theRouteSet
.mod/node-api/engines/echo/engine.go (5)
29-31
: LGTM!The
Engine
type definition is clear and appropriate.
33-37
: LGTM!The
New
method correctly initializes theEngine
with an existingecho.Echo
instance.
39-47
: LGTM!The
NewDefaultEngine
method correctly initializes theEngine
with default middleware and a custom validator.
50-51
: LGTM!The
Run
method correctly starts the server on a specified address.
54-62
: LGTM!The
RegisterRoutes
method correctly registers routes based on the providedRouteSet
.mod/node-api/backend/utils/validator.go (2)
1-19
: File Header: License and Copyright InformationThe file includes a comprehensive license header, which is good practice.
21-28
: Imports: Ensure All Imports Are NecessaryThe imports appear to be necessary for the function's operation.
mod/node-api/handlers/beacon/block.go (2)
1-19
: File Header: License and Copyright InformationThe file includes a comprehensive license header, which is good practice.
21-27
: Imports: Ensure All Imports Are NecessaryThe imports appear to be necessary for the function's operation.
mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/fork.ssz.go (2)
Line range hint
1-57
:
Generated Code: Serialization LogicThe serialization and deserialization logic appears to be correct and consistent with the
Fork
object structure.
2-2
: Hash Update: Verify ConsistencyThe hash value has been updated. Ensure that this change is consistent with the underlying data structure modifications.
Verification successful
Hash Update Verified: Consistency Confirmed
The hash value update is consistent with the underlying data structure modifications. No changes were found in the
Fork
structure or its related methods that would affect the hash.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistency of the hash update. # Test: Check for changes in the data structure that would affect the hash. rg --type go 'Fork' -A 10Length of output: 229965
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for changes in the Fork structure definition and its related methods. rg --type go 'type Fork struct' -A 10 rg --type go 'func (f \*Fork)' -A 10 rg --type go 'Fork' -A 10Length of output: 230842
mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/attestation_data.ssz.go (1)
2-2
: Verify the consistency of the hash value update.The hash value has been updated, indicating a change in the serialized data representation. Ensure this change is consistent with the rest of the file and no manual modifications are present.
Verification successful
The hash value update is consistent.
The hash value
0cb37f7871b8a8eff779a16efc527e9ae4bfff6082127420e67f7a9f016b30b1
is found only once in the filemod/consensus-types/pkg/types/attestation_data.ssz.go
, indicating no manual modifications are present. The update appears consistent.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistency of the hash value update in the generated file. # Test: Ensure no manual modifications are present. Expect: Only occurances of the new hash value. rg --type go '0cb37f7871b8a8eff779a16efc527e9ae4bfff6082127420e67f7a9f016b30b1'Length of output: 207
mod/node-api/engines/echo/middleware.go (2)
32-39
: LGTM!The function correctly constructs an Echo handler from a given route handler and handles errors appropriately.
41-55
: LGTM!The function covers relevant error types and returns appropriate HTTP status codes.
mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/fork.go (1)
35-39
: LGTM!The JSON tags are correctly added and consistent with the field names.
mod/node-api/server/handlers.go (2)
34-49
: LGTM! Ensure proper error handling in handlers.The function
DefaultHandlers
initializes and returns a slice of handlers. Ensure that each handler properly handles errors and edge cases.
23-32
: Remove unnecessary imports.The imports from
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/node-api/handlers
and its sub-packages should be reviewed for necessity. If any are unused, they should be removed.mod/node-api/handlers/node/routes.go (1)
23-27
: Remove unnecessary imports.The import from
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/node-api/handlers
should be reviewed for necessity. If unused, it should be removed.mod/node-api/handlers/beacon/handler.go (4)
40-53
: LGTM! Ensure proper error handling in the constructor.The method
NewHandler
initializes a new handler for the beacon API. Ensure that any potential errors during initialization are properly handled.
55-57
: LGTM!The method
RouteSet
correctly returns the route set of the handler.
59-61
: LGTM!The method
NotImplemented
correctly returns a not implemented error.
30-38
: Ensure proper initialization of generic fields.The struct
Handler
uses generics forContextT
,ForkT
, andValidatorT
. Ensure that these generic types are correctly initialized and used throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Ensure proper initialization of generic fields.
The generic types
ContextT
,ForkT
, andValidatorT
within theHandler
struct are correctly initialized and used throughout the codebase.
mod/node-api/handlers/beacon/handler.go
: Initialization and usage ofHandler
with generics.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of generic types in the codebase. # Test: Check if the generic types are correctly used and initialized. rg --type go -A 5 'Handler'Length of output: 48212
mod/node-api/handlers/beacon/types.go (4)
28-39
: LGTM! Well-defined interface for the backend.The
Backend
interface is well-structured and follows Go conventions.
41-45
: LGTM! Simple and clear interface for genesis backend.The
GenesisBackend
interface is correctly defined.
47-54
: LGTM! Well-defined interface for block backend.The
BlockBackend
interface is well-structured and follows Go conventions.
56-70
: LGTM! Well-defined interface for validator backend.The
ValidatorBackend
interface is well-structured and follows Go conventions.mod/node-api/handlers/utils/id.go (3)
27-32
: LGTM! Well-defined state ID constants.The state ID constants are well-defined and follow Go conventions.
34-37
: LGTM! Well-defined constants for head and genesis states.The constants are well-defined and follow Go conventions.
60-67
: LGTM! Reusing the function is a good approach.The function reuses
SlotFromStateID
to convert a block ID to a slot, which is a good approach.mod/beacon/interfaces.go (2)
69-69
: Verify the impact of removing the context parameter.The removal of the
context.Context
parameter simplifies the method call but may impact how state is managed or retrieved. Ensure that all usages ofDepositStore
are updated accordingly.
67-67
: Verify the impact of removing the context parameter.The removal of the
context.Context
parameter simplifies the method call but may impact how state is managed or retrieved. Ensure that all usages ofAvailabilityStore
are updated accordingly.mod/da/pkg/da/types.go (1)
82-82
: Verify the impact of removing the context parameter.The removal of the
context.Context
parameter simplifies the method call but may impact how state is managed or retrieved. Ensure that all usages ofAvailabilityStore
are updated accordingly.mod/node-api/backend/mocks/withdrawal.mock.go (1)
1-85
: LGTM!The autogenerated mock code for the
Withdrawal
type appears to be well-structured and follows standard mocking practices.mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/block_denebplus.ssz.go (1)
2-2
: Hash value update approved.The hash value has been updated to reflect a new version of the code generation process.
mod/node-api/backend/mocks/withdrawal_credentials.mock.go (1)
1-92
: Autogenerated mock code approved.This file contains autogenerated code for mocking
WithdrawalCredentials
using mockery. The code is standard and follows the expected patterns for mock generation.mod/da/pkg/store/store.go (1)
109-109
: Change to useslot.Unwrap()
approved.The change from
uint64(slot)
toslot.Unwrap()
likely improves type safety or encapsulates additional logic.Ensure that the
Unwrap
method is correctly implemented and used consistently throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Unwrap method implementation and usage verified.
The
Unwrap
method is correctly implemented and used consistently throughout the codebase. The change to useslot.Unwrap()
inmod/da/pkg/store/store.go
is appropriate and aligns with the usage patterns in other parts of the codebase.
mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/header.go
mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/block.go
mod/da/pkg/store/store.go
mod/beacon/block_store/service.go
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the `Unwrap` method. # Test: Search for the implementation of `Unwrap`. Expect: Correct implementation of the method. rg --type go 'func (.*) Unwrap' -A 5Length of output: 2820
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `Unwrap` method on `slot`. # Test: Search for instances of `slot.Unwrap()` in the codebase. rg --type go 'slot\.Unwrap()' -A 3Length of output: 1129
mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/header.go (2)
82-83
: Ensure all instances ofNewBeaconBlockHeader
are updated.Verify that all instances of
NewBeaconBlockHeader
in the codebase are updated to use the new wrapped types forslot
andproposerIndex
.Verification successful
All instances of
NewBeaconBlockHeader
are updated to use the new wrapped types forslot
andproposerIndex
.
header_test.go
: Verified thatNewBeaconBlockHeader
is called withmath.Slot
andmath.ValidatorIndex
.header.go
: Verified thatNewBeaconBlockHeader
is defined and called withmath.Slot
andmath.ValidatorIndex
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all instances of `NewBeaconBlockHeader` are updated to use the new wrapped types. # Test: Search for all instances of `NewBeaconBlockHeader` in the codebase. rg --type go 'NewBeaconBlockHeader'Length of output: 775
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract relevant lines around each instance of NewBeaconBlockHeader in header_test.go and header.go # Extract 5 lines before and after each instance in header_test.go rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'NewBeaconBlockHeader' mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/header_test.go # Extract 5 lines before and after each instance in header.go rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'NewBeaconBlockHeader' mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/header.goLength of output: 2331
82-83
: Verify the correctness of theUnwrap()
method.Ensure that the
Unwrap()
method forslot
andproposerIndex
is correctly implemented and handles potential errors or invalid states properly.mod/beacon/blockchain/process.go (1)
75-75
: Verify theAvailabilityStore
method implementation.Ensure that the
AvailabilityStore
method no longer requires thectx
parameter and that the context is managed correctly within the service.mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/header.ssz.go (1)
2-2
: Verify the hash value change.The hash value has changed, indicating a modification in the file content. Ensure that this change is intentional and does not introduce any issues.
mod/node-api/backend/backend.go (5)
25-28
: Verify the import statements.New packages have been imported, and some previous packages have been removed. Ensure that the new imports are necessary and that the removed packages are no longer needed.
34-70
: LGTM!The
Backend
struct has been redefined to incorporate a comprehensive set of type parameters, enhancing flexibility and type safety.
77-128
: LGTM!The
New
function's signature has been significantly altered to align with the new structure of theBackend
type.
132-136
: LGTM!The
AttachNode
function implementation is straightforward and aligns with the new structure.
138-150
: LGTM!The
StateFromSlot
function implementation is correct and aligns with the new structure.mod/node-api/backend/mocks/availability_store.mock.go (1)
1-132
: LGTM!The autogenerated mock implementations for the
AvailabilityStore
type appear to be correctly implemented.mod/node-api/backend/mocks/block_store.mock.go (6)
20-45
: Ensure mock return values are specified.The
Get
function will panic if no return value is specified. This is a safeguard, but ensure that all test cases provide the necessary return values to avoid runtime panics.
76-91
: Ensure mock return values are specified.The
Prune
function will panic if no return value is specified. This is a safeguard, but ensure that all test cases provide the necessary return values to avoid runtime panics.
123-138
: Ensure mock return values are specified.The
Set
function will panic if no return value is specified. This is a safeguard, but ensure that all test cases provide the necessary return values to avoid runtime panics.
170-181
: LGTM! Ensure proper cleanup in tests.The
NewBlockStore
function correctly initializes the mock and sets up cleanup to assert expectations. Ensure that this function is used in your tests to maintain proper mock expectations.
7-10
: LGTM!The
BlockStore
type definition is correct and uses generics effectively.
12-14
: LGTM!The
BlockStore_Expecter
type definition is correct and uses generics effectively.mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload_header.ssz.go (5)
2-2
: Verify the hash value update.The hash value has been updated, indicating a change in the data structure or its serialization. Ensure that the hash value is correct and consistent with the changes.
Line range hint
7-9
:
LGTM!The
MarshalSSZ
function correctly serializes theExecutionPayloadHeaderDeneb
object using thessz.MarshalSSZ
method.
Line range hint
11-43
:
LGTM!The
MarshalSSZTo
function correctly serializes theExecutionPayloadHeaderDeneb
object to a target array using thessz.MarshalSSZTo
method.
Line range hint
45-96
:
LGTM!The
UnmarshalSSZ
function correctly deserializes theExecutionPayloadHeaderDeneb
object using thessz.UnmarshalSSZ
method.
Line range hint
98-106
:
LGTM!The
SizeSSZ
function correctly calculates the size of the serializedExecutionPayloadHeaderDeneb
object.mod/node-api/backend/beacon.go (7)
30-42
: LGTM!The
GenesisValidatorsRoot
function correctly retrieves the genesis validators' root based on a slot parameter.
44-63
: LGTM!The
StateRootAtSlot
function correctly returns the state root at a specified slot and handles the semantical expectation that 0 -> latest.
66-77
: LGTM!The
StateForkAtSlot
function correctly returns the fork of the state at a specified slot.
80-95
: LGTM!The
BlockRootAtSlot
function correctly returns the block root at a specified slot.
113-145
: LGTM!The
ValidatorByID
function correctly retrieves validator data based on the provided slot and ID.
148-166
: LGTM!The
ValidatorsByIDs
function correctly retrieves multiple validators' data based on the provided slot and IDs.
169-197
: LGTM!The
ValidatorBalancesByIDs
function correctly retrieves multiple validators' balances based on the provided slot and IDs.mod/node-api/backend/mocks/deposit_store.mock.go (5)
7-10
: LGTM!The
DepositStore
struct is correctly defined as a mock type for theDepositStore
interface.
12-14
: LGTM!The
DepositStore_Expecter
struct is correctly defined to facilitate setting expectations on the mock.
20-36
: LGTM!The
EnqueueDeposits
function correctly mocks the behavior of enqueuing deposits and handles return values properly.
66-94
: LGTM!The
GetDepositsByIndex
function correctly mocks the behavior of retrieving deposits by index and handles return values properly.
125-141
: LGTM!The
Prune
function correctly mocks the behavior of pruning deposits and handles return values properly.mod/config/go.mod (1)
Line range hint
59-122
:
LGTM!The new module dependencies are correctly added to the
require
block.mod/node-api/backend/mocks/validator.mock.go (16)
12-15
: LGTM!The mock type
Validator
is correctly defined with testify's mock package.
17-19
: LGTM!The helper type
Validator_Expecter
is correctly defined for setting up expectations.
21-23
: LGTM!The
EXPECT
function correctly returns a new instance ofValidator_Expecter
.
25-41
: LGTM!The
GetWithdrawalCredentials
function correctly handles the mock return value and type assertion.
43-46
: LGTM!The helper type
Validator_GetWithdrawalCredentials_Call
is correctly defined for chaining method calls.
48-51
: LGTM!The
GetWithdrawalCredentials
function inValidator_Expecter
correctly sets up the mock call.
53-58
: LGTM!The
Run
function inValidator_GetWithdrawalCredentials_Call
correctly sets up a custom function to be executed.
60-63
: LGTM!The
Return
function inValidator_GetWithdrawalCredentials_Call
correctly sets up the return value.
65-68
: LGTM!The
RunAndReturn
function inValidator_GetWithdrawalCredentials_Call
correctly sets up a custom function to be executed and returned.
70-86
: LGTM!The
IsFullyWithdrawable
function correctly handles the mock return value and type assertion.
88-91
: LGTM!The helper type
Validator_IsFullyWithdrawable_Call
is correctly defined for chaining method calls.
93-98
: LGTM!The
IsFullyWithdrawable
function inValidator_Expecter
correctly sets up the mock call.
100-105
: LGTM!The
Run
function inValidator_IsFullyWithdrawable_Call
correctly sets up a custom function to be executed.
107-110
: LGTM!The
Return
function inValidator_IsFullyWithdrawable_Call
correctly sets up the return value.
112-115
: LGTM!The
RunAndReturn
function inValidator_IsFullyWithdrawable_Call
correctly sets up a custom function to be executed and returned.
164-176
: LGTM!The
NewValidator
function correctly creates a new instance ofValidator
and registers a testing interface with cleanup.mod/beacon/blockchain/types.go (2)
219-220
: LGTM!The
StateFromContext
method correctly retains thecontext.Context
parameter.
218-218
: Verify context management inAvailabilityStore
.The method signature has been altered to remove the
context.Context
parameter. Ensure that the method implementation correctly handles context or uses a default context.mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/payload.ssz.go (1)
2-2
: Verify the hash value change.The hash value in the generated code has been updated. Ensure that the change is intentional and does not introduce any issues.
Verification successful
The hash value change appears to be intentional and does not introduce any issues.
The new hash value is found in the expected context and there are no occurrences of the previous hash value in the codebase. This suggests a deliberate update.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the hash value change in the generated code. # Test: Search for the previous hash value in the codebase. Expect: No occurrences of the previous hash value. rg '60ac64e30dc0dc2b06e4142bccc8bf1570dcfea625a6763628a2e04382db61e6'Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the context and usage of the new hash value in the codebase. # Test: Search for the new hash value in the codebase. Expect: Find occurrences of the new hash value. rg '9b410e58bc61933fbac0a8c66b80f3c0c3b74c10c8d686f376a5051ef85e495b' -A 5Length of output: 556
mod/beacon/validator/types.go (1)
250-250
: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The removal of the
context.Context
parameter simplifies the method signature.However, ensure that all function calls to
DepositStore
match the new signature.Verification successful
LGTM! All function calls to
DepositStore
match the new signature.The removal of the
context.Context
parameter simplifies the method signature and does not affect other parts of the codebase.
- Verified that all instances of
DepositStore
usage conform to the new signature.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `DepositStore` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'DepositStore'Length of output: 48543
mod/node-api/backend/mocks/deposit.mock.go (6)
20-36
: LGTM!The
GetIndex
method correctly mocks the behavior of theGetIndex
function.
65-93
: LGTM!The
HashTreeRoot
method correctly mocks the behavior of theHashTreeRoot
function.
122-150
: LGTM!The
MarshalSSZ
method correctly mocks the behavior of theMarshalSSZ
function.
179-207
: LGTM!The
MarshalSSZTo
method correctly mocks the behavior of theMarshalSSZTo
function.
237-253
: LGTM!The
SizeSSZ
method correctly mocks the behavior of theSizeSSZ
function.
282-298
: LGTM!The
UnmarshalSSZ
method correctly mocks the behavior of theUnmarshalSSZ
function.mod/node-api/backend/mocks/storage_backend.mock.go (6)
24-40
: LGTM!The
AvailabilityStore
method correctly mocks the behavior of theAvailabilityStore
function.
69-85
: LGTM!The
BlockStore
method correctly mocks the behavior of theBlockStore
function.
114-130
: LGTM!The
DepositStore
method correctly mocks the behavior of theDepositStore
function.
159-175
: LGTM!The
StateFromContext
method correctly mocks the behavior of theStateFromContext
function.
52-57
: LGTM!The
Run
method correctly mocks the behavior of theRun
function.
64-67
: LGTM!The
RunAndReturn
method correctly mocks the behavior of theRunAndReturn
function.mod/beacon/validator/block_builder.go (2)
299-299
: LGTM! But verify the method usage in the codebase.The change to the
GetDepositsByIndex
method call is approved.However, ensure that all method calls to
GetDepositsByIndex
match the new signature.Verification successful
All method calls to
GetDepositsByIndex
match the new signature.The change to the
GetDepositsByIndex
method call is verified and approved. No further issues found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all method calls to `GetDepositsByIndex` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'GetDepositsByIndex'Length of output: 6504
268-268
: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The change to the
ctx
parameter is approved.However, ensure that all function calls to
buildBlockBody
match the new signature.mod/node-api/go.mod (2)
5-9
: Approve module replacements.The updates to
cosmossdk.io/api
andgit.luolix.top/cosmos/cosmos-sdk
are approved.
Line range hint
25-205
:
Approve new dependencies.The introduction of new dependencies, including
buf.build/gen/go/cometbft/cometbft/protocolbuffers/go
,cosmossdk.io/collections
, andgit.luolix.top/cosmos/crypto
, is approved.mod/cli/go.mod (1)
Line range hint
5-9
:
Approve module replacements.The updates to
cosmossdk.io/api
andgit.luolix.top/cosmos/cosmos-sdk
are approved.mod/node-api/engines/echo/vaildator.go (8)
34-37
: LGTM!The
CustomValidator
struct is correctly defined and encapsulates the validator instance.
Line range hint
69-74
:
LGTM!The
ValidateStateID
function correctly validates state IDs against allowed values.
Line range hint
75-80
:
LGTM!The
ValidateBlockID
function correctly validates block IDs against allowed values.
Line range hint
81-87
:
LGTM!The
ValidateUint64
function correctly validates if a field is a valid unsigned 64-bit integer.
Line range hint
88-97
:
LGTM!The
ValidateValidatorID
function correctly validates validator IDs against a hex-encoded public key or a numeric validator index.
Line range hint
98-103
:
LGTM!The
ValidateHex
function correctly validates if a field is a valid hex string.
Line range hint
104-114
:
LGTM!The
ValidateValidatorStatus
function correctly validates validator statuses against allowed values.
Line range hint
115-137
:
LGTM!The
validateStateBlockIDs
function correctly validates state block IDs against allowed values, unsigned 64-bit integers, or hex-encoded state roots.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- mod/node-api/handlers/utils/context.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
mod/node-api/handlers/utils/context.go (5)
1-20
: LGTM!The license header is standard and correctly formatted.
21-21
: LGTM!The package declaration is appropriate.
23-26
: LGTM!The imports are necessary and correctly included.
28-28
: Reminder: Add validation logic.The TODO comment indicates that validation logic needs to be added.
29-36
: Consider adding validation logic.The function currently binds the request but lacks validation logic. Consider adding validation to ensure the request data is correct.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (7)
- mod/node-api/engines/echo/engine.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/handlers.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/routes.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/handlers/utils/context.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/handlers.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/server/server.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/types/beacon/request.go (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (20)
mod/node-api/handlers/handlers.go (2)
27-27
: LGTM!The
handlerFn
type declaration is concise and leverages Go's generics for flexibility.
29-31
: LGTM!The
Handlers
interface is well-defined and promotes consistency and scalability across the application.mod/node-api/handlers/routes.go (3)
25-30
: LGTM!The
Route
type declaration is straightforward and aligns with the overall architecture.
32-36
: LGTM!The
RouteSet
type declaration is well-structured and promotes modularity.
38-46
: LGTM!The
NewRouteSet
function is concise and correctly initializes theRouteSet
type.mod/node-api/engines/echo/engine.go (4)
33-37
: LGTM!The function correctly initializes the
Engine
struct by wrapping an existingecho.Echo
instance.
39-48
: LGTM!The function correctly sets up the default middleware and validator, enhancing modularity and separation of concerns.
51-52
: LGTM!The method correctly starts the server using the
echo.Echo
instance encapsulated within theEngine
struct.
55-63
: LGTM!The method correctly groups routes and adds them to the
echo.Echo
instance.mod/node-api/server/handlers.go (1)
34-49
: LGTM!The function correctly initializes and returns a list of default handlers, enhancing modularity and separation of concerns.
mod/node-api/server/server.go (2)
61-67
: LGTM!The method correctly starts the server if it is enabled in the configuration.
84-86
: LGTM!The method correctly returns the name of the server.
mod/node-api/types/beacon/request.go (8)
26-28
: LGTM!The integration of
types.StateIDRequest
and the field names and validation tags are appropriate.
32-34
: LGTM!The integration of
types.StateIDRequest
and the adjustments to the field names for consistency are appropriate.
38-39
: LGTM!The integration of
types.StateIDRequest
and the field names and validation tags are appropriate.
43-44
: LGTM!The integration of
types.StateIDRequest
and the field names and validation tags are appropriate.
48-49
: LGTM!The integration of
types.StateIDRequest
and the field names and validation tags are appropriate.
69-72
: LGTM!The integration of
types.StateIDRequest
and the overall structure are appropriate.
76-77
: LGTM!The integration of
types.StateIDRequest
and the overall structure are appropriate.
86-87
: LGTM!The integration of
types.BlockIDRequest
and the field names and validation tags are appropriate.
// BindAndValidate binds the request to the context and validates it. | ||
func BindAndValidate[RequestT any, ContextT context.Context]( | ||
c ContextT, | ||
) (RequestT, error) { | ||
var req RequestT | ||
if err := c.Bind(&req); err != nil { | ||
return req, types.ErrInvalidRequest | ||
} | ||
if err := c.Validate(&req); err != nil { | ||
return req, types.ErrInvalidRequest | ||
} | ||
return req, nil |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider adding detailed validation logic.
The function currently binds the request but lacks detailed validation logic. Consider adding validation to ensure the request data is correct.
func BindAndValidate[RequestT any, ContextT context.Context](
c ContextT,
) (RequestT, error) {
var req RequestT
if err := c.Bind(&req); err != nil {
return req, types.ErrInvalidRequest
}
// Add detailed validation logic here
if err := validateRequest(req); err != nil {
return req, err
}
return req, nil
}
func validateRequest(req RequestT) error {
// Implement detailed validation logic
return nil
}
// TODO: custom logger. | ||
func New[ | ||
ContextT apicontext.Context, | ||
EngineT Engine[ContextT, EngineT], | ||
]( | ||
config Config, | ||
engine EngineT, | ||
logger log.Logger[any], | ||
handlers ...handlers.Handlers[ContextT], | ||
) *Server[ContextT, EngineT] { | ||
for _, handler := range handlers { | ||
handler.RegisterRoutes() | ||
engine.RegisterRoutes(handler.RouteSet()) | ||
} | ||
return &Server[ContextT, EngineT]{ | ||
engine: engine, | ||
config: config, | ||
logger: logger, | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! But consider implementing the custom logger.
The function correctly initializes the Server
struct and registers routes for the provided handlers.
However, there is a TODO comment regarding a custom logger.
Do you want me to generate the custom logger code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
func (s *Server[_, _]) start(ctx context.Context) { | ||
errCh := make(chan error) | ||
go func() { | ||
errCh <- s.engine.Run(s.config.Address) | ||
}() | ||
for { | ||
select { | ||
case err := <-errCh: | ||
s.logger.Error(err.Error()) | ||
case <-ctx.Done(): | ||
return | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider adding logging for server start and stop events.
Adding logging for server start and stop events can help in monitoring the server's lifecycle.
+ s.logger.Info("Starting node API server...")
+ defer s.logger.Info("Node API server stopped.")
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
func (s *Server[_, _]) start(ctx context.Context) { | |
errCh := make(chan error) | |
go func() { | |
errCh <- s.engine.Run(s.config.Address) | |
}() | |
for { | |
select { | |
case err := <-errCh: | |
s.logger.Error(err.Error()) | |
case <-ctx.Done(): | |
return | |
} | |
} | |
func (s *Server[_, _]) start(ctx context.Context) { | |
s.logger.Info("Starting node API server...") | |
defer s.logger.Info("Node API server stopped.") | |
errCh := make(chan error) | |
go func() { | |
errCh <- s.engine.Run(s.config.Address) | |
}() | |
for { | |
select { | |
case err := <-errCh: | |
s.logger.Error(err.Error()) | |
case <-ctx.Done(): | |
return | |
} | |
} |
@@ -72,7 +79,12 @@ require ( | |||
github.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2 v2.2.8 // indirect | |||
github.com/kr/pretty v0.3.1 // indirect | |||
github.com/kr/text v0.2.0 // indirect | |||
github.com/labstack/echo/v4 v4.12.0 // indirect |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
config coupled to web framework
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files ignored due to path filters (3)
go.work
is excluded by!**/*.work
mod/node-api/engines/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
mod/node-api/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (10)
- Dockerfile (2 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/backend.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/beacon.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/mocks/node.mock.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/backend/types.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/engines/go.mod (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/go.mod (5 hunks)
- mod/node-core/go.mod (3 hunks)
- mod/node-core/pkg/components/api.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-core/pkg/components/types.go (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (55)
mod/node-api/engines/go.mod (4)
1-3
: LGTM!The module definition and Go version are correctly specified.
5-5
: LGTM!The module replacement is appropriate for local development.
7-11
: LGTM!The required dependencies are appropriate and commonly used libraries.
13-29
: LGTM!The indirect dependencies are appropriate and commonly used libraries.
mod/node-api/backend/mocks/node.mock.go (4)
1-5
: LGTM!The package declaration and imports are appropriate for mock generation.
7-10
: LGTM!The mock type definition is appropriate and follows common practices for mock generation.
20-46
: LGTM!The mock function definition is appropriate and follows common practices for mock generation.
12-18
: LGTM!The helper methods and constructor are appropriate and follow common practices for mock generation.
Also applies to: 48-89
mod/node-core/pkg/components/api.go (5)
36-39
: LGTM!The function
ProvideNodeAPIEngine
is straightforward and returns a new default engine.
82-90
: LGTM!The function
ProvideNodeAPIHandlers
is straightforward and returns a list of default handlers.
23-34
: LGTM!The imports are appropriate and necessary for the functionality provided in the file.
48-73
: LGTM!The function
ProvideNodeAPIBackend
correctly initializes a backend with various dependencies.However, ensure that all dependencies are correctly passed and initialized.
101-111
: LGTM!The function
ProvideNodeAPIServer
correctly initializes a server with various dependencies.However, ensure that all dependencies are correctly passed and initialized.
mod/node-api/go.mod (3)
7-7
: Approved: Added dependency ongit.luolix.top/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/geth-primitives
.This change aligns with the reorganization of dependencies.
8-8
: Approved: Added dependency ongit.luolix.top/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/log
.This change aligns with the reorganization of dependencies.
43-43
: Approved: Added indirect dependency ongit.luolix.top/go-faster/xor v1.0.0
.This addition enhances the project's capabilities, particularly in performance and modularity.
mod/node-api/backend/types.go (4)
1-20
: Approved: License and copyright information.This segment complies with licensing requirements.
21-29
: Approved: Package declaration and import statements.Imports are necessary and correctly referenced.
31-43
: Approved: Definition ofAvailabilityStore
interface.The interface methods are correctly defined and logically sound.
45-121
: Approved: Definitions of various interfaces.The interface methods are correctly defined and logically sound.
mod/node-api/backend/backend.go (5)
Line range hint
1-20
: Approved: License and copyright information.This segment complies with licensing requirements.
Line range hint
21-28
: Approved: Package declaration and import statements.Imports are necessary and correctly referenced.
31-71
: Approved: Definition ofBackend
struct with type parameters.The struct definition is correctly defined and logically sound.
78-138
: Approved: Definition ofNew
function andAttachNode
method.The function and method are correctly defined and logically sound.
140-152
: Approved: Definition ofStateFromSlot
method.The method is correctly defined and logically sound.
Dockerfile (2)
51-51
: LGTM! The addition of theengines
module files is appropriate.Including the
go.mod
andgo.sum
files ensures that the dependencies for theengines
module are managed correctly within the Docker build context.
77-77
: LGTM! The inclusion of theengines
module in the Go workspace is appropriate.This change ensures that the
engines
module is properly integrated into the build system, enhancing modularity and maintainability.mod/node-api/backend/beacon.go (8)
24-25
: LGTM! The updated import statements are appropriate.The inclusion of
backend/utils
andtypes
is necessary for the new and modified functions in the file.
31-42
: LGTM! TheGenesisValidatorsRoot
function improves clarity.The function aligns with its intended operation by retrieving the genesis validators' root based on a provided slot parameter. Ensure that the
StateFromSlot
method handles the slot parameter correctly.Verification successful
The
StateFromSlot
method correctly handles the slot parameter.The method creates a query context using the slot and retrieves the state from this context, ensuring that the
GenesisValidatorsRoot
function works as intended.
mod/node-api/backend/backend.go: StateFromSlot
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `StateFromSlot` method handles the slot parameter correctly. # Test: Search for the `StateFromSlot` method implementation. Expect: Correct handling of the slot parameter. rg --type go -A 5 'func (b Backend' | rg 'StateFromSlot'Length of output: 128
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `StateFromSlot` method handles the slot parameter correctly. # Test: Search for the `StateFromSlot` method implementation within the `Backend` struct. rg --type go 'func (b Backend' -A 50 | rg 'StateFromSlot'Length of output: 129
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `StateFromSlot` method handles the slot parameter correctly. # Test: Search for the `StateFromSlot` method implementation directly and capture context. rg --type go 'StateFromSlot' -A 10Length of output: 4319
170-195
: LGTM! TheValidatorBalancesByIDs
function improves efficiency and usability.The function retrieves multiple validator balances based on the provided slot and IDs, aligning with its intended operation. Ensure that the
StateFromSlot
method andValidatorIndexByID
utility handle the parameters correctly.Verification successful
The
StateFromSlot
method andValidatorIndexByID
utility handle parameters correctly.
- The
StateFromSlot
method inmod/node-api/backend/backend.go
correctly processes the slot parameter.- The
ValidatorIndexByID
utility inmod/node-api/backend/utils/validator.go
correctly handles both numeric and string inputs for validator IDs.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `StateFromSlot` method and `ValidatorIndexByID` utility handle the parameters correctly. # Test: Search for the `StateFromSlot` method implementation and `ValidatorIndexByID` utility. Expect: Correct handling of the parameters. rg --type go -A 5 'func (b Backend' | rg 'StateFromSlot\|ValidatorIndexByID'Length of output: 150
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `StateFromSlot` method and `ValidatorIndexByID` utility handle the parameters correctly. # Search for the `StateFromSlot` method implementation in Go files. rg --type go 'func (b Backend) StateFromSlot' -A 5 # Search for the `ValidatorIndexByID` utility in Go files. rg --type go 'func ValidatorIndexByID' -A 5Length of output: 569
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `StateFromSlot` method and review the `ValidatorIndexByID` utility's implementation. # Search for the `StateFromSlot` method implementation in Go files more broadly. rg --type go 'StateFromSlot' -A 5 # Display the full implementation of the `ValidatorIndexByID` utility for review. rg --type go -A 20 'func ValidatorIndexByID' mod/node-api/backend/utils/validator.goLength of output: 2894
149-166
: LGTM! TheValidatorsByIDs
function improves efficiency and usability.The function retrieves multiple validator data based on the provided slot and IDs, aligning with its intended operation. Ensure that the
StateFromSlot
method andValidatorByID
function handle the parameters correctly.Verification successful
Let's correct the regex pattern and re-run the shell script to verify the
StateFromSlot
method andValidatorByID
function.
Let's correct the regex pattern and re-run the shell script to verify the
StateFromSlot
method andValidatorByID
function.
Let's extract the full implementations of
StateFromSlot
andValidatorByID
frommod/node-api/backend/beacon.go
.
LGTM! The
ValidatorsByIDs
function improves efficiency and usability.The function retrieves multiple validator data based on the provided slot and IDs, aligning with its intended operation. The
StateFromSlot
andValidatorByID
methods handle the parameters correctly.
StateFromSlot
retrieves the state from a given slot and returns an error if it fails.ValidatorByID
usesStateFromSlot
to get the state and then retrieves the validator index and validator data based on the provided ID.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `StateFromSlot` method and `ValidatorByID` function handle the parameters correctly. # Test: Search for the `StateFromSlot` method implementation and `ValidatorByID` function. Expect: Correct handling of the parameters. rg --type go -A 5 'func (b Backend' | rg 'StateFromSlot\|ValidatorByID'Length of output: 145
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `StateFromSlot` method and `ValidatorByID` function handle the parameters correctly. # Test: Search for the `StateFromSlot` method implementation and `ValidatorByID` function. Expect: Correct handling of the parameters. rg --type go -A 5 'func (b Backend' | rg 'StateFromSlot|ValidatorByID'Length of output: 144
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `StateFromSlot` method and `ValidatorByID` function handle the parameters correctly. # Test: Search for the `StateFromSlot` method implementation and `ValidatorByID` function. Expect: Correct handling of the parameters. rg --type go -A 5 'func \(b Backend' | rg 'StateFromSlot|ValidatorByID'Length of output: 252
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the full implementations of `StateFromSlot` and `ValidatorByID` from `mod/node-api/backend/beacon.go`. rg --type go -A 20 'func \(b Backend' mod/node-api/backend/beacon.go | rg -A 20 'StateFromSlot|ValidatorByID'Length of output: 3383
114-143
: LGTM! TheValidatorByID
function improves logic and error handling.The function retrieves validator data based on the provided slot and ID, aligning with its intended operation. Ensure that the
StateFromSlot
method andValidatorIndexByID
utility handle the parameters correctly.
67-77
: LGTM! TheStateForkAtSlot
function enhances usability.The function retrieves the state fork at a specified slot, directly linking its functionality to the slot parameter. Ensure that the
StateFromSlot
method handles the slot parameter correctly.
45-63
: LGTM! TheStateRootAtSlot
function improves operational clarity.The function retrieves the state root at a specified slot, aligning with its intended operation. Ensure that the
StateFromSlot
method and the logic for calculating the index handle the slot parameter correctly.Verification successful
LGTM! The
StateRootAtSlot
function improves operational clarity.The function retrieves the state root at a specified slot, aligning with its intended operation. The
StateFromSlot
method and the logic for calculating the index handle the slot parameter correctly.
StateFromSlot
correctly creates a query context based on the slot and retrieves the state.- The
Unwrap
method is used appropriately to get the underlying value oflatestSlot
.- The
SlotsPerHistoricalRoot
method provides the correct divisor for index calculation.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `StateFromSlot` method and index calculation logic handle the slot parameter correctly. # Test: Search for the `StateFromSlot` method implementation and index calculation logic. Expect: Correct handling of the slot parameter and index calculation. rg --type go -A 10 'func (b Backend' | rg 'StateFromSlot\|Unwrap\|SlotsPerHistoricalRoot'Length of output: 163
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `StateFromSlot` method and index calculation logic handle the slot parameter correctly. # Test: Search for the `StateFromSlot` method implementation and index calculation logic. Expect: Correct handling of the slot parameter and index calculation. rg --type go 'func (b Backend' -A 10 | rg 'StateFromSlot|Unwrap|SlotsPerHistoricalRoot'Length of output: 161
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `StateFromSlot` method and index calculation logic handle the slot parameter correctly. # Test: Search for the `StateFromSlot` method implementation and index calculation logic. Expect: Correct handling of the slot parameter and index calculation. rg --type go 'func \(b Backend' -A 10 | rg 'StateFromSlot|Unwrap|SlotsPerHistoricalRoot'Length of output: 480
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the full implementation details of the `StateFromSlot`, `Unwrap`, and `SlotsPerHistoricalRoot` methods. # Search for the `StateFromSlot` method implementation. rg --type go 'StateFromSlot' -A 20 # Search for the `Unwrap` method implementation. rg --type go 'Unwrap' -A 20 # Search for the `SlotsPerHistoricalRoot` method implementation. rg --type go 'SlotsPerHistoricalRoot' -A 20Length of output: 96675
81-95
: LGTM! TheBlockRootAtSlot
function expands the API's capabilities.The function retrieves the block root at a specified slot, enhancing state-related queries. Ensure that the
StateFromSlot
method and the logic for retrieving the block root handle the slot parameter correctly.mod/node-core/pkg/components/types.go (5)
43-48
: LGTM! The updated import statements are appropriate.The inclusion of
backend
,echo
, andserver
is necessary for the new type aliases introduced in the file.
268-290
: LGTM! TheNodeAPIBackend
type alias enhances expressiveness.The type alias for
backend.Backend
with a comprehensive list of field types improves the expressiveness of the backend's type system.
292-293
: LGTM! TheNodeAPIContext
type alias improves type safety and clarity.The type alias for
echo.Context
enhances type safety and clarity within the API's architecture.
295-296
: LGTM! TheNodeAPIEngine
type alias improves type safety and clarity.The type alias for
echo.Engine
enhances type safety and clarity within the API's architecture.
298-302
: LGTM! TheNodeAPIServer
type alias improves type safety and clarity.The type alias for
server.Server
incorporatingNodeAPIContext
and*NodeAPIEngine
enhances type safety and clarity within the API's architecture.mod/node-core/go.mod (15)
10-10
: Verify the new module path.Ensure that the new path
../config
correctly reflects the intended module structure and is consistent with the project's directory layout.
13-13
: Verify the new module path.Ensure that the new path
../storage
correctly reflects the intended module structure and is consistent with the project's directory layout.
12-12
: Verify the new module path.Ensure that the new path
../node-api/engines
correctly reflects the intended module structure and is consistent with the project's directory layout.
9-9
: Verify the new module path.Ensure that the new path
../beacon
correctly reflects the intended module structure and is consistent with the project's directory layout.
11-11
: Verify the new module path.Ensure that the new path
../node-api
correctly reflects the intended module structure and is consistent with the project's directory layout.
27-27
: Verify the new module path.Ensure that the new path
../beacon
correctly reflects the intended module structure and is consistent with the project's directory layout.
65-65
: Verify the module version.Ensure that the version
v4.12.0
forgit.luolix.top/labstack/echo/v4
is correct and consistent with other module versions.Verification successful
The module version is correct.
The version
v4.12.0
forgit.luolix.top/labstack/echo/v4
is consistently used across thego.mod
files.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the module version. # Test: Check if the module version is consistent. Expect: Version is correct. rg --type go -A 5 $'github.com/labstack/echo/v4 v4.12.0'Length of output: 57
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all occurrences of `github.com/labstack/echo/v4` in go.mod files and list their versions. # Find all go.mod files and search for the module `github.com/labstack/echo/v4` to check for version discrepancies. fd go.mod --exec rg 'github.com/labstack/echo/v4' {}Length of output: 189
70-70
: Verify the module version.Ensure that the version
v1.0.0
forgit.luolix.top/valyala/bytebufferpool
is correct and consistent with other module versions.Verification successful
Verified the module version.
The version
v1.0.0
forgit.luolix.top/valyala/bytebufferpool
is correct and consistently used across different modules in the codebase.
mod/node-core/go.mod
mod/node-api/engines/go.mod
mod/config/go.mod
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the module version. # Test: Check if the module version is consistent. Expect: Version is correct. rg --type go -A 5 $'github.com/valyala/bytebufferpool v1.0.0'Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the module version. # Test: Check if the module version is consistent. Expect: Version is correct. rg 'github.com/valyala/bytebufferpool v1.0.0' -g '*.mod'Length of output: 287
40-40
: Verify the module version.Ensure that the version
v0.0.0-20240717225334-64ec6650da31
forgit.luolix.top/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/state-transition
is correct and consistent with other module versions.Verification successful
Verified the module version.
The module version
v0.0.0-20240717225334-64ec6650da31
forgit.luolix.top/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/state-transition
is correct and consistent across the codebase.
mod/node-core/go.mod
mod/node-core/go.sum
mod/node-api/go.mod
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the module version. # Test: Check if the module version is consistent. Expect: Version is correct. rg --type go -A 5 $'github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/state-transition v0.0.0-20240717225334-64ec6650da31'Length of output: 109
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all instances of the module and list their versions. # Search for all instances of the module `github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/state-transition` and list their versions. rg 'github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/state-transition' -A 1Length of output: 3733
62-62
: Verify the module version.Ensure that the version
v10.22.0
forgit.luolix.top/go-playground/validator/v10
is correct and consistent with other module versions.Verification successful
Verified the module version.
The version
v10.22.0
forgit.luolix.top/go-playground/validator/v10
is correctly added and consistent in thego.mod
files.
mod/node-core/go.mod
- Another
go.mod
file in the repositoryScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the module version. # Test: Check if the module version is consistent. Expect: Version is correct. rg --type go -A 5 $'github.com/go-playground/validator/v10 v10.22.0'Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the module version in go.mod and other occurrences in the codebase. # Check the go.mod file for the specific module version echo "Checking go.mod for github.com/go-playground/validator/v10 v10.22.0" rg 'github.com/go-playground/validator/v10 v10.22.0' go.mod # Check for any other occurrences of the module in the codebase echo "Checking the codebase for other versions of github.com/go-playground/validator/v10" rg 'github.com/go-playground/validator/v10' --type goLength of output: 563
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the go.mod file and verify the module version. # Locate the go.mod file in the repository echo "Locating go.mod file in the repository" fd go.mod # Check the located go.mod file for the specific module version echo "Checking located go.mod for github.com/go-playground/validator/v10 v10.22.0" fd go.mod --exec rg 'github.com/go-playground/validator/v10 v10.22.0' {}Length of output: 948
71-71
: Verify the module version.Ensure that the version
v1.2.2
forgit.luolix.top/valyala/fasttemplate
is correct and consistent with other module versions.Verification successful
Verify the module version.
Ensure that the version
v1.2.2
forgit.luolix.top/valyala/fasttemplate
is correct and consistent with other module versions.
Verification successful.
The module
github.com/valyala/fasttemplate
with versionv1.2.2
is correctly referenced in thego.mod
file and no other versions are found in the codebase.
mod/node-core/go.mod
:github.com/valyala/fasttemplate v1.2.2 // indirect
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the module version. # Test: Check if the module version is consistent. Expect: Version is correct. rg --type go -A 5 $'github.com/valyala/fasttemplate v1.2.2'Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the module version. # Check if the module version `v1.2.2` is referenced in the go.mod file. rg 'github.com/valyala/fasttemplate' mod/node-core/go.mod # Check if any other versions of `github.com/valyala/fasttemplate` are referenced in the codebase. rg 'github.com/valyala/fasttemplate' --type goLength of output: 156
72-72
: Verify the module version.Ensure that the version
v0.5.0
forgolang.org/x/time
is correct and consistent with other module versions.Verification successful
Verified the module version.
The version
v0.5.0
forgolang.org/x/time
is correct and consistent with other module versions in the codebase.
mod/node-core/go.mod
mod/node-api/engines/go.mod
build/tools/go.mod
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the module version. # Test: Check if the module version is consistent. Expect: Version is correct. rg --type go -A 5 $'golang.org/x/time v0.5.0'Length of output: 46
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence and version of the golang.org/x/time module. # Search for any mention of golang.org/x/time in go.mod files rg --type go 'golang.org/x/time'Length of output: 32
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if golang.org/x/time is used in the codebase. # Search for any references to golang.org/x/time in the codebase rg 'golang.org/x/time'Length of output: 1939
59-59
: Verify the module version.Ensure that the version
v1.4.4
forgit.luolix.top/gabriel-vasile/mimetype
is correct and consistent with other module versions.Verification successful
Verified: The module version
github.com/gabriel-vasile/mimetype v1.4.4
is correctly added.
mod/node-core/go.mod
mod/node-api/go.mod
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the module version. # Test: Check if the module version is consistent. Expect: Version is correct. rg --type go -A 5 $'github.com/gabriel-vasile/mimetype v1.4.4'Length of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the module version in go.mod file. # Test: Check if the module version is present in the go.mod file. Expect: Version is correct. rg 'github.com/gabriel-vasile/mimetype v1.4.4' go.modLength of output: 102
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the go.mod file and verify the module version. # Step 1: Locate the go.mod file go_mod_path=$(fd go.mod) # Step 2: Verify the module version in the located go.mod file if [ -n "$go_mod_path" ]; then rg 'github.com/gabriel-vasile/mimetype v1.4.4' "$go_mod_path" else echo "go.mod file not found" fiLength of output: 2142
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Iterate through each go.mod file and verify the module version. # Step 1: Locate all go.mod files go_mod_files=$(fd go.mod) # Step 2: Iterate through each go.mod file and check for the module version for file in $go_mod_files; do echo "Checking $file" rg 'github.com/gabriel-vasile/mimetype v1.4.4' "$file" doneLength of output: 4747
41-41
: Verify the module version.Ensure that the version
v0.0.0-20240723155519-565f208d5482
forgit.luolix.top/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/storage
is correct and consistent with other module versions.Verification successful
The module version is correct.
The version
v0.0.0-20240723155519-565f208d5482
forgit.luolix.top/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/storage
is correctly specified in themod/node-core/go.mod
file.
mod/node-core/go.mod
: Line 41Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the module version. # Test: Check if the module version is consistent. Expect: Version is correct. rg --type go -A 5 $'github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/storage v0.0.0-20240723155519-565f208d5482'Length of output: 100
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the module version. # Test: Check for any occurrences of the module to gather more context. rg --type go 'github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/storage'Length of output: 4038
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the module version in the go.mod file. # Test: Check for the specific version in the go.mod file to ensure correctness. rg 'github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/storage v0.0.0-20240723155519-565f208d5482' go.modLength of output: 139
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the module version in the mod/node-core/go.mod file. # Test: Check for the specific version in the mod/node-core/go.mod file to ensure correctness. rg 'github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/storage v0.0.0-20240723155519-565f208d5482' mod/node-core/go.modLength of output: 186
35-35
: Verify the module version.Ensure that the version
v0.0.0-20240717210058-a144e074f6b2
forgit.luolix.top/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/node-api
is correct and consistent with other module versions.Verification successful
The module version is correct.
The version
v0.0.0-20240717210058-a144e074f6b2
forgit.luolix.top/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/node-api
is correctly referenced in the codebase.
mod/config/go.mod
mod/node-core/go.mod
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the module version. # Test: Check if the module version is consistent. Expect: Version is correct. rg --type go -A 5 $'github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/node-api v0.0.0-20240717210058-a144e074f6b2'Length of output: 101
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence of the module and its version. # Test: Check if the module name exists in the codebase. Expect: Module name is found. rg --type go -A 5 'github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/node-api' # Test: Check the versions of the module in go.mod files. Expect: Correct version is listed. rg --type go 'github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/node-api' | grep 'v0.0.0-20240717210058-a144e074f6b2'Length of output: 16663
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the specific version of the module in go.mod files. # Test: Check if the specific version of the module is listed in go.mod files. Expect: Correct version is listed. rg --type go 'github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/node-api v0.0.0-20240717210058-a144e074f6b2' go.modLength of output: 150
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate all go.mod files and check for the specific module version. # Step 1: Locate all go.mod files in the repository. go_mod_files=$(fd go.mod) # Step 2: Check each go.mod file for the specific module version. for file in $go_mod_files; do echo "Checking $file" rg 'github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/node-api v0.0.0-20240717210058-a144e074f6b2' "$file" doneLength of output: 5749
TODO: Investigate why first 7 (0x1, ..., 0x7) slots queried for return an empty slot root |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files ignored due to path filters (3)
mod/cli/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
mod/node-api/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
mod/node-core/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (6)
- mod/cli/go.mod (1 hunks)
- mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/fork.go (1 hunks)
- mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/header.go (1 hunks)
- mod/node-api/go.mod (5 hunks)
- mod/node-core/go.mod (3 hunks)
- mod/node-core/pkg/components/types.go (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (22)
mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/fork.go (3)
34-34
: Add JSON tags toPreviousVersion
.The JSON tag
json:"previous_version"
is correctly added to thePreviousVersion
field.
36-36
: Add JSON tags toCurrentVersion
.The JSON tag
json:"current_version"
is correctly added to theCurrentVersion
field.
38-38
: Add JSON tags toEpoch
.The JSON tag
json:"epoch"
is correctly added to theEpoch
field.mod/consensus-types/pkg/types/header.go (2)
80-80
: UseUnwrap()
forslot
.The
Unwrap()
method is correctly used for theslot
field, enhancing type safety and error management.
81-81
: UseUnwrap()
forproposerIndex
.The
Unwrap()
method is correctly used for theproposerIndex
field, enhancing type safety and error management.mod/node-api/go.mod (4)
7-7
: Update dependencymod/primitives
.The dependency
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/primitives
is updated tov0.0.0-20240710022448-e56f337d051f
.
8-8
: Remove dependencymod/geth-primitives
.The dependency
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/geth-primitives
is removed.
9-9
: Add dependencymod/log
.The dependency
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/log
is added.
43-43
: Add dependencygit.luolix.top/go-faster/xor
.The dependency
github.com/go-faster/xor v1.0.0
is added.mod/cli/go.mod (2)
6-9
: Verify the compatibility ofgit.luolix.top/cosmos/cosmos-sdk
version update.Ensure that the project is compatible with the new version
v0.46.0-beta2.0.20240624014538-75ba469b1881
.
Line range hint
1-5
:
Verify the impact of removinggit.luolix.top/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/primitives
.Ensure that all references to this module have been removed or replaced appropriately.
mod/node-core/pkg/components/types.go (7)
44-44
: Verify the necessity of thebackend
import.Ensure that the
backend
package is used appropriately in the file.Verification successful
The
backend
import is necessary and correctly used.The
backend
package is referenced multiple times in themod/node-core/pkg/components/types.go
file, confirming its necessity.
mod/node-core/pkg/components/types.go: NodeAPIBackend = backend.Backend
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `backend` import. # Test: Search for references to the `backend` package. Expect: References found. rg --type go 'backend'Length of output: 5193
293-294
: Verify the correctness and usage ofNodeAPIContext
.Ensure that the type alias is correctly defined and used in the file.
Verification successful
Verify the correctness and usage of
NodeAPIContext
.The type alias
NodeAPIContext
is correctly defined and used in multiple places within the codebase, specifically intypes.go
andapi.go
. The references indicate that it is being used as intended.
mod/node-core/pkg/components/types.go
: Lines 293-294mod/node-core/pkg/components/api.go
: Multiple referencesScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness and usage of the `NodeAPIContext` type alias. # Test: Search for references to `NodeAPIContext`. Expect: References found. rg --type go 'NodeAPIContext'Length of output: 519
45-45
: Verify the necessity of theecho
import.Ensure that the
echo
package is used appropriately in the file.Verification successful
The
echo
import is necessary and correctly used.The
echo
package is used in the filemod/node-core/pkg/components/types.go
for definingNodeAPIContext
andNodeAPIEngine
.
mod/node-core/pkg/components/types.go
:NodeAPIContext = echo.Context
,NodeAPIEngine = echo.Engine
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `echo` import. # Test: Search for references to the `echo` package. Expect: References found. rg --type go 'echo'Length of output: 1528
46-46
: Verify the necessity of theserver
import.Ensure that the
server
package is used appropriately in the file.Verification successful
The
server
import is necessary and correctly used in the file.The
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/node-api/server
package is utilized in themod/node-core/pkg/components/types.go
file for defining theNodeAPIServer
type alias.
mod/node-core/pkg/components/types.go
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `server` import. # Test: Search for references to the `server` package. Expect: References found. rg --type go 'server'Length of output: 11541
296-297
: Verify the correctness and usage ofNodeAPIEngine
.Ensure that the type alias is correctly defined and used in the file.
Verification successful
The type alias
NodeAPIEngine
is correctly defined and used.
- The type alias
NodeAPIEngine
is correctly defined asecho.Engine
.- It is used appropriately in function signatures and struct definitions.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness and usage of the `NodeAPIEngine` type alias. # Test: Search for references to `NodeAPIEngine`. Expect: References found. rg --type go 'NodeAPIEngine'Length of output: 509
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract context around references to `NodeAPIEngine` in relevant files. # Extract 5 lines before and after the reference to `NodeAPIEngine` in `mod/node-core/pkg/components/api.go` rg --type go 'NodeAPIEngine' -A 5 -B 5 mod/node-core/pkg/components/api.go # Extract 5 lines before and after the reference to `NodeAPIEngine` in `mod/node-core/pkg/components/types.go` rg --type go 'NodeAPIEngine' -A 5 -B 5 mod/node-core/pkg/components/types.go # Extract 5 lines before and after the reference to `NodeAPIEngine` in `mod/node-core/pkg/components/defaults.go` rg --type go 'NodeAPIEngine' -A 5 -B 5 mod/node-core/pkg/components/defaults.goLength of output: 1634
299-303
: Verify the correctness and usage ofNodeAPIServer
.Ensure that the type alias is correctly defined and used in the file.
Verification successful
The type alias
NodeAPIServer
is correctly defined and used in the codebase.The references to
NodeAPIServer
indefaults.go
,service_registry.go
, andapi.go
are consistent with its definition and expected usage.
defaults.go
:ProvideNodeAPIServer
is listed among other providers.service_registry.go
:NodeAPIServer
is used as a field in a struct and as an argument in a function call.api.go
:NodeAPIServerInput
struct andProvideNodeAPIServer
function useNodeAPIServer
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness and usage of the `NodeAPIServer` type alias. # Test: Search for references to `NodeAPIServer`. Expect: References found. rg --type go 'NodeAPIServer'Length of output: 608
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract relevant lines around each reference to `NodeAPIServer` to verify their correctness and consistency. # Get context around references in defaults.go rg --type go 'NodeAPIServer' -A 5 -B 5 mod/node-core/pkg/components/defaults.go # Get context around references in service_registry.go rg --type go 'NodeAPIServer' -A 5 -B 5 mod/node-core/pkg/components/service_registry.go # Get context around references in api.go rg --type go 'NodeAPIServer' -A 5 -B 5 mod/node-core/pkg/components/api.goLength of output: 1678
269-291
: Verify the correctness and usage ofNodeAPIBackend
.Ensure that the type alias is correctly defined and used in the file.
Verification successful
The type alias
NodeAPIBackend
is correctly defined and used in the codebase.
types.go
: Definition ofNodeAPIBackend
.api.go
: Usage inNodeAPIBackendInput
struct andProvideNodeAPIBackend
function.defaults.go
:ProvideNodeAPIBackend
is listed among other providers.builder.go
:apiBackend
is a field within a struct.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness and usage of the `NodeAPIBackend` type alias. # Test: Search for references to `NodeAPIBackend`. Expect: References found. rg --type go 'NodeAPIBackend'Length of output: 585
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the relevant lines around the references to `NodeAPIBackend` in the identified files to verify their correctness and usage. # Extract lines around the reference in types.go rg --type go --context 5 'NodeAPIBackend' mod/node-core/pkg/components/types.go # Extract lines around the references in api.go rg --type go --context 5 'NodeAPIBackend' mod/node-core/pkg/components/api.go # Extract lines around the reference in defaults.go rg --type go --context 5 'NodeAPIBackend' mod/node-core/pkg/components/defaults.go # Extract lines around the reference in builder.go rg --type go --context 5 'NodeAPIBackend' mod/node-core/pkg/builder/builder.goLength of output: 1770
mod/node-core/go.mod (4)
62-62
: Verify the necessity and usage ofgit.luolix.top/go-playground/validator/v10
.Ensure that the new dependency is necessary and correctly used in the project.
59-59
: Verify the necessity and usage ofgit.luolix.top/gabriel-vasile/mimetype
.Ensure that the new dependency is necessary and correctly used in the project.
11-11
: Verify the correctness of the local path forgit.luolix.top/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/node-api
.Ensure that the local path
../node-api
is correct and accessible.
13-13
: Verify the correctness of the local path forgit.luolix.top/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/storage
.Ensure that the local path
../storage
is correct and accessible.Verification successful
The local path
../storage
for the dependencygit.luolix.top/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/storage
is correct and accessible.
- The
mod/storage/
directory exists and contains the necessary files (go.mod
,go.sum
, etc.) for a Go module.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the local path for `github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/storage`. # Test: Check if the local path exists. Expect: Path exists. ls ../storageLength of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the `storage` directory within the repository. # Test: Use `fd` to find the `storage` directory. Expect: Path to the `storage` directory. fd --type d storageLength of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the contents of `mod/storage/` to ensure it matches the expected structure for the dependency replacement. # Test: List the contents of `mod/storage/`. Expect: Directory contains relevant files and structure. ls mod/storage/Length of output: 45
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- mod/node-core/go.mod (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
mod/node-core/go.mod (2)
11-11
: Verify the path forgit.luolix.top/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/node-api
.The local path
../node-api
does not exist. Consider verifying or correcting the path. The closest match found ismod/node-api/
.
59-74
: Verify New DependenciesSeveral new dependencies have been added. Ensure that these dependencies are necessary and compatible with the existing codebase:
github.com/gabriel-vasile/mimetype v1.4.4
github.com/go-playground/validator/v10 v10.22.0
github.com/labstack/echo/v4 v4.12.0
github.com/valyala/bytebufferpool v1.0.0
github.com/valyala/fasttemplate v1.2.2
golang.org/x/time v0.5.0
@@ -6,7 +6,11 @@ replace ( | |||
// The following are required to build with the latest version of the cosmos-sdk main branch: | |||
cosmossdk.io/api => cosmossdk.io/api v0.7.3-0.20240623110059-dec2d5583e39 | |||
cosmossdk.io/core/testing => cosmossdk.io/core/testing v0.0.0-20240623110059-dec2d5583e39 | |||
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/consensus => ../consensus | |||
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/beacon => ../beacon |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Verify the path for github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/beacon
.
The local path ../beacon
does not exist. The correct path should be mod/beacon/
.
- Update the path in
mod/node-core/go.mod
tomod/beacon/
.
Analysis chain
Verify the path for github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/beacon
.
The local path ../beacon
does not exist. Consider verifying or correcting the path. The closest match found is mod/beacon/
.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correctness of the local path for `github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/beacon`.
# Test: Check if the local path exists. Expect: Path exists.
ls ../beacon
Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the `beacon` module within the repository to find its correct location.
# Use `fd` to find directories named `beacon` that might contain the module.
fd --type d --name beacon
Length of output: 278
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the `beacon` module within the repository to find its correct location.
# Use `fd` to find directories named `beacon` that might contain the module.
fd --type d beacon
Length of output: 162
@@ -6,7 +6,11 @@ | |||
// The following are required to build with the latest version of the cosmos-sdk main branch: | |||
cosmossdk.io/api => cosmossdk.io/api v0.7.3-0.20240623110059-dec2d5583e39 | |||
cosmossdk.io/core/testing => cosmossdk.io/core/testing v0.0.0-20240623110059-dec2d5583e39 | |||
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/consensus => ../consensus | |||
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/beacon => ../beacon | |||
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/config => ../config |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Verify the path for github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/config
.
The local path ../config
does not exist. The closest match found is mod/config/
. Consider updating the path to mod/config/
.
mod/config/
Analysis chain
Verify the path for github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/config
.
The local path ../config
does not exist. Consider verifying or correcting the path. The closest match found is mod/config/
.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correctness of the local path for `github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/config`.
# Test: Check if the local path exists. Expect: Path exists.
ls ../config
Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for directories named `config` within the repository.
# Test: Find all directories named `config` to identify potential correct paths.
fd --type d --name config
Length of output: 278
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for directories named `config` within the repository.
# Test: Find all directories named `config` to identify potential correct paths.
fd config --type d
Length of output: 157
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/config => ../config | ||
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/node-api => ../node-api | ||
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/node-api/engines => ../node-api/engines | ||
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/storage => ../storage |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Verify the path for github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/storage
.
The local path ../storage
does not exist. The correct path should be mod/storage/
.
- Current Path:
../storage
- Suggested Path:
mod/storage/
Please update the path accordingly.
Analysis chain
Verify the path for github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/storage
.
The local path ../storage
does not exist. Consider verifying or correcting the path. The closest match found is mod/storage/
.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correctness of the local path for `github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/storage`.
# Test: Check if the local path exists. Expect: Path exists.
ls ../storage
Length of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for directories or files named `storage` within the repository.
# Find directories named `storage`
fd --type d --name storage
# Find files named `storage`
fd --type f --name storage
Length of output: 559
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for directories or files named `storage` within the repository.
# Find directories named `storage`
fd --type d storage
# Find files named `storage`
fd --type f storage
Length of output: 193
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/runtime v0.0.0-20240710022902-57d64ab384c7 | ||
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/state-transition v0.0.0-20240710023256-e9246f6a35e1 | ||
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/storage v0.0.0-20240718074353-1a991cfeed63 | ||
github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/runtime v0.0.0-20240717210058-a144e074f6b2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Inconsistent Module Versions
The module github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/runtime
has inconsistent versions across different go.mod
files:
mod/cli/go.mod
:v0.0.0-20240710022902-57d64ab384c7
mod/node-core/go.mod
:v0.0.0-20240717210058-a144e074f6b2
beacond/go.mod
:v0.0.0-20240710022902-57d64ab384c7
Please ensure that all go.mod
files reference the same version to maintain consistency.
Analysis chain
Inconsistent Module Versions
The module github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/runtime
has inconsistent versions across different go.mod
files:
beacond/go.mod
:v0.0.0-20240710022902-57d64ab384c7
mod/node-core/go.mod
:v0.0.0-20240717210058-a144e074f6b2
mod/cli/go.mod
:v0.0.0-20240710022902-57d64ab384c7
Please ensure that all go.mod
files reference the same version to maintain consistency.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the module version.
# Test: Check if the module version is consistent. Expect: Version is correct.
rg --type go -A 5 $'github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/runtime v0.0.0-20240717210058-a144e074f6b2'
Length of output: 100
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for all instances of the module `github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/runtime` in `go.mod` files and list their versions.
# Find all `go.mod` files and search for the module `github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/runtime` in them.
rg --type go.mod 'github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/runtime' -A 1
Length of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for all instances of the module `github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/runtime` in `go.mod` files and list their versions.
# Find all instances of the module string and filter to show only `go.mod` files.
rg 'github.com/berachain/beacon-kit/mod/runtime' --glob '**/go.mod' -A 1
Length of output: 828
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Updates
Improvements