Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Let us choose extration type(s) #2

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2023

Conversation

wiwski
Copy link
Collaborator

@wiwski wiwski commented Feb 2, 2023

No description provided.

@wiwski wiwski changed the title ✨ Let us chose extration type(s) ✨ Let us choose extration type(s) Feb 2, 2023
@wiwski wiwski force-pushed the feature/extraction-type-choice branch 4 times, most recently from ec9b46e to 1ff2acd Compare February 6, 2023 16:10
johnoppenheimer
johnoppenheimer previously approved these changes Feb 6, 2023
@wiwski wiwski force-pushed the feature/extraction-type-choice branch 4 times, most recently from 26b2335 to fea5882 Compare February 9, 2023 11:40
refactor: integrate lst to converter module

fix: move enum to specific folder
so we can use in keyword for comparison

chore(ci): add lst to h5iff test

fix(lst): remove .lst suffix in HDF5 file name
@wiwski wiwski force-pushed the feature/extraction-type-choice branch from fea5882 to 06ce492 Compare February 9, 2023 11:41
@wiwski wiwski merged commit 524e33e into main Feb 9, 2023
@wiwski wiwski deleted the feature/extraction-type-choice branch February 9, 2023 11:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants